<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>A Cognitive Measurement Model for Pre-Service Teachers’ Higher Order of Thinking Skills in Digital Literacy.</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Begimbetova Guldana</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Atymtaevna</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Heri</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Retnawati</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This study aims to; (1) Develop a HOTS digital literacy skills measurement &#13;
model for prospective teachers at KazNPU, hereinafter referred to as the DLMCI; &#13;
(2) Evaluate the quality of the digital literacy skills measurement instrument; and &#13;
(3) Provide empirical evidence regarding the feasibility of measuring pre-service &#13;
teachers' digital literacy skills, and (4) Analyse the pre-service teachers’ digital &#13;
literacy HOTS profiles.&#13;
This study employed a quantitative research method in the context of R&amp;D. &#13;
The subjects were 151 prospective teachers (n = 151) at KazNPU. The data &#13;
collection instrument consisted of a two-part test: a Tier-Two Item Test and a &#13;
Situational Judgment (SJ) in the form of an anti-cyberbullying video. Data analysis &#13;
was conducted using RStudio version R 4.4.3 to examine the parameters of the &#13;
developed items.&#13;
The results showed that (1) the Cognitive Measurement Model, the DLMCI, &#13;
was successfully developed to assess pre-service teachers’ HOTS digital literacy. &#13;
The (2) DLMCI has very high content validity, with an Aiken V value of 0.94 and &#13;
a composite reliability (McDonald's Omega) of α = 0.803. In classical test theory &#13;
(CTT), Two-tier choice items showed an average a = 0.510, indicating moderate &#13;
discrimination, and an average difficulty level of b = 0.643. In IRT, the instrument &#13;
is multidimensional: MDIFF ranges from -1.27 to +1.29, and MDISC between 0.78 &#13;
and 3.92. The residual correlation r_res. ≈0 supports local independence; the odd￾even theta coefficient (r = 0.925) confirms parameter invariance. Most of the &#13;
distractors in the items functioned well, indicated by a selection rate above 5%, &#13;
except for one case with a percentage of 1.3%. The measurement model that best &#13;
fits the data is the Generalised Partial Credit Model (GPCM). In a logistic scale [-3 &#13;
to +3], Theta estimates for measuring higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) of digital &#13;
literacy of prospective teachers at KazNPU are in the range of -3.01 ≤ θ ≤ +2.4. The &#13;
(3) DMCI demonstrated feasibility when implemented in a real-world setting &#13;
without hindrances; it is both efficient and environmentally friendly. The (4) HOTS &#13;
profile of digital literacy among prospective teachers at KazNPU is divided into &#13;
four categories: Low (-1.93 ≤ θ &lt; -0.85), Medium (-0.85 ≤ θ &lt; 0.23), High (0.23 ≤ &#13;
θ &lt; 1.31), and Very High (1.31 ≤ θ ≤ 2.4). The minimum and maximum Theta values &#13;
are -3.00 and +2.4, respectively, with an average Theta of -0.3, which falls into the &#13;
“Low” category. The Low, Medium, High, and Very High categories are represented &#13;
by 30 (19.86%), 67 (44.37%), 40 (26.50%), and 14 (9.27%) pre-service teachers, &#13;
respectively. Therefore, this study recommends that the Ministry of Education in &#13;
Kazakhstan utilise the DLMCI for data-driven decision-making.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Teknologi Pendidikan</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Evaluasi Pendidikan</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-01-07</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Sekolah Pascasarjana;Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>