eprintid: 82758 rev_number: 9 eprint_status: archive userid: 1290 dir: disk0/00/08/27/58 datestamp: 2024-07-29 07:26:47 lastmod: 2024-07-29 07:26:47 status_changed: 2024-07-29 07:26:47 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Mistiani, Wiwin creators_name: Istiyono, Edi title: Model Penilaian Karakter Pelajar Pancasila Berbasis Web di Sekolah Menengah Atas. ispublished: pub subjects: D2 subjects: sos_kewarganegaraan divisions: pps_lit_evazdik full_text_status: restricted keywords: Penilaian, Karakter, WBT abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengembangkan desain model penilaian karakter pelajar Pancasila berbasis web di sekolah menengah atas dan (2) menganalisis kualitas, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan model penilaian karakter yang dikembangkan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan dengan memodifikasi model Thiagarajan dan Mardapi yang meliputi tahap defining,designing, developing, dan disseminating. Uji coba instrumen model melibatkan 200 peserta didik SMA, sedangkan uji coba penerapan model melibatkan 370 peserta didik dan 30 guru di lima SMA di Kabupaten Wonosobo. Validasi isi model yang meliputi prototype model, keterbacaan instrumen model, web-based assessment dan penduan model melibatkan pakar pendidikan karakter/agama, penelitian dan evaluasi pendidikan, ahli media, serta guru dan hasilnya dianalisis dengan rumus Aiken dan reliabilitasnya diestimasi dengan ICC. Validitas konstruk instrumen dianalisis dengan Confirmatory Faktor Analisis dan diestimasi dengan Composite Reliability dan Alpha Cronbach. Karakteristik butir instrumen diestimasi dengan pendekatan MIRT-GRM Bifaktor. Data kepraktisan dan keefektifan model dianalisis dengan deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Desain model penilaian karakter Pelajar Pancasila yang dikembangkan meliputi prototype model, instrumen, web based assessment dan pedoman model. (2) Kualitas model yang terdiri dari prototype model secara keseluruhan, instrumen model dan web-based assessment, pedoman model terbukti valid dengan nilai V-Aiken > 0,74 dan ICC > 0,7. Validitas konstruk instrumen, yang terdiri dari teacher assessment, peer assessmen,t dan self assessment terbukti fit, dengan nilai P-value ≥ 0,05, RMSEA≤ 0,08, Chi- Square< 2df, Goodness of Fit Index ≥0,90, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) ≥0,95, SRMR≤ 0,09, Incremental Fit Index ≥0,90, Non-Normed Fit Index ≥0,95 dengan nilai loading factor ≥0,3. Karakteristik butir instrumen menunjukkan kecocokan model GRM bifactor dengan MDISC berada pada rentang 0-2 an MDIFF menunjukkan parameter step yang ideal, dengan MDIFF1 85%. 4) Model yang dikembangkan tersebut efektif ditinjau dari ketercapaian tujuan, yang mampu menggambarkan hasil penilaian karakter secara akurat dan komprehensif serta memiliki relevansi dengan kebutuhan pengguna/guru di SMA. date: 2024-06-24 date_type: published institution: Sekolah Program Pascasarjana department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan thesis_type: disertasi referencetext: Abass, O. A., Olajide, S. A., & Samuel, B. O. (2017). Development of a web-based examination system using open source programming model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.306555 Abidin, A. Z., Istiyono, E., Fadilah, N., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2019). A computerized adaptive test for measuring the physics critical thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 376– 383. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.19642 Ackerman, T. A., Gierl, M. J., Alberta, U., & Walker, C. M. (1989). Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory to Evaluate Educational and Psychological Tests. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 3992.2003.tb00136.x Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. C. (1997). The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621697211001 Adhiwibowo, B., & Karyati. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis masalah berorientasi pada kreativitas matematis. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), 174–183. : http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i2.16158 AERA. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Education Research Association. Ainscow, M., Beresford, J., Harris, A., Hopkins, D., Southworth, G., & West, M. (2013). Creating the conditions for school improvement: A handbook of staff development activities. London : Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315068749 Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. Bandung: Rosda Karya. Albertus, K. D. (2010). Pendidikan karakter strategi mendidik anak di zaman Global. Jakarta : PT.Grasindo. Allen, C. (2016) Lessons from an Assessment Pioneer. Wisconsin : Alverno College; July, 1–8. Allen, M. J. dan W. M. Y. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory (1st ed.). Illinois : Waveland Press. Alwehaibi, H. U. (2012). Novel program to promote critical thinking among higher education students: Empirical study from Saudi Arabia. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p193 Alwi, E. A. Z. E., Anas, N., Ibrahim, M. S., Dahan, A. F. M., & Yaacob, Z. (2014). Digital Quran applications on smartphones and tablets: A study of the foundation programme students. Asian Social Science, 10(15), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n15p212 Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (2013). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools, second edition. In Assessing Affective Characteristics in the Schools, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605443 Andrian, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hadi, S. (2018). The instrument development to evaluate local curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 172 1(14), 921–934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11458a Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos user’s guide version 3.6. Chicago : SmallWaters Corporation. Arlinwibowo, J. (2022). Model penilaian capaian pembelajaran siswa smp dengan kerangka science, technology, engineering, and mathematic (Issue 8.5.2017). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Asmaranti, W., Syafdi, M. & Dewi, R. (2016). Pengembangan computer based test (cbt) untuk mengukur kemampuan pemahaman instrumental pada materi segiempat dan segitiga siswa kelas VII SMP. [Universitas Bengkulu]. http://repository.unib.ac.id/16330/ Austin, Z., Gregory, P. A. M., & Chiu, S. (2008). Use of reflection-in-action and self-assessment to promote critical thinking among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(3). Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar. Babcock, B. G. E. (2009). Estimating a noncompensatory IRT model using a modified metropolis algorithm. (Issue December). The University of Minnesota. Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., & Sandford, R. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817 Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337 Baker, F. B. (1985). Book Review : Item response theory: principles and applications. In Applied Psychological Measurement (Vol. 9, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900315 Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2010). Assessment & evaluation in higher education developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. April 2015, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302 Barekar, P., Deshmukh, S., Satone, A., Maity, S., Bhandarkar, K., & Dhote, D. (2021). Web based test system for online examination. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 14(1), 2517–2527. Benninga, J., Berkowitz, M., Kuehn, P., & Smith, K. (2003). The Relationship of Character Education Implementation and Academic Achievement in Elementary Schools. Journal of Character Education, 1(1), 19. Benninga, J. S., & Wynne, E. A. (1998). Keeping in Character A Time-Tested Solution. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(6), 439-445. Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2015). Skills for the 21 st Century: What should students learn? Center for Curriculum Redesign, 3(4), 29. Boo, J., & Vispoel, W. (2012). Computer versus paper-and-pencil assessment of educational development: Comparison of psychometric features and examinee preferences. Psychological Reports, 111(2), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.03.11.PR0.111.5.443-460 Borg, W.R. & Gall, M. D. G. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th 173 ed.). White Plains, New York : Longman. Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York :The Guilford Press. Buhagiar, M. A. (2006). The classroom assessment cycle within the alternative assessment paradigm : exploring the role of the teacher. 2, 17–36. Bunderson, C.V., Inouye, D.K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In Educational Measurement (3rd ed., p. 28). American Council on Education/Macmillan Publishing. Burton, Laura J.; Mazerolle, S. M. (2011). Survey instrument validity part I: principles of survey instrument development and validation in athletic training education research. Athletic Training Education Journal, 6 (1), 27–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ935072 Campbell, JP, Dunnette, MD, Lawler, EE, & Weick, K. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York : McGraw-Hill. Candra. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen nilai kebangsaan mata pelajaran pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan di SMP [Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta]. In Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16019 Casey, A., & Fernandez-Rio, J. (2019). Cooperative learning and the affective domain. Journal of physical education, recreation and dance, 90(3), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2019.1559671 Choi, S. W., & Tinkler, T. (2002). Evaluating comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer-based assessment in a K-12 setting. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, October, 1–19. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Evaluating +comparability+of+paper-and-pencil+and+computer- based+assessment+in+a+K-12+setting#0 Čisar, S. M., Radosav, D., Markoski, B., Pinter, R., & Čisar, P. (2010). Computer adaptive testing of student knowledge. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 7(4), 139–152. Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Phillips, S. M. (1996). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. California : Mayfield Publishing Co. Conway, J., & Huffcutt, A. (2019). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research a review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research conway , james m ; Huffcutt , Allen I. January. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103251541 Curzer, H. J. (2016). Aristotelian character education. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(265), 851–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv107 DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001 Desjardins, C. D., & Bulut, O. (2017). Handbook of educational measurement and 174 Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment (17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985642 psychometrics using R. London : CRC Press. Dunn, K. J., Mccray, G., Watkins, M. W., & Dunn, K. J. (2020). The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing. 11(July), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357 Dwyer, C. A. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: Theory and practice. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050109 Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement.(5th ed.). New Delhi : Prentice Hall of India. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Evans, R., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2004). Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians. British Medical Journal, 328(7450), 1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1240 Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts 2020 Update. In Insight assessment (Vol. 28, Issue 1). http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/what&why2007.pd%0Ahttp://w ww.eduteka.org/PensamientoCriticoFacione.php Faizah, U., Zuchdi, D., & Alsamiri, Y. (2019). An authentic assessment model to assess kindergarten students’ character. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.24588 Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. In Review of Educational Research, 70 (3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287 Ferdinand, A. (2006). Structural Equation Modelling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen, Aplikasi Model-Model Rumit Dalam Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. UNDIP. Finch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2019). Psychological and Educational Measurement.Title. Philadelphia : Routledge. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 Gable R. K. (1986). Instrumen development in the affective domain. Berlin : Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. Gay, L. R., Geoffrey E. M.,& Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research, competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. Ghozali, I., & F. (2014). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 9.1. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Gibbons, R. D. (2014). Full information item bi-factor analysis, on technical report (Issue February 1992). University of Illinois. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200305 Gregory, R. J. (2015). Psychological testing: History, principles, and application (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 397045-9.00219-6 175 Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. In New York: Macmillan (10th ed.). New York : Macmillan Publishing Company. Gullickson, A. (2005). Review of practical assessment , Research & Evaluation , Volume 10. Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas, 10, 199–203. Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(September 2018), 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585 Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition) by Joseph F. Hair, William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson (z-lib.org).pdf (p. 761). Hambleton, R,K & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response Theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Inc Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84(3), 352–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098- 237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J Harun, Kartowagiran, B., & Manaf, A. (2021). Student attitude and mathematics learning success: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14413a Hasbi. (2021). Administrasi Pendidikan (Tinjauan Teori Dan Praktik). Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. Hidayah, M., A. (2022). P Hidayat, M., Kurniawan, D. A., Sandra, R. O., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Misconception Materials Tool : Web-Based Assessment of Buoyancy. 6(2), 237–246. Hobri. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Pengembangan. Jember :Pena Salsabila. Imtihan, N., Zuchdi, D., & Istiyono, E. (2017). Analisis problematika penilaian afektif peserta didik Madrasah Aliyah. Schemata, 6(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.20414/schemata.v6i1.836 Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian dan analisis hasil belajar fisika, dengan teori tes klasik dan modern. Yogyakarta : UNY Press. Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Erfianti, L., & Astuti, W. (2020). Applying CBT in physics learning to measure students’ higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1440/1/012061 Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Permatasari, A. K., & Aristiawan. (2020). Developing computer based test to assess students’ problem-solving in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012060 Jones, C. A. (2005). Assessment for learning. London : Learning and Skills Development Agency. Julia, & Supriyadi, T. (2018). The Implementation of Character Education at Senior 176 engembangan instrumen penilaian karakter berbasis budaya sekolah pada Siswa SMP. S2 thesis, Program Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas negeri Yogyakarta. High School. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00085. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200085 Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2018). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Hoboken : Pearson. Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan., 20(2), 132–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063 Katilmiş, A., Ekşi, H., & Öztürk, C. (2011). Efficiency of social studies integrated character education program. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 854–859. Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Asas-Asas Penelitian Behavioral. In L. R. S. H.J. Koesoemanto ; penerjemah (Ed.), Foundation of behavioral research (3rd ed., p. 442). Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada Press. Kiliq, E. D. (2007). Measure for university students' attitude towards peer assessment. Turkey : Harran University. Kim, J., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2018). Investigation of factor structure and measurement invariance by gender for the behavioral and emotional screening system among high school students. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 231– 240. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000469 Kirana, K., Studi, P., Dan, P., Pendidikan, E., Pascasarjana, P., & Yogyakarta, U. N. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap keberpancasilaan siswa Sekolah Dasar. Klenowski, V. (1995). Student Self-evaluation Processes in Student-centered Teaching and Learning Contexts of Australia and England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594950020203 Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking. Berlin : Springer. Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modeling in physics education: A critical re- analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science and Education, 16(7–8), 751–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9000- 7 Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2013). Educational testing and measurement. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education (p. 164). New York, Washington DC : The George Washington University. Kurniawan, E., & Mutaqimah, E. (2009). Penilaian. Depdiknas. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. A Paper Presented at Content Validity 11, a Conference Held at Bowling Green State University, 28, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.3412/jsb.16.926 Lewis. R. Aiken. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131–141. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013164485451012 Lickona, T. (2019). Educating for Character – How our Schools Can Teach Respect 177 and Responsibility (Terjemahan). New York: Bantam Books. Lilley, M., Barker, T., & Britton, C. (2004). The development and evaluation of a software prototype for computer-adaptive testing. Computers and Education, 43(1-2 SPEC ISS.), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.008 Mahmudi. (2005). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN. Majduddin, K. (2010). Peer assessment alternative to traditional testing. Iran : University of Tehran. Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Offset. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121289 McGregor, D. (2007). Developing thinking ; developing learning : a guide to thinking skills in education. New York : McGraw-Hill Open University Press. Megawangi, R. (2012). Menyemai Pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta : Indonesia Heritage Foundation. Mehrens, W.A., & Lehman, I. J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. Belmont CA : Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Mei-Ju, C., Chen-Hsin, Y., & Pin-Chen, H. (2014). The beauty of character education on preschool children’s parent-child relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.431 Meivawati, E., Kartowagiran, B., & Rustini, T. (2018). Evaluation Of Character And Moral Education In Elementary School. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education., 8(4), 63–72. Miller, P. J. (2010). Assessment & evaluation in higher education the effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment the effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. October 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000066218 Miller, P. W. (2008). Measurement and Teaching. Patrick W. Miller & Associates. Murtadlo, M., & Alia,N & Basri, H. (2021). Indeks karakter siswa. Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI. Muzayanah, U. (2014). Strategi pendidikan karakter pada madrasah Tsanawiyah Muhammadiyah 01 Purbalingga, Jawa tengah. Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 12(3), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v12i3.91 Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., & Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior, 76(July 2018), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028 Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, 125–135. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students. 178 Hoboken : Pearson Education, Inc. Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2008). Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802170387 Nurhasanah, N., & Nida, Q. (2016). Character Building of Students By Guidance and Counseling Teachers Through Guidance and Counseling Services. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v4i1.86 O’Malley, K. J., Kirkpatrick, R., Sherwood, W., Burdick, H. J., Hsieh, M.C. &, Sanford, E. E. (2005). Comparability of a Paper Based and Computer Based Reading Test in Early Elementary Grades. Paper Presented at the AERA Division Graduate Student Seminar. O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student – Centered Learning : W Hat for Students and Lecturers ? Does It Mean. Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, January 2005, 30–39. http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/2917/1/McCarthy and Higgs 2005.pdf Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191 Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Human learning. (6th ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey : Pearson/Prentice Hall. Paek, I & Ki, C. (2020). Using R for item response theory model applications. Melbourne : Routledge. Pandra, V., Sugiman, S., & Mardapi, D. (2021). Development of mathematics achievement test for third grade students at elementary school in indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/647 Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three- dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003 Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. In Journal of the American Statistical Association (Vol. 70, Issue 352). Thomson Learning,inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285468 Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Piirto, J. (2014). Creativity for 21st Century Skills : How to Embed Creativity Into the Classroom Creativity for 21st Century Skills How to Embed Creativity into the Curriculum (Issue June). Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. Pratiwi, D. I. (2023). Enhancing students' learning outcomes through mall in TOEFL preparation class for railway mechanical technology enhancing students ’ learning outcomes through MALL in TOEFL preparation class for railway mechanical technology. July. 179 Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.22839 Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Studies in Higher Education Feedback : focusing attention on engagement. November 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513 Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & de Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and Individual Differences in Early Adolescents’ Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400204 Reckase, M. D. (1997). The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621697211002 Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respon butir dan penerapannya: untuk peneliti, praktisi pengukuran dan pengujian, Mahasiswa Pascasarjana. Yogyakarta : Nuha Medika. Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., Nugraha, A. C., Arlinwibowo, J., Sulistyaningsih, E., Djidu, H., Apino, E., & Iryanti, H. D. (2017). Implementing the computer- based national examination in Indonesian schools: The challenges and strategies. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 612–633. Reynolds, C.R., Livingston,Ronald B., & Willson, V. (2013). Measurement and Assessment in Education. In Pearson. https://doi.org/10.2307/1502911 Reynolds, M. R., & Keith, T. Z. (2017). Intelligence multi-group and hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the wechsler intelligence scale for children What does it measure ? Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.02.005 Rini Andriani. (2018). Efektivitas program peningkatan produksi hasil peternakan di Kecamatan Pinggir Kabupaten Bengkalis. Jom Fisip, 5(2), 1–14. file:///C:/Users/Lenovo Jan 2023/Downloads/21862-42371-1-SM-6.pdf Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3 Rochmiyati, R. (2013). Model peer assessment pada pembelajaran kolaboratif elaborasi ips terpadu di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1704 Roever, C. (2001). Web-based language testing. Language Learning and Technology, 5(2), 84–94. Rokhaniyah, H., & Putra, O. V. (2021). Developing Web-Based Online Test System To Boost Ielts Academic Reading Score. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i2.4348 Rukhayati, S. (2020). Strategi Guru PAI Dalam Membina Karakter Peserta Didik SMK Al-Falah Salatiga. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat LP2M IAIN Salatiga. Rusman, et al. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru. Yogyakarta : Rajawali Pers. Sabon, Y. O. S., Istiyono, E., & Widihastuti, W. (2022). Developing “Pancasila 180 Student Profile” instrument for self-assessment. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i1.45144 Saepuzaman, D. (2023). Model assessment as learning berbasis pemahaman dan hots pada pembelajaran fisika dasar bagi mahasiswa program studi pendidikan fisika. In eprint.uny. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Sagala, S. (2005). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran untuk membantu memecahkan problematika belajar dan mengajar. Purworejo : Alfabeta. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34(4), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372160 Saputra, W. N. E. (2018). Perilaku agresi pada siswa SMK di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26638/jfk.475.2099 Sari, Y. M. (2020). Model penilaian kemampuan penalaran dan kemampuan Pembuktian matematika SMA terintegrasi dynamic Geometry software (dgs). In eprint.uny. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Sarwono. (2011). Psikologi remaja. Yogyakarta : Rajagrafindo Persada. Selman, Y. F., & Jaedun, A. (2020). Evaluation of the implementation of 4c skills in Indonesian subjects at senior high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.23459 Setiawan, A., Mardapi, D., Supriyoko, & Andrian, D. (2019). The development of instruments for assessing students’ affective domain using self- and peer- assessment models. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12326a Shaughnessy, M. F. (1998). An interview with e. paul torrance: about creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 10(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022849603713 Shen, J., & Cooley, V. E. (2008). Critical issues in using data for decision-making. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701721839 Shilova, T. V., Artamonova, L. V., & Averina, S. Y. (2014). Computer-based Tests as an Integral Component of an EFL Course in Moodle for Non-linguistic Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154(October), 434–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.187 Shultz, D. K. S., & Whitney, D. J. (2021). Measurement Theory in Action: Case Studies and Exercises (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127536 Singh, L. K., & Rajput, H. (2016). Ensuring safety in design of safety critical computer based systems. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 92, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.02.002 Sirait, E.D & Sugiono, S. (2020). implementasi pendidikan karakter terhadap karakter siswa di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Bethel Petamburan. Edukasi : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 11, 16–30. https://sttbi.ac.id/journal/index.php/edukasi Solimun. (2002). Multivariate analysis structural equation modelling (sem) lisrel dan amos (aplikasi di manajemen, ekonomi pembangunan, psikologi, sosial, kedokteran dan agrokompleks). Malang : Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang. Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Rajawali Pers. 181 Sudjana, N. (2005). Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Rosda Karya. Supramono, A. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian karakter profil pelajar pancasila untuk peserta didik fase b jenjang Sekolah Dasar [Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta]. In UNY. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16019 Sutrisno, E. (2007). Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta : Kencana. Syamsudin, A., Budiyono, B., & Sutrisno, S. (2016). Model of effective assessment of primary school students. Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8307 Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M. I. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. In Journal of School Psychology.14 (1). Indiana University. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 4405(76)90066-2 Tim Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Kemdikbud. (2019). Model Penilaian Karakter. 1– 59. Tooth, J. A., Nielsen, S., & Armstrong, H. (2013). Coaching effectiveness survey instruments: Taking stock of measuring the immeasurable. Coaching, 6(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2013.802365 Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569. Van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular development research as a specimen of educational design research. Educational Design Research, 53–70. Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 Wahyuningsih, S., Zuchron, D., & Purnawinarni, E. (2021). Tunas pancasila sebagai duta profil pelajar pancasila di sekolah dasar. Direktorat Sekolah Dasar, Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi, 1–12. http://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/upload/filemanager/2021/05/konsepsi tunas pancasila sebagai duta profile pelajar pancasila (09 Mei 2021).pdf Wardani, I. (2014). Persiapan guru pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam menyongsong implementasi kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri se-Kecamatan Pare Kabupaten Kediri. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang. Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis : A Guide to Best Practice. 1– 28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807 Widoyoko, E. P. (2011). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar. Witt, P. L. (2015). Pursuing and Measuring Affective Learning Objectives. Communication Education, 64(4), 505–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1064143 World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938795 Wright, P. M., & Craig, M. W. (2011). Tool for assessing responsibility-based education (TARE): Instrument development, content validity, and inter-rater 182 reliability. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 15(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2011.590084 Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903252998 Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390 Yaumi. (2018). Media dan Teknologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana. Yusutria, & Sutarman. (2021). Profesionalisme Guru Dalam Menumbuhkan Nilai Karakter Siswa Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Budaya 5S (Senyum, Sapa, Salam, Sopan, Santun) Di Smk 1 Muhammadiyah Kasihan Bantul Yogyakarta. Manusia Dalam Perspektif Agama Islam, 2(September), 177–188. https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/7974 Zepeda, C. (2014). Regulatory Conventions and Institutions that Govern Global Agricultural Trade. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 5, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00043-7 Zimmerman, J.B.,& Schunk, H. . (2004). Self-Regulating Intellectual Processes and Outcomes: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition (1st Edition, p. 28). Routledge. Zuchdi, D. (2011). Pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif teori dan praktek. Yogyakarta : UNY Press. Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Impact of character education implementation: A goal-free evaluation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.881 citation: Mistiani, Wiwin and Istiyono, Edi (2024) Model Penilaian Karakter Pelajar Pancasila Berbasis Web di Sekolah Menengah Atas. S3 thesis, Sekolah Program Pascasarjana. document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/82758/1/disertasi_wiwin%20mistiani_19701261011.pdf