eprintid: 82549
rev_number: 9
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/08/25/49
datestamp: 2024-07-10 04:18:26
lastmod: 2024-07-10 04:18:26
status_changed: 2024-07-10 04:18:26
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Saefudin, Abdul Aziz
creators_name: Astuti, Siti Irene
title: Desain Didaktis untuk Mengembangkan Kreativitas dan Resiliensi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D2
subjects: F4
divisions: pps_ip
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: desain didaktis, hambatan belajar, kreativitas, matematika, resiliensi, teori situasi didaktis
abstract: Salah satu permasalahan dalam pembelajaran matematika adalah hambatan belajar untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika siswa, yang disebabkan oleh hambatan belajar ontogenik, epistemologis, dan didaktik. Berdasarkan hambatan belajar tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengkaji proses analisis prospektif untuk merancang desain didaktis untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika siswa SMP; (2) mengkaji proses analisis metapedadidaktik terhadap implementasi desain didaktis untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika siswa SMP; (3) mengkaji proses analisis retrospektif terhadap implementasi desain didaktis untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika siswa SMP; dan (4) merancang desain didaktis empirik dan menghasilkan teori pembelajaran lokal (local instructional theory/LIT) untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP).
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian desain dengan metode penelitian desain didaktis, yang meliputi tahap analisis prospektif, analisis metapedadidaktik, dan analisis restropektif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMP di Kota Yogyakarta, Kabupaten Sleman, dan Kabupaten Bantul, Provinsi DI Yogyakarta. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa dan guru SMP di ketiga kota tersebut. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tes dan angket serta melalui studi dokumen, observasi, wawancara, dan rekaman audio visual, dan dianalisis menggunakan pendekatan multimethod dengan menggabungkan analisis dari beberapa data, baik secara kualitatif maupun kuantitatif.
Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa desain didaktis berdasarkan teori situasi didaktis secara empirik dapat mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika. Tahapan desain didaktis tersebut meliputi pemberian situasi didaktis berbentuk masalah matematika terbuka di awal pembelajaran, yang dilanjutkan dengan aktivitas belajar melalui tahap situasi aksi, formulasi, validasi, dan institusionalisasi. Penelitian ini juga menghasilkan suatu teori pembelajaran lokal untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dan resiliensi matematika dalam bentuk urutan aktivitas pembelajaran, meliputi aktivitas menyelesaikan soal matematika terbuka dengan banyak jawaban benar (fluency), banyak cara penyelesaian (flexibility), dan jawaban yang unik (originality) dengan disertai tumbuhkembangnya sikap positif siswa dalam bentuk penghargaan terhadap kegunaan matematika (value), pertumbuhan (growth), perjuangan (struggle), dan kegigihan (perseverance).
date: 2024-06-11
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Program Pascasarjana
department: Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: Acevedo, G. V., Arenas, T.Y.A., Calderón, W.J.T. (2020). Relationship between mathematical anxiety and academic performance in mathematics in high school students. Ciencias Psicológicas, 14(1), e-2174. doi: https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v14i1.2174
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: theories and practicalities. Education, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893
Adler, S. M., & Iorio, J. M. (2013). Progressive teachers of young children: Creating contemporary agents of change. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(2), 129-143.
Agustin, N., Noto, M. S., &Dewi, I. L.K. (2022). Constructions of student mathematics resilience through the development of sainsmatika based teaching materials. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0683. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11835
Ahmadi, A., & Uhbiyati, N. (2001). Ilmu Pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.
Alvira, L., Ahyaningsih, F., & Minarni, A. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan CTL untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan resiliensi matematis siswa SMP Gajah Mada Medan. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 2253- 2269. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1621
An, D., Song, Y.M., & Carr, M. (2016). A comparison of two models of creativity: Divergent thinking and creative expert performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 78–84.
Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5, 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003
Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9
Anindyarini, R., & Supahar. (2019). Portrait of mathematical anxiety in early youth ages. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(3), 128-132.
Aprianti, D.A., Karlimah, Hidayat, S. (2016). Desain didaktis pengelompokan bangun datar untuk mengembangkan komunikasi matematis siswa kelas II
    
 469
Sekolah Dasar. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v3i1.5102
Arifin, Z.A.I., & Kismiantini. (2023). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and relation to mathematics achievement of Indonesian students. AIP Conf. Proc., 2556 (1): 050017. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110256
Artigue M., Haspekian M., & Corblin-Lenfant A. (2014) Introduction to the Theory of Didactical Situations (TDS). In Bikner-Ahsbahs A., Prediger S. (eds). Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_4
Artigue, M. (1994). Didactical engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. In Rolf Biehler, Roland W. Scholz, Rudolf Strässer, & Bernard Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Artigue, M. (2009). Didactical design in mathematics education. NORMA08, 2009, Copenhaguen, Denmark, pp.7-16. ⟨hal-00699775⟩
Artigue, M., Haspekian, M., & Corblin-Lenfant, A. (2014). Introduction to the Theory of Didactical Situations (TDS). Advances in Mathematics Education, 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_4
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: personal, educational and cognitive consequences. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
Atami, D., Budiyono, & Indriati, D. (2020). Mathematical resilience and mathematical problem-solving ability in Junior High School. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1613 012028.
Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. Utrecht: CD-β Press, Center for Science and Mathematics Education.
Bakker, A. (2018). Design Research in Education: A Practical Guide for Early Career Researchers. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman & Company.
Barkatsas, A., & Malone, J. (2005). A typology of mathematics teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics and instructional practices.
470
     
Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03217416
Barnadib, I. (2017). Filsafat Pendidikan: Sistem dan Metode. Penerbit Ombak.
Baroody, A.J., Cibulskis, M., Lai, M.L, & Li, X. (2004). Comments on the use of learning trajectories in curriculum development and research, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 227-260, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_8
Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 147(2), 134–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000307
Bergström, P. (2012). Designing for the Unknown. Didactical Design for Process- Based Assessment in Technology-Rich Learning Environments. Umeå University Press.
Beswick, K. (2005). The beliefs/practice connection in broadly defined contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 39–68.
Beswick, K. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educ Stud Math (2012) 79:127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2
Bicer, A. (2021). A systematic literature review: Discipline-specific and general instructional practices fostering the mathematical creativity of students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 9(2), 252–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1254.
Bicer, A., Chamberlin, S., & Perihan, C. (2020b). A meta-analysis of the relationship between mathematics achievement and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.474.
Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M.M, & Capraro, R.M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 457– 485 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8
Bingolbali, E. (2020). An analysis of questions with multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes in mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(5), 669-687, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1606949
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A
471
       
longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246– 263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Blum, W., Artigue, M., Mariotti, M.A., Sträßer, R., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2019). European Didactic Traditions in Mathematics: Aspects and Examplesfrom Four Selected Cases. In G. Kaiser (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on MathematicalEducation, ICME-13 Monographs, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_19.
Boaler J., (2015). Mathematical mindset: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Bobis, J., Russo, J., Downton, A., Feng, M., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Sullivan, P. (2021). Instructional moves that increase chances of engaging all students in learning mathematics. Mathematics, 9(582). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060582.
Bolden, D.S., Harries, T.V., & Newton, D.P. (2010). Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educ Stud Math, 73, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9207-z.
Boli, D., & Bartlett, T. (2019). The use of Socratic Method to improve problem solving skills among further education students. Curtis, F. (Ed.) Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 39(1). http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2019/07/BSRLM-CP-39-1-02.pdf
Borman, G.D., & Overman, L.T. (2004). Academic Resilience in Mathematics among Poor and Minority Students. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3).
Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Reflective states associated with creating inquiry‐based mathematical discourse. Teachers and Teaching, 11(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500083915
Brooks, R., & Goldstein, S. (2008). The mindset of teachers capable of fostering resilience in students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23(1), 114- 126.
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Brousseau, G., & Warfield, V. (2014). Didactic Situations in Mathematics Education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_47
472
        
Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2015). The Essentials of Instructional Design, Connecting Fundamental Principles with Process and Practice, Third Edition. Routledge.
Bruder, R. (2016). Role of Heuristics for Problem Solving. In Liljedahl, P., Santos- Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., Bruder, R., Problem Solving in Mathematics Education, ICME-13 Topical Surveys, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 40730-2_1
Bui, P., Pongsakdi, N., McMullen, J., Lehtinen, E., & Hannula-Sormunen, M.M. (2023). A systematic review of mindset interventions in mathematics classrooms: What works and what does not? Educational Research Review, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100554.
Caniëls, M. C. J., Semeijn, J. H., & Renders, I. H. M. (2018). Mind the mindset! The interaction of proactive personality, transformational leadership and growth mindset for engagement at work. Career Development International, 23(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2016-0194
Capuno, R., Necesario, R., Etcuban, J. O., Espina, R., Padillo, G., & Manguilimotan, R. (2019). Attitudes, Study Habits, and Academic Performance of Junior High School Students in Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 547- 561. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5768
Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 457–470.
Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., Franke, M.L., & Zeringue, J. K. (2005). Algebra in elementary school: Developing relational thinking. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655897
Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003.
Chapman, O. (2015). Reflective Awareness in Mathematics Teachers’ Learning and Teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1334a
Charalambous, C.Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151, https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070.
473
         
Cheung, K.C. (2016). The effects of resilience in learning variables on mathematical literacy performance: a study of learning characteristics of the academic resilient and advantaged low achievers in Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. Educational Psychology, 1- 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1194372.
Chiu, M.S. (2009). Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 55-79.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning trajectories in early mathematics: Sequences of acquisition and teaching. Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development, 1-6. Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and Teaching Early Math: The learning Trajectories Approach. Routledge.
Colman. (2001). Dictionary of multicultural psychology: issues, terms, and concepts. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and design research: choose between five approach. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J.W. (2015). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, Fifth edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth Edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
Cross, C.T., Woods, T.A., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. The National Academies Press.
Daro, P., Mosher, F. A., Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A Foundation for Standards, Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004.
Dedy, E., & Sumiaty, E. (2017). Desain didaktis bahan ajar matematika SMP berbasis learning obstacle dan learning trajectory. JRPM (Jurnal Review
474
  
Pembelajaran Matematika), 2(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.1.69-80
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Elsevier Science, Inc
Doll, B. (2013). Enhancing Resilience in Classrooms. In Goldstein, S., & Brooks, R.B. (eds.) Handbook of resilience in children. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
dos Santos, S. P., & Farias, L. M. S. (2022). The anthropological theory of the didactic in Brazilian researches. Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 501-525. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1562
Douady, R., & Mercier A (eds). (1992). Research in didactique of mathematics: selected papers [Special issue], Recherches en Didactique des Mathimatiques, 12.
Dowker, A., Sarkar A., & Looi, C.Y. (2016) Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Front. Psychol. 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
Drijvers, P. (2004). Classroom-based research in mathematics education: Overview of doctoral research published by Freudenthal Institute. Freudenthal Institut.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
Dwiningrum, S.I.A. (2019). Transformasi Belajar di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Penguatan Resiliensi Guru dan Siswa. Bahan Perkuliahan Teori Persekolahan, Prodi S3 Ilmu Pendidikan, Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Dwyer, S.C. & Buckle, J.L. (2009). The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 54-63
Ebbutt, S., & Straker, A. (1995). Mathematics in Primary Schools Part I: Children and Mathematics. Collins Educational Publisher Ltd.
Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art, 249–253. Falmer.
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-34.
475
   
Ernest, P. (2004). What is the philosophy of mathematics education?. Diunduh pada https://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/public ations/pmej/pome18/PhoM_%20for_ICME_04.htm
Ervynck, G. (2002). Mathematical creativity. In Tall, D. (eds), Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Farida, I. (2021). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran brain-based learning (bbl) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematiks terhadap siswa. Teaching: jurnal inovasi keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan, 1(4), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v1i4.751
Felmer, P. (2023). Collaborative problem-solving in mathematics, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101296.
Fitri, S., Syahputra, E., & Syahputra, H. (2019). Blended learning rotation model of cognitive conflict strategy to improve mathematical resilience in high school students. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8, 80-87.
Fitriani., Herman, T., & Fatimah, S. (2023). Considering the mathematical resilience in analyzing students' problem-solving ability through learning model experimentation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 219- 240. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16113a
Fonger, N. L., Maria, B., Isler, I., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M. (2017). Developing a learning progression for curriculum, instruction, and student learning: An example from mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1392965
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
Fransiska, N., Nursit, I., & Khairunnisa, G. F. (2022). Efektivitas pendekatan metaphorical thinking terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan resiliensi matematis pada materi segiempat di SMP Islam Maarif 02 Malang. https://repository.unisma.ac.id/handle/123456789/4952
Frederick, M. L., Courtney, S., & Caniglia, J. (2014). With a little help from my friends: Scaffolding techniques in problem solving, Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790340.
Fuadiah, N. F., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstanding: A case study on negative integers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12127a
476
         
Fuadiah, N.F., Suryadi, D., Turmudi. (2017). Analysis of didactical contracts on teaching mathematics: A design experiment on a lesson of negative integers operations. Infinity: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P.M., & Barnes, M. A. (2020). Addressing the role of working memory in mathematical word-problem solving when designing intervention for struggling learners. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01070-8
Gafoor, K. A, & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why high school students feel mathematics difficult? An exploration of affective beliefs. Paper presented at the UGC Sponsored National Seminar on Pedagogy of Teacher Education, Trends and Challenges (Kozhikode, Kerala, India, Aug 18-19, 2015)
Gick, M.L. (1986): Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 99- 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653026
Gjergo, E., & Samarxhiu, S. (2014). Basic principles of “collaborative learning”. European Scientific Journal, 22-36.
Godino, J. D., Rivas, H., Burgos, M., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2019). Analysis of didactical trajectories in teaching and learning mathematics: Overcoming extreme objectivist and constructivist positions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3983
Goforth, K., Noltemeyer, A., Patton, J., Bush, K. R., & Bergen, D. (2014). Understanding mathematics achievement: an analysis of the effects of student and family factors, Educational Studies, 40(2), 196-214, https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.866890
Goldstein, S., & Brooks, R.B. (2005). Why study resilience? In Handbook of resilience in children. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Goodall, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2015). Overcoming mathematical helplessness and developing mathematical resilience in parents: An illustrative case study. Creative Education, 6(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.65052
Gravemeijer, K. (2004) Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105-128, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3
Gravemeijer, K. (2010). Realistic mathematics education theory as a guideline for problem centered,interactive mathematics education. In Sembiring, R. K.,
477
       
Hoogland, & Dolk, M. (eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia. APS International.
Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal: A mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270050167170
Gravemeijer, K., & Van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/596999
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1986). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Hadar, L.L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100585. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585.
Hadi, S. (2002). Effective teacher professional development for implementation of realistic mathematics education in Indonesia. University of Twente.
Hadi, S. (2015) The mathematics education reform movement in Indonesia. In Cho S. (eds) Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-17187-6_15
Hamilton, D. (1999). The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England?), Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 7(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200048
Haqq, A. A. (2020). Pengembangan desain didaktis geometri berbantuan perangkat lunak Cabri3D pada pembelajaran matematika SMA. Journal Theorems, 5(1), 49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/th.v5i1.2215
Harel, G. (2008). What is mathematics? A Pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. In R. B. Gold & R. Simons (Eds.), Proof and other dilemmas: Mathematics and philosophy, 265– 290. Mathematical Association of America .
Hasanah, U., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Ekawati, R. (2023). Rekayasa didaktis untuk mengembangkan flipbook bangun ruang dalam rangka meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 231-240. Retrieved from https://mail.jurnaledukasia.org/index.php/edukasia/article/view/247
Haylock, D. W. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 68–74.
478
        
Haylock, D.W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school chilren. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367914
Hendriana, Sumarmo, U., Carli, C., , Ristiana, M.G., & Putra, H.D. (2019). Enhancing students mathematical creative skill and resilience by using problem posing approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1318, 012065, IOP Publishing, https://doi.org/:10.1088/1742- 6596/1318/1/012065
Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2023). Praxeology review: Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2229. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953
Hernández, O.S., Méndez, F.X., & Garber, J. (2015). Divergent Explanatory Production: The relationship between resilience and creativity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(3), 551-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.37.14126
Heyder, A. (2019). Teachers' beliefs about the determinants of student achievement predict job satisfaction and stress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102926
Hidayah, M., & Forgasz, H. (2020). A comparison of mathematical tasks types used in Indonesian and Australian textbooks based on Geometry contents. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 385-404. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11754.385-404.
Hiller, S.E., Kitsantas, A., Cheema, J.E., & Poulou, M. (2021). Mathematics anxiety and self-efficacy as predictors of mathematics literacy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1868589
Hodgson B.R., Kuzniak A., Lagrange JB. (2016) Introduction: Perspectives on Didactics of Mathematics through Michèle Artigue’s Contributions. In Hodgson B., Kuzniak A., Lagrange JB. (eds). The Didactics of Mathematics: Approaches and Issues. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26047-1_1
Hoffman, B. (2010). “I think I can, but I’m afraid to try”: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.001
479
          
Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.
Hossami, E.A., Bunescu, R., Teehan, R., Powell, L., Mahajan, K., & Dorodchi, M. (2023). Socratic Questioning of Novice Debuggers: A Benchmark Dataset and Preliminary Evaluations. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 709–726. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai,C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics, Computers & Education, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031.
Idris, N., & Nor, N. M. (2010). Mathematical creativity: Usage of technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1963-1967.
Jahnke et al. (2017). Digital Didactical Designs as research framework: iPad integration in Nordic schools. Computers & Education, 113: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.006
Jahnke, I. (2016). Digital Didactical Designs: Teaching and Learning in CrossActionSpaces. Routledge.
Jahnke, I., Norqvist, L., & Olsson, A. (2013). Designing for iPad-classrooms. In
Proceedings of the European Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), Cyprus, 1-8.
Jamilah, Suryadi, D., & Priatna, N. (2021). Analysis of Didactic Transposition and HLT as a Rationale in Designing Didactic Situation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 513. Conference: 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.164
Jenkins, A. (2005). Creativity and Resilience in the African American Experience, The Humanistic Psychologist, 33(1), 25-32, https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15473333thp3301_3
Jiang, R., Liu, R., Star, J., Zhen, R., Wang, J., Hong, W., Jiang, S., Sun, Y., & Fu, X. (2020). How mathematics anxiety affects students' inflexible perseverance in mathematics problem-solving: Examining the mediating role of cognitive reflection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1),1-24 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12364
480
     
Jihan, J. C. A. (2021). Desain didaktis perkalian dan pembagian berbantuan geogebra untuk memfasilitasi literasi numerasi siswa sd. Indonesian GeoGebra Journal , 1(1), 27-29. Retrieved from https://journal.geogebra.id/index.php/IGJ/article/view/5
Johnston-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2010). Developing mathematical resilience. In: BERA Annual Conference 2010, 1-4 Sep 2010, University of Warwick.
Johnston-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2019). How can we address mathematics anxiety more effectively as a community? In: 15th International Conference of The Mathematics Education for the Future Project Theory and Practice (Rogerson, Alan ed.).
Johnston-Wilder, S., Brindley, J., & Dent, P. (2014). A survey of mathematics anxiety and mathematical resilience among existing apprentices. Gatsby Charitable Foundation. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/73857/
Johnston-Wilder, S., Lee, C., Brindley, J., & Garton, E. (2015) Developing mathematical resilience in school-students who have experienced repeated failure. In: 8th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI2015), Seville, Spain, 16-18 Nov 2015. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/73734/
Johnston-Wilder, S., Lee, C., Garton, L., Goodlad, S., & Brindley, J. (2013). Developing coaches for mathematical resilience. In: 2013 ICERI 2013 : 6th International Conference on Education, Research and Innovation, 18- 20 Nov 2013, Seville, Spain.
Johnston-Wilder, S., Pardoe, S., Almehrz, H., Evans, B., Marsh, J. & Richards, S. (2016). Developing teaching for mathematical resilience in further education. In: 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, ICERI2016, Seville (SPAIN), 14-16 of Nov 2016. Published in: ICERI2016 Proceedings, 3019-3028.
Juniati, D., & Budayasa, I.K. (2020). Working Memory Capacity and Mathematics Anxiety of Mathematics Undergraduate Students and Its Effect on Mathematics Achievement. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 271-290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.653518
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0.
Kablan, Z., & Uğur, S.S. (2020): The relationship between routine and non-routine problem solving and learning styles. Educational Studies, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1701993
481
     
Kandemir, M.A., & Gür, H. (2009). The use of creative problem solving scenarios in mathematics education: views of some prospective teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1628–1635.
Kang, W., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Didactic Transposition in Mathematics Textbooks. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(1), 2-7. Retrieved April 1, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248035
Kansanen, P. (2003). Studying–the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and Learning. An Attempt to a Conceptual Whole of the Teaching-Studying- Learning Process. Educational Studies, 29(2-3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690303279
Kansanen, P., & Meri, M. (1999). Didactic relation in the teaching-studying- learning process, 2(1). http://tntee.umu.se/publications/v2n1/pdf/ch8.pdf
Kapur, M. (2015) Learning from productive failure, Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51-65, https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195
Katsara, O., & De Witte, K. (2018). How to use Socratic questioning in order to promote adults’ self-directed learning, Studies in the Education of Adults, https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1526446
Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K.,j & Christou, C. (2009). Mathematical Creativity through Teachers’perceptions. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M. & Sakonidis, H. (eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 297- 304. PME
Kemendikbud RI. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Kemendikbud RI.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia Tahun 2023. Diunduh di
https://raporpendidikan.kemdikbud.go.id/
Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi No. 33/H/KR/2022 tentang Perubahan Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi No. 08/H/KR/2022 tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M. ., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270-291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
482
       
Ki Hadjar Dewantara. (2013). Bagian I Pendidikan: Pemikiran, Konsepsi, Keteladanan, Sikap Merdeka. Majelis Luhur Persatuan Tamansiswa.
Kirisci, N., Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2020). The effectiveness of the selective problem solving model on students’ mathematical creativity: A Solomon four-group research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100719
Kızıltoprak, A., & Köse, N. Y. (2017). Relational thinking: The bridge between arithmetic and algebra, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10, 131–145. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131893
Klein, S., & Leikin, R. (2020). Opening mathematical problems for posing open mathematical tasks: what do teachers do and feel?. Educ Stud Math, 105, 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09983-y
Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Conceptions of Proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959
Kooken, J., Welsh, M. E., Mccoach, D. B., Johnson-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2013). Measuring mathematical resilience: an application of the construct of resilience to the study of mathematics. In: American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2013 Annual Meeting: Education and Poverty: Theory, Research, Policy and Praxis, 27 Apr - 1 May 2013, San Francisco, CA, USA. https://oro.open.ac.uk/38987/
Kooken, J., Welsh, M.E., McCoach, D.B., Johnston-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2015). Development and Validation of the Mathematical Resilience Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(3), 217- 242.
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, A. B., & Runco, A. M. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 447-459. Cambridge University Press.
Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019) “Factors that Influence Mathematical Creativity, The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), Article 26. Available at:https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol16/iss1/26
Kozlowski, J.S., & Si, S. (2019). Mathematical creativity: A vehicle to foster equity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100579.
Kriegler, S. (2007). Just what is algebraic thinking? Introduction to Algebra: Teacher Handbook, 1-11.
Kurnia, H. I., Royani, Y., Hendriana, H., Nurfauziah, P. (2018). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa SMP ditinjau dari resiliensi
483
     
matematik. JPMI Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(5), 933- 940. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i5.p933-940
Kurnik, Z. (2008). The Scientific Approach to Teaching Math. Metodika, 17(2), 421-432.
Kusumaningrum, M., & Saefudin, A.A. (2012) Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika melalui Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Kontribusi Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika dalam Membangun Karakter Guru dan Siswa, 1-10. ISSN 978-979- 16353-8-7
Kusumawati, I., Fachrudin, A.D., Kohar, A.W., & Widadah, S. (2020). History of mathematics for teaching mathematics: The case of Indonesian prospective teachers' beliefs and attitudes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 2305-2314. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080614
Laal, M. (2013). Collaborative learning; elements. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 814- 818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.153
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490.
Laborde, C. (2014). Didactical Situation. In: Gunstone R. (eds). Encyclopedia of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-6165-0_404-1
Langdridge. (2007). Relational-centred research for psychotherapists: exploring meanings and experience. Willey Blackwell Publications.
Langford, P.E. (2005). Vygostky’s Developmental and Educational Psychology. Psychology Press.
Larsen, S. P. (2013). A local instructional theory for the guided reinvention of the group and isomorphism concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 712-725, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.006
Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics: Assessment for learning in practice. Open University Press.
Lee, C., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2013). Learning mathematics—letting the pupils have their say. Educational Study Math, 83,163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9445-3
484
        
Lee, C., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2014). Mathematical resilience: What is it and why is it important? In Chinn, S. (Eds.), The routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning difficulties, 337–345. Routledge.
Lee, C., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2017). The Construct of Mathematical Resilience. Understanding Emotions in Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 269– 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802218-4.00010-8
Lee, C., & Ward-Penny, R. (2017). Teachers’ Accounts of Developing Mathematical Resilience in the Classroom, Paper presented at the Second International Mathematical Resilience Conference, March 2017.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, 3 (pp. 161–168).
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013a). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: what makes the difference?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45,183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858- 012-0460-8.
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013b). Creativity and mathematics education: the state of the art. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1.
Leikin, R., Subotnik, R., Pitta-Pantazi, D. Singer, F. M., & Pelczer, I. (2013). Teachers’ views on creativity in mathematics education: an international survey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0472-4
Lestari, J., Pranata, O.H., Lidinillah, D.A.M. (2018). Desain didaktis jaring-jaring kubus dan balok untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v5i1.7351
Lestari, S.A.B., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis The Level Anxiety of Students in Dealing with National Exam on Mathematics Subjects, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(2), 99-107.
Levav-Waynberg, A. & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001.
485
       
Levenson, E. (2013). Tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity: teachers’ choices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 269–291 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9229-9
Li, H. (2017). The ‘secrets’ of Chinese students’ academic success: academic resilience among students from highly competitive academic environments. Educational Psychology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1322179
Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on Mathematical Creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 17–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248517
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education, ICME-13 Topical Surveys, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1
Lincoln, Y.S., & Denzin, N.K. (Eds). (1994). Qualitative research landscape, 255- 286. Sage Publications.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276.
Littlejohn. (1999). Theories of human communication. Wadsworth Pub.
Lizcano-Dallos, A.R., Vargas-Daza, M.D.P., Barbosa-Chacón, J.W. (2019). Collaborative learning and technologies in higher education: Characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for its implementation. Proceedings of EDULEARN19 Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1866
Lloyd, G.E.R. (2009). What was mathematics in the ancient world? Greek and Chinese perspectives. In Robson, E. & Stedall, J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Lo, W. Y. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ prior learning experiences of mathematics and the influences on their beliefs about mathematics teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 795-812.
Lugalia, M., Johnston-Wilder, S., & Goodall, J. (2013). The Role of ICT in developing mathematical resilience in learners, INTED 2013
Luria, S.R., Sriraman, B. & Kaufman, J.C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2
486
      
Lutfi, M. K., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2020). Students’ ontogenic obstacle on the topic of triangle and quadrilateral. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012108.
Lutovac, S. (2019). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ narrated failure: Stories of resilience. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.006.
MacDonald, R., Miell, D. & Morgan, L. (2000). Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 405–415 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172984
Mackrell, K., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2020). The mathematics resilience approach to mathematics anxiety: Is this supported by self-determination theory?. In Marks, R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 40(1).
Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2023). Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta- analysis with recommendations for best practices. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3-4), 133–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000352
Mainali, B. (2022). Investigating Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs Towards Mathematics: A Case Study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 412-435. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12103
Man, E.L. (2006). Creativity: The Essence of Mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.
Man, E.L. (2009). The Search for Mathematical Creativity: Identifying Creative Potential in Middle School Students, Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903297402.
Manno, G. (2006). Embodiment and adidactical situation in the teaching learning of the perpendicular straight lines concept. Disertasi. Departement of Didactic Mathematics Comenius University Bratislava.
Mardhatillah, P., Fauzi, K., & Saragih, S. (2022). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Adobe Flash Menggunakan Model Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Spasial dan Resiliensi Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1166-1183. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1343
Marfuah, M., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., & Isnawan, M.G. (2022). Providing Online Learning Situations for In-Service Mathematics Teachers' External Transposition Knowledge During COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of
487
       
Indonesia. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2388.
Marshall, C., & Rosmann, G. B. (2016). Designing Qualitative Research, Sixth Edition. Sage Publication, Inc.
Marsigit. (2016). Pembelajaran Matematika dalam Perspektif Kekinian. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 132-141
Masten A.S., & Obradovic, J.(2006). Competence and resilience in development. Ann N Y Acad Sci., 1094, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.003.
Melissinopoulos, S. (2013). From Pedagogy to Didactics: Clarifying the Discussion on Architectural Education. AAE Conference 2013. https://architecturaleducators.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/melissinopoul os-2013-from-pedagogy-to-didactics-clarifying-the-discussion-on- architectural-education.pdf
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Metzl, E.S., & Morrell, M.A. (2008) The Role of Creativity in Models of Resilience: Theoretical Exploration and Practical Applications, Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(3), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401380802385228.
Meyer, M. A. (2007). Didactics, Sense Making, and Educational Experience. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.161
Middleton, J.A., Gorard, S., Taylor, C., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). The “compleat” design experiment: from soup to nuts. In Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R. A., Baek, J. Y. (eds). Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Mitnik, R., Recabarren, M., Nussbaum, M., & Soto, A. (2009). Collaborative Robotic Instruction: A Graph Teaching Experience. Computers & Education. 53(2): 330–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.010
Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2013). A didactical situation for the enhancement of meta-analogical awareness. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.004
488
         
Molad, O., Levenson, E.S. & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post–high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09952-5
Moore, A.M., McAuley, A.J., Allred, G.A., & Ashcraft, M.H. (2015). Mathematics anxiety, working memory, and mathematical performance: the triple-task effect and the affective drop in performance. In Cin, S., The Routledge International Handbook of Dyscalculia and Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Routledge.
Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi-method re search design. In Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 189-208. Sage Publication.
Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi-method re search design. In C. Teddlie, & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Sage Publication.
Muhardi. (2004). Kontribusi Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Bangsa. Mimbar, 20(4), 478-492.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy P., & Hooper, M. (2015). TIMSS 2015: International Results in Mathematics. Lynch School of Education, IEA.
Newman, T. (2004). What Works in Building Resilience? Barnado’s.
Nickerson, S.D., & Whitacre, I. (2010) A Local Instruction Theory for the Development of Number Sense, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(3), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986061003689618
Nizam. (2016). Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen: Belajar dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIMSS, INAP/AKSI. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2003). Didactics: From classical rhetoric to kitchen-Latin. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11(3), 315–330.
Nufus, H., Duskri, M., & Bahrun. (2018). Mathematical Creative Thinking and Student Self-Confidence in the Challenge-Based Learning Approach. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 57- 68.
Nurdiani, N. (2013). Teknik Sampling Snowball dalam Penelitian Lapangan. ComTech, 5(2), 1110-1118.
Nurwahyu, B., Tatag, Y.E.S., & Suwarsono, St. (2016). Bayangan Konsep (Concept Image) Mahasiswa pada Konsep Kombinasi Ditinjau dari
489
  
Perbedaan Gender dan Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 2442–4218.
OECD (2015), “Does Math Make You Anxious?”, PISA in Focus, No. 48, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5js6b2579tnx-en.
OECD. (2013). Mathematics self-belief and participation in mathematics-related activities in PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn – Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (volume III). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA2012-Vol3-Chap4.pdf.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills Education 2030.
https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20( 05.04.2018).pdf
OECD. (2019). Indonesia – Country Note – PISA 2018 Results. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets Indonesia. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country- notes/indonesia-c2e1ae0e/
Ofiesh, N., & Mather, N. (2013). Resilience and the Child with Learning Disabilities, In Goldstein, S., & Brook, R.B., (eds.), Handbook of resilience in children. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Østergaard, K. (2013). Theory and practice in mathematics teacher education.
Proceedings of the Ivth international congress on the anthropological theory of didactics (ATD), 1–22. Ive congrès international sur la TAD.
Øystein, H.P. (2011). What characterises high achieving students’ mathematical reasoning? In Sriraman, B., Lee, K.H. (eds). The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, 1. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-439-3_13
Pan, Y., Ke, F., & Xu, X. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings, Educational Research Review, 36, 100448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100448
Panaoura, A., & Panaoura, G. (2014). Teachers’ awareness of creativity in mathematical teaching and their practice. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 4, 1-11.
Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448443.pdf
490
          
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The thinker's guide to socratic questioning. Rowman & Littlefield.
Paul, R., and Elder, L. (2008). Critical thinking: the art of Socratic questioning, part III. Journal of developmental education, 31(3), 34–35.
Pehkonen, E. (1997). The State-of-Art in Mathematical Creativity. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 63–67.
Penn State University. (2003). Training and Instructional Design. Applied Research Laboratory.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 tahun 2021 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan tahun 2020- 2024.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 tentang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (2008). From producing optimal teaching to analysing usual classroom situations. Development of a fundamental concept in the theory of didactic situations: the notion of milieu. The fist century of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (1908-2008), Mar 2008, Rome, Italy. Résumé paru (abstract) page 308. Ffal-01660872f.
Petronzi, D., Staples, P., Sheffield, D., Hunt, T.E., & Fitton-Wilde, S. (2019). Further development of the Children’s Mathematics Anxiety Scale UK (CMAS-UK) for ages 4–7 years. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9860-1
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age Publishing.
Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills. How to embed creativity into the curriculum. Sense Publishers.
Pitta-Pantazi, D., Sophocleous, P., & Christou, C. (2013). Spatial visualizers, object visualizers and verbalizers: their mathematical creative abilities. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858- 012-0475-1
Pohan, J. E. (2019). Filsafat Pendidikan: Teori Klasik hingga Postmodernisme dan Problematikanya di Indonesia. Rajawali Press.
Poloma, M.M. (2001). Sosiologi kontemporer. PT Raja Grafindo.
491
   
Pólya, G. (2004). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
Postelnicu, V. (2017). Didactic transposition in school algebra: The case of writing equations of parallel and perpendicular lines. Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 10, Feb 2017, Dublin, Ireland. hal-01914664
Potton. M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation method, 3 edition. Sage Publications.
Prahmana, R.C.I., Sutanti, T., & Diponegoro, A.M. (2021). Mathematics anxiety and the influencing factors among Junior High School Students in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Croatian Journal of Education, 23(2), 343-369. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v23i2.3890
Pramling, N., & Samuelsson, I.P. (2011). Introduction and Frame of the Book. In Pramling, N., & Samuelsson, I.P. (eds.). Educational Encounters: Nordic Studies in Early Childhood Didactics, International perspectives on early childhood education and development, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-1617-9_1.
Pramuditya, S.A., Noto, M.S., & Handayani, V.D. (2021). Desain Didaktis Konteks Fabel Berbasis Pemahaman Matematis Siswa pada Materi Aljabar. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2730
Pratiwi, I. P. Yulianti, D., & Fitrianna, A. Y. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik Siswa MTs Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Resiliensi Matematik Siswa. JPMI – Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(2), 171-184.
Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning. Florence. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203819166
Purnomo, Y. W. (2017). The complex relationship between teachers’ Mathematics- related beliefs and their Practices in Mathematics Class. The New Educational Review, 47(1), 200-210. http://www.educationalrev.us.edu.pl/dok/volumes/tner_1_2017b.pdf#pag e=200
Purnomo, Y. W., Suryadi, D., & Darwish, S. (2016). Examining pre-service elementary school teacher beliefs and instructional practices in mathematics class. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 629-642.
Purnomo, Y.W., Mastura, F.S., & Perbowo, K.S. (2019). Contextual features of geometrical problems in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. Journal of
492
       
Physics: Conference Series, 1315, 012048, http://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1315/1/012048
Purwanto, N. (2009). Ilmu Pendidikan Teoritis dan Praktis. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran (Puskurjar). (2021). Panduan Pengembangan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/MA). Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/hal/profil-pelajar-pancasila
Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran (Puskurjar). (2022). Kajian Akademik Kurikulum untuk Pembelajaran. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/rujukan/kajian- naskah-akademik
Pusmenjar. (2020a). AKM dan implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Kemendibudristek.
Pusmenjar. (2020b). Desain pengembangan soal AKM. Kemendikbudristek. Puspendik. (2018). Ringkasan Eksekutif: Hasil Ujian Nasional 2018 Masukan
untuk Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Puspendik Balitbang Kemendikbud. Puspendik. (2019). Ringkasan Eksekutif: Hasil Ujian Nasional 2019 Masukan
untuk Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Puspendik Balitbang Kemendikbud.
Puspitasari, L., In’am, A., & Syaifuddin, M. (2019). Analysis of students’ creative thinking in solving arithmetic problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3962
Putra, Z. H. (2019). Praxeological change and the density of rational numbers: The case of pre-service teachers in Denmark and Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1711. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105867
Putra, Z. H. (2020). Didactic transposition of rational numbers: A case from a textbook analysis and prospective elementary teachers’ mathematical and didactic knowledge. Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 365 – 394. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.13.4.365-394.2020
Radford, L. (2008). Theories in Mathematics Education: A Brief Inquiry into their Conceptual Differences. Working Paper. Prepared for the ICMI Survey
493
        
Team 7. The notion and role of theory in mathematics education. http://www.luisradford.ca/pub/31_radfordicmist7_EN.pdf
Rahardi, R., & Dartanto, T. (2021). Growth mindset, delayed gratification, and learning outcome: evidence from a field survey of least-advantaged private schools in Depok-Indonesia, Heliyon, 7(4), e06681.
Ramaekers, S. (2016). Langeveld, Martinus J. (1905–1989). In: Peters M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_203-1
Ramos, G. (2019). Changing the Odds for Vulnerable Children: Building Opportunities and Resilience. The OECD’s report. In https://gabrielailianramos-wordpress-com.
Rebollo, C., Remolar, I., Rossano, V., & Lanzilotti, R. (2022). Multimedia augmented reality game for learning math. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 14851–14868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10821-3
Regier, P., & Savic, M. (2019). How teaching to foster mathematical creativity may impact student self-efficacy for proving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100720.
Reinholz, D.L. (2016). Developing mathematical practices through reflection cycles. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 441–455 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0175-1
Reivich, K & Shatte, A. (2002). The Resilience Factor; 7 Essential Skill for Overcoming Life’s Inevitable Obstacle. New York, Broadway Books
Rejeki, S., Meidina, R.A., Hapsari, M.P., Setyaningsih, R., & Azura, R.N.F. (2021). Context-based tasks in mathematics textbooks for vocational high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776, 012030. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012030
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.
Rezky, R., & Wijaya, A. (2018). Designing hypothetical learning trajectory based on van hiele theory: a case of geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012129. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012129
Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2017). Learning Environments that Support Student Creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D., Tracey, M.W. (2010). The Instructional Design Knowledge Base, Theory, Research, and Practice. Taylor & Francis.
494
         
Risdiyanti, I., & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2020). The learning trajectory of number pattern learning using Barathayudha war stories and Uno Stacko. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 157-166. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.10225.157-166.
Rudi. (2020). Desain Didaktis untuk Praktik Refleksi Guru Matematika dalam Komunitas: Sebuah Studi Didactical Design Research (DDR) dan Didactic Mathematical Knowledge (DMK). S3 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. http://repository.upi.edu/58869/
Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design Tools in Didactical Research: Instrumenting the Epistemological and Cognitive Aspects of the Design of Teaching Sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09338513
Saefudin, A. A., Wijaya, A., & Dwiningrum, S. I. A. (2023a). Growth Mindset in Mathematics in Junior High School: A Reflection on Students’ Mathematics Learning Activities in a Science Specialization Class. In Wardhana, A. K (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd UPY International Conference on Education and Social Science (UPINCESS 2023), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 812, 164-168. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-176-0_24
Saefudin, A. A., Wijaya, A., & Dwiningrum, S. I. A. (2023d). Mapping research trends in mathematical creativity in mathematical instructional practices: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 439-458. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202322691
Saefudin, A. A., Wijaya, A., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., & Yoga, D. (2023b). The characteristics of the mathematical mindset of junior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2208. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12770
Saefudin, A. A., Wjaya, A., & Dwiningrum, S. I. A. (2023c). Hypothetical Learning Trajectory Based on Theory of Didactical Situation: An Initial Learning Trajectory Design to Enhance Mathematical Creativity and Resilience. In Wardhana, A. K (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd UPY International Conference on Education and Social Science (UPINCESS 2023), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 812, 169-175. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-176-0_25
Salim, S., Kamriana, & Nasrianty. (2023). Growth mindset of mathematics and science education students in South Sulawesi. AIP Conf. Proc., 2614, 040080. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125797
Sandoval-Hernandez, A., & Białowolski, P. (2016). Factors and conditions promoting academic resilience: a TIMSS based analysis of five Asian
495
        
education systems. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., 17, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9447-4
Sarrazy, B., & Novotná, J. (2013). Didactical contract and responsiveness to didactical contract: a theoretical framework for enquiry into students’ creativity in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0496-4
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. Academic Press.
Schoevers, E.M., Kroesbergen, E.H. and Kattou, M. (2020), Mathematical Creativity: A Combination of Domain-general Creative and Domain- specific Mathematical Skills. J Creat Behav, 54: 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.361
Schoevers, E.M., Kroesbergen, E.H., Moerbeek, M., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2022). The relation between creativity and students’ performance on different types of geometrical problems in elementary education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01315-5
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson Education.
Sembiring, R., Hoogland, K., & Dolk, M. (2010). Introduction to: A decade of PMRI in Indonesia. In R. Sembiring, K. Hoogland, & Dolk, M. (Eds.), A decade of PMRI in Indonesia. APS International.
Shaikh, S. N. (2013). Mathematics Anxiety Factors and Their Influence on Performance in Mathematics in Selected International Schools in Bangkok. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 4(3), pp. 77-85. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v4i3.103
Sharma, Y. (2013). Mathematical giftedness: a creative scenario. Amt, 69(1).
Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A Systematic Review on Algebraic Thinking in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2065. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11486
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 75–80
Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114– 145.
496
     
Simon, M. (2014). Hypothetical Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_72
Simon, M.A., Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
Singer, F.M., & Voica, C. (2015). Is Problem Posing a Tool for Identifying and Developing Mathematical Creativity? In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7
Siswono, T. Y. E., Kohar, A. W., & Hartono, S. (2017). Secondary Teachers’ Mathematics-related Beliefs and Knowledge about Mathematical Problem-solving. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012046. IOP Publishing.
Siswono, T.Y.E. (2010). Leveling Students’ Creative Thinking in Solving and Posing Mathematical Problem. IndoMS. Journal on Mathematics Education, 1(1), 17-40.
Siswono, T.Y.E., Kohar, A. W., & Hartono, S. (2019). Examining Teacher Mathematics-related Beliefs and Problem-solving Knowledge for Teaching: Evidence from Indonesian Primary and Secondary Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(5), 493– 506. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019553346
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ Creative thinking process stages: implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Sjoberg, S. (2007). Constructivism and learning. In Baker, E., McGaw, B. & Peterson P (Eds), International Encyclopaedia of Education 3rd Edition, Oxford: Elsevier.
Sofroniou A, & Poutos K. (2016). Investigating the Effectiveness of Group Work in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 6(3):
citation:   Saefudin, Abdul Aziz and Astuti, Siti Irene  (2024) Desain Didaktis untuk Mengembangkan Kreativitas dan Resiliensi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama.  S3 thesis, Sekolah Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/82549/1/disertasi_abdul%20aziz%20saefudin_19703261011.pdf