eprintid: 82520
rev_number: 12
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/08/25/20
datestamp: 2024-07-09 08:06:34
lastmod: 2024-07-09 08:06:34
status_changed: 2024-07-09 08:06:34
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Herianto, Herianto
creators_name: Ikhsan, Jaslin
title: Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY (Engineering Design Learning Cycle) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Abad 21 Peserta Didik SMP.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D2
subjects: G5
divisions: pps_ip
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: engineering design learning cycle, keterampilan abad 21, model STEM-EDELCY
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menghasilkan model pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY yang memiliki karakteristik dapat meningkatkan keterampilan abad 21, (2) menghasilkan model STEM-EDELCY yang layak, (3) menghasilkan model STEM-EDELCY yang praktis, dan (4) menghasilkan model STEM-EDELCY yang efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan abad 21 peserta didik SMP.
Penelitian ini adalah research and development dengan menggunakan prosedur ADDIE yang terdiri atas tahap analysis, design, develop, implement, dan evaluate. Subjek uji coba terbatas yaitu 32 peserta didik kelas VII dari satu SMP di kota Yogyakarta. Subjek uji coba luas yaitu 285 peserta didik kelas VII dari tiga SMP di kota Yogyakarta, tahun ajaran 2022/2023. Instrumen pengumpulan data terdiri atas pedoman wawancara dan angket analisis kebutuhan, lembar validasi model pembelajaran dan perangkat pembelajaran, lembar angket kepraktisan, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan, dan instrumen penilaian keterampilan abad 21 (soal tes dan lembar observasi). Karakteristik model dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Kelayakan dan kepraktisan model pembelajaran dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Keefektifan model pembelajaran dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan one-way ANCOVA.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Karakteristik model pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY tampak dari rasional teoretis (teori konstruktivistik, situated cognition); sintaks (engage, define the problem, plan and design, create, test and improve, explain, elaborate, evaluate); sistem sosial (kooperatif, demokratis); prinsip reaksi (guru sebagai fasilitator); sistem pendukung (buku model, buku pedoman model, modul ajar, LKPD, dan bahan ajar modul); dampak instruksional (keterampilan abad 21) dan pengiring (hasil belajar, rasa ingin tahu). (2) Model pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY layak untuk digunakan dalam pembelajaran, berdasarkan penilaian ahli dengan kategori sangat baik. (3) Model pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY memenuhi kriteria kepraktisan untuk diterapkan dalam pembelajaran dengan kategori sangat baik, berdasarkan penilaian dari guru dan keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran. (4) Model pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan abad 21 peserta didik, yang terlihat dari adanya perbedaan keterampilan abad 21 yang signifikan antara model STEM-EDELCY dengan model 5E-learning cycle dan guided inquiry. Keterampilan abad 21 peserta didik yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model STEM- EDELCY lebih tinggi dibandingkan model 5E-learning cycle dan guided inquiry.
date: 2024-06-10
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Program Pascasarjana
department: Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: Adams, J., Avraamidou, L., Bayram-Jacobs, D., Joujaoude, S., Bryan, L., Christodoulou, A., Couso, D., Danielsson, A., Dillon, J., & Erduran, S. (2018). The role of science education in a changing world. NIAS Lorentz center.
Adhiriyanthi, S., Solihin, H., & Arifin, M. (2021). Improving students’ creative thinking skills through guided inquiry practicums learning with STEM approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012180
Ahonen, A. K., & Kinnunen, P. (2014). How do students value the importance of twenty-first century skills? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.904423
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurument, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Akki, F., & Larouz, M. (2021). Speaking and writing interconnections: A systematic review. Journal of Translation and Language Studies, 2(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.48185/jtls.v2i2.280
Akwantin, Y. T., Hidayati, Y., Qomaria, N., Muharrami, L. K., & Rosidi, I. (2022). Profil tingkat kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP pada materi pemanasan global. Jurnal Natural Science Educational Research, 5(1), 20–30. https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/nser/article/view/12104/6959
Al-mughrabi, A. M. (2021). Inclusion of 21st century skills in biology textbook for the ninth grade. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 1959–1969. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.215
Albeta, S. W., Firdaus, L. N., Copriady, J., & Alimin, M. (2023). TPACK-based blended learning as an implementation of progressivism education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51287
Almuharomah, F. A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2023). Profile of creative thinking skill of new normal era at junior high school students. International Conference on Biology Education, Natural Science, and Technology, 1(1), 572–579. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/index.php/incobest/article/view/3469/3273
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1).
356
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Altan, E. B., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y
Altin, H., & Pedaste, M. (2013). Learning approaches to applying robotics in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(3), 365–377. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol12/365-
377.Altin_JBSE_V ol.12.3.pdf
Annafi, N., & Agustina, S. (2018). Pengembangan model pembelajaran project based learning (PBL) berbasis kearifan lokal untuk mempersiapkan calon pendidik yang berbudaya. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 9(1), 1–10.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (Ninth). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Arslan, H. (2018). Fundamental concepts of education. In An introduction to
education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Arti, Y., & Ikhsan, J. (2020). The profile of junior high school students’ critical thinking skills and concept mastery level in local wisdom based on outdoor learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012105
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to research in education (Ninth). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Asrizal, Yurnetti, & Usman, E. A. (2022). ICT thematic science teaching material with 5E learning cycle model to develop students’ 21st-century skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33764
Asyafah, A. (2019). Menimbang model pembelajaran (kajian teoretis-kritis atas model pembelajaran dalam pendidikan Islam). TARBAWY : Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v6i1.20569
Ataizi, M. (2012). Situated cognition. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6
Atmojo, I. R. W., Saputri, D. Y., & Bekti, A. Y. (2023). Peningkatan keterampilan komunikasi tertulis menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(1), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpd.v11i2.81260
Aufa, M. N., Hadi, S., Syahmani, Hasbie, M., Fitri, M., Saputra, M. A., & Isnawati. (2021). Profile of students’ critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration skills
357

on environmental pollution material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012027
Bahtaji, M. A. A. (2021). The role of math and science exposure on the effect of 5e instructional model in physics conceptions. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.10
Banko, W., Grant, M. L., E, J. M., McCormack, A. J., & O’Brien, T. (2013). Science for the next generation : preparing for the new standards. NSTA Press.
Bapna, Ak., Sharma, N., Kaushik, A., & Kumar, A. (2017). Measuring 21st century skill (Issue December). evaldesign.
Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Seabert, D. M. (2005). Teachers’ use of models of teaching. Educational Practice and Theory, 27(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/27.1.04
Benek, I., & Akcay, B. (2022). The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.22.27.9.2
Bennett, K., Heritage, B., & Allen, P. (2023). SPSS statistics: A practical guide (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High school student perceptions of the utility of the engineering design process: creating opportunities to engage in engineering practices and apply math and science content. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956- 014-9498-4
Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model structure and a comparison among products - three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Biruni, I. B., Suwono, H., & Sueb, S. (2020). Fostering student’ critical thinking skills in respiratory and excretory system classroom through 5E learning cycle in 11th grade SMAN 2 Malang. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000567
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: the ADDIE approach. Springer. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: challenges and opportunities.
National Science Teachers Association. 358

Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model : creating teachable moments. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.
Cakmakci, G., Aydeniz, M., Brown, A., & Makokha, J. M. (2020). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship learning. In Science education: theory and practice. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.5748/9contecsi2012/rf-456
Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education ISSN:, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204
Carlson, J. (2014). Learning cycle. In Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 1– 5). Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-007-6165-0_165-3
Carter, D. F., Ro, H. K., Alcott, B., & Lattuca, L. R. (2016). Co-curricular connections: the role of undergraduate research experiences in promoting engineering students’ communication, teamwork, and leadership skills. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 363–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9386-7
Challoner, J. (2019). STEM lab: 25 super-cool projects. DK Publishing.
Chazan, B. (2022). Principles and pedagogies in Jewish education. Palgrave
Macmillan.
Chen, D. (2021). Toward an understanding of 21st-century skills: From a systematic review. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 23(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-021-09511-1
Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (7th ed.).
Child, S., & Shaw, S. (2016). Collaboration in the 21st century: Implications for assessment. A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 22, 17–22. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/374626-collaboration-in- the-21st-century-implications-for- assessment.pdf%0Ahttp://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/research- matters/
Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition on human knowledge and computer 359

representations. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: how to monitor creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488195
Contant, T. L., Tweed, A. A., Bass, J. E., & Carin, A. A. (2018). Teaching science through inquiry- based instruction. Pearson.
Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1148
Damayanti, C., Rusilowati, A., & Linuwih, S. (2017). Pengembangan model pembelajaran IPA terintegrasi etnosains untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i1.17071
Darling, G. (2012). Fighting children’s misconceptions with the “fantastic-four” ways in which force affects motion. Science and Children, 50–54. https://www.vtaeyc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/How-Does-Force- Affect-Motion_.pdf
Dipalaya, T., Susilo, H., & Corebima, A. D. (2016). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran pdeode (predict-discuss-explain-observe-discuss- explain) pada kemampuan akademik berbeda terhadap keterampilan komunikasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1713–1720.
Drapeau, P. (2014). Sparking student creativity : practical ways to promote innovative thinking and problem solving. ASCD.
Duchesne, S., McMaugh, A., & Mackenzie, E. (2022). Educational psychology for learning and teaching (7th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia Pty Limited.
Dunbar, N. E., Brooks, C. F., & Kubicka-Miller, T. (2006). Oral communication skills in higher education: Using a performance-based evaluation rubric to assess communication skills. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9012-x
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An applied guide to research designs : quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (Second). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Ennis, R. H. (2016). Critical thinking across the curriculum: a vision. Topoi, 37. 360

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences, 98(102181). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181
Eun, B. (2018). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941
Facione, P., & Gittens, C. A. (2016). Think critically (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Fadaei, A. S., & Mora, C. (2015). An investigation about misconceptions in force and motion in high school. US-China Education Review A, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623x/2015.01.004
Fatihah, A. Al, Yennita, Y., & Futra, D. (2022). Students’ written communication skills in science learning. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(4), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.292
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education. In McGraw-Hill Higher Education (eleventh, Issue 0). McGraw Hill Education.
Fredagsvik, M. S. (2021). The challenge of supporting creativity in problem- solving projects in science: a study of teachers’ conversational practices with students. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1898359
Garay, I. S., & Quintana, M. G. B. (2019). 21st century skills. An analysis of theoretical frameworks to guide educational innovation processes in chilean context. In Technology, Innovation, Education, and their Social Impact. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30809- 4_50
Grace, D. M., & Gilsdorf, J. W. (2004). Classroom strategies for improving students’ oral communication skills. Journal of Accounting Education, 22(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2004.06.001
Grubbs, M., & Strimel, G. (2015). Engineering design: the great integrator. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.30707/jste50.1grubbs
Guven, G., Kozcu Cakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2020). Arduino- assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1812136
361

Ha, V. T., Chung, L. H., Hanh, N. Van, & Hai, B. M. (2023). Teaching science using argumentation-supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and conventional didactic methods: differences in the learning outcomes of middle school students. Education Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030247
Hacıoğlu, Y. (2021). The effect of STEM education on 21st century skills: Preservice science teachers’ evaluations. Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Art Education, 4(2), 140–167. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1693716
Haik, Y., & Shahin, T. M. (2011). Engineering design process. Cengage Learning. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Partial least
squares structural equation modeling (PlS-SEM). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hall, A., & Miro, D. (2016). A Study of student engagement in project-based learning across multiple approaches to STEM education programs. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12182
Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process- based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846933
Hardanie, B., Inabuy, V., Sutia, C., Maryana, O., & Lestari, S. (2021). Buku panduan guru IPA SMP kelas VII. Kemendikbudristek.
Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Association for Science Education.
Haryanti, A., & Suwarma, I. R. (2018). Profil keterampilan komunikasi siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran IPA berbasis STEM. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i1.10940
Henson, K. T. (2015). Curriculum planning : integrating multiculturalism, constructivism and education reform. Waveland Press, Inc.
Herianto, H., Ikhsan, J., & Purwastuti, L. A. (2023). Panduan implementasi model pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY: mengembangkan keterampilan abad 21. CV. Media Sains Indonesia.
362

Herianto, H., Ikhsan, J., & Purwastuti, L. A. (2024a). Developing student 21st- century skills through STEM engineering design learning cycle (STEM- EDELCY ) model. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2346659
Herianto, H., Ikhsan, J., & Purwastuti, L. A. (2024b). STEM-EDELCY learning model: a conceptual and pedagogical framework to facilitate students to develop 21st-century skills. Education 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2330949
Herianto, H., Wilujeng, I., & Lestari, D. P. (2022). Effect of interactive multimedia e-books on lower-secondary school students’ curiosity in a Science course. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11005-8
Hermawansyah, T., Rahman, T., & Anwar, S. (2019). Profile of science communication competence of junior high school students on science lesson. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018), 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022047
Hewitt, P. G., Lyons, S. A., Suchoki, J. A., & Yeh, J. (2014). Conceptual integrated science (Second). Pearson Education Limited.
Hidayati, Y., & Sinaga, P. (2019). The profile of critical thinking skills students on science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(4), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044075
Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43(101000). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000
Hixson, N. K., Ravitz, J., & Whisman, A. (2012). Extended professional development in project-based learning: impacts on 21st century teaching and student achievement. West Virginia Department of Education.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Huang, B., Jong, M. S. Y., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Jiang, M. Y. C. (2022). Promoting secondary students’ twenty-first century skills and stem career interests through a crossover program of stem and community service education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903252
Hussein, B. (2021). Addressing collaboration challenges in project-based learning: 363

The student’s perspective. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080434
Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., & Rogers, C. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=n cete_publications
Isnaini, I., Atmazaki, A., Ahda, Y., Lufri, L., Elizar, E., Amran, A., Fitri, N., Afriwes, A., & Hasan, A. (2023). Analysis of critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration skills (4C) for junior high school students. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biology, Science and Education (IcoBioSE 2021), 1, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94- 6463-166-1_27
Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by design: stategies and activities for grades 4-8. Taylor & Francis.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (Ninth). Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st century skills: evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d71187ce5274a097c07b985/ 21st_century.pdf
Kanmaz, A. (2022). Middle school teacher’ critical thinking skills and awareness towards teaching critical thinking skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(4), 1648–1671. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1353469.pdf
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. a, & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0827/2008008343- d.html%5Cnhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0827/2008008343- t.html
Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9353-5
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a
364

collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Kilbane, C. R., & Milman, N. B. (2014). Teaching models: designing instruction for 21st century learners. Pearson Education, Inc.
Kivunja, C. (2015a). Exploring the pedagogical meaning and implications of the 4Cs “super skills” for the 21st century through Bruner’s 5E lenses of knowledge construction to improve pedagogies of the new learning paradigm. Creative Education, 6(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.62021
Kivunja, C. (2015b). Using De Bono ’ s six thinking hats model to teach critical thinking and problem solving skills essential for success in the 21st century economy. Creative Education, 6, 380–391. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.63037
Kumaiyah, S., Rosdiana, L., & Purnomo, A. R. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran 5E (learning cycle) pada materi pencemaran air dan dampaknya bagi lingkungan untuk melatihkan keterampilan komunikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(50), 253–261. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/28671/26248
Kurnia, A., Sukarmin, & Sunarno, W. (2021). Profil kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa menggunakan soal tes pilihan ganda pada pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 4(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v4i1.1147
Kusumaningtyas, D. A. (2021). Pengembangan model pembelajaran STEM IScIT (integrative scientific thinking) untuk meningkatkan kompetensi mahasiswa. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review (Issue June).
Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575
Latifa, B. R. A., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Harjono, A. (2017). Pengaruh model learning cycle 5E (engage, explore, explain, elaboration, & evaluate) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik kelas X MAN 1 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v3i1.325
Lawson, A. E. (2002). The learning cycle. In R. G. Fuller (Ed.), A Love of Discovery: Science Education-The Second Career of Robert Karplus (pp. 51– 76). Kluwer Academic.
Lederman, J. S. (2009). Level inquiry and the 5 E’s learning cycle model. National 365

Geographic Science. http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/monographs/SCL22- 0407A_SCI_AM_Lederman_FP.pdf
Leung, A. (2019). Exploring STEM pedagogy in the mathematics classroom: a Tool-based experiment lesson on estimation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9924-9
Li, W., & Chiang, F.-K. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of STEAM education and attitudes toward STEAM disciplines and careers in China. In Y. Li (Ed.), Critical, Transdisciplinary and Embodied Approaches in STEM Education (pp. 83–100). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Liebech-Lien, B., & Sjølie, E. (2020). Teachers’ conceptions and uses of student collaboration in the classroom. Educational Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1839354
Lindgren, J., & Bleicher, R. E. (2005). Learning the learning cycle: the differential effect on elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18038.x
Linn, M. C., Gerard, L., Matuk, C., & McElhaney, K. W. (2016). Science education: from separation to integration. In Review of Research in Education (Vol. 40, Issue 1, pp. 529–587). AERA. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680788
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A
Lubis, M. U., Siagian, F. A., Zega, Z., Nuhdin, N., & Nasution, A. F. (2023). Pengembangan kurikulum merdeka sebagai upaya peningkatan keterampilan abad 21 dalam pendidikan. Education and Learning Journal, 1(January), 106– 113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/anthor.v1i5.222
Madani, R. A. (2020). Teaching challenges and perceptions on STEM implementation for schools in Saudi Arabia. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/8468
Maharani, A. D., Rintayati, P., & Sriyanto, M. I. (2018). Peningkatan keterampilan menyimpulkan hasil percobaan tentang gaya melalui model pembelajaran learning cycle 5E pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Didaktika Dwija Indira, 6(2). https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pgsdsolo/article/view/11126
Mapeala, R., & Siew, N. M. (2015). The development and validation of a test of science critical thinking for fifth graders. SpringerPlus, 4(741).
366

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1535-0
Marek, E. A. (2008). Why the learning cycle? Journal of Elementary Science
Education, 20(3), 63–69. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ849833.pdf
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D. A., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2021). Model pembelajaran MiSHE (Metacognition in Science for Higher Education). Penerbit K-Media.
Mater, N. R., Haj Hussein, M. J., Salha, S. H., Draidi, F. R., Shaqour, A. Z., Qatanani, N., & Affouneh, S. (2020). The effect of the integration of STEM on critical thinking and technology acceptance model. Educational Studies, 1– 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793736
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. M., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA-94-19
Mitchell, B. M., Stueckle, A. F., & Wilkens, R. F. (1983). Planning for creative learning (3rd ed.). Kendall/Hunt.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2011). Riset terapan bidang pendidikan dan teknik (1st ed.). UNY Press.
Namgyel, T., & Buaraphan, K. (2017). The development of simulation and game in 5E learning cycle to teach photoelectric effect for grade 12 students. Asia- Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v18_issue2_files/buaraphan.pdf
NASA, N. (2021). Unmanned aircraf systems: educator guide. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
National Research Council, N. (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8 (R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (eds.)). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3327
367

National Research Council, N. (2011). Assessing 21st century skills: summary of a Workshop. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council, N. R. C. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Ngilmaya, A. N. K., Irawan, E., & Ifariyah, F. (2021). Efektivitas model inkuiri terbimbing dalam meningkatkan kemampuan menarik kesimpulan peserta didik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i2.190
NGSS Lead States, N. L. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states (Vols. 1–2). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In Educational design research (pp. 1–206). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766
Nikmah, A., Saptono, S., & Sulistyorini, S. (2021). The effectiveness of guided inquiry with SETS vision to improve communication skills and understanding of science concepts. Journal of Primary Education, 10(1), 99–107. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/27794
Nofianti, E., Nurhidayanti, A., Handayani, N. A., Rosana, D., & Wilujeng, I. (2022). Profil berpikir kritis peserta didik SMP pada materi sistem ekskresi manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v6i3.23877
Nugroho, P. S., Nasir, M., Syafi’i, M., & Erviyenni, E. (2023). Profile perception of student’s collaboration and creative thinking skills in physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IP A, 9(2), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.3055
Nurdian, D., Saefudin, & Amprasto. (2023). Profil kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan komunikasi ilmiah siswa SMP pada materi teknologi ramah lingkungan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IP A, 9(10), 8473–8481. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3884
Nurmawaddah, N., Ramlawati, R., & Rusli, M. A. (2021). Deskripsi miskonsepsi peserta didik pada mata pelajaran ipa dengan menggunakan tes diagnostik two – tier multiple choice question di kelas VIII SMPN. Jurnal IPA Terpadu, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35580/ipaterpadu.v5i1.12348
Nurohman, S., Sunarno, W., Sarwanto, S., & Yamtinah, S. (2021). The validation 368

of digital analysis tool-assisted real-world inquiry (Digita-RI) as a modification of the inquiry-based learning model in the digital age. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30779
Octaviana, F., Wahyuni, D., & Supeno, S. (2022). Pengembangan e-LKPD untuk meningkatkan keterampilan kolaborasi siswa SMP pada pembelajaran IPA. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 2345–2353. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2332
OECD, O. (2022). Thinking outside the box: the PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/creative-thinking/
Ofstedal, K., & Dahlberg, K. (2009). Collaboration in student teaching: Introducing the collaboration self-assessment tool. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 30(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020802668043
Oktavia, L., Muhlisin, A., & Dewantari, N. (2022). The effect of 5E cycle learning model on critical thinking skills in natural science learning. Jurnal Biolokus, 5(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v5i1.1256
Oliveira, A. W., Brown, A. O., Zhang, W. S., LeBrun, P., Eaton, L., & Yemen, S. (2021). Fostering creativity in science learning: The potential of open-ended student drawing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: foundation, principles and issues (7 (ed.)). Pearson Education Limited.
Ornstein, A. C., Levine, D. U., Gutek, G. L., & Vocke, D. E. (2017). Foundations of education (13th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: a case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00110a
Owens, A., & Hite, R. (2019). Globalize your classroom: employing global collaboration to develop student communication skills using the water cycle. Science Scope, 43(4), 44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26899101
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2019). Engineering design: a systematic approach (Second). Springer.
369

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual (6th ed.). MC Graw Hill Education.
Pamungkas, A., Subali, B., & Linuwih, S. (2017). Implementasi model pembelajaran IPA berbasis kearifan lokal untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.14562
Parappilly, M., Woodman, R. J., & Randhawa, S. (2019). Feasibility and effectiveness of different models of team-based learning approaches in STEMM-based disciplines. Research in Science Education, 51, 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09888-8
Partnership for 21st Century Learning, P. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Definitions BFK.pdf
Pathak, R. P. (2012). Philosophical and sociological principles of education. Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (Eighth). Rowman & Littlefield.
Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills. Sense Publishers.
Powell, S. D. (2019). Your introduction to education: explorations in teaching (4th
ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Pratiwi, H. R., Juhanda, A., & Setiono, S. (2020). Analysis of student collaboration skills through peer assessment of the respiratory system concept. Journal Of Biology Education, 3(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.21043/jobe.v3i2.7898
Priandini, A. B., Fadly, W., Zubaidi, A., & Ju’subaidi, J. (2022). Analisis kemampuan kolaborasi peserta didik kelas VIII MTs N 6 Ponorogo. In PISCES: Proceeding of Integrative Science Education Seminar, 2, 181–189. https://prosiding.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/pisces/article/view/767
Purwati, S., & Alberida, H. (2022). Profile of students’ creative thinking skills in high school. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 5(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v5i1.45432
Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Supeno, & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Exploring students’ critical thinking skills using the engineering design process in a physics classroom. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3
Ritter, S. M., Gu, X., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PLoS ONE,
370

15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773
Roth, W. M., & Jornet, A. (2013). Situated cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(5), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1242
Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(21), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z
Rusli, W., Haris, A., & Yani, A. (2016). Studi miskonsepsi peserta didik kelas IX SMP negeri 1 makassar pada pokok bahasan gerak dan gaya. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 12(2), 192–199. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JSdPF/article/view/2172
Şahan, H. H., & Terzi, A. R. (2015). Analyzing the relationship between prospective teachers’ educational philosophies and their teachinglearning approaches. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 2. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2166
Salamanca, J. C. G., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 1– 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366
Sánchez, I. G., Verano-Tacoronte, D., González-Betancor, S. M., Fernández- Monroy, M., & Bolívar-Cruz, A. (2017). Assessing oral presentation skills in electrical engineering: developing a valid and reliable rubric. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 54(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720916659501
Santos, L. F. (2017). The Role of Critical Thinking in Science Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(20), 159–173.
Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century. OECD Publishing.
Schnittka, C., & Bell, R. (2011). Engineering design and conceptual change in science: Addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade. International Journal of Science Education, 33(13), 1861–1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.529177
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: an educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Schunk, D. H. (2014). Learning theories an educational perspective (Pearson New International Edition) (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. www.pearsoned.co.uk
371

Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? In Education Research and Foresight. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243126
Semmler, L., & Pietzner, V. (2018). Views of German chemistry teachers on creativity in chemistry classes and in general. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(9), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018- 0025-4
Setiawan, D. (2020). Pembelajaran EDP-problem solving project untuk melatih siswa meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan penyelesaian masalah. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v4i2.147
Setiawan, I. N., Roostika, M., Utami, S., Julie, H., & Panuluh, A. H. (2019). Improving the communication skills of grade VII students for animals classification and set by using STEM approach. Companion Proceedings of the SEADRIC, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.24071/seadr.2019.14
Shakeel, S. I., Al Mamun, M. A., & Haolader, M. F. A. (2023). Instructional design with ADDIE and rapid prototyping for blended learning: validation and its acceptance in the context of TVET Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7601–7630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11471- 0
Shalihin, N. A. F., Saptono, S., & Masturi, M. (2019). Implementation of guided inquiry learning to improve the critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(3), 306–314. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise
Siddiqui, M. H. (2008). Excellence of teaching: Amodel approach. A.P.H Publishing corporation.
Siew, N. M., Goh, H., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). Integrating stem in an engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school students in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.477
Siswanto, J., Susantini, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Practicality and effectiveness of the IBMR teaching model to improve physics problem solving skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.381
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10).
372

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking
Skills and Creativity, 23, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002 Starko, A. J. (2014). Creativity in the classroom: schools of curios delight (Fifth).
Routledge Taylor& Francis Group.
Stehle, S. M. S., & Peters-burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21 st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(39), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1
Suardana, I. N., Selamet, K., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., Sarini, P., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Guided inquiry learning model effectiveness in improving students’ creative thinking skills in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1317/1/012215
Sufyadi, S., Lambas, L., Rosdiana, T., Rochim, F. A. N., Novrika, S., Iswoyo, S., Hartini, Y., Primadonna, M., & Mahardhika, R. L. (2021). Pembelajaran paradigma baru. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Sullivan, K., Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2020). Developing twenty-first-century skills in out-of-school education: the Bridge21 Transition Year programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1835709
Susilowati. (2015). IPA dan Pembelajarannya. UNY Press.
Taber, K. S. (2017). Science education as a field of scholarship. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education: An International Course Companion. Sense Publishers.
Tandika, P. B. (2022). Instructional materials and the development of young children’s 21st century skills: perspectives from early educators in ukerewe, Tanzania. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1834473
Tegegne, T. A., & Kelkay, A. D. (2023). Comparative study of using 5E learning cycle and the traditional teaching method in chemistry to improve student understanding of water concept: The case of primary school. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2199634
The Curriculum Development Council, C. (2017). Science education: key learning area curriculum guide (pimary 1-secondary 6). The Education Bureau
373

HKSARG. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3051259
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Tight, M. (2021). Twenty-first century skills: meaning, usage and value. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1835517
Tillery, B. W., Enger, E. D., & Ross, F. C. (2019). Integrated science (Seventh). McGraw-Hill Education.
Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing creativity: a guide for Educators. In Journal of Education and Learning (Issue December). The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED505548%0Ahttp:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
Trefil, J., & Hazen, R. M. (2016). The sciences: an integrated approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21St century skills: learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Turan, S. (2021). Pre-service teacher experiences of the 5E instructional model: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11102
Turan, S., & Matteson, S. M. (2021). Middle school mathematics classrooms practice based on 5e instructional model. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1041
Ünlü, Z. K., & Dökme, İ. (2022). A systematic review of 5E model in science education: proposing a skill-based STEM instructional model within the 21-st century skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(13), 2110– 2130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031
van Broekhoven, K. (2023). The evaluation and selection of creative ideas in educational settings: current knowledge and future directions. Creativity Research Journal, 00(00), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403
374

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers : a systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Varas, D., Santana, M., Nussbaum, M., Claro, S., & Imbarack, P. (2023). Teachers’ strategies and challenges in teaching 21st century skills: Little common understanding. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2023.101289
Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández- Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en
Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Wahyudi, Z. Z., Salsabila, K., Khairiyah, N., & Siagian, N. (2024). Efektivitas LKPD berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi IPA peserta didik. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(2), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v4i2.3315
Wati, M. Y., Maulidia, I. A., Irnawati, & Supeno. (2019). Keterampilan komunikasi siswa kelas VII SMPN 2 Jember dalam pembelajaran IPA dengan model problem based learning pada materi kalor dan perubahannya. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(4), 275–280.
Wells, J. G. (2016a). I-STEM Ed exemplar: implementation of the PIRPOSAL model. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(2), 16–23. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96423/Wells_Impleme ntPIROPSAL_TET_v76n2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Wells, J. G. (2016b). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: conceptual and pedagogical framework for classroom implementation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12–19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96424/Wells_PIRPOS AL_March2016-TET.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and 375

entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(May), 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046
Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran: panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik (1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Widyapuraya, N. W., Suryana, A. L., Suyanta, S., & Wilujeng, I. (2023). Profil keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMP Negeri 1 Juwangi pada pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.1723
Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603203-9
Wilujeng, I. (2018). IPA terintegrasi dan pembelajarannya. UNY Press.
Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N. J., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). Synthesizing results from empirical research on engineering design process in science education: a systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9129
Withers, M. (2016). The college science learning cycle: An instructional model for reformed teaching. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0101
Wiyono, F. M., Sugiyanto, S., & Yulianti, E. (2016). Identifikasi hasil analisis miskonsepsi gerak menggunakan instrumen diagnostik three tier pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 6(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v6n2.p61-69
Wong, D., & Pugh, K. (2014). Encyclopedia of science education. Encyclopedia of Science Education, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_518-2
Yaki, A. A. (2022). Fostering critical thinking skills using integrated STEM approach among secondary school biology students. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 06. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12481
Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8
Yossyana, V., Suprapto, N., & Prastowo, T. (2020). 5E Learning cycle in practicing written and oral argumentation skills. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(3), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i3.53
376

Yu, K. C., Wu, P. H., & Fan, S. C. (2020). Structural Relationships among High School Students’ Scientific Knowledge, Critical Thinking, Engineering Design Process, and Design Product. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(6), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763- 019-10007-2
Zanden, P. J. A. C. van der, Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2020). Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices. Research in Post- Compulsory Education, 25(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313
Zhong, B., Liu, X., Xia, L., & Sun, W. (2022). A Proposed taxonomy of teaching models in STEM education: robotics as an example. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221099525
Zulfa, A. R., & Rosyidah, Z. (2020). Analysis of communication skills of junior high school students on classification of living things topic. INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2078
citation:   Herianto, Herianto and Ikhsan, Jaslin  (2024) Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran STEM-EDELCY (Engineering Design Learning Cycle) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Abad 21 Peserta Didik SMP.  S3 thesis, Sekolah Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/82520/1/disertasi_herianto_20703261024.pdf