eprintid: 82517
rev_number: 13
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/08/25/17
datestamp: 2024-07-04 04:37:08
lastmod: 2024-07-04 04:37:08
status_changed: 2024-07-04 04:37:08
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Ningsih, Eka Fitria
creators_name: Budiningsih, Asri
title: Model Problem posing mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri untuk meningkatkan komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika.
ispublished: pub
subjects: F4
subjects: sos_sosiokultural
divisions: pps_ip
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: problem posing, budaya Lampung, komunikasi matematis, norma sosiomatematika
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses dan hasil pengembangan model pembelajaran problem posing yang mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri yang layak, praktis dan efektif untuk meningkatkan komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika peserta didik Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah.
Model penelitian dan pengembangan ini menggunakan Gall, Gall & Borg (2007) yang mengakomodasi model Dick & Carey (2001) meliputi: (1) analisis kebutuhan; (2) analisis instruksional; (3) analisis peserta didik & konteks; (4) merumuskan tujuan; (5) mengembangkan instrumen penilaian; (6) mengembangkan strategi pembelajaran; (7) mengembangkan materi pembelajaran; (8) evaluasi formatif; (9) revisi; dan (10) evaluasi sumatif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah di Kabupaten Lampung Timur dan Kota Metro. Teknik analisis data menggunakan pendekatan multimethod dengan metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan diantaranya angket, tes dan observasi. Data kelayakan model dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen angket penilaian model pembelajaran oleh ahli model dari teknologi pendidikan dan ahli materi dalam bidang pendidikan matematika. Uji validitas model pembelajaran dibuktikan melalui Indeks Aiken. Data kepraktisan model dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen angket keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran yang melibatkan guru dan peserta didik. Uji kepraktisan model dianalisis berdasarkan persentase hasil observasi. Data keefektifan model dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen tes komunikasi matematis dan lembar observasi norma sosiomatematika. Uji keefektifan model menggunakan uji N-gain.
Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut. (1) Melalui proses penilaian para ahli, model pembelajaran problem posing yang mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri layak digunakan untuk meningkatkan komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika yang dibuktikan dengan indeks validitas Aiken sebesar 0,85 (validitas tinggi) (2) Melalui proses evaluasi sumatif, model pembelajaran problem posing yang mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri praktis digunakan untuk meningkatkan komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika yang dibuktikan dengan hasil penilaian sebesar 84,5% (sangat praktis). (3) Melalui proses evaluasi sumatif, model pembelajaran problem posing yang mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri efektif untuk meningkatkan komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika. Hasil uji multivariat dan uji-t menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rata-rata komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika baik secara bersamaan maupun pada tiap-tiap variabel antara sebelum dan sesudah implementasi model. Hasil analisis N-gain juga menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peningkatan rata-rata komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika peserta didik setelah implementasi model. (4) Model pembelajaran problem posing yang mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri memiliki komponen sintaks, sistem sosial, prinsip reaksi, dampak instruksional dan pendukung serta sistem pendukung. Artefak budaya Lampung berperan sebagai konteks masalah untuk kegiatan problem posing sedangkan piil pesenggiri berperan sebagai norma untuk berinteraksi selama pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian ini merekomendasikan model pembelajaran problem posing yang mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri untuk diterapkan di Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
date: 2024-06-03
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Program Pascasarjana
department: Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: Aineamani, B. (2019). How Learners Communicate Their Mathematics Reasoning in Mathematics Discourse. In Language and Communication in Mathematics Education International Perspectives (p. 65). Springer.
Akhiruddin, Sujarwo, Atmowardoyo, & H, N. (2019). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Cahaya Bintang Cemerlang.
Amaliah, D., Musaddad, A., & Sariyatun. (2018). Values of Piil Pesenggiri: Morality, Religiosity, Solidarity, and Tolerance. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(4), 1–9. https://doaj.org/article/901955e0b1ab46548b4649a2fecf56fa
Ambrosio, U. D., & Rosa, M. (2017). Ethnomathematics and Its Pedagogical Action in Mathematics Education. 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-59220-6
Anim, Prasetyo, Y. D., & Rahmadani, E. (2019). Experimentation of Problem Posing Learning Model Assisted of Autograph Software To Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability in Terms of Student’S Gender. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i2.301
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach (Ninth Edit). Mc Graw Hill Higher Education.
Asfar, A. M. I. T., & Nur, S. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing & Solving : Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. CV Jejak.
Atabas, S., Schellinger, J., Whitacre, I., Findley, K., & Hensberry, K. (2020). A tale of two sets of norms: Comparing opportunities for student agency in mathematics lessons with and without interactive simulations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58(December 2019), 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100761
Ayuwanti, I., Marsigit, & Siswoyo, D. (2021). Teacher-student interaction in mathematics learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
Aziza, M. (2018). An analysis of a teacher’s questioning related to students’ responses and mathematical creativity in an elementary school in the UK. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438138
346
Basri, H. (2012). Kearifan Lokal bisa Menyejukkan Lampung (Perspektif Komunikasi Lintas Budaya). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 63–70.
Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2021). The process of problem posing: development of a descriptive phase model of problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10136-y
Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2022). The process of problem posing: development of a descriptive phase model of problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10136-y
Behizadeh, N. (2014). Enacting Problem- Posing Education through Project-Based Learning. 2, 99–104.
Beshop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics Education and Culture. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions. In D. E. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty- sixth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 773–781).
Borba, M. C. (1997). Ethnomathematics and Education. In Ethnomathematics. State University of New York Press.
Boyd, D., & Bee, H. (2015). Lifespan Development (Seventh Ed). Pearson.
Brennner, M. E. (1994). A communication Framework for Mathematics. In Language and learning: Educating linguistically diverse students. State University of New York Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=egQI1PUpG6sC&oi=fnd&p g=PA233&ots=JzcZf0Xx1W&sig=Dz8zBy6hxXPszaOcOUt0mFFCr6g&red ir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2012). The art of problem posing. In The Art of Problem Posing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052266
Budiningsih, C. A. (2001). Karakteristik Siswa Sebagai Pijakan dalam Penelitian Pembelajaran. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXX(No 1).
Bukri, Sayuti, H., Soepangat, & Sukiji. (1998). Sejarah Daerah Lampung. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Kantor Wilayah Propinsi Lampung.
Cai, J., Chen, T., Li, X., Xu, R., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., & Song, N. (2019). Exploring the impact of a problem-posing workshop on elementary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions on problem posing and lesson design.
347

Cai,
Cai,
Cai,
Cai,
Cai,
International Journal of Educational Research, February, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.004
J., & Hwang, S. (2019). Learning to teach through mathematical problem posing: Theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, January, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001
J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-Posing Research in Mathematics Education: Some Answered and Unanswered Questions. In Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 1– 569). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3
J., Jakabcsin, M. S., & Lane, S. (1996). Assessing Students’ Mathematical Communication. School Science and Mathematics, 96(5), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10235.x
J., & Leikin, R. (2020). Affect in mathematical problem posing: conceptualization, advances, and future directions for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649- 020-10008-x
J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
Çakır, A., & Akkoç, H. (2020). Examining socio-mathematical norms related to problem posing: a case of a gifted and talented mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10001-4
Chen, T., & Cai, J. (2020). An elementary mathematics teacher learning to teach using problem posing: A case of the distributive property of multiplication over addition. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(November 2018), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.004
Clark, P. G., Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2008). Documenting the emergence of “speaking with meaning” as a sociomathematical norm in professional learning community discourse. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.01.001
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of Classroom Mathematics Traditions: An Interactional Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003573
348

Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Sociomathematical Norms , Argumentation , and Autonomy in Mathematics Author ( s ): Erna Yackel and Paul Cobb Published by : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/749877 REFERENCES Linked references are avail. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Cooke, B. D., & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical communication in the classroom: A teacher makes a difference. In Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0007-5
Cross, D. I. (2009). Creating optimal mathematics learning environments: Combining argumentation and writing to enhance achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 905–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9144-9
D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and Its Place in the History and Pedagogy of Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245585.230
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2016). Shaping School Culture (Third Edit). Jossey- Bass A Wiley Brand.
Degeng, N. S. (2013). Ilmu Pembelajaran. Aras Media.
DeJarnette, A. F., Wilke, E., & Hord, C. (2020). Categorizing mathematics teachers’ questioning: The demands and contributions of teachers’ questions. International Journal of Educational Research, 104(October), 101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101690
Dewantara, K. H. (1962). Dasar Dasar Pendidikan (pp. 1–5). Majelis Luhur Tamansiswa. https://id1lib.org/book/3416980/a551a2
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. In Americas New York, NY 1002. Simon & schuster.
Dewi, F. C., Nurfithriyya, A., Susiana, S., Rakhmawati, R., & Anggoro, B. S. (2019). Etnomatematika Eksplorasi Tapis Lampung Sebagai Sumber Belajar Dalam Upaya Melindungi Warisan Budaya Lampung. Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 2(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v2i2.74
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Pearson.
Dominikus, W. S., Nenohai, J. M. H., & Hale, M. (2020). Increasing students’ mathematical communication skills by applying probing-prompting learning model based on Belu culture artefact. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
349

1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012020
Donato, R., & Adair-Hauck, B. (1992). Discourse perspectives on formal instruction. Language Awareness, 1(2), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1992.9959807
Douglas, E. P., & Chiu, C. C. (2013). Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(3), 1–16.
Driyarkara, N. (2006). Problematika Pendidikan. In Sudiarja, B. Subanar, Sunardi, & Sarkim (Eds.), Karya Lengkap Driyarkara : Esai-Esai Filfasat Pemikiran yang Terbit Penuh dalam Perjuangan Bangsa. Gramedia PUstaka Utama.
Dunphy, L. (2015). Transition to School: Supporting Children’s Engagement in Mathematical Thinking Processes. In Mathematics and Transition to School, Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer.
Durfee, M. V. (2018). An Exploratory Case Study of How High-Performance Team Training Develops Sociomathematical Norms and Differing Levels of Math- Talkof Math-Talk. Utah State University.
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework For Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166.
Edi Siswanto, A. R. P. B. (2014). the Cultural Preservation of Piil Pesinggiri in Lampung Muliticutural Society: Citizenship Education Study in Baradatu, Waykanan. Jurnal Civicus, 14(2).
Eka Yanuarti. (2017). Pemikiran Pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara dan Relevansinya dengan Kurikulum 13. Jurnal Penelitian, 11(2), 237–266.
English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. 183–217.
English, L. D. (2019). Teaching and learning through mathematical problem posing: commentary. International Journal of Educational Research, June, 0– 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.014
Erikson, E. H. (1989). Identitas dan siklus hidup manusia. Gramedia.
Ernest, P. (2004). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Taylor & Francis
Group.
Estes, T. H., & Mintz, S. L. (2016). Instruction: A Models Approach (Seventh Ed).
350

Pearson.
Fachruddin, F. (2007). Falsafah Piil Pesenggiri Sebagai Kearifan Kota Lampung Teraktualisasi Melalui Pendidikan Non Formal. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(VIII), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.151.12
Fadlillah, M. (2017). Aliran Progresivisme dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. Dimendi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 17–24.
Fitriyah, D. N., Santoso, H., & Suryadinata, N. (2018). Bahan Ajar Transformasi Geometri Berbasis Discovery Learning melalui Pendekatan Etnomatematika. Jurnal Elemen, 4(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v4i2.705
FREUDENTHAL, H. (2002). Revisiting Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2012a). Classroom sociomathematical norms for proof presentation in undergraduate in abstract algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.04.002
Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2012b). Classroom sociomathematical norms for proof presentation in undergraduate in abstract algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.04.002
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (Eighth Edi). Pearson Education.
Gorgorió, N., & Planas, N. (2005). Social representations as mediators of mathematics learning in multiethnic classrooms. XX, 91–104.
Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal: a mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 6, 777–796.
Güçler, B. (2014). The role of symbols in mathematical communication: the case of the limit notation. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.919872
Gutek, G. L. (1974). Philosophical Alternative inEducation. OHIO: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company, A Bell & Howell Company.
Güven, N. D., & Dede, Y. (2017). Examining social and sociomathematical norms in different classroom microcultures: Mathematics teacher education perspective. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(1), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0383
Hähkiöniemi, M. (2017). Student teachers’ types of probing questions in inquiry- 351

based mathematics teaching with and without GeoGebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 973– 987. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1329558
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision.D, Measurement and Reasearch Methodology. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22025883%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.c om/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:ANALYZING+CHANGE/GAI N+SCORES#0%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search &q=intitle:Analyzing+change/gain+scores%230
Hamzah, A., & Muhlisrarini. (2014). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Haris, A., & Amalia, A. (2018). Makna dan Simbol dalam Proses Interaksi Sosial (Sebuah Tinjauan Komunikasi). Jurnal Dakwah Risalah, 29(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.24014/jdr.v29i1.5777
Hartinah, S., Suherman, S., Syazali, M., Efendi, H., Junaidi, R., Jermsittiparsert, K., & Umam, R. (2019). Probing-prompting based on ethnomathematics learning model: The effect on mathematical communication skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.574275
Haryono, D. (2015). Filsafat Matematika. Alfabeta.
Hendayana, S. (2014). Teacher Learning through Study in Indonesia. In Realising Learning: Teachers’ Professional Development Through Lesson and Learning Study. Routledge.
Hidayati, F. N., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Ethnomathematics’ Research in Indonesia during 2015-2020. Ethnomathematics’ Research in Indonesia, 1(1), 29–42. http://doi.org/10.48135/ije.v1i1.29-42
Hurlock, E. B. (1996). Psikologi Perkembangan Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan. Erlangga.
Ingram, J., Andrews, N., & Pitt, A. (2018). Making Student Explanations Relevant in Whole Class Discussion. 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055- 2_5
Jenks, C. (1993). Culture. Routledge.
Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariat statistical Analysis. Pearson Education.
352

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2016). Models of Teaching (E. Sembilan (ed.)). Pustaka Pelajar.
Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
Kang, S. M., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Sociomathematical norms and the teacher’s mathematical belief: A case study from a Korean in-service elementary teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1308a
Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 Tentang Capaian Pembelajaran (2022).
Kesuma, T. A. R. P., & Ciciria, D. (2018). Piil Pesenggiri : Strategi Resolusi Konflik Menggunakan Nilai-Nilai Agama Dan Pancasila. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 19(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v19i2.394
Khasanah, B. A., Nuria, N., Liana, L., & Iswahyudi, I. (2021). Etnomatematika pada Pakaian Adat Lampung. JURNAL E-DuMath, 7(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v7i2.1546
Kilbane, C. R., & Milman, N. B. (2014). Teaching Models: Designing Instruction for 21st Century Learners. In Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387- 71254-3_5
Koentjaraningrat. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Koichu, B., & Kontorovich, I. (2013). Dissecting success stories on mathematical problem posing: A case of the Billiard Task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9431-9
Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving. Educational Studies, 45(6), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
Kosko, K. W. (2016). Primary teachers’ choice of probing questions: Effects of MKT and supporting student autonomy. Mathematics Education, 11(4), 991– 1012.
Kosko, K. W., & Gao, Y. (2017). Mathematical Communication in State Standards Before the Common Core. Educational Policy, 31(3), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815595723
353

Kosko, K. W., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2010). Mathematical communication and its relation to the frequency of manipulative use. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/251
Krishnamoorthy, R., Prelatha, R., David, T. K., & Manikam, M. K. (2021). the Implementation of Behaviorism, Constructivism and Information Processing Theory in Instructional Design Practice Activities-a Review. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy (IJEAP), 3(2), 37–44. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeapJournalwebsite:http://myjms.moh e.gov.my/index.php/ijeaphttp://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap
Kuboja, J. M., & Ngussa, B. M. (2015). Conceptualizing the Place of Technology in Curriculum Formation: A View of the Four Pillars of Curriculum Foundations. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v4-i2/1728
Kul, Ü., & Çelik, S. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Problem Posing Strategies on Students’ Learning of Mathematics. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/325
Lapp, D., Bender, H., Ellenwood, S., & John, M. (1975). Teaching and Learning: Philosophical, Psychological, Curricular Applications. Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M. L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi- institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406– 418. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406
Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2006). Mathematically and practically- based explanations: Individual preferences and sociomathematical norms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9011-x
Lim, C. S., & Chew, C. M. (2007). Mathematical Communication in Malaysian Bilingual Classrooms. 3rd APEC-Tsukuba International Conference: Innovation of Classroom Teaching and Learning through Lesson Study- Focusing on Mathematical Communication, 1993, 1–7. http://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/math/apec/apec2008/papers/PDF/11.LimCh apSam_Malaysia.pdf
Lomibao, L. S., Luna, C. A., & Namoco, R. A. (2016). The Influence of Mathematical Communication on Students’ Mathematics Performance and Anxiety. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-5-3
354

Loviana, S., Merliza, P., Damayanti, A., Mahfud, M. K., & Islamuddin, A. M. (2020). Etnomatematika pada Kain Tapis dan Rumah Adat Lampung. Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah, 4(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v4i1.1956
Machaba, F., & Dhlamini, J. (2021). Ethnomathematics as a Fundamental Teaching Approach. In Mathematics Teaching and Professional Learning in sub-Sahara Africa. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82723-6_5
Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuruan, penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi 2). Parama Publishing.
Marsigit. (2008). Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru Matematika Melalui Model- Model Pembelajaran, Lesson Study dan PTK Melalui Peran MGMP. https://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/131268114/pengabdian/pengambangan- kompetensi-guru-matematika-melalui-model-model- pembelajaranlessonstudy-dan-ptk-melalui-.pdf
Marsigit. (2018). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Matematika. Media Akademi.
McCarthy, P., Sithole, A., McCarthy, P., Cho, J., & Gyan, E. (2016). Teacher questioning strategies in mathematical classroom discourse : A case study of two grade eight teachers in Tennessee, USA. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 80–89.
McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An Analysis of Development of Sociomathematical Norms in One First-Grade Classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/749827
McDonald, P. A., & Smith, J. M. (2019). Improving mathematical learning in Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence through problem posing: an integrative review. Curriculum Journal, curj.15. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.15
McNeal, B., & Simon, M. A. (2000). Mathematics Culture Clash: Negotiating New Classroom Norms with Prospective Teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 475–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00027-4
Meiriyanti, M., Suhendra, S., & Nurlaelah, E. (2018). Improving mathematical communication ability through problems based learning model. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3, 739–744.
Merliza, P. (2021). Studi Etnomatematika: Eksplorasi Konsep Matematika pada Permainan Tradisional Provinsi Lampung. Suska Journal of Mathematics
355

Education, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v7i1.12537
Mujiyati, M., & Adiputra, S. (2018). Influence of Peer Groups to The Self-Esteem of Lampung and Javanese Students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.01.003
Mumtaz Ali Memon, Hiram Ting, Jun-Hwa Cheah, Thurasamy, R., Francis Chuah, & Tat Hue Cham. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 2590–4221.
Muzakki, A. (2018). Introducing Local Genius-Based Harmony Education (Piil Pesenggiri) Among the Indigenous People of Lampung. Penamas, 30(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v30i3.188
Muzakki, A. (2021). Konfigurasi Nilai-Nilai Kepemimpinan Etnopedagogi dalam Falsafah Piil Pesenggiri Masyarakat Adat Lampung. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. VA:NCTM.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
Ngunjiri, M. (2022). Individual Differences and Instruction in Mathematics : A Review. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.37284/ijar.5.1.715.IEEE
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0937-9
Ningsih, E. F., Budiningsih, C. A., Sugiman, & Pamungkas, T. (2023). Examining the Impact of Math Anxiety, Scaffolding, and Math Attitude on Working Memory: A Comparative Analysis between Islamic Boarding Schools and Public Schools. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 6(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v6i1.3245
Norton, A. H., & McCloskey, A. (2008). Teaching experiments and professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9076-x
Nugraha, T. H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v9i1.5880
356

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results COMBINED EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES VOLUME I, II & III: Vol. I. Secretary-General of the OECD.
Olteanu, C., & Olteanu, L. (2013). Enhancing mathematics communication using critical aspects and dimensions of variation. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.742153
Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang (Jilid 1). Erlangga.
Örnek, T., & Soylu, Y. (2021). A model design to be used in teaching problem posing to develop problem-posing skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100905
Ozdemir Baki, G., & Kilicoglu, E. (2022). Social and socio-mathematical norms constructed by teachers in classes through the development of noticing skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), em0723. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12649
Pambudi, D. S., Aini, R. Q., Oktavianingtyas, E., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Hussen, S. (2021). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Matematika Nalaria berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i1.4206
Parmono. (1995). Nilai dan Norma Masyarakat. Jurnal Filsafat, 23(November).
Partanen, A. M., & Kaasila, R. (2015). Sociomathematical Norms Negotiated in the Discussions of Two Small Groups Investigating Calculus. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 927–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9521-5
Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (2008). Problem-Solving Strategies for Efficient and Elegant Solutions, Grades 6-12: A Resource for the Mathematics Teacher. Corwin Press.Inc.
Prosser, J. (1999). school Culture. Paul Chapman Publishing.
Purwanto, N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran (Edisi 15).
Remaja Rosdakarya.
Puspendik. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia belajar dari hasil PISA 2018 (Issue 021). Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/16742
Putri, R. I. I., Dolk, M., & Zulkardi, Z. (2015). Professional Development of PMRI 357

Teachers for Introducting Social Norm. IndoMS-JME : Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 11–19. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/1900/795
Qohar, A., & Sumarmo, U. (2013). Improving mathematical communication ability and self regulation learning of yunior high students by using reciprocal teaching. Journal on Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.562.59-74
Rachmawati, I. (2019). Relationship between Views of Progressivism and Curriculum 2013 on Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v9i2.48392
Rahmawati, A., Cholily, Y. M., & Zukhrufurrohmah, Z. (2023). Analyzing Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability in Solving Numerical Literacy Problems. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i1.1938
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional-Design Theories And Models: An Overview of Their Current Status (Volume 1, p. 13). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Rencher, A. C. (1998). Multivariate statistical inference and applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Rochmad, Dewi, N. R., & Noviyana, I. N. (2020). Students’ mathematical communication ability in the ethnomathematical arias model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1567/3/032009
Rodriguez, C., & Bonner, E. P. (2018). The impact of teacher questioning and open- ended problems on mathematical communication. Journal of Teacher Action Research, 4(3), 68–89.
Rogers, K. C., & Kosko, K. W. (2019). How elementary and collegiate instructors envision tasks as supportive of mathematical argumentation: A comparison of instructors’ task constructions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53(August), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.08.004
Rohid, N., Suryaman, S., & Rusmawati, R. D. (2019). Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills (MCS) in Solving Mathematics Problems: A Case in Indonesian Context. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.423a
358

Rosa, F. O., Mundilarto, Wilujeng, I., & Mujriah. (2020). The Integration of Collaborative Problem Solving with “Piil Pesenggiri” Local Wisdom to Build Scientific Attitudes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020
Rosa, M., D’Ambrosio, U., Orey, D. C., Shirley, L., Alangui, W. V., Palhares, P., & Gavarrete, M. E. (2016). Current and Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics as a Program. 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 30120-4
Rosa, M., & Gavarrete, M. E. (2017). An Ethnomathematics Overview: An Introduction. In Ethnomathematics and its Diverse Approaches for Mathematics Education. Springer International Publishing.
Rosenstein, J. G. (1997). New Jersey Mathematics Curriculum Framework. http://archive.dimacs.rutgers.edu/nj_math_coalition/framework.html
Rubingah, N., Yani, J. A., Kartasura, K., Sukoharjo, K., Tengah, J., Saraswati Indriasari, P., & Muhammadiyah Surakarta Jl Yani, U. A. (2023). Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Pandangan Filsafat Esensialisme Endang Fauziati. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia (JUBPI), 1(1), 136–147.
Rukiyati, & Purwastuti, L. A. (2015). Mengenal Filsafat Pendidikan. UNY Press.
Rusdi, M. (2016). Dinamika Sosial Masyarakat Desa. Pena Persada.
Ruseffendi, E. T. (2006). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Tarsito.
Ruslan, I. (2016). Dimensi Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Lampung sebagai Media Resolusi Konflik. Proceeding of The 16 Th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies The Contribution of Indonesian Islam To The World Civilization The Heritage of Islamic Tradition Area Studies.
Rustam, A., & Ramlan, A. M. (2017). Analysis Of Mathematical Communication Skills Of Junior. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 45–51. http://usnsj.com/index.php/JME/article/view/2.2.45-51%0D
Saadati, F., & Celis, S. (2023). Student Motivation in Learning Mathematics in Technical and Vocational Higher Education: Development of an Instrument. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(1), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2194
Sahin, A., & Kulm, G. (2008). Sixth grade mathematics teachers’ intentions and use of probing, guiding, and factual questions. Journal of Mathematics
359

Teacher Education, 11(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008- 9071-2
Sánchez, V., & García, M. (2014). Sociomathematical and mathematical norms related to definition in pre-service primary teachers’ discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9516-0
Santrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan Anak (Kesebelas). Erlangga.
Santrock, J. W. (2012). Life_Span Development, Perkembangan Masa Hidup
(Ketigabela). Erlangga.
Sanusi Siregar, A., Surya, E., Syahputra, E., & Rais Sirait, A. (2018). The Improving Mathematical Communication Ability and Students’ Self- Regulation Learning through Realistic Mathematical Approach Based on Batak Toba Culture. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 1397– 1402. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-10-9
Sarwoedi, Marinka, D. O., Febriani, P., & Wirne, I. N. (2018). Efektifitas etnomatematika dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 03(02), 171–176. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jpmr/article/view/7521
Schindler, M., & Bakker, A. (2020). Affective field during collaborative problem posing and problem solving: a case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09973-0
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories an Educational Perspective. Pustaka Pelajar.
Schwols, A., & Dempsey, K. (2013). Common core standards for middle school mathematics.
Seeger, F., Voigt, J., & Waschescio, U. (1998). The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Serow, P., Callingham, R., & Muir, T. (2016). Primary Mathematics. Primary Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316544358
Setiawan, D. E., Joebagio, H., & Susanto. (2020). Local wisdom masyarakat Lampung sebagai penguat dalam pendidikan karakter di sekolah. Prosiding Seminar ..., 29–34. http://research- report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/view/3407
Shirley, L., & Alangui, W. V. (2017). Some Conclusions About Ethnomathematics: Looking Ahead. In Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for
360

mathematics education. Springer International Publishing.
Silver, E. A. (2013a). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Looking back, looking around, and looking ahead. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9477-3
Silver, E. A. (2013b). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Looking back, looking around, and looking ahead. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9477-3
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). Problem an Analysis of Arithmetic Posing By Middle School Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521–539.
Sinaga, R. M. (2014). Revitalisasi Tradisi : Strategi Mengubah Stigma. Universitas Indonesia.
Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Russell, J. D., & Mims, C. (2010). Instructional technology and media for learning. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(44), 191–196.
Soekanto, S. (2017). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Raja Wali Pers.
Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Deulofeu, J., & Ulloa, R. (2020). Teacher support for argumentation and the incorporation of contingencies in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 5211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1733686
Stephan, M. (2014). Sociomathematical Norms in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 563–566). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8
Stephan, M. (2020). Sociomathematical Norms in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education Second Edition (p. 802). Springer.
Sulasman, & Setia, G. (2013). Teori-teori Kebudayaan: Dari Teori Hingga Aplikasi. Pustaka Setia.
Supriadi, N., & R. Damayanti. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Lamban Belajar dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Bangun Datar. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1–9.
Teoh, S. H., Singh, P., Cheong, T. H., & Mohd Rasid, N. S. (2020). Reflection in a Mathematics Classroom. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(SI1), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5isi1.2315
361

Tilaar, H. A. ., Paat, J. P., & Paat, L. (2011). Pedagogik Kritis: Perkembangan, Substansi, dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Tismi Dipalaya, Herawati Susilo, and A. D. C. (2016). The Effect Of Pdeode (Predict-Discuss-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain) Learning Strategy In The Different Academic Abilities On Students’ Learning Outcomes In Senior High School Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II Tahun 2016.
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Quoc, N. V. A. (2021). The improvement of 10th students’ mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics. Heliyon, 7(11), e08282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282
TREFFERS, A. (1978). Three dimensions, A Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Instruction - The Wiskobas Project. D. REIDEL PUBLISHING COMPANY. https://doi.org/10.1090/clrm/051/06
Trung, L. T. B. T., Vuong, P. V., Trang, L. D. H., & Loc, N. P. (2020). Enhancing mathematical communication in the classroom: A case study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1387–1393. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080431
Udi, E. A., & Star, J. (2011). The Skill of Asking Good Questions in Mathematics Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.291
Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (2003).
Utama, F. (2019). Piil Pesenggiri Dalam Masyarakat Lampung : Atara Instrumen Bina Damai Atau Dalih Kekerasan Piil Pesenggiri In Lampung Comunnity : Between Peace Building Or Violence Excuse. Kelitbangan, 7(2).
Utami, I. Q., & Hwang, W. Y. (2021). The impact of collaborative problem posing and solving with ubiquitous-decimal app in authentic contexts on math learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(3), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00209-5
Van Harpen, X. Y., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. J. Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press.
Wahyu Widada, Dewi Herawaty, Dwi Yanti, D. I. (2018). the Student Mathematical 362

Communication Ability in Learning Etnomathematics Orieted Realistic Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(9), 881–884. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20191277
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. (2015). Students authoring personalized “algebra stories”: Problem-posing in the context of out-of-school interests. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.001
Walle, J. A. V. de, Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2020). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally (Book). In Teaching Children Mathematics (Vol. 10, Issue 5).
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2013). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001
Widjaja, W. (2012). Exercising Sociomathematical Norms in Classroom Discourse about Data Representation: Insights from One Case Study of A Grade 6 Lesson in Indonesia. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 21–38.
Widodo, S. A., Turmudi, Dahlan, J. A., Harini, E., & Sulistyowati, F. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis sosiomathematics norm among junior high school student. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20445
Wijayanto, A. D., Fajriah, S. N., & Anita, I. W. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Smp Pada Materi Segitiga Dan Segiempat. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.36
Winarti, & Istiyono, E. (2020). Taksonomi Hingher Order Thinking Skill Untuk Penilaian Pembelajaran Fisika. In Widya Sari Press Salatiga (Vol. 1).
Woolfolk, A. (2015). Educational Psychology, Global Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
Wright, P., Fejzo, A., & Carvalho, T. (2022). Progressive pedagogies made visible: Implications for equitable mathematics teaching. Curriculum Journal, 33(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.122
Xu, P., & Yue, X. (2019). Talent leadership strategies enhance teacher’s professional competencies in 21st century education for sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 373(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/373/1/012003
363

Yackel, E. (2004). Theoretical Perspectives for Analyzing Explanation, Justification and Argumentation in Mathematics Classrooms. Journal of The Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series, 8(1).
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (2020). Small-Group Interactions as a Source of Learning Opportunities in Second-Grade Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.22.5.0390
Yang, E. F. Y., Chang, B., Cheng, H. N. H., & Chan, T. W. (2016). Improving pupils’ mathematical communication abilities through computersupported reciprocal peer tutoring. Educational Technology and Society.
Zaditania, A. P., & Ruli, R. M. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Himpunan. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(1), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1997
Zamroni. (2011). Kultur Sekolah. Gavin Kalam Utama.
Zhang, L., Yu, S., Li, B., & Wang, J. (2017). Can students identify the relevant information to solve a problem? Educational Technology and Society, 20(4), 288–299.
Zhou, M., & Brown, D. (2017). Educational Learning Theories. Retrieved from (https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks/1/).
Zhou, M., College, D. S., Brown, D., & College, D. S. (2017). Educational Learning Theory. In Instructional Design: International Perspectives I. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062920-11
Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). New School Mathematics Curricula, PISA and PMRI in Indonesia. In School Mathematics Curricula, Asian Perspectives and Glimpses of Reform. Springer.
citation:   Ningsih, Eka Fitria and Budiningsih, Asri  (2024) Model Problem posing mengakomodasi budaya piil pesenggiri untuk meningkatkan komunikasi matematis dan norma sosiomatematika.  S3 thesis, Sekolah Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/82517/1/disertasi_eka%20fitria%20ningsih_19703261044.pdf