eprintid: 82516
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/08/25/16
datestamp: 2024-07-04 03:49:51
lastmod: 2024-07-04 03:49:51
status_changed: 2024-07-04 03:49:51
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Wawan, Wawan
creators_name: Retnawati, Heri
title: Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terintegrasi Etnomatematika dan Teknologi dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah, Berpikir Kreatif, Kolaborasi, dan Motivasi.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D0
subjects: F4
subjects: G5
divisions: pps_ip
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: berpikir kreatif, etnomatematika, kolaborasi, motivasi, pemecahan masalah
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap (1) prototype model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi, (2) kelayakan model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, kemampuan kolaborasi, dan motivasi belajar, (3) kepraktisan model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, kemampuan kolaborasi, dan motivasi belajar, dan (4) keefektifan model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, kemampuan kolaborasi, dan motivasi belajar.
Model pengembangan produk yang digunakan mengacu pada kerangka kerja Borg dan Gall yang memuat 10 tahapan pengembangan. Ujicoba model melibatkan para ahli, guru, observer, dan peserta didik kelas XI sekolah menengah atas. Instrumen pengumpulan data yang digunakan meliputi: (1) angket need assessment; (2) lembar validasi untuk model, perangkat pembelajaran, dan instrumen penilaian; (3) lembar observasi keterlaksanaan model; (4) angket respons peserta didik; (5) angket respons guru, (6) tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan berpikir kreatif; (7) lembar observasi kemampuan kolaborasi; serta (8) angket motivasi belajar matematika. Kelayakan model dievaluasi berdasarkan penilaian para pakar dan praktisi senior menggunakan indeks validitas Aiken. Kepraktisan model dielaborasi berdasarkan hasil observasi keterlaksanaan produk serta respons peserta didik dan guru dengan menggunakan kriteria penilaian ideal. Keefektifan model dianalisis menggunakan statistik uji parametrik yang meliputi: uji-t, One-Way MANOVA, dan n-gain setelah semua asumsi yang dipersyaratkan terpenuhi.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Struktur sintaks model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi terdiri dari enam tahapan, yakni: (a) memulai dengan pertanyaan mendasar yang memuat etnomatematika, (b) merancang skema penyelesaian proyek berbasis etnomatematika, (c) menyusun jadwal penyelesaian proyek, (d) melaksanakan penyelesaian proyek berbasis etnomatematika dengan bantuan teknologi serta memonitor progres dan kinerja peserta didik dalam penyelesaian proyek, (e) menilai hasil pembelajaran, dan (f) merefleksikan pembelajaran. (2) Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi telah dinyatakan layak oleh ahli materi dan ahli model. (3) Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi telah dinyatakan praktis oleh para observer, guru dan peserta didik. (4) Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis proyek terintegrasi etnomatematika dan teknologi efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah, berpikir kreatif, kolaborasi dan motivasi belajar.
date: 2024-05-16
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Program Pascasarjana
department: Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdullah, S. (2017). Ethnomathematics in perspective of Sundanese culture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3877.1-15.
Adiputra, S., & Mujiyati, M. (2017). Motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa di Indonesia: kajian meta-analisis. Konselor, 6(4), 150. https://doi.org/10.24036/02017648171-0-00.
Ahmadi, A. (2010). Psikologi sosial. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Alawi, N. H., & Soh, T. M. T. (2019). The effect of project-based learning (PJBL) on critical thinking skills form four students on dynamic ecosystem topic “vector! oh! vector!” Creative Education, 10(12), 3107–3117. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012235.
Aliftika, O., Purwanto, P., & Utari, S. (2018). Profil keterampilan abad 21 siswa SMA pada pembelajaran project based learning (PJBL) materi gerak lurus. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika). https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/WPF/article/view/20178.
Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009.
Ambrosio, D. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics - An International Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 44–48.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.84.3.261.
Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics curriculum development and the role of problem solving. Australian Curriculum Studies Association Conference.
Arends, R. I. (2000). Classroom instruction and manajement. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Arisetyawan, A., Suryadi, D., Herman, T., & Rahmat, C. (2014). Study of ethnomathematics : A lesson from the Baduy culture. International Journal of Education and Research, 2, 681–688.
278
Arulmoly, C., & Branavan, A. (2017). The impact of academic motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Paddiruppu Educational Zone in the Batticaloa District, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(5), 115–126.
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the teacher training agency, London. In King’s College, Univeristy of London. http://www.mikeaskew.net/page4/files/EffectiveTeachersofNumeracy.pdf.
Babbitt, W., Lachney, M., Bulley, E., & Eglash, R. (2015). Adinkra mathematics: a study of ethnocomputing in Ghana. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2015.1399.
Bahar, a K., & Maker, C. J. (2011). Exploring the relationship between mathematical creativity and mathematical achievement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 3(1), 33–48.
Banfield, J., & Wilkerson, B. (2014). Increasing student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy through gamification pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 7(4), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v7i4.8843.
Bédard, D., Lison, C., Dalle, D., Côté, D., & Boutin, N. (2012). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering and medicine: determinants of students’ engagement and persistance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- Based Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1355.
Belgheis, S. R. (2018). The intention to use geogebra in the teaching of mathematics among Malaysian teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 109–115. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=geogebra&id=EJ1165486.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415.
Bellanca, J. A., & Brandt, R. S. (2015). 21St Century Skills : Rethinking How Students Learn. 375. https://books.google.no/books?hl=no&lr=&id=a.
Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into geometry learning-A lesson from India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a.
279

Bhat, A. M. (2014). Effect of problem solving ability on the achievement in mathematics of high school students. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 4(8), 685–688. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/august2014/195.
Biembengut, M. S. (2016). Mathematical modelling, problem solving , project and ethnomathematics : Confluent points. Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 816–820.
Brandt, A., & Chernoff, E. (2015). The importance of ethnomathematics in the math class. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 71, 31–36.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating student to learn (2nd ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brunkalla, K. (2009). How to increase mathematical creativity - an experiment. Tmme, 6(1&2), 257–266.
Budiyono. (2020). Pengantar penilaian hasil belajar. Surakarta: UNS Press. Carskadon, T. G., McCarley, N. G., & McCaulley, M. H. (1987). Compendium of
research involving the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. 191.
Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709– 712. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.779
Choirul, S. (2020). Konsep, pengertian, dan tujuan kolaborasi. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
Clapham, C., & Nicholson, J. (2009). The concise oxford dictionary of mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
D’Ambrosio, U., & D’Ambrosio, B. S. (2013). The role of ethnomathematics in curricular leadership in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4(1), 12–29.
Dagar, V., & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: a paradigm for teaching and learning. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 7(4).
Danim, S. (2013). Pengantar kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Desmita. (2012). Perkembangan peserta didik. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
280

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning ? Elsevier, 1– 19.
Dogru, M., & Kalender, S. (2007). Applying the subject “cell” through constructivist approach during science lessons and the teacher’s view. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(1), 3–13.
Duncan, K. J. (2020). Examining the effects of immersive game-based learning on student engagement and the development of collaboration, communication, creativity and critical thinking. TechTrends, 64(3), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00500-9.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266.
Ebbutt, S., & Straker, A. (1995). Mathematics in primary schools part i: children and mathematics. London: Collins Educational Publisher Ltd.
Educational Technology Division, M. of E. (2006). Project-based learning handbook “educating the millenial learner.” Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.
Edutopia Staff. (2007). How does project-based learning work? The George Lucas Educational Foundation. http://www.edutopia.org/project-based- learning-guide-implementation#pbl_plan.
Eglash, R. (1997). When math worlds collide: Intention and invention in ethnomathematics. Science Technology and Human Values, 22(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200104
Eglash, R. (2012). How to tell the difference between multicultural mathematics and ethnomathematics. NCTM Annual Meeting.
Eglash, R., Krishnamoorthy, M., Sanchez, J., & Woodbridge, A. (2011). Fractal simulations of African design in pre-college computing education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/2037276.2037281.
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 127–150. http://10.0.30.91/1541- 5015.1339%255.
Fadel, C. (2014). Mathematics for the 21st century: what should students learn? Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesain.
281

Fajriah, N., & Asiskawati, E. (2015). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik di SMP. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i2.643.
Firdaus, E. F. (2019). Pengaruh keaktifan siswa dalam pembelajaran metode probing prompting terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis materi logika. Jes-Mat, 5(2), 137–144.
Fisher, C. (1990). The research agenda project as prologue. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.2307/749459.
Foshay, R., & Kirkley, J. (1998). Principles for teaching problem solving. Eric, 1– 17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED464604.
Freudenthal, H. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305618.
Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2014). New pedagogies for deep learning whitepaper: education plus. Collaborative Impact SPC, 3–9. https://michaelfullan.ca/education-plus/.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: an introduction. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Ganal, N. N., & Guiab, M. R. (2014). Problems and difficulties encountered by students owards mastering learning competencies in mathematics. -Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 5(4), 25–37.
Granberg, C., & Olsson, J. (2015). ICT-supported problem solving and collaborative creative reasoning: Exploring linear functions using dynamic mathematics software. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.11.001.
Gündoğdu, B., & Merç, A. (2021). A systematic review of tech-supported collaborative creativity practices in the field of education. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.953760.
Gutek, G. L. (2013). Philosophical, ideological, and theoretical perspectives on education. London: Pearson.
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520–532.
282

Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772.
Hallowell, M. R., & Gambatese, J. A. (2010). Qualitative research: Application of the delphi method to CEM research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943- 7862.0000137.
Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEM project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271.
Hartini, T. S., & Warmi, A. (2019). Analisis motivasi belajar peserta didik dalam pembelajaran matematika di SMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Sesiomadika, 640–646.
Heafner, T. (2004). Using technology to motivate students to learn social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher, 4(1), 42–53. http://www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss1/socialstudies/article1.cfm.
Heryan, U. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMA melalui pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik berbasis etnomatematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(2), 94–106.
Hidayat, F. N., & Tamimuddin, M. (2015). Pemanfaatan aplikasi geogebra untuk pembelajaran matematika (dasar). Jakarta : Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Hidayati, N. (2019). Collaboration skill of biology students at Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(11), 208–211.
Hidayati, R. M., & Wagiran, W. (2020). Implementation of problem-based learning to improve problem-solving skills in vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i2.31210.
Hikmah, N. H., Yuli, T., Siswono, E., Surabaya, U. N., & Timur, J. (2020). Profil collaborative problem solving siswa kelas IX. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 04(02), 701–710.
Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2005). Combination of dynamic geometry , algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra. Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching Conference 2004. http://www.geogebratube.org/material/show/id/747.
283

Hohenwarter, M., & Hohenwarter, J. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software geogebra calculus with geogebra. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics - TSG 16, 1–9.
Holmes, V. L., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education. Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979911.
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. New Jersey: Pearson.
Hurlock B, E. (1978). Perkembangan anak jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga
Ina V.S. Mullis, Michael O. Martin, Pierre Foy, and A. A. (2012). Timss 2011 International Results in Mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, 2012(136), 7–11. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3295935&tool=p mcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
Istiqomah. (2020). Transformasi geometri matematika umum kelas XI. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan.
Jaenudin, D., Kurniasih, S., & Amalia, G. R. (2020). Improving students ability in problem solving and creativity through project-based learning. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200513.058.
Jalinus, N. (2017). Implementation of the pjbl model to enhance problem solving skill and skill competency of community college student. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(3), 304–311.
Johnson, H. L., & McClintock, E. (2018). A link between students’ discernment of variation in unidirectional change and their use of quantitative variational reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9799-7.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2003). Models of teaching. New Jersey: Printice Hall Inc.
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Student difficulties in solving equations from an operational and a structural perspective. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1–2), 39–55.
Kaldi, S., Filippatou, D., & Govaris, C. (2011). Project-based learning in primary schools: Effects on pupils’ learning and attitudes. Education 3-13, 39(1), 35– 47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903179538.
284

Kartini, F. S., Widodo, A., Winarno, N., & Astuti, L. (2021). Promoting student’s problem-solving skills through STEM project-based learning in earth layer and disasters topic. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.27555.
Katsap, A., & Silverman, F. L. R. (2008). A case study of the role of ethnomathematics among teacher education students from highly diverse cultural backgrounds. The Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 3(1), 66– 102.
Khikmah, N., & Sabrina, F. P. (2021). Etnomatematika dalam motif batik jlamprang kota Pekalongan sebagai penerapan konsep geometri transformasi. ProSANDIKA UNIKAL (Prosiding .... https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/544%250Ahtt ps://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/download/544/419.
Khofifah, L., Sugiarti, T., & Setiawan, T. B. (2018). Etnomatematika karya seni batik khas suku osing Banyuwangi sebagai bahan lembar kerja siswa materi geometri transformasi. Kadikma, 9(3), 148–159. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/11066/6702.
Kllogjeri, P. (2015). GeoGebra in teaching and learning mathematics in albanian secondary schools geogebra in teaching and learning mathematics in albanian secondary schools.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733.
Koutrouba, K., & Karageorgou, E. (2013). Cognitive and socio-affective outcomes of project-based learning: Perceptions of Greek Second Chance School students. Improving Schools, 16(3), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213501062.
Koyan, I. W. (2007). Statistik pendidikan, teknik analisis data kuantitatif. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Press.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration : a literature review research report. Research Reports, April, 41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069464.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2011). The main course, not dessert: How are students reaching 21st century goals with 21st century project based learning? Buck Institute for Education, l, 1–4. https://www.cisd.org/cms/lib6/TX01917765/Centricity/Domain/162/Main_C ourse.pdf.
285

Lattimer, H., & Riordan, R. (2011). Project-based learning engages students in meaningful work. Middle School Journal, 43(2), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461797.
Lawrence, C. L. (2002). Communication Technology to develop collaborative skills. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.2190/hwyc-qga8-5aqq-jhbp.
Learning Sciences International. (2015). Collaborative work skills rubric.
International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English.
Lee, I. (2010). The Effect of learning motivation , total quality teaching and peer- assisted learning on study achievement : empirical analysis from Vocational universities or colleges’ students in Taiwan. Adult Learning, 6(December), 56–74.
Lefoe, G. (1998). Creating constructivist learning environments on the web:the challenge in higher education. Ascilite98, 453–464. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/wollongong98/asc98- pdf/lefoe00162.pdf.
Ligorio, M. B. (2010). Dialogical relationship between identity and learning. Culture and Psychology, 16(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X09353206.
Litwin, M. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. London: Sage Publications.
Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, C. H. (2010). The survey study of mathematics motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MMSLQ) for grade 10-12 Taiwanese students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 221–233.
Ma’rup. (2014). Pembelajaran matematika berbasis budaya Bugis-Makassar di Kelas V SD Negeri No.141 Pakka Kabupaten Sinjai. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan FKIP Unismuh Makassar, 1(2), 102–114.
Mahendra, I. W. E. (2017). Project based learning bermuatan etnomatematika dalam pembelajar matematika. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9257.
Maheswari D, V., & Benjamin, A. E. W. (2015). Problem solving ability and academic achievement in mathematics of vii standard students in Madurai District. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5(2), 166–168.
Maija, A., & Haatainen, O. (2019). Project-Based Learning (PBL) in practise active teachers’ views of its’ advantages and challenges. Integrated Education for the Real World, June, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11330-2.
286

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Manullang, S., Kristianto, A., Hutapea, T. A., Sinaga, L. P., Bornok, S., Mangaratua Marianus, & Sinambela, P. N. J. M. (2017). Matematika SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta : Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Marsigit, Ilham, R., & Murdiyani, M. . (2015). Filsafat matematika. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Massarwe, K., Bshouty, D., & Verner, I. M. (2012). Ethnomathematics and multi- cultural education : analysis and construction of geometric ornaments. Journal of Mathematics & Culture.
McIntosh, R., Jarrett, D., & Peixotto, K. (2000). Teaching mathematical problem solving: Implementing the vision. Journal of Mathematics and .... http://cimm.ucr.ac.cr/ciaemFrances/articulos/universitario/conocimiento/Tea ching Mathematical Problem Solving: Implementing the Vision*McIntosh, Robert .
Medlyn Claudyasuka Patari, Jeni Stefvia, & Saidati, S. (2022). Penggunaan aplikasi messenger pada etnomatematika bangun ruang di SMA Negeri 1 Nanga Mahap. JUPENJI : Jurnal Pendidikan Jompa Indonesia, 1(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.55784/jupenji.vol1.iss1.142.
Miarso, Y. (2007). Menyemai benih teknologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Mila Kudsiyah, S., Novarina, E., & Suryani Lukman, H. (2017). Faktor - faktor yang mempengaruhi kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika kelas X di SMA Negeri 2 Kota Sukabumi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan 2017, 110– 117.
Moma, L. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis untuk siswa SMP. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 27–41. http://ejournal.unkhair.ac.id/index.php/deltapi/article/view/142.
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, inc.
Mosley, L., & Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. International Journal, 61(3), 771. https://doi.org/10.2307/40204208.
Mullis, I. V. ., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international- results/timss-2015/mathematics/student-achievement.
Mulyasa. (2005). Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya. 287

Munandar, U. (1995). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muwahiddah, U., Asikin, M., & Mariani, S. (2018). Project based learning berbasis etnomatematika berbantuan augmented reality untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah geometri. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan 2018, 22, 157–164.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. United States of America : The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Netwong, T. (2018). Development of problem solving skills by integration learning following STEM education for higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(9), 639–643. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.9.1114.
Nurafiah, V., Utari, S., & Liliawati, W. (2018). Profil keterampilan abad 21 siswa SMA pada project based learning (pjbl) materi tegangan permukaan. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v4i2.20176.
OECD. (2016). Pisa 2015 results excellence and equity in education: Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490- en.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, July, 131–188. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-8-en.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results. OECD Publishing, III, 1–10. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf
Ogunkunle, R. A., Harcourt, P., Harcourt, P., George, N. R., & Ed, M. (2015). Integrating ethnomathematics into secondary school mathematics curriculum for effective artisan creative skill development. European Scientific Journal, 11(3), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2015.v11n3p%p.
Ontario Public Service. (2016). 21 century competencies. Towards Def Ining 21s t Century Competencies for Ontario, 1–66. http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/21stCenturyLearning/21CL_21stCen turyCompetencies.pdf.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkis, F. (2018). Curriculum: foundations principles, and issues. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
288

Özcan, Z. Ç. (2016). The relationship between mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning through homework behaviours, motivation, and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1080313.
P21. (2015). Partnership for 21st century learning. In Partnership for 21st Century Learning.
Panhuizen, M. V. den H. (1998). Realistic mathematics education: work in progress. theory into practice in mathematics education. Kristiansand, Norway: Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences. http://www.fi.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/4966.pdf.
Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom. revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9502-0.
Pearlman, B., & Thomas, J. W. (2000). Home project-based learning 21st century learning a review of research on project-based learning. http://www.bie.org/research/study/review_of_project_based_learning_2000.
Perdana, D. C., & Isrokatun, I. (2019). Problem-based learning and ethnomathematics on mathematical understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1318/1/012134.
Petrosino, A. J. (2004). Integrating curriculum, instruction, and assessment in project-based instruction: A case study of an experienced teacher. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(4), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-004-1466-y.
Pfeiffer, C. (2017). A study of the development of mathematical knowledge in a geogebra- focused learning environment. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/102718.
Pifarré, M. (2019). Using interactive technologies to promote a dialogic space for creating collaboratively: A study in secondary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.01.004.
Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchale, P. (2009). Factors influencing mathematic problem-solving ability of sixth grade students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.381.385.
289

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.95.4.667.
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/ED338122.
Plucker, J., & Zabelina, D. (2009). Creativity and interdisciplinarity: One creativity or many creativities? ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0155-3.
Polgar, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2020). Introduction to research in the health sciences. LOndon: Elsevier.
Polya, G. (1988). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PPPPTK Matematika. (2011). Peran, fungsi, tujuan, dan karakteristik matematika sekolah. 5 Oktober. https://p4tkmatematika.org/2011/10/peran-fungsi-tujuan- dan-karakteristik-matematika-sekolah/.
Presmeg, N. (1998). Ethnomathematics in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009946219294.
Purwanto, N. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Ramadhani, T., Koryati, D., & . D. (2016). Analisis model dan media pembelajaran yang digunakan oleh guru pada mata pelajaran ekonomi di SMA Se-Kecamatan Inderalaya. Jurnal PROFIT Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 34–45.
Raniah, D., Efendi, R., Liliawati, W., Studi, P., Fisika, P., Matematika, P., Ilmu, D., & Alam, P. (2018). Profil keterampilan abad 21 pada pembelajaran project based learning (pjbl) materi gelombang bunyi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (SINAFI) 2018, 4(1), 19–24.
Ratuanik, M., & Nay, F. (2017). Study of project based learning with scientific approach of ethnomathematic to improve problem. Proceedings The 2017 International Conference on Research in Education - Sanata Dharma University, 241–256.
290

Ravitz, J. (2010). Beyond changing culture in small high schools: Reform models and changing instruction with project-based learning. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(3), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2010.491432.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penilaian(panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers’ strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10317a.
Risdiyanti, I., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). Ethnomathematics: Exploration in Javanese culture. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012032.
Rizka, S., & Mastur, Z. (2014). Model project based learning bermuatan etnomatematika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi matematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 3(2).
Rizkiyah, Z. R., Hariyadi, S., & Novenda, I. (2020). The influence of project based learning models on science technology, engineering and mathematics approach to collaborative skills and learning results of student. ScienceEdu, 3(2), 1–6.
Rizqi, A. A., Yusmansyah, & Mayasari, S. (2018). faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi belajar. Jurnal FKIP Universitas, 1.
Rohman, A., & Karimah, S. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi rendahnya motivasi belajar siswa kelas XI. At-Taqaddum, 10(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v10i1.2651.
Rosa, M., D’Ambr sio, U., Orey, D. C., Shirley, L., Alangui, W. V., Palhares, P., & Gavarrete, M. E. (2016). Current and future perspectives of ethnomathematics as a program. ICME-13 Topical Surveys, 45. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30120-4.
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. (2011). Ethnomathematics: the cultural aspects of mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 4(2), 32–54. http://www.revista.etnomatematica.org/index.php/RLE/article/view/32.
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2016). Innovative approaches in ethnomathematics. ... Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics As a Program.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5.
291

Roy, S., Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2017). Multimedia resources designed to support learning from written proofs: an eye-movement study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017- 9754-7.
Ruseffendi, E. T. (2006). Pengantar kepada membantu guru mengembangkan kompetensinya dalam pengajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.
Rusman. (2010). Model-model pembelajaran: mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Rustad, M., & Andersen, R. (2022). Using Minecraft as an educational tool for supporting collaboration as a 21st century skill. Computers and Education Open, 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100094.
Sabrina, R., Fauzi, & Yamin, M. (2017). Faktor-Faktor penyebab rendahnya motivasi belajar siswa dalam proses pembelajaran matematika di kelas V SD Negeri Garot Geuceu Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2, 108–118.
Sagala, S. (2009). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Saha, R. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). The effects of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: Enlightening Coordinate Geometry learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.095.
Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2006). Developmental variation in children’s creative mathematical thinking as a function of schooling, age, and knowledge. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_5.
Sanjaya, W. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada media.
Santrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan anak. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.
Saragih, S., Napitupulu, E. E., & Fauzi, A. (2017). Developing learning model based on local culture and instrument for mathematical higher order thinking ability. International Education Studies, 10(6), 114. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p114.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics learning to think mathematically. In Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (Vol. 196, Issue 2). New York: MacMillan. http://www.docbenton.com/Schoenfeld/Schoenfeld_MathThinking.pdf.
292

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories. New Jersey: Printice Hall Inc.
Seah, E. K. (2005). Analysis of students’ difficulties in solving integration problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 39–59. http://math.nie.edu.sg/ame/matheduc/journal/v9_1/v91_39.aspx.
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of World Poverty. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345727.n229.
Serin, H. (2019). Project based learning in mathematics context. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p232.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715.
Shadiq, F. (2012). Kemahiran matematika. In Diklat Instruktur Pengembang Matematika SMA Jenjang Lanjut. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika. https://mgmpmatsatapmalang.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/smalanjut- kemahiran-fadjar.pdf.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 29(3), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997- 0003-x.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.151.
Skinner, R., Nelson, R. R., Chin, W. W., & Land, L. (2015). The Delphi method research strategy in studies of information systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 31–63. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03702.
Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allin and Bacob Publisher.
Soedjadi, R. (2000). Kiat pendidikan matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sudirman, Rosyadi, & Lestari, W. D. (2017). Penggunaan etnomatematika pada karya seni batik Indramayu dalam pembelajaran geometri transformasi. Pedagogy, 2(1), 74–85.
293

Sugiman. (2009). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa SMP: problematika dan cara melatihnya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, 531–538.
Suhendri, H., Anawati, S., & Nurhayati. (2014). Analisis pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan model pembelajaran konstruktif berbasis penemuan terbimbing di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Se-Jakarta Selatan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Siliwangi, 2, 101–106.
Suherman, E. dkk. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sulaiman. (2021). Meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika dengan project based learning di SMA Negeri 1 Binjai. Journal Mathematics Education Sigma [JMES]. https://doi.org/10.30596/jmes.v2i1.6747.
Surya, E. (2013). Analisis pemetaan dan pengembangan model pembelajaran matematika SMA di Kabupaten Tapteng dan kota Sibolga Sumatera Utara. Paradikma Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 75–88.
Švecová, V., Rumanová, L., & Pavlovičová, G. (2014). Support of pupil’s creative thinking in mathematical education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1715–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.461
Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2013). School mathematics and creativity at the elementary and middle-grade levels: How are they related? ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0471-5.
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020.
Tauber, R. T. (2007). Classroom management: sound theory and effective practice. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Terrón-López, M. J., García-García, M. J., Velasco-Quintana, P. J., Ocampo, J., Vigil Montaño, M. R., & Gaya-López, M. C. (2017). Implementation of a project-based engineering school: increasing student motivation and relevant learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 618–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1209462.
294

Tias, A. A. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2015). Analisis kesulitan siswa SMA dalam pemecahan masalah matematika kelas XII IPA di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7148.
Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148.
Tossavainen, T., & Faarinen, E. C. (2019). Swedish fifth and sixth graders’ motivational values and the use of ict in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108533.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: a model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction. In Netherland: Springer-Netherland. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05957-0_4.
Utami, R. P., Probosari, R. M., & Fatmawati, U. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran project based learning berbantu instagram terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 8 Surakarta. Bio- Pedagogi, 4(1), 46–52.
Uyangör, S. M. (2012). The effect of project-based learning on teaching of polygon and plane geometry unit. New Educational Review, 29(3), 212–226.
Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2015). Mathematics creativity in elementary teacher training. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10, 101–109.
Verner, I., Massarwe, K., & Bshouty, D. (2013). Constructs of engagement emerging in an ethnomathematically-based teacher education course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.06.002.
Wagner, T. (2008). The Global achievement gap : Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need--and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.
Wahida, F., Rahman, N., & Gonggo, T. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif dan hasil belajar siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Parigi. Sains Dan Teknologi Tadulako, 4(3), 36–43.
Walia, P. (2012). Achievement in relation to mathematical creativity of eighth grade students. Indian Streams Research Journal, 2(Ii), 1–4.
Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The perceptions of teachers and students on a 21 st century mathematics instructional model. IEJME - Mathematics Education, 12(2), 193–215.
295

Wheeler, S., Waite, S. J., & Bromfield, C. (2002). Promoting creative thinking through the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 367– 378. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00247.x.
Whitcombe, A. (2014). Mathematics creativity, imagination, beauty. Mathematics in School, 17(2), 13–15. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/3021444.
Wicaksono, P. N., & Purnomo, A. (2021). Analisis model-model pembelajaran yang digunakan oleh guru IPS di SMP negeri se-kecamatan Sukorejo kabupaten Kendal. Sosiolium: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPS, 3(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.15294/sosiolium.v3i1.45464.
Xu, Y., & Liu, W. (2010). A project-based learning approach: A case study in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9093-1.
Yanti, D., & Haji, S. (2019). Studi tentang konsep-konsep transformasi geometri pada kain besurek Bengkulu. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i2.1744.
Yusra, D., & Saragih, S. (2016). The profile of communication mathematics and students’ motivation by joyful learning-based learning context Malay culture. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 15(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2016/25521.
Zakaria, E., & Nordin, N. M. (2008). The effects of mathematics anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75303.
Zakaria, E., & Salleh, T. S. (2015). Using technology in learning integral calculus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5S1), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p144.
Zeeshan, K., Watanabe, C., & Neittaanmaki, P. (2021). Problem-solving skill development through STEM learning approaches. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2021-Octob. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637226.
Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038.
296

Zhou, M., & Brown, D. (2017). Educational learning theories: 2nd Edition. In Education Open Textbooks. https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education- textbooks/1.
Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The effect of using GeoGebra on conceptual and procedural knowledge of high school mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p102.
citation:   Wawan, Wawan and Retnawati, Heri  (2024) Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terintegrasi Etnomatematika dan Teknologi dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah, Berpikir Kreatif, Kolaborasi, dan Motivasi.  S3 thesis, Sekolah Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/82516/1/disertasi_wawan_17703261038.pdf