eprintid: 79618
rev_number: 9
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/96/18
datestamp: 2023-11-23 03:45:03
lastmod: 2023-11-23 03:45:03
status_changed: 2023-11-23 03:45:03
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Ulfah, Aulia Hermawati
creators_name: Supahar, Supahar
title: Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi SMA.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D2
subjects: F1
divisions: pps_lit_evazdik
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: biologi, keterampilan proses sains, penilaian kinerja
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1) mengkonstruksi instrumen penilaian kinerja keterampilan proses sains peserta didik SMA pada mata pelajaran Biologi, 2) mengungkapkan karakteristik butir instrumen penilaian kinerja keterampilan proses sains peserta didik SMA pada mata pelajaran Biologi, dan 3) mengungkapkan profil keterampilan proses sains peserta didik pada mata pelajaran Biologi.
Penelitian pengembangan ini menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE (analyze, design, develop, implement, dan evaluate) dengan penggabungan bersama langkah-langkah pengembangan instrumen menurut Mardapi (2016). Tahap analyze terdiri dari analisis kebutuhan dan kajian teori yang relevan terkait instrumen yang dikembangkan; tahap design meliputi penyusunan tujuan serta kisi-kisi instrumen, serta penentuan skala penilaian dan sistem penskoran; tahap develop terdiri dari penulisan butir soal, validasi isi, uji coba instrumen, analisis hasil uji coba, dan merakit kembali instrumen; tahap implement terdiri dari pengukuran dan menafsirkan hasil pengukuran; serta tahap evaluate yaitu menganalisis dan menyimpulkan kelayakan instrumen baik sebelum dan sesudah implemtasi. Uji coba instrumen melibatkan 415 peserta didik yang telah mempelajari Bab Plantae dari empat SMA di Kabupaten Sumedang, sedangkan pengukuran melibatkan 65 peserta didik kelas 10 SMAN Cimanggung. Validasi isi dilakukan oleh expert dengan menggunakan validasi Aiken’s V, sedangkan validasi konstruk dibuktikan melalui Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Karakteristik butir dianalisis menggunakan teori respons butir model GPCM (Generalized Partial Credit Model).
Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Konstruksi instrumen penilaian kinerja keterampilan proses sains yang dikembangkan terdiri dari 31 butir soal pilihan majemuk. Instrumen penilaian yang dikembangkan mengukur keterampilan mengamati, menginferensi, memprediksi, mengukur, mengklasifikasi, mengkomunikasi, menginterpretasi dan mendesain penyelidikan. (2) Karakteristik butir instrumen yang dikembangkan tersebut memiliki kualitas yang baik berdasarkan uji validasi isi dan validasi konstruk, keandalan instrumen, item fit, dan analisis teori respons butir model GPCM. Instrumen tersebut valid, andal, dan dapat digunakan untuk mengukur keterampilan proses sains peserta didik pada kemampuan rendah, sedang, dan tinggi. (3) Keterampilan proses sains peserta didik SMAN Cimanggung masuk kategori rendah (11%), sedang (75%), dan tinggi (14%).
date: 2023-08-02
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Pascasarjana
department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Abduh, M. (2019). Model penilaian formatif pada pembelajaran abad ke-21 untuk sekolah dasar. Pusat Penelitian Pendidikan.
Abell, S., Martini, M., & George, M. (2001). “That’s what scientists have to do”: preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. Internasional Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069001002504
Agus Kurniawan, D., Putri Wirman, R., Wulan Dari, R., & Yuhanis, E. (2020). Description of student science process skills on temperature and heat practicum. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep
Aida, N., Kusaeri, K., & Saepul Hamdani, A. (2017). Karakteristik instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika ranah kognitif yang dikembangkan mengacu pada model Pisa. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i2.3897
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Cole Publishing Company.
Al-Rabaani, A. (2014). The acquisition of science process skillsby omani’s pre- servise social studies’ teachers. European Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 13–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343224121
Anwar, R. K., Rizal, E., & Saepudin, E. (2015). Kemamppuan literasi informasi siswa tentang apotek hidup berbasis individual competence framework. 3(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v3i1.9486
Asrial, Syahrial, Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., & Nugroho, P. (2019). Supporting Technology 4.0: Ethoconstructivist multimedia for elementary schools. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 15(14), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11365
Asrizal, Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613
Bailer, J., Ramig, J. E., & Ramsey, J. M. (1995). Teaching process skills. Good Apple.
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
161
Bass, J. E., Contant, T. L., & Carin, A. A. (2009). Teaching scienceas inquiry (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Baxter, G. P., & Shavelsons, R. J. (1994). Science performance assessments: benchmarks and surrogates. Internasional Journal of Educational Research, 21, 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80020-0
Bichi, A. A., Ibrahim, R. H., & Ibrahim, F. B. (2019). Assessment of students performances in biology: Implication for measurements and evaluation of learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i3.12200
Brown, G. T., Irving, S. E., & Keegan, P. J. (2014). An introduction to educational assessment, measurement and evaluation (3rd ed.). Dunmore Publishing.
Chakraborty, D., & Kidman, G. (2021). Inquiry process skills in primary science textbooks: authors and publishers’ Intentions. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09996-4
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary school (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Clauser, B. E. (2000). Recurrent issues and recent advances in scoring performance assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 310– 324. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210022031778
Darmawan, E., Yusnaeni, Ismirawati, N., & Riswanto, R. H. (2021). Strategi belajar mengajar Biologi. Pustaka Rumah C1nta.
de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. The Guilford Press.
Deta, U. A., Prakoso, I., Agustina, P. Z. R., Fadillah, R. N., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., Admoko, S., Zainuddin, A., Nurlailiyah, A., & Prahani, B. K. (2020). Science process skills profile of non-science undergraduate student in universitas negeri surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012067
Ekici, M., & Erdem, M. (2020). Developing science process skills through mobile scientific inquiry. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100658
Elfrida, E., Nursamsu, N., & Ariska, R. N. (2021). Development of performance assessment instruments through practical learning to improve science process skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.867
162

Elmore, R. F. (2019). The future of learning and the future of assessment. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119878962
Evendi, Susanna, K., & Nurulwati. (2020). Effectiveness of a question web-based learning model to improve students’ science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1460/1/012110
Farach, N., Kartimi, & Mulyani, A. (2021). Application of performance assessment in STEM-based biological learning to improve student’s science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012220
Fitrianingrum, H., & Noor, M. F. (2022). Science process skills students on cells and tissues concept during the covid-19 pandemic: How did it achieve? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2157(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012041
Gillies, R. M., & Nichols, K. (2015). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9418-x
Gruijter, D. N. de, & Kamp, L. J. T. van der. (2008). Statistical test theory for the behavioral sciences. Taylor & Francis Group.
Gultepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of scientific process skills in the context of teaching chemistry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 111– 132. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.234a
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anserson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Haka, N. B., Hamid, A., Puspita, L., Widiawati, N., Reftyawati, D., & Anggraini, W. (2021). The analysis of the ability of preservice teachers in compiling an analysis rubric for learning performance assessments. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012025
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
163

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminatan, H., & Rogers, J. H. (1991). Fundamental of item response theory. Sage Publications, Inc.
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044
Hibbard, M. (n.d.). Performance assessment in the science classroom. Glencoe McGraw-Hill.
Hırça, N. (2013). The influence of hands on physics experiments on scientific process skills according to prospective teachers’ experiences. European J of Physics Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20308/EJPE.35918
Houtz, B. (2010). Teaching science today. Corinne Burton.
Ilma, A. Z., Adhelacahya, K., & Ekawati, E. Y. (2021). Assessment for learning model in competency assessment of 21st century student assisted by google classroom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012005
Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Widjajanti, E., & Suyanta. (2017). Students’ science process skill and analytical thinking ability in chemistry learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995100
Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian dan analisis hasil belajar Fisika dengan teori tes klasik dan modern (2nd ed.). UNY Press.
Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2006). Method for teaching promoting student learning in K12 Classrooms. Pearcon education.
Joint Information Systems Committee. (2020). The future of assessment: five principles, five targets for 2025. https://beta.jisc.ac.uk/reports/the-future-of- assessment-five-principles-five-targets-for-2025
Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011). Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Using I Diagrams. In Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ (Vol. 3, Issue 1). http://www.eurasianjournals.com/index.php/ejpce
Kartowagiran, B., Mardapi, D., Purnama, D. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2019). Parallel tests viewed from the arrangement of item numbers and alternative answers. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.23721
Kaymakcı, G., & Can, Ş. (2021). Investigation of the effects of some variables on middle school students’ problem-solving skills, science process skills and learning styles. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(1), 394–426. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.334.21
 164

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 20 tahun 2016, tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 22 tahun 2016, tentang Standar Proses.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 23 tahun 2016, tentang Standar Penilaian.
Kemendikbud-Ristek. (2022). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Nomor 16 Tahun 2022, tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Kemendikbud-Ristek. (2022). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Nomor 21 Tahun 2022, tentang Standar Penilaian pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Kemendikbud-Ristek. (2022). SK Kepala BSKAP No. 8 Tahun 2022, tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Khamhaengpol, A., Sriprom, M., & Chuamchaitrakool, P. (2021). Development of STEAM activity on nanotechnology to determine basic science process skills and engineering design process for high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2021.100796
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Kriswantoro, Kartowagiran, B., & Rohaeti, E. (2021). A critical thinking assessment model integrated with science process skills on chemistry for senior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 285– 298. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.285
Kruit, P., Oostdam, R., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. (2020). Performance assessment as a diagnostic tool for science teachers. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1093–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9
Kurniawati, A. (2021). Science process skills and its implementation in the process of science learning evaluation in schools. Atik Kurniawati/ JSER, 2021(2), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v5i2.44269
Kurpius, S. E. R., & Stafford, M. E. (2006). Testing and measurement a used- friendly guide. Sage Publications, Inc.
165

Kusnandar. (2014). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013) Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics,Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18404/IJEMST.19784
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Penelitian pendidikan matematika. PT Refika Aditama.
Maison, M., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Dewi, U. P., & Kartina, L. (2019). Analysis of science process skills in physics education students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.28123
Mardapi, D. (2016). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Parama publishing.
Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M. , Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., & Kusuma, I. P. I. (2017). Asesmen autentik dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Martin, D. J. (2009). Elementary science methods a constructivist approach (5th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Martin, R., Sexton, C., & Franklin, T. (2005). Teaching science for all children: inquiry methods for constructing understanding.
Minalisa, M., Festiyed, & Ratnawulan. (2019). The development of performance assessment of inquiry-based learning (IBL) to improve student’s science process skill of class XI Senior High School 1 Bayang. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1185/1/012134
National Education Association. (2021). Principles for the futur of assessment.
Nurdini, Y., Wulan, A. R., & Diana, S. (2020). Assessment for learning through written feedback to develop 21st-century critical thinking skills on plantae learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042019
Oriondo, L. L., & Dallo-Antonio. (1998). Evaluating educational outcomes (test, measurement, and evaluation) (3rd ed.). REX Printing Company.
166

Pine, J., & Baxter, G. P. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0404_7
Purnama Wati, H., & Wulandari, S. (2016). Upaya meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains dan mengurangi miskonsepsi melalui penerapan e-module berbasis problem-based learning kelas X mia 2 SMA Batik 1 Surakarta. Bio- Pedagogi, 5(1), 32–37.
Putro, B. L., Waslaluddin, Putra, R. R. J., & Rahman, E. F. (2019). Creative learning model as implementation of curriculum 2013 to achieve 21st century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032034
Radinsky, J., & Tabak, I. (2016). Constructions of the self as learner: perspective- taking and positioning in mathematics, history, and science learning. In Journal of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 25, Issue 3, pp. 331–334). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1203621
Ratnasari, D., Sukarmin, S., & Suparmi, S. (2017). Analisis implementasi instrumen two-tier multiple choice untuk mengukur keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v2i2.627
Restiana, & Djukri. (2021). Effectiveness of learning models for improving science process skills: A review study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012046
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respon butir dan penerapannya. www.nuhamedika.gu.ma
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometri). Parama Publishing.
Rezba, R. J., Sprague, C. R., McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (1995). Learning and assessing science process skills (3rd ed.). Hunt Publishing Company.
Rifatul Mahmudah, I., Makiyah, Y. S., & Sulistyaningsih, D. (2019). Profil keterampilan proses sains (KPS) siswa SMA di Kota Bandung. Diffraction, 1(1), 39–43.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Rhetoric and Reality in Science Performance Assessments: An Update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1045–1063.
Sahhyar, S., & Hastini Nst, F. (2017). The effect of scientific inquiry learning model based on conceptual change on physics cognitive competence and
167

science process skill (SPS) of students at senior high school. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 120–126. www.iiste.org
Saido, G. M., Siraj, S., & Saadallah, O. (2015). Higher order thinking skills among secondary school students in science learning. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 13–20. https://mojes.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/12778/8203
Salvin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology: theory and practice. Pearson Education.
Samritin, S., & Suryanto, S. (2016). Developing an assessment instrument of junior high school students’ higher order thinking skills in mathematics. Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8268
Sheeba, M. N. (2013). An anatomy of science process skills in the light of the challenges to realize science instruction leading to global excellence in education. Educationia Confab.
Siahaan, P., Suryani, A., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills through Simple Computer Simulations on Linear Motion Conceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012017
Srirahayu, R. Y., & Arty, I. S. (2019). Development of experiment performance assessment instruments using guided inquiry learning models to assess science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012075
Supahar, S., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja kemampuan inkuiri peserta didik pada mata pelajaran Fisika SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4560
Suratno, S., & Kurniati, D. (2017). Implementasi model pembelajaran math- science berbasis performance assessment untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa di daerah perkebunan kopi Jember. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.11799
Tanfiziyah, R., Akbar, B., & Anugerah, D. (2021). Development instrument science process skills biology for Junior High School. Edubiotik : Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 6(01), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v6i01.884
Teluma, M., & Rivaie, W. (2019). Penilaian pembelajaran. PGRI Prov Kalbar. 168

van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6
Wahyuni Salosso, S., & Kusumawarnadi, R. (2018). Analisis keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA melalui penerapan model pembelajaran learning cycle 5e pada pokok bahasan larutan asam dan basa. Bivalen: Chemical Studies Journal Maret, 1(1), 45–50. http://jurnal.fkip.unmul.ac.id/index.php/bivalen
Wilson, S., Heidi, S., & Natalie, N. (2015). Science teachers’ learning: enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. National Academies Press.
Yakob, M., Hamdani, H., Sari, R. P., Haji, A. G., & Nahadi, N. (2021). Implementation of performance assessment in stem-based science learning to improve students’ habits of mind. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 624–631. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21084
Yamin, S. (2021). SmartPLS 3, AMOS, & STATA Olah data statistik (mudah & praktis). Dewangga Energi Internasional.
Yunianti, A. U., Wasis, & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of guided inquiry learning model to improve science process skill on heat matter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1417/1/012080
Zi Yan, T. G. B., & Heene, M. (2021). Applying the rasch model fundamental measurement in the human sciences (4th ed.). Routledge.
Ziraluo, Y. P. B. (2021). Pembelajaran Biologi implementasi dan pengembangan. Forum Pemuda Aswaja.
Zuhera, Y., & Habibah, S. (2017). Kendala guru dalam memberikan penilaian terhadap sikap siswa dalam proses pembelajaran berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri 14 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar , 2(1), 73–87.
citation:   Ulfah, Aulia Hermawati and Supahar, Supahar  (2023) Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi SMA.  S2 thesis, Sekolah Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/79618/1/tesis-aulia%20hermawati%20ulfah-21701251014.pdf