eprintid: 79603
rev_number: 8
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/96/03
datestamp: 2023-11-23 03:14:04
lastmod: 2023-11-23 03:14:04
status_changed: 2023-11-23 03:14:04
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Setyorini, Arifah Indah
creators_name: Haryanto, Haryanto
title: Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Matematika untuk Peserta Didik Kelas VIII Jenjang SMP.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D2
divisions: pps_lit_evazdik
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: berpikir tingkat tinggi, matematika, tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan: (1) konstruk tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada mata pelajaran matematika, (2) kualitas soal tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi, dan (3) hasil tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi peserta didik SMP di Kota Yogyakarta pada mata pelajaran matematika.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan yang prosedur pengembangannya menggunakan kombinasi prosedur pengembangan tes yang dikembangkan oleh Retnawati (2016) dan oleh Mardapi (2017) yang terdiri atas 11 langkah yaitu: (1) menentukan tujuan penyusunan instrumen tes, (2)mencari teori yang relevan sesuai cakupan materi, (3) menyusun indikator butir soal, (4) menyusun butir instrumen, (5) memvalidasi instrumen, (6) melakukan uji coba tes, (7) melakukan analisis butir tes, (8) memperbaiki tes, (9) merakit instrumen tes, (10) melaksanakan tes, dan (11) interpretasi hasil tes. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP negeri di Kota Yogyakarta. Instrumen utamanya adalah tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi dan instrumen pendukungnya lembar validasi. Analisa data menggunakan V Aiken untuk mengecek tingkat validitas isi tes, analisis EFA untuk mengecek tingkat validitas konstruk tes, estimasi reliabilitas instrumen menggunakan SPSS 22, dan uji PCM untuk menganalisis kualitas butir soal.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Konstruk tes yang dikembangkan disusun berdasarkan kata kerja operasional yang disesuaikan indikatorlevel HOTS. (2) Tes yang dikembangkan tersebut memenuhi validitas isi dengan nilai V Aiken, yaitu 0,95 (kategori sangat tinggi) dan memenuhi validitas konstruk dengan nilai persentase varians sebesar 41,241%. Estimasi reliabilitas Cronbach’s Alpha memenuhi kriteria sangat reliabel dengan nilai 0,919. (3) Kualitas butir memenuhi uji asumsi IRT unidimensi dengan persentase kumulatif sebesar41,241% dan memenuhi uji invariansi parameter dengan nilai koefisien korelasi R2= 0,9172 sehingga tes cocok dengan model PCM. Hasil tes menunjukkan kemampuan 117 siswa (42,86%) dalam kategori sangat tinggi, 32 siswa (11,72%) dalam kategori tinggi, 41 siswa (15,02%) dalam kategori sedang, 39 siswa (14,29%) dalam kategori rendah, dan 44 siswa (16,12%) dalam kategori sangat rendah.
date: 2023-07-31
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Pascasarjana
department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Abidin, M., & Retnawati, H. (2019). A diagnosis of difficulties in answering questions of circle material on junior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16454
Aida, N., Kusaeri, & Hamdani, A. S. (2017). Karakteristik Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika Ranah Kognitif yang Dikembangkan Mengacu pada Model Pisa. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130–139.
Aini, D. F. N., & Sulistyani, N. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian E-Quiz (Electronic Quiz) Matematika Berbasis HOTS (Higher of Order Thinking Skills) untuk Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 1– 10. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v3i2.137
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1991). Introduction to Measurment Theory. California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
Amile, & Reesnes. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Yogyakarta: Literasi Nusantara.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Asessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (A Bridged). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl - A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing.pdf
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2017). Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Andrews, P., Ryve, A., & Hemmi, K. (2014). PISA , TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching : an enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9545-3
Arafah, K., Amin, B. D., Sari, S. S., & Hakim, A. (2021). The Development of Higher Order-Thinking Skills (HOTS) Instrument Assessment in Physics Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012140
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos 7.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills Matematika Siswa SMA Kelas X. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14058
Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestary, R., & Zamroni. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Ketrampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Asrul, Ananda, R., & Rosinta. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. In Ciptapustaka Media. Bandung : Citapustaka Media.

Asysyifa, D. S., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analysis of Students Critical Thinking Skills Using Partial Credit Models (PCM) in Physics Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518068
Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 4). Pustaka Pelajar.
Barnett, J. E., & Francis, A. L. (2012). Educational Psychology : An International Journal of Experimental Using higher order thinking questions to foster critical thinking : a classroom study. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.638619
Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). EM Solution of the Marginal Likelihood Equations. Psychometrika, 46(4), 443–459.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (3rd Editio). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How To Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills In Your Classroom. Virginia: ASCD Member Book. www.ascd.org/memberbooks
Budiman, A., & Jailani. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas VIII Semester 1. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 139–151.
Cagasan, L., Care, E., Robertson, P., & Luo, R. (2020). Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Examine Formative Assessment Practices in the Philippines. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766960
Chuseri, A., Anjarini, T., & Purwoko, R. Y. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Realistik Terintegrasi Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Pada Materi Bangun Ruang. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2021.v3i1.18-31
Darmawan, I. P. A., & Sujoko, E. (2013). Revisi Taksonomi Pembelajaran Benyamin S. Bloom. Satya Widya, 29(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2013.v29.i1.p30-39
DeMars, C. (2010). Item Response Theory: Understanding Statistics Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001
Depdikbud. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 16, Tahun 20018, Tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013.
Driana, E., & Ernawati. (2019). Teachers’ Understanding and Practices In Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills at Primary Schools. 51(6), 204–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v1i2.233
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). An introduction to 78

evaluation. In A Practitioner Handbook on Evaluation (4th ed.). Peason Education. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808026.00007
Friyatmi, F., Mardapi, D., & Haryanto, H. (2020). Assessing Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.196
Ghufron, A., & Sutama. (2011). Tes, Pengukuran, Asesmen, dan Evaluasi, Peran dan Fungsinya dalam Pembelajaran. In Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika (pp. 1– 27). Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. http://repository.ut.ac.id/id/eprint/4387
Golla, E., & Reyes, A. (2022). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework (Draft). November 2018. https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/files/PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework Draft.pdf
Gorur, R. (2014). Towards a sociology of measurement in education policy. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.1.58
Gradini, E, Lubis, N. A., Yustinaningrum, B., & Gemasih, R. (2019). Analyzing Students ’ Higher Order Thinking Skills Using TIMSS-Like Questions. 10. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287190
Gradini, Ega. (2019). Menilik Konsep Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Numeracy, 6(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v6i2.475
Guilford, J. (1956). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory Principles and Applications. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-017-1988-9
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publication Inc.
Hamdi, S., Suganda, I. A., & Hayati, N. (2018). Developing higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument using Lombok local cultures as contexts for junior secondary school mathematics. Research and Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i2.22089
Han, K. T. (2016). Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616631317
Hariono, I., Wiryokusumo, I., & Fathirul, A. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif Berbasis Google Form Pelajaran Matematika. Edcomtech Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p057
Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. International

Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304
Hartono, W., Hadi, S., Rosnawati, R., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Uji Kecocokan Model Parameter Logistik Soal Diagnosa Kemampuan Matematika Dasar. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.5899
Haryanto. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Konsep dan Manajemen). In UNY Press (I). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Haryanto, B., & Setiadi, H. (2021). Pengaruh Math Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Tingkat Pendidikan Ibu, dan Sumber Belajar Di Rumah Terhadap Capaian Literasi Matematika Siswa Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Penilaian Pendidikan, 3(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.22236/jppp.v3i1.6403
Huda, N., & Mardapi, D. (2016). Komparasi Model Penskoran Berdasarkan Teori Respons Butir Pada Soal Ujian Nasional Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 1–23.
Huriaty, D. (2015). Metode Kalibrasi dan Desain Tes Berdasarkan Teori Respon Butir (IRT). Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v1i3.19
Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., Liang, J.-C., Chu, H.-C., & Tsai, C. (2018). A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3
Ibrahim, N. N., Ayub, A. F. M., & Yunus, A. S. M. (2020). Impact of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Module Based on the Cognitive Apprenticeship Model (CAM) on Student’s Performance. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(7), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.14
Isgiyanto, A. (2013). Perbandingan Penyekoran Model Rasch dan Model Partial Credit Pada Matematika. Jurnal Kependidikan, 43(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v43i1.1954
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. B., & Rahayu, F. (2018). Pengembangan Tes Creative Thinking Skills Fisika SMA (PhysCreTHoTS) Berdasarkan Teori Tes Modern. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.19233
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PysTHOTS) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120
Jonan, Y. R. (2020). Pengembangan Rubrik Penskoran pada Asesmen Otentik untuk Materi Volume dan Luas Balok. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 4(2), 275–284.
80

https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v4i2.1174
K, A. H., Siregar, T. M., Purba, J., & Mukmin, B. A. (2019). Evaluation of Implementation of Blanded Learning Implementation in Universitas Negeri Medan. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 1(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v1i2.89
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
Kartowagiran, B., Mardapi, D., Purnama, D. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2019). Parallel tests viewed from the arrangement of item numbers and alternative answers. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.23721
Kemdikbud. (2022). Pembelajaran dan Asesmen. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi RI.
Kemendikbud, B. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia: Belajar Dari Hasil PISA 2018. In Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD (Issue 021). Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD.
King, F., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2012). Higher Order Thinking Skills. In Assessment and Evaluation Educational Services Program (Vol. 88, Issue 18, pp. 495–496). Florida: Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment, Florida State University.
Kones, N. I., & Rosnawati, R. (2021). Kualitas Butir dan Estimasi Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMP pada Soal Ujian Sekolah. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 280– 294. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i2.3054
Koshy, V., Ernest, P., & Casey, R. (2009). Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802566907
Koyan, I. W. (2011). Asesmen dalam Pembelajaran. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Press.
Kriswantoro, Kartowagiran, B., & Rohaeti, E. (2021). A critical thinking assessment model integrated with science process skills on chemistry for senior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.285
Kurniasi, E. R., & Arsisari, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1213–1222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3162
Kurniati, D., Harimukti, R., & Jamil, N. A. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMP di Kabupaten Jember dalam menyelesaikan soal berstandar PISA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 142–155.

https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.8058
Kusaeri, K. (2014). Acuan dan Teknik Penilaian Proses dan Hasil Belajar Dalam
Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz Media.
Lipianto, D., & Budiarto, M. T. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikaan Soal Yang Berhubungan Dengan Peersegi dan Persegi Panang Berdasarkan Taksonomi Solo Plus Pada Kelas VIIj. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu- Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains, 7(01), 1.
Litna, K. O., Mertasari, N. M. S., & Sudhirta, G. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika SMA Kelas X. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(1), 10–20. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/278
Lyon, C. J., Nabors Oláh, L., & Brenneman, M. (2020). A Formative Assessment Observation Protocol to Measure Implementation: Evaluating the Scoring Inference. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766957
Majid, A. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran (Cetakan Ke). Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan (I). Yogyakarta : Nuha Medika.
Mardapi, D. (2013). Evaluasi Penerapan Ujian Akhir Sekolah Dasar Berbasis Standar Nasional. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v13i2.1411
Mardapi, D. (2017). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes (II). Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press.
Mardapi, D., Kumaidi, & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukur Hasil Belajar Nirbias dan Terskala Baku. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/130693812/penelitian/pengembangan- instrumen-pengukur-hasil-belajar-nirbias-dan-terskala-baku.pdf
Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1978). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (Fourth Edi). New York : NY Houghton Mifflin Company.
Mertasari, N. M. S., & Candiasa, I. M. (2021). Analisis Tes Kinerja Dengan Partial Credit Model (PCM). Proseding Senadimas Undiksa, 1453–1459.
Miterianifa, Ashadi, Saputro, S., & Suciati. (2021). Higher Order Thinking Skills in the 21st Century: Critical Thinking. ICONS 2020, Januari. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-11-2020.2303766
Mohamed, A., Abdullah, Z., & Razak, A. Z. A. (2021). Validation of An Instrument For Measuring Integrated Principal Leadership Practices. Malaysian Online Journal of Education Management (MOJEM), 9(1), 1–20.
Mulianah, S., & Hidayat, W. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Berbasis Komputer. 82

KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 9(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v9i2.181
Muliyani, T., & Huriaty, D. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen tes Geometri dan Pengukuran Pada Jenjang SMP. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 91–98.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2011). Terapan Riset Bidang Pendidikan dan Teknik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (2003). PARSCALE 4 for Windows: IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded items and rating scales [Computer software]. In Chapter 7 (Issue January). Scientific Software International. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.67.2
Muttaqin, H., Susanto, Hobri, & Tohir, M. (2021). Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematics Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Problems Based on Online Trading Arithmetic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(012036), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012036
Myung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 2496(02)00028-7
Ndiung, S., & Jediut, M. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika peserta didik sekolah dasar berorientasi pada berpikir tingkat tinggi. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i1.6274
Netriawati. (2018). Penerapan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v2i02.50
Nithyanantham, V., Paulmony, R., & Ramadan Hasan, S. (2019). Self-Perspective of 21st Century Educators: A Challenge in The Globalised Educational World. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573869
Novita, N., Mellyzar, M., & Herizal, H. (2021). Asesmen Nasional (AN): Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Calon Guru. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i1.1568
Nurhayati, & Angraeni, L. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa (Higher Order Thinking) dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Konsep Optika melalui Model Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03201
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 result in focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from
PISA 2018 (pp. 1–10).
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD
Publishing (pp. 1–198). Paris: OECD Publishing. 83

https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Parmiti, D. P., Antara, I. G. W. S., & Wulandari, I. G. A. A. M. (2022). The Effectiveness of E-Scrapbook Media Containing HOTS Questions on Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i3.52078
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21
Pendidikan, T. P. P. (2019). Panduan Penulisan Soal HOTS-Higher Order Thinking Skills (Issue 1). Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD.
Pillay, L. A. M., Singh, C. K. S., Harun, R. N. S. R., & Tarsame Singh Masa Singh. (2018). The Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills for Teaching and Learning. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Special Issue 5, 668–675. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi5.668.675
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied Multivariate Statistics For The Social Sciences (Analyses with SAS and IBM‘s SPSS) (Sixth, Vol. 44, Issue 8). New York: Routledge. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781107415324A009/t ype/book_part
Pratiwi, N. P. W., Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., & Paramartha, A. A. G. Y. (2019). The Reflection of HOTS in EFL Teachers’ Summative Assessment. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 3(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i3.21853
Prihatni, Y., Kumaidi, K., & Mundilarto, M. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Diagnostik Kognitif Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7524
Prihono, E. W. (2019). Validitas Instrumen Kompetensi Profesional pada Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Guru. EKSPOSE: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 18(2), 897–910. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v18i2.529
Priyaadharshini, M., & Sundaram, B. V. (2018). Evaluation of Higher-Order Thinking Skills Using Learning Style in an Undergraduate Engineering in Flipped Classroom. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(6), 2237– 2254. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22035
Purbaningrum, K. A. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Smp Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2029
Puspendik. (2019). Paduan Penilaian Tes Tertulis. In Nucl. Phys. Jakarta : Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.
84

Puspitasari, L., Alwi, Z., Suhardi, S., & Zulkardi, Z. (2021). Literacy Questions Based on Hots Using Context Covid-19. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(4), 624. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.33870
Putra, Y. Y., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Konten Bilangan untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v2i1.175
Putri, H., Susiani, D., Wandani, N. S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kognitif pada Tes Uraian dan Tes Objektif. Jurnal Papeda, 4(2), 139–148.
Radišić, J., Videnović, M., & Baucal, A. (2015). Math Anxiety-Contributing School and Individual Level Factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0224-7
Rahmawati, N. D., Komarudin, K., & Suherman, S. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Matematika Berbasis Hots Pada Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 860. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4893
Rahmayani, F., & Istiyono, E. (2022). Affective Assesment Instrument to Assess Student Attitudes Towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 637–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i4.47681
Ramadhan, S., Mardapi, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Utomo, H. B. (2019). The development of an instrument to measure the higher order thinking skill in physics. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu- jer.8.3.743
Rapianingsih, N. N. T., Suarjane, I. M., & Dibia, I. K. (2021). Hot Based Assessment Instrument to Assess Math Learning Achievement. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v4i2.36734
Ratnasari, D., Sukarmin, & Suparmi. (2017). Analisis Implementasi Instrumen Two- Tier Multiple Choice untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v2i2.627
Razak, F., Yunarni, A., & Aminah, S. (2022). Deskripsi kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal hots matematika di sma negeri 3 pangkep. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 3, 46–58. https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/817
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya (I). Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H. (2017). Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Unnes, 12(1), 129541. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132255129/pengabdian/8 Reliabilitas3 alhamdulillah.pdf
Retta, A. M., Kesumawati2, N., & Octaria, D. (2021). Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe HOTS Pada Mata Kuliah Kapita Selekta Matematika SMA. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2254– 2267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4099
RI., P. P. P. K. (2019). Capaian Nilai Ujian Nasional SMA dan MA Tahun 2015 sampai 2019.
https://hasilun.pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/#2019!smp!capaian!04&01&999!T &T&T&N&1&unbk!3!&
Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1336
Riscaputantri, A., & Wening, S. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Afektif Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.16885
Safaruddin, Anisa, & AF, M. S. (2012). Partial Credit Model (PCM) dalam Penskoran Politomi pada Teori Respon Butir. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika, & Komputasi, 9(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v9i1.3397
Şahin, M. G., & Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2019). Analyzing the Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method with Fences in ca-MST. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.634091
Sainuddin, S. (2018). Analisis Karakteristik Butir Tes Matematika Berdasarkan Teori Modern (Teori Respon Butir). Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1–12.
Santoso, A. (2018). Karakteristik Butir Tes Pengantar Statistika Sosial Berdasarkan Teori Respon Butir. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, VI(2), 158–168.
Schulz, H., & FitzPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers’ understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v62i1.56168
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173
Setiawan, H., Dafik, & Lestari, N. D. S. (2014). Soal Matematika dalam PISA Kaitannya dengan Literasi Matematika dan Keterampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Universitas Jember, 1, 244– 251.
Shantika, E. G., & Istiyono, E. (2017). Diagnosis Kesalahan Peserta Didik Berbasis Penskoran Politomus dengan Partial Credit Model (PCM) dalam Menjawab Soal Matematika Kelas X SMA Negeri Kota Mataram. Thesis Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Shiel, G., & Gilleece, L. (2015). Literacy and Numeracy in Northern Ireland and the 86

Republic Of Ireland In International Studies. The Irish Journal of Education / Iris Eireannach an Oideachais, 40, 3–28.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications (Second Edi, Vol. 21, Issue 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203
Suciati, Munadi, S., Sugiman, & Febriyanti, W. D. R. (2020). Design and validation of mathematical literacy instruments for assessment for learning in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.865
Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.
Sukla, D., & Dungsungneon, A. P. (2016). Students Perceived Level and Teachers Teaching Strategies of Higher Order Thinking Skills; A Study on Higher Educational Institutions in Thailand. Journal of Education and Practkice, 7(12), 211–219.
Sulistiawan, C. H. (2016). Kualitas Soal Ujian Sekolah Matematika Program IPA dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7516
Suntusia, S., Dafik, D., & Hobri, H. (2021). The Level of Critical Thinking Skill on Solving Two-Dimensional Arithmetics Problems Through Research-Based Learning. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2021.v3i1.55-69
Susongko, P. (2010). Perbandingan Keefektifan Bentuk Tes Uraian dan Teslet dengan Penerapan Graded Response Model (GRM). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v14i2.1082
Syafii, A., Haryanto, H., Ahmad, I. F., & Fauziah, A. (2021). Analysis of Items with Item Response Theory (IRT) Approach on Final Assessment for Al-Quran Hadith Subjects. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 18(1), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2021.181-09
Syaifuddin, M. (2022). Minimum Competency Assessment to Measure Mathematical Literacy of Junior High School Students. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i2.46263
Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2020). Mathematics Students’ HOTS Assessment. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.31071
Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item Response Theory for Items Scored in More Than Two Categories (I). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Umami, R., Rusdi, M., & Kamid. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes untuk Mengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) berorientasi programme for international student asessment (PISA) pada peserta didik. JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Matematika), 7(1), 57–68.
87

https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v7i1.2069
Utaminingsih, S. (2019). Monograf Penilaian Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasi HOTS. In Eprints.Umk.Ac.Id. Kudus: Universitas Maria Kudus. https://eprints.umk.ac.id/10920/1/Monograf Penilaian HOTS 2018.pdf
Vidmar, M., Niklas, F., Schneider, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (2017). On-entry Assessment of School Competencies and Academic Achievement : A Comparison Between Slovenia and Germany. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(2), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0294-9
Wahyuni, A. A. Y., Suarni, K., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2014). Pengaruh Penggunaan Bentuk Tes terhadap Hasil Belajar Membaca Bahasa Indonesia dengan Kovariabel Motivasi Berprestasi pada Siswa Kelas XII SMA Pariwisata PGRI Dawan Klungkung. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 4(3), 0–5.
Wardani, R. K., Yamtinah, S., & Mulyani, B. (2015). Instrumen Penilaian Two-Tier Test Aspek Pengetahuan Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains (KPS) Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Untuk Siswa SMA/MA Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Sebelas Maret, 4(4), 156–162.
Warsono, Nursuhud, P. I., Darma, R. S., & Supahar. (2020). Empirical analysis of diagramatic representation test instruments using partial credit model in realizing learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 617– 632. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13342a
Widana, I. W., Adi, S., Herdiyanto, Abdi, J., Marsito, & Istiqomah. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika (S. Hadi (ed.)). Direktorat Pembinaan SMA, Dirjen Dikdasmen, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Widana, I. W., Parwata, I. M. Y., Parmithi, N. N., Jayantika, I. G. agung T., Sukendra, K., & Sumandya, I. W. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74
Widhiarso, W. (2010). Aplikasi Teori Respon Item untuk Pemodelan Respons Menipu pada Skala Kepribadian. Laporan Hasil Penelitian, UGM.
Widiyawati, Y., Nurwahidah, I., & Sari, D. S. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Integrated Science Test Tipe Pilihan Ganda Beralasan untuk Mengukur HOTS Peserta Didik. Saintifika, 21(2), 1–14. issn: 1411 – 5433
Widoyoko, E. P. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah (Edisi Revi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wulandari, F. (2016). Pengaruh Bimbingan Konseling dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Pilihan Peminatan Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Penilaian Pendidikan, 1(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.22236/JPPP
Yang, F., Ren, H., & Hu, Z. (2019). Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Three- 88

Parameter Weibull Distribution Using Evolutionary Strategy. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6281781
citation:   Setyorini, Arifah Indah and Haryanto, Haryanto  (2023) Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Matematika untuk Peserta Didik Kelas VIII Jenjang SMP.  S2 thesis, Sekolah Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/79603/1/tesis-arifah%20indah%20setyorini-19701251039.pdf