eprintid: 79528
rev_number: 9
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/95/28
datestamp: 2023-11-17 03:14:43
lastmod: 2023-11-17 03:14:43
status_changed: 2023-11-17 03:14:43
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Saepuzaman, Duden
creators_name: Istiyono, Edi
title: Model Asessment as Learning Berbasis Pemahaman dan HOTS pada Pembelajaran Fisika DasarBagi Mahasiswa Program Studi pendidikan Fisika.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D4
subjects: F2
divisions: pps_lit_evazdik
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: assessment as learning, pemahaman dan HOTS, fisika dasar, prodi pendidikan fisika
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk : (1) memperoleh desain model AaL berbasis pemahaman dan HOTS pada pembelajaran fisika dasar, (2) menganalisis kualitas model AaL berbasis pemahaman dan HOTS, (3) memperoleh profil pemahaman dan HOTS mahasiswa, dan (4) menganalisis keefektifan model AaL berbasis pemahaman dan HOTS dalam meningkatkan pemahaman HOTS mahasiswa prodi pendidikan fisika.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan dengan langkah pengembangan memodifikasi model Plomp dan Mardapi sehingga menjadi lima tahapan meliputi studi pendahuluan, merumuskan model, pengembangan produk, uji coba dan revisi produk serta finalisasi produk. Instrumen penilaian pemahaman dan HOTS terdiri dari tugas terstruktur dan soal pre-test dan post-test. Kualitas instrumen dilakukan dengan validasi sembilan ahli dan dianalisis menggunakan formula Aiken. Hasil analisis diperoleh seluruh butir penyusun instrumen valid secara konten dan hasil penilaian ahli reliabel. Uji coba instrumen melibatkan 525 mahasiswa yang terdiri dari 11 universitas keguruan di Indonesia. Analisis hasil uji coba instrumen menghasilkan instrumen valid dan reliabel secara konstruk, serta menunjukkan kualitas parameter butir yang baik berdasarkan analisis teori respon butir PCM. Tahapan uji coba penerapan model dilakukan secara bertahap melalui uji coba terbatas dengan melibatkan 31 mahasiswa dan uji coba diperluas 139 mahasiswa dari tiga universitas keguruan. Keefektifan model dalam meningkatkan pemahaman dan HOTS dilihat dari signifikansi peningkatan capaian pemahaman dan HOTS mahasiswa selama pembelajaran dan berdasarkan peningkatan capaian pre-test dan post-test.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Dihasilkan model AaL berbasis pemahaman yang baik dengan spesifikasi; tujuan model, karakteristik model, komponen model, instrumen model, tahapan penerapan model, dan panduan penerapan model. (2) Kualitas model AaL yang baik dibuktikan dengan terbuktinya validitas isi dan konstruk instrumen, indeks reliabilitas semua instrumen di atas 0,7, perameter butir memiliki karakteristik yang baik, dan instrumen cocok digunakan untuk siswa dengan kemampuan rendah sampai tinggi. Selain itu, model yang dikembangkan terbukti praktis. (3) Profil capaian pemahaman dan HOTS mahasiswa disajikan secara komprehensif meliputi capaian individu, secara keseluruhan dan setiap aspek pemahaman dan HOTS. (4) Model efektif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman dan HOTS mahasiswa.
date: 2023-10-30
date_type: published
institution: Sekolah Pascasarjana
department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: AAIA. (2012). Pupil self-assessment. AAIA North East Region. http://www.aarohilife.org/sites/default/files/UK%0AGuide to Self Assessment.pdf
Ab Kadir, M. A. (2017). What Teacher Knowledge Matters in Effectively Developing Critical Thinkers in the 21 st Century Curriculum? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.011
Ababio, B. T., & Dumba, H. (2013). The value of continuous assessment strategies
�� ��������� �������� �� ���. ������ ��
Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.
Adeyemo, S. A. (2010). Students’ Ability Level and Their Competence in Problem- Solving Task in Physics. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(December), 35–47. http://www.soeagra.com/ijert/vol2/7.pdf
Adhiwibowo, B., & Karyati, K. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berorientasi Pada Kreativitas Matematis. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), 174–183.
Ahrari, S., Samah, B. A., Hassan, M. S. H. Bin, Wahat, N. W. A., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2016). Deepening critical thinking skills through civic engagement in Malaysian higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.009
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Ainscow, M., Beresford, J., Harris, A., Hopkins, D., Southworth, G., & West, M. (2013). Creating the conditions for school improvement: A handbook of staff development activities. Routledge.
Akib, E., & Muhsin, M. A. (2020). Critical thinking in cognitive domain: Exploring assessment of English teaching at pandemic period of covid-19. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society, 5(2), 178–184.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. Google Scholar.
347
�
Amalathas, E. (2010). Learning to learn in further education. A literature review of effective practice in England and abroad. In CfBt Education Trust. www.cfbt.com
Amien, M. (1987). Mengajarkan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) dengan menggunakan metode “discovery” dan “inquiry.” Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Amrien, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2012). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. In A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Longman, New York.
Andrade, H. (2010). Handbook of Formative Assessment. In Handbook of Formative Assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874851
Andrian, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hadi, S. (2018). The instrument development to evaluate local curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11458a
Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 12100.
Arafah, K., Amin, B. D., Sari, S. S., & Hakim, A. (2021). The Development of Higher Order-Thinking Skills (HOTS) Instrument Assessment in Physics Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012140
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos user’s guide version 3.6. Chicago. SmallWaters Corporation.
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408–415.
Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. In Teaching for Student Learning: Becoming an Accomplished Teacher. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866771
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran (Vol. 118). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arlinwibowo, J., Retnawati, H., & Kartowagiran, B. (2021). Item Response Theory Utilization for Developing the Student Collaboration Ability Assessment Scale in STEM Classes. Ingénierie Des Systèmes d Inf., 26(4), 409–415.
348

Armstrong, T. L. M. (2013). Implementing and managing self assessment procedures. (p. ). Thesis Magister. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. http:
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning 10 principles: Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. In Assessment Reform Group (pp. 1–3).
Austin, Z., Gregory, P. A. M., & Chiu, S. (2008). Use of reflection-in-action and self-assessment to promote critical thinking among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(3).
Azwar, S. (2019). Dasar-dasar psikometri Yogyakarta.
Baird, J.-A. (2013). The currency of assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.787782
Baker, F. B. (1992). Item Response Theory. Parameter Estimation Theory. New York, Basel, Hong Kong: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Bakula, N. (2010). The benefits of formative assessments for teaching and learning. Science Scope, 34(1), 37–43.
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 023108.
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Enhancing higher order thinking skills among inservice science teachers via embedded assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009- 9141-z
Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills In Higher Education: A Review Of The Literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554
Bell, R. L. (2008). Best practices in science education teaching the nature of science: three critical questions. Hampton-Brown: National Geographic Learning/Cengage.
Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press. 349

Black, P. (2004). The nature and value of formative assessment for learning (draft). ������ ���. ����� ������
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575.
Bostock, S. (2012). Student peer assessment. The Higher Education Academy. http://www.reading
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Vol. 41, Issue 3).
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom advances. In Journal of Education (Vol. 1, Issue 18). ASCD. www.ascd.org/memberbooks
Brown, S., & Glasner, A. E. (2003). Assessment Matters in Higher Education- Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Buhagiar, M. A. (2006). The classroom assessment cycle within the alternative assessment paradigm: exploring the role of the teacher. Journal of Maltese Education Research, 4(2), 17–36.
Burton, V. J., & Watkins, R. V. (2007). Measuring word learning: Dynamic versus static assessment of kindergarten vocabulary. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(5), 335–356.
350

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Carin, A. A., & Sund, R. B. (1989). Teaching science through discovery. In (No Title). Merrill Publishing Companny.
Carless, D. (2002). Implementing task-based learning with young learners. ELT Journal, 56(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.389
Chairunnisa, N. A., Mursalin, M., & Ntobuo, N. E. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Kolaboratif Jire Berbasis IT (Information and Technology) Materi Suhu dan Kalor Fisika. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 8(3), 805–812.
Chakrabartty, S. N. (2013). Best split-half and maximum reliability. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 3(1), 1–8.
Chen, C. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer- assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008
Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803–819.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa Jr, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching. Columbus. In OH: Pearson. Pearson Education Inc.
Chinn, D. (2005). Peer assessment in the algorithms course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067468
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
Cioffi, G., & Carney, J. J. (1983). Dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 36(8), 764–768.
Clark, I. (2012). Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
Clarke, S. (2005a). ��������� ���������� �� ��. ���� � Great Britain for Hodder Murray.
Clarke, S. (2005b). Formative assessment in the secondary classroom. Hodder Muray.
351

Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Phillips, S. M. (1996). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. Mayfield Publishing Co.
Collins, R. (2014). Skills for the 21st Century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum & Leadership Journal, 12(14).
Conklin, W. (2012). Higher-Order Thinking Skills to Develop 21st Century Learners. In Shell Education. Shell Educational Publishing, Inc.
Corazza, G. E., & Agnoli, S. (2016). Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Springer.
Cotrus, A., & Stanciu, C. (2014). A study on dynamic assessment techniques, as a method of obtaining a high level of learning potential, untapped by conventional assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2616–2619.
Cotton, K. (1997). Developing employability skills. In School Improvement Research Series (Issue 1987). http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/8/0015.html
Coulacoglou, C., & Saklofske, D. H. (2017). Psychometrics and psychological assessment: Principles and applications. Academic Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Crocker, L. (2012). Introduction to measurement theory. Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, 371–384. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874769-27
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349.
Dann, R. (2012). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. In Promoting Assessment as Learning: Improving the Learning Process. Routledge Falmer, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470152
Dann, R. (2014a). Assessment as learning: blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166.
Dann, R. (2014b). Assessmentaslearning: blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.898128
352

Davies, A. (2011). Making Classroom Assessment Work. Connection Publishing.
Davies, P. (2000). Computerized Peer Assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/135580000750052955
Debelak, R., Strobl, C., & Zeigenfuse, M. D. (2022). An introduction to the rasch model with examples in r. Crc Press.
DeLuca, C., Chapman-Chin, A. E. A., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Klinger, D. A. (2018). Student perspectives on assessment for learning. Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1401550
DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.
Dewanti, S. S., Hadi, S., & Nu’man, M. (2021). The Application of Item Response Theory in Analysis of Characteristics of Mathematical Literacy Test Items. Ilkogretim Online, 20(1).
DiGiovanni, E., & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review: an alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal, 55(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.263
Dochy, F. J. R. C., Moerkerke, G., & Martens, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning and instruction: Assessment of domain-specific and domaintranscending prior knowledge and progress. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22(4), 309–339.
du Toit, M. (2003). IRT from SSI: Bilog-MG, Multilog, Parscale, Testfact. Scientific Software International.
Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Sage Publications, Inc.
Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(7), 7.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. In Thinking Skills and Creativity (Vol. 12, pp. 43–52). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Earl, L. (2003). Assessment As Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning (Experts In Assessment Series). Corwin Press. http://www.amazon.com/Assessment-As-Learning-Classroom- Maximize/dp/0761946268
Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2013). Getting to the core of learning: Using assessment for self-monitoring and self-regulation. In Self-Directed Learning Oriented
353

Assessments in the Asia-Pacific. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4507-0_7
Earl, L. M. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1979). Essentials of educational measurement, Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L., Way, W. D., & Steffen, M. (1993). Case Studies in Computer Adaptive Test Design Through Simulation1,2. ETS Research Report Series, 1993(2), i–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1993.tb01567.x
Ellis, G. (2001). Looking at Ourselves—Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: practice examples from New Zealand. Reflective Practice, 2(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940127336
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory. Psychology Press.
Enggiel, G. T., & Purnomo, H. D. (2022). Application Of K-Means Method In The Spread Of Positive Cases Of Covid-19 In Salatiga City. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif), 3(5), 1323–1328.
Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, 14(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37805-7_2
Facione, P., & Gittens, C. A. (2016). Think Critically. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Pearson.
Falchikov, N. (1986). PRODUCT COMPARISONS AND PROCESS BENEFITS OF COLLABORATIVE PEER GROUP AND SELF ASSESSMENTS. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110206
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287
Ferdinand, A. (2002). Structural equation modeling dalam penelitian manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ferdinand, A. (2006). Structural Equation Modelling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen, Aplikasi Model-Model Rumit Dalam Penelitian Thesis dan Disertasi. Fakultas Ekonomi UNDIP.
Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of educational programs. Jakarta: National Education Planning Evaluation and Curriculum Development.
354

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1981). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4(3), 465–466.
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. In Statistics (American, Vol. 58).
Figa, J. G., Tarekegne, W. M., & Kebede, M. A. (2020). The practice of formative assessment in Ethiopian secondary school curriculum implementation: The case of West Arsi Zone Secondary Schools. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 276–287.
Finch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2019). Educational an Psychological Measurement. Routledge.
Fisher, R. (2010). Thinking Skill Strategies.pdf. In D. J. Arthur & T. Cremin (Eds.), Learning to Teach in The Primary School (2nd ed., pp. 374–387). Routledge.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Frank*, M., & Barzilai, A. (2004). Integrating alternative assessment in a project- based learning course for pre-service science and technology teachers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 41–61.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2008). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. Routledge.
Frye, R., McKinney, G. R., & Trimble, J. E. (2007). Tools and Techniques for course improvement: a handbook for course review and assessment of student learning. Western Washington University, Office of Institutional Assessment, Research ....
Gable, R. K., & Gable, R. K. (1986). A Review of the Steps for Developing an Affective Instrument. Instrument Development in the Affective Domain, 169– 177.
Garson, G. D. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Statnotes: topics in multivariate analysis. north carolina state university. Retrieved May, 1.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Person Education, Inc.
355

https://yuli-elearning.com/pluginfile.php/4831/mod_resource/content/1/Gay- E%20Book%20Educational%20Research-2012.pdf
Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
Ghozali, & Fuad. (2005). Equation Modeling: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Dengan ������� ��B�ad�an�Pe�nerb�it U�n�ive�rsita�s Dip�onegoro.
Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling: Teori. In Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan program LISREL 9.10 (4th ed., Vol. 4). Badan penerbit UNDIP.
Giancoli, D. C. (2014). Physics: principles with applications seventh edition. United Stated of America: Pearson Education.
Gijbels*, D., van de Watering, G., & Dochy, F. (2005). Integrating assessment tasks in a problem‐based learning environment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 73–86.
Glaser, R., & De Corte, E. (1992). Preface to the assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. Assessment of Prior Knowledge as a Determinant for Future Learning, 1–2.
Glasson, T. (2008). Improving student achievement through assessment for learning. Curriculum Leadership, 6(31).
Goode, K., & Et.al. (2010). Curriculum Insert: Assessment for learning. ETFO Voice. http://www.etfovoice
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
Gronlund, N. E., Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2009). Measurement & Evaluation in Teaching (Tenth Edit). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Guo, J., & Woulfin, S. (2016). Twenty-First Century Creativity: An Investigation of How the Partnership for 21st Century Instructional Framework Reflects the Principles of Creativity. Roeper Review, 38(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1183741
Gyamfi, A., Yeboah, A., Erzoah, K. K., & Lange, P. (2022). Impact of Assessment as Learning on Attitudes towards Mathematics of Senior High School Students in Ahanta West and Mpohor Districts. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v26i530643
356

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Routledge.
Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585
Hadi, S. (2013). Konstruk Kinerja Kepala Sekolah Dasar Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v11i1.1416
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th edn). Cengage Learning EMEA.
Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. In Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. Allyn & Bacon A Pearson Education Company.
Hambleton, R. K., Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. 2.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory.Boston. Kluwer.Inc.
Hamdani, A. D., Nurhafsah, N., & Silvia, S. (2022). Inovasi pendidikan karakter dalam menciptakan generasi emas 2045. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 3(3), 170–178.
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53– 70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776
Harjo, B., Kartowagiran, B., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). Development of critical thinking skill instruments on mathematical learning high school. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12410a
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer-and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111.
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2018). Using Self-Assessment to Improve Student Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351036979
357

Hasudungan, A. N., & Kurniawan, Y. (2018). Meningkatkan Kesadaran Generasi Emas Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Melalui Inovasi Digital Platform www.indonesia2045.org. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin, 1, 51–58. https://ejournal.unwaha.ac.id/index.php/snami/article/view/263
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: feedback. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational
Research, 77(1), 81–112.
He, X., & Canty, A. (2012). Empowering Student Learning Through Rubric- Referenced Self-Assessment*. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 26(1), 24– 31. https://doi.org/10.7899/1042-5055-26.1.24
Hearn, J., & McMillan, J. H. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42923742
Hell, B., Trapmann, S., Weigand, S., & Schuler, H. (2007). Die Validität von Auswahlgesprächen im Rahmen der Hochschulzulassung - eine Metaanalyse. Psychologische Rundschau, 58(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033- 3042.58.2.93
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. In Formative Assessment: Making it Happen in the Classroom. Corwin. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219493
Ho, N. (2015). An exploratory investigation of the practice of assessment for �������� �� ���������� ������ ������� practice (M.Ed. Thesis) . Queensland University. Unpublished.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M. R., & AL., E. (2008). Evaluating Model Fit : a Synthesis of the Structural Equation Modelling Literature. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 21(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498
Iman, M., Arabnia, H. R., & Rasheed, K. (2023). A review of deep transfer learning and recent advancements. Technologies, 11(2), 40.
358
�

Inch, E. S., & Tudor, K. H. (2014). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in Argument (Seventh Edition). Pearson.
Istiyono. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Teori Klasik dan Modern. UNY Press.
Istiyono, E. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v6i1.7817
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Fenditasari, K., Ayub, M. R. S. S. N., & Saepuzaman, D. (2023). The Development of a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Based on Modern Test Theory in Physics Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1).
Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2014). Analysis of nature of science included in recent popular writing using text mining techniques. Science & Education, 23, 1785–1809.
Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1993). An exploratory study of dynamic assessment involving two instructional strategies on experts and novices’ performance in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Diagnostique, 18(4), 305–324.
Jones, C. A. (2005). Assessment for learning. Learning and Skills Development Agency London.
Jr. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Pearson New International Edition. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 201– 225.
Kane, M. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 425–461.
Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. Educational Measurement, 4(2), 17–64.
Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal
of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles,
applications, and issues. Cengage Learning.
Kartowagiran, B. (2012). Penulisan butir soal. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri
Yogyakarta, 1–33.
Kartowagiran, B., Mardapi, D., Purnama, D. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2019). Parallel tests viewed from the arrangement of item numbers and alternative answers. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.23721
359

Kauchak, D., & Eggen, P. (2012). Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education, Inc, publishing as Allyn & Bacon.
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027.
Khaghaninejad, M. S. (2015). Dynamic assessment: From theory to practice. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2010). Higher order thinking skills: Definition, Teaching Strategies, Assessment. http://goo.gl/su233T.
Kissling, E. M., & O’Donnell, M. E. (2015). Increasing language awareness and self-efficacy of FL students using self-assessment and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Language Awareness, 24(4), 283–302.
Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
Klopfer, L. E., & Aikenhead, G. S. (2022). Humanistic science education: The history of science and other relevant contexts. Science Education, 106(3), 490– 504.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.
Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive Knowledge and Executive Control: Metacognition. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal Mind � Human Mind (pp. 201–224). Springer- Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68469-2_12
Kristanto, Y. D. (2018). Technology-enhanced pre-instructional peer assessment: Exploring students’ perceptions in a Statistical Methods course. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(2), 105–116.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1999). Innovative tasks to improve critical and creative thinking skills. In D. L. V Stiff & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Developing Mathematical Reasong in Grades K-12 (pp. 138–145). NCTM.
Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2003). Educational Testing and Measurement. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., Koller, D., & Klemmer, S. R. (2013). Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(6), 1–31.
Kumaidi. (2014). Validitas dan pemvalidasian instrumen penilaian,” Makal. disampaikan dalam Semin. Nas. Pengemb. Instrumen Penilai. Pendidik. Karakter yang valid, karakter. Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
360

Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162
Lane, S. (2016). Test development process. In M. R. S. L (Ed.), Handbook of Test Development (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
Lau, J. Y. F. (2011). An introduction to critical thinking and creativity: Think more, think better. John Wiley & Sons.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 6570.1975.tb01393.x
Leahy, S. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19–24.
Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Lee, I. (2007). Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 199–213.
Leirhaug, P. E., & Annerstedt, C. (2016). Assessing with new eyes? Assessment for learning in Norwegian physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(6), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095871
Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). The Effect of the Inclusion of Selfassessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120093887
Lester, P. E., Inman, D., & Bishop, L. K. (2014). Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences. Rowman & Littlefield.
Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131–137.
Lidz, C. S. E. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. Guilford Press.
Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer
361

Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266- 4909.2001.00198.x
Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7, 328.
Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36(6), 1372– 1405.
Liu, D., & Zhang, H. (2022). Improving students’ higher order thinking skills and achievement using WeChat based flipped classroom in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7281–7302.
Liu, S., Yang, X., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Yoneda, T., & Li, Z. (2018). Study on teaching methods for developing higher order thinking skills for college students in flipping classroom. Proceedings - 6th International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology, EITT 2017, 2018-March, 254– 257. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.69
LM Earl. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81–100.
Lorna, E., & Katz, S. (2006). MB: Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. manitoba Education, Citizenship in Publication Data. http://www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf
Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P. E., & Cendron, M. (1998). Cognitive and metacognitive abilities involved in the solution of mathematical word problems: Validation of a comprehensive model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(3), 257–275.
Machfudhoh, S., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2013). Analisis Cluster Kabupaten/Kota Berdasarkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni POMITS, 2(1), 2337–3520.
Magdalena, I., Prabandani, R. O., & Rini, E. S. (2021). Analsisi Taksonomi Bloom sebagai Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SDN Kosambi 06 Pagi. NUSANTARA, 3(2), 227–234.
Magin, D. J. (2001). A Novel Technique for Comparing the Reliability of Multiple Peer Assessments with that of Single Teacher Assessments of Group Process
362

Work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930020018971
Mansyur, M. (2013). Pengembangan Model Assessment for Learning Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di Smp. In Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 71–91). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i1.1088
Marcy, T. (2010). Self-assessment (as practiced by Alverno College Students, with Faculty Direction.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. In Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia (Vol. 127, p. 88).
Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Marlina, L., Liliasari, Tjasyono, B., & Hendayana, S. (2018). Improving the critical thinking skills of junior high school students on Earth and Space Science (ESS) materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 12063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012063
Martin, R., Sexton, C., & Franklin, T. (2005). Teaching science for all children: An inquiry approach.
Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.
Masters, G. N. (2006). Towards a growth mindset in assessment. Practically Primary, 19(2), 4–8.
McComas, W. F. (2015). The nature of science & the next generation of biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 77(7), 485–491.
McDowell, N. G. (2011). Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiology, 155(3), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.170704
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing thinking; developing learning. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
McGuinness, C. (2005). Teaching thinking: theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II: Pedagogy-Teaching for Learning, 3, 107–126.
McMillan, J. H. (2017). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice that enhance student learning and motivation. Pearson.
363

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40– 49.
McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the Effect of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement: So Much More Is Needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(2), n2.
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Miller, P. J. (2003). The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self- assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 383– 394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000066218
Morton, J. B., & Macbeth, W. A. A. G. (1977). Correlations between staff, peer and self assessments of fourth-year students in surgery. Medical Education, 11(3), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1977.tb00586.x
Motro, D., Comer, D. R., & Lenaghan, J. A. (2021). Examining the effects of negative performance feedback: the roles of sadness, feedback self-efficacy, and grit. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 367–382.
Munns, G., & Woodward, H. (2006). Student engagement and student self‐ assessment: the REAL framework. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13(2), 193–213.
Muraki, E., & Bock, D. (2003). PARSCALE: IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded response items and rating scales (Version 4.1). Scientific Software.
Muraki, E., & Muraki, M. (2016). Generalized partial credit model. In Handbook of item response theory (pp. 155–166). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Mussawy, S. A. J. (2009). ���������� ���������� ���� perceptions of classroom assessment.
Nazari, B., & Mansouri, S. (2014). Dynamic assessment versus static assessment: A study of reading comprehension ability in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 134–156.
Newby, L., & Winterbottom, M. (2011). Can research homework provide a vehicle for assessment for learning in science lessons? Educational Review, 63(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.560247
364
�

Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, 125–135.
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. Design Research, 153(1), 152–169.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Students (6th Ed). In Pearson Education. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Norcini, J. (2010). The power of feedback. Medical Education, 44(1), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03542.x
Nugroho, L. A., & Ediyono, S. (2021). Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia: Integrasi Visi Creative Minority dalam Kurikulum. Penerbit Lakeisha.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory 3rd edition (MacGraw- Hill, New York).
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Edition). Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7–21.
Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press.
OECD. (2006). Education Policy Analysis: Focus on Higher Education�2005-2006.
O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-Centred Learning: What Does it Mean for Students and Lecturers? Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, 27–36. http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/
Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S- X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 289–298.
Orpen, C. (1982). Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: A research note. Higher Education, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00194421
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1997). A study in self‐assessment: tutor and students’ perceptions of performance criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 357–368.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: a qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 369–386.
365

Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models (Issue 144). Sage.
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278.
Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2018). Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: the role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8
Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three- dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2012). Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 (Issue 8). Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational Design Research, 11–50.
Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P. (2017). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. Tesol QUARTERLY, 51(2), 332–357.
Prakash, R., & Litoriya, R. (2022). Pedagogical Transformation of Bloom Taxonomy’s LOTs into HOTs: An Investigation in Context with IT Education. Wireless Personal Communications, 122(1), 725–736.
Presseisen, B. Z. (1988). Thinking skills: Meanings and models. In D. A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 43–48). ASCD.
Presseisen, B. Z. (2001). �������� ������� �������� � Developing Minds. A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. 3 Edition (D. A.
L. Costa, Ed.). ASCD.
Price, L. R. (2016). Psychometric methods: Theory into practice. Guilford Publications.
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896.
Putra, A. (2019). How student worksheet oriented of content complexity and cognitive processes can improve conceptual understanding and critical thinking skill of student in physics learning in high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 012045.
366
�

Ramist, L., Lewis, C., & McCamley-JENKINS, L. (1994). STUDENT GROUP DIFFERENCES IN PREDICTING COLLEGE GRADES: SEX, LANGUAGE, AND ETHNIC GROUPS. ETS Research Report Series, 1994(1), i–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1994.tb01600.x
Ramos, J. L. S., Dolipas, B. B., & Villamor, B. B. (2013). Higher order thinking skills and academic performance in physics of college students: A regression analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 4(48– 60).
Reeve, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trial: Methods and Practice, 2, 55–74. http://www.abe.pl/html/samples/b/0198527691.pdf
Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81–95.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya (1st ed.). Nuha Medika_ Yogyakarta.
Retnawati, H. (2016a). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). In Parama Publishing. Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H. (2016b). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir (Validation, reliability, and item character). Parama Publishing.
Reynold, C. R. (2009). Measurment and Assesment in Education. Pearson.
Robinson, J. P. (2000a). A Fact Sheet: What Are Employability Skills? In Alabama Cooperative Extension System (Vol. 1, Issue 3). http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb.
Robinson, J. P. (2000b). A Fact Sheet: What Are Employability Skills. Alabama Cooperative Extension System, 1(3).
Rolheiser, C., & Ross, J. A. (2001). Student self-evaluation: What research says and what practice shows. Plain Talk about Kids, 43, 57.
Rosmiati, R., & Satriawan, M. (2019). The ocean climate phenomenon: The challenges of earth physics lectures in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 32038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1157/3/032038
Ross, J. A. (2006a). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(1), 10.
367

Ross, J. A. (2006b). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11(10).
Rustaman, N. Y. (2011). Pendidikan dan penelitian sains dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi untuk pembangunan karakter. Prosiding Seminar Biologi, 8(1).
Sadler, D. R. (1989a). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sadler, D. R. (1989b). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Sadler, D. R. (1989c). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Safe’i, A. I. (2018). Aplikasi K-Means untuk Pengelompokan Kabupaten dan Kota Berdasarkan Produktivitas Tanaman Pangan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2015.
Saleh, H., Hadjaratie, L., Masaong, A. K., & Panai, A. H. (2023). Mempersiapkan Generasi Emas Indonesia 2045 Menghadapi Bonus Demografi Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Kreatifitas. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 9(2), 949–958.
Samejima, F. (2016). Graded response models. In Handbook of item response theory (pp. 123–136). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Santon, K. (2012). The Feel Good Factory on creative thinking: mind-flexing, brain-storming, juice-flowing ways to discover your inner genius. Infinite Ideas.
Santoso, S. (2014). Statistik Multivariat Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS, Edisi revisi. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Computindo.
Santrock, J. W. (2013). Edacational Psychology. The Mc.Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Saprudin, S., Liliasari, S., Prihatmanto, A. S., & Setiawan, A. (2019). Pre-service physics teachers’ thinking styles and its relationship with critical thinking skills on learning interference and diffraction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 32029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032029
Sarwono, Y. (2010a). Pengertian Dasar Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). In Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Ukrida (Vol. 10, Issue 3, p. 98528).
Sarwono, Y. (2010b). Pengertian dasar structural equation modeling (SEM). Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis.
368

Satriawan, M., Liliasari, W., & Abdullah, A. G. (2020). Analysing of pre-service physics teachers critical thinking skills profile in ocean wave energy topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 22041.
Schneider, B., Krajcik, J., Lavonen, J., Salmela-Aro, K., Klager, C., Bradford, L., Chen, I.-C., Baker, Q., Touitou, I., & Peek-Brown, D. (2022). Improving science achievement—Is it possible? Evaluating the efficacy of a high school chemistry and physics project-based learning intervention. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 109–121.
School Superintendents Position Paper, M. A. (2007). Building an awessment future with purpose in mind, MASS Curriculum Committee.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003044231033
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.
Seifert, T., & Feliks, O. (2019). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 169–185.
Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2019). Epistemic tools for science classrooms: The continual need to accommodate and adapt. Science Education, 103(4), 1112–1119.
Shirley, M. L. (2010). A model of formative assessment practice in secondary science classrooms using an audience response system. In Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 70, p. 3402).
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
Sofyan, F. S., & Sanusi, A. R. (2023). Relevance Compulsory Learning in Basic Education, Pancasila Students and The Golden Generation of Indonesia in 2045. Journal Civics and Social Studies, 7(1), 56–67.
Solievich, T. N. (2022). Specific aspects of improving the quality of education in higher education institutions. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(9), 31–34.
Spiller, D. (2009). Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment. The University of Waikato.
369

Stanley, T., & Moore, B. (2013). Critical Thinking and Formative Assessments. In Critical Thinking and Formative Assessments. Eye on Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856261
Stapleton, C. D. (1997). Basic Concepts and Procedures of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Stefani, L. A. J. (1992). Comparison of collaborative self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical. Biochemical Education, 20(3), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(92)90057-s
Steinfeld, J., & Robitzsch, A. (2021). Item parameter estimation in multistage designs: A comparison of different estimation approaches for the Rasch model. Psych, 3(3), 279–307.
Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory into Practice, 44(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3
Suárez‐Falcón, J. C., & Glas, C. A. W. (2003). Evaluation of global testing procedures for item fit to the Rasch model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56(1), 127–143.
Sudiyanto, S., Kartowagiran, B., & Muhyadi, M. (2015a). Pengembangan model assessment as learning pembelajaran akuntansi di SMK. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 189–201.
Sudiyanto, S., Kartowagiran, B., & Muhyadi, M. (2015b). Pengembangan Model Assessment As Learning Pembelajaran Akuntansi Di Smk. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5579
Sullivan, M. E., Hitchcock, M. A., & Dunnington, G. L. (1999). Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials. The American Journal of Surgery, 177(3), 266–269.
Suluh, M., & Lede, Y. A. (2021). Pengukuran Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa SMA Kabupaten Sumba Barat Daya Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 9(2), 170–177.
Sumranwanich, W., & Yuenyong, C. (2014). Graduate students’ concepts of nature of science (NOS) and attitudes toward teaching NOS. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2443–2452.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chiou, S.-K., & Hou, H.-T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.002
370

Sung, Y.-T., Lin, C.-S., Lee, C.-L., & Chang, K.-E. (2003). Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer- Assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30(4), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3004_06
Supranto, J. (2010). Analisis multivariat: arti & interpretasi.
Suranto, S., Muhyadi, M., & Mardapi, D. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Uji Kompetensi Keahlian (Ukk) Administrasi Perkantoran Di Smk. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127
Suratno. (2009). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Teman Sejawat Kompetensi Akuntansi Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif: Uji Empirik pada Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Ekonomi Jurusan Pendidikan IPS – FKIP Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin. In Disertasi doktor, tidak diterbitkan.
Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2011.582838
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. (No Title).
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481.
Tamba, S. P., & Kesuma, F. T. (2019). Penerapan Data Mining Untuk Menentukan Penjualan Sparepart Toyota Dengan Metode K-Means Clustering: data mining; k-means-clustering. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer Prima (JUSIKOM PRIMA), 2(2), 67–72.
Temel, S., Şen, Ş., & Özcan, Ö. (2017). Validity and reliability analyses for the nature of science instrument secondary (NOSI-S). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 429.
Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2010). Higher order thinking.
Thompson, F. E., & Subar, A. F. (2017). Dietary assessment methodology. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease (pp. 5–48). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802928-2.00001-1
Thompson, J. C. (2012). ��������� ��-" �Ou�r �Ance�sto�rs ar�e i�n u�s"�: �� strengthening our voices through language revitalization from a Tahltan worldview.
371

Thompson, T. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in Bloom’s taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 96–109.
Thorndike, R. M., Cunningham, G. K., Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428
Triyanto, W. A. (2015). Algoritma K-Medoids Untuk Penentuan Strategi Pemasaran Produk. Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro Dan Ilmu Komputer, 6(1), 183– 188.
Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1990). Becoming a secondary school science teacher. Merrill Publishing Company.
Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S.-M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1–3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00069-0
Tyler, R. W. (n.d.). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press.
Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, 1–14.
van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular development research as specimen of educational design research. Educational Design Research, 53–70.
Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021). Student perceptions of assessment feedback: A critical scoping review and call for research. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33, 345–373.
Verhelst, N. D., & Verstralen, H. (2008). Some Considerations on the Partial Credit Model. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 29(2), 229–254.
Volante, L. (2009). Amenament of for, and as learning whithin schools: Implications for transforming classroom practice. http://www.icxei2009.org.presentations/Volante/Volante.
Wang, S., & Zhang, D. (2020). Perceived teacher feedback and academic performance: The mediating effect of learning engagement and moderating
372

effect of assessment characteristics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 973–987.
Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379– 394.
Widarjono, A. (2015). Analisis multivariat terapan edisi kedua. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Widhiarso, W. (2000). SPSS untuk Psikologi (pp. 1–34). Mengestimasi reliabilitas. Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2021). Assessment and feedback practices in the EFL
classroom. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 7(1).
Widihastuti, W., & Suyata, S. (2014a). Model AFL Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Dan Higher Order Thinking Skills Mahasiswa Vokasi Bidang Busana. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 275–289.
Widihastuti, W., & Suyata, S. (2014b). Model AFL Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Dan Higher Order Thinking Skills Mahasiswa Vokasi Bidang Busana. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 275–289.
Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam dasar-dasar untuk praktik. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indoensia Press.
Wijanto, S. H. (2008). SEM dengan Lisrel 8.8. Yogyakarta: PT. Graha Ilmu. Wijayanto, S. H. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling dengan LISREL 8.8.
Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Graha Ilmu.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution tree press.
Winnie, S. W. M. (2004). Assessing primary science learning: beyond paper and pencil assessment. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 1–27.
Winstone, N. E., Hepper, E. G., & Nash, R. A. (2021). Individual differences in self- reported use of assessment feedback: The mediating role of feedback beliefs. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 844–862.
WNCP. (2006). Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind. In Learning. https://doi.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Cumming, J. J. (2009). Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice. In Educational Assessment in the 21st Century: Connecting Theory and Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9
373

Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39–49.
Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238.
Yan, Z., & Boud, D. (2022). Conceptualising assessment-as-learning. Assessment as Learning: Maximising Opportunities for Student Learning and Achievement, 2.
Yan, Z., Brown, G. T. L., Lee, J. C.-K., & Qiu, X.-L. (2020). Student self- assessment: Why do they do it? Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509–532.
Yan, Z., Chiu, M. M., & Ko, P. Y. (2020). Effects of self-assessment diaries on academic achievement, self-regulation, and motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 562–583.
Yan, Z., & Yang, L. (2021). Assessment as Learning: Maximising Opportunities for Student Learning and Achievement. In Z. Yan & L. Yang (Eds.), Routledge. Routledge.
Yang, S., Ni, X., Yin, X., Kante, B., Zhang, P., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2014). Feedback-driven self-assembly of symmetry-breaking optical metamaterials in solution. Nature Nanotechnology, 9(12), 1002–1006.
Zhang, R., & Rudnicky, A. I. (2002). A large scale clustering scheme for kernel k- means. 2002 International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 4, 289–292.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299– 315). Routledge.
citation:   Saepuzaman, Duden and Istiyono, Edi  (2023) Model Asessment as Learning Berbasis Pemahaman dan HOTS pada Pembelajaran Fisika DasarBagi Mahasiswa Program Studi pendidikan Fisika.  S3 thesis, Sekolah Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/79528/1/disertasi-duden%20saepuzaman-19701261008.pdf