eprintid: 78286
rev_number: 9
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/82/86
datestamp: 2023-07-24 02:36:07
lastmod: 2023-07-24 02:36:07
status_changed: 2023-07-24 02:36:07
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Hapsari, Wilis Putri
creators_name: Haryanto, Haryanto
title: Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Numerasi untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D1
subjects: F4
divisions: pps_lit_evazdik
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: instrumen asesmen, numerasi, sekolah dasar
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan: (1) konstruk instrumen asesmen numerasi untuk siswa sekolah dasar, (2) kualitas instrumen asesmen numerasi untuk siswa sekolah dasar, dan (3) hasil asesmen numerasi siswa sekolah dasar.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan yang mengacu pada prosedur pengembangan dari Mardapi (2017), dengan langkah-langkah: (1) perancangan tes yang meliputi (a) penentuan tujuan tes, (b) penentuan kompetensi, (c) penentuan konstruk materi, (d) penyusunan kisi-kisi instrumen tes, dan (e) penyusunan item tes; (2) validitas isi; (3) uji coba instrumen ke-1; (4) analisis validitas konstruk dan reliabilitas; (5) perbaikan instrumen; (6) uji coba instrumen ke-2; (7) analisis dan intrepretasi hasil ketercapaian; dan (8) perakitan tes. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 442 siswa kelas 5 sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Kulon Progo yang ditentukan dengan menggunakan teknik random sampling (200 siswa untuk uji coba ke-1 dan 242 siswa untuk uji coba ke-2). Validitas isi dibuktikan melalui penilaian ahli yang dikuantifikasi dengan formula Aiken. Validitas konstruk dibuktikan dengan Exploratory Factor Analysis, sedangkan reliabilitasnya dibuktikan dengan nilai Cronbach’s Aplha sebesar 0,872. Kualitas butir tes dianalisis menggunakan Item Response Theory melalui uji Partial Credit Model dan analisis deskriptif untuk menggambarkan kemampuan numerasi siswa.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Konstruk instrumen yang dikembangkan d berdasarkan kompetensi pada domain numerasi. (2) Instrumen asesmen ini memenuhi validitas isi dengan semua butir memiliki indeks V Aiken lebih dari 0,7 sedangkan nilai KMO-MSA pada validitas konstruknya adalah sebesar 0,788 dengan nilai sig Bartlett’s 0,000, yang berarti telah memenuhi validitas konstruk. Nilai reliabilitas Cronbach’s Alpha juga termasuk dalam kategori sangat andal. Instrumen yang dikembangkan dapat mengukur kemampuan siswa pada rentang -1,2 sampai 2,8 dengan memberikan fungsi informasi maksimal sebesar 58 dengan standar error 0,7. (3) Sejumlah 51% siswa sekolah dasar memiliki kemampuan numerasi dengan kategori cakap, yang berarti siswa mampu mengaplikasikan kemampuan matematis dalam konteks yang lebih beragam, akan tetapi masih perlu diasah kemampuan bernalarnya untuk mendeteksi suatu kesalahan. Domain numerasi yang memiliki skor perolehan tertinggi adalah domain bilangan (20,98%), sub domain representasi (40,7%), sedangkan domain dengan skor perolehan terendah adalah domain geometri dan pengukuran (12,48%) dan sub domain bangun geometri (15,75%).
date: 2023-03-17
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Abidin, M., & Retnawati, H. (2019). A diagnosis of difficulties in answering questions of circle material on junior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16454
Abidin, Z. (2016). Penerapan Pemilihan Media Pembelajaran. Edcomtech, 1(1), 9–20.
Achmetli, K., Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2019). Multiple Solutions for Real- World Problems, Experience of Competence and Students’ Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1605–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9936-5
Aditomo, A., Rahmawati, Felicia, N., Shihab, N., & Handayani, F. (2019). Kajian Akademik dan Rekomendasi Reformasi Sistem Asesmen Nasional. 1–26.
Ahmad, A. (2022). Pemantauan Pelaksanaan Asesmen Nasional Berbasis Komputer (ANBK) Sekolah Dasar Binaan Kecamatan Kopang Kabupaten Lombok Tengah Tahun 2021. Jurnal Paedagogy, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v9i1.4619
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Aishalya, A. S., Bayu, A., Nandiyanto, D., Kurniawan, T., Bilad, M. R., Akuntansi, D., Indonesia, U. P., Kimia, D. P., & Indonesia, U. P. (2022). Implementation of Numeracy Literacy through Economics Learning in Elementary School. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 63–68. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ IJOMR/
Allen, M. ., & Yen, W. . (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Wadsworth.Inc.
AM, M. A., & Hadi, S. (2021). Implementation of Item Response Theory at Final Exam Test in Physics Learning: Rasch Model Study: Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541, 336–342. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.048
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 41, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Andikayana, D. M. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Literasi Membaca Level 2 untuk Siswa Kelas 4 SD. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Aziza, M. (2019). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal tertutup dan terbuka pada pokok bahasan lingkaran. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.26563
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.
Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2019). The Basics of Item Response Theory Using R.
Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54205-8 Bellini, D., Crescentini, A., Zanolla, G., Cubico, S., Favretto, G., Faccincani, L.,
 151
Ardolino, P., & Gianesini, G. (2019). Mathematical Competence Scale (MCS) for primary school: The psychometric properties and the validation of an instrument to enhance the sustainability of talents development through the numeracy skills assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092569
Bennison, A., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2020). Utilising a research-informed instructional design approach to develop an online resource to support teacher professional learning on embedding numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(5), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020- 01140-2
Bernadi, R. M. A. (2017). Peningkatan kreativitas siswa kelas IV SD melalui pembelajaran tematik integratif dengan pendekatan open-ended. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v5i1.7783
Brennan, R. L. (2006). Educational measurement (4th ed.). USA: America Council on Education and Praeger
Chinn, S. (2021). The Trouble with Maths (4th ed.). Routledge.
Cobo, C. (2013). Skills for innovation: Envisioning an education that prepares for the changing world. Curriculum Journal, 24(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744330
Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts. London: HM Stationery Office.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinrhart and Winston
Dasar Sekolah, D. (2021). Modul Literasi Numerasi Di Sekolah Dasar. In Modul Literasi Numerasi Di Sekolah Dasar (Vol. 1, p. 22). Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Direktorat Jenderal PAUD, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah. http://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/upload/filemanager/2021/06/2 Modul Literasi Numerasi.pdf
de Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PIA perspective. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 13.
DeMars, C. (2010). Item Response Theory. In Series in Understanding Statistic. Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/5 48173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think- asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625
Diputera, A. M. (2018). ANALISIS IRT MENGGUNAKAN WINGEN 3: Teori Respon Butir & Aplikasi. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
Doig, B., McCrae, B., & Rowe, K. (2003). A good start to numeracy. Melbourne:
152

Australian Council for Educational Research., 63. http://dysgu.cymru.gov.uk/docs/learningwales/publications/03goodstarten.pdf
Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2020). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based strategies for enhancing teaching and learning. Routledge.
Dr. Y. Rajasekhar, D. Y. R. (2012). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Higher Education. International Journal of Scientific Research, 3(3), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/march2014/28
Duskri, M., Kumaidi, K., & Suryanto, S. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Di Sd. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2123
Evans, D., & Hares, S. (2021). Should Governments and Donors Prioritize Investments in Foundational Literacy and Numeracy? (Issue May 2021). https://www.cgdev.org/publication/should-governments-and-donors-prioritize- investments-foundational-literacy-and-numeracy
Faizah, U., Zuchdi, D., & Alsamiri, Y. (2019). An authentic assessment model to assess kindergarten students’ character. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.24588
Fiangga, S., M. Amin, S., Khabibah, S., Ekawati, R., & Rinda Prihartiwi, N. (2019). Penulisan Soal Literasi Numerasi bagi Guru SD di Kabupaten Ponorogo. Jurnal Anugerah, 1(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.31629/anugerah.v1i1.1631
Fitzpatrick, J. ., Sanders, J. ., & Worthen, B. . (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed). Pearson Education.
Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0648-1
Goos, M., Geiger, V., Bennison, A., & Roberts, J. (2015). Numeracy Teaching across the Curriculum in Queensland: Resources for Teachers. Final Report.
Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2011). TEACHERS’ PERSONAL CONCEPTIONS OF NUMERACY. 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 457–464.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Book Review : Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. In Applied Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900315
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, D. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 29, Issue 07). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-4185
Hamidy, A., & Jailani, J. (2019). Kemampuan proses matematis siswa Kalimantan Timur dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika model PISA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26679
Harahap, A. C. P. (2020). Covid 19: Self Regulated Learning Mahasiswa. Al-Irsyad, 10(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.30829/al-irsyad.v10i1.7646
153

Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304
Haryanto, H. (2013). Pengembangan Computerized Adaptive Testing (Cat) Dengan Algoritma Logika Fuzzy. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(1), 47– 70. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i1.1087
He, Q., & Wheadon, C. (2013). The effect of sample size on item parameter estimation for the partial credit model. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1(3), 297. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijqre.2013.057692
IndonesiaPisa. (2020). Indonesia Pisa. https://indonesiapisa.com/profil/)
Isgiyanto, A. (2013a). Diagnosis Kesalahan Siswa Berbasis Penskoran Politomus Model Partial Credit Pada Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1099
Isgiyanto, A. (2013b). Perbandingan Penyekoran Model Rasch dan Model Partial Credit pada Matematika. Jurnal Kependidikan, 43(1), 9–18.
Istiyono, E. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penliaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Teori Klasik dan Modern (2nd ed.). UNY Press.
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI FISIKA (PysTHOTS) PESERTA DIDIK SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120
Jailani, J. (2021). Behind The Change of National Examination Policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1).
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0
Kamaruddin, K., & Haryanto, H. (2014). Pengembangan sistem penilaian hasil belajar mata pelajaran menganalisis rangkaian listrik berbasis computerized adaptive testing. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 4(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v4i1.2533
Kartowagiran, B., Mardapi, D., Purnama, D. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2019). Parallel tests viewed from the arrangement of item numbers and alternative answers. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.23721
Kebudayaan, K. P. dan. (2022). Buku Saku Rapor pendidikan Indonesia. Kemdikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik
Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi. Kementrian Pendidikan
Dan Kebudayaan, 8(9), 1–58.
Kemendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan
154

Kementerian Pendidikan Dan KebudayaanPembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Prinsip Asesmen Pembelajaran (p. ). Platform Merdeka Mengajar.
Kennedy, L. ., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics (11th ed.). Thompson Wadsworth.
Khasanah, D. R. A. U., Pramudibyanto, H., & Widuroyekti, B. (2020). Pendidikan Dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 41–48.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. In Center for Education Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council (Vol. 17, Issue 12). National Academy Press. ftp://129.132.148.131/EMIS/journals/ZDM/zdm026r1.pdf
Kim, S., & Lee, W.-C. (2004). IRT Scale Linking Methods for Mixed-Format Tests. ACT, Inc
Kobayashi, M. (2017). STUDENTS ’ MEDIA PREFERENCES IN ONLINE LEARNING. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(July), 4–15.
Koesoema, D. (2019). Kebijakan Ujian Nasional dan Asesmen Nasional. 1–11.
Kohar, A. W., Dhany, F. A., & Widadah, S. (2021). Facilitating Students’ Multiple Intelligences through RME: A Learning Trajectory of Volume and Surface Area Measurement. Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), 3(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v3i1.248
Kovas, Y., Voronin, I., Kaydalov, A., Malykh, S. B., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Literacy and Numeracy Are More Heritable Than Intelligence in Primary School. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2048–2056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486982
Krishnan, S., & Idris, N. (2018). Using Partial Credit Model to Improve the Quality of an Instrument. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(4), 313. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i4.15146
Kriswantoro, Kartowagiran, B., & Rohaeti, E. (2021). A critical thinking assessment model integrated with science process skills on chemistry for senior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.285
Lamprinoau, I., & Athanasou, A. (2009). A Teacher’s Guide to Educational Assesment. Brill.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). a Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lee, H. Y., & Dodd, B. G. (2012). Comparison of exposure controls, item pool characteristics, and population distributions for CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(1), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411411296
Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., & Isnaeni, W. (2020). NGSS-oriented chemistry test
155

instruments: Validity and reliability analysis with the Rasch model. Research and Evaluation in Education, 6(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i1.30112
Mardapi, D. (2007). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan NonTes. Mitra Cendekia. Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.).
Parama.
Mardapi, D., Kumaidi, & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Developing Unbiased And Standardized Instrumens For Students Achievements In High Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 327–341.
Masters, G N. (1988). A General Form of Rasch ’ s Extended Logistic Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(4), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0104
Masters, Geoff N. (2006). Towards a growth mindset in assessment. Practically Primary, 19(2), 4–8.
Masters, Geoff N. (2013). Australian Education Review Reforming Educational Assessment : Imperatives , principles and challenges Australian Education Review Reforming Educational Assessment : Imperatives , principles and challenges. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Maulidiansyah, D., Meutia, I., & Istiyono, E. (2021). Computer-Based Two-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Critical Thinking Skills in Optical Instrument. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.059
Mawati, A. ., Permadi, Y. ., Rasinus, R., Simarmata, J., Chamidah, D., Purba, B., & Karwanto, K. (2020). Inovasi Pendidikan: Konsep, Proses dan Strategi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Md-Ali, R., Karim, H. B. B. A., & Yusof, F. M. (2016). Experienced primary school teachers’ thoughts on effective teachers of literacy and numeracy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2016.13.1.3
Megawati, L. A., & Sutarto, H. (2021). Analysis Numeracy Literacy Skills in Terms of Standardized Math Problem on a Minimum Competency Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.49540
Meiliasari, Rahayu, W., & Maryam, R. (2022). Pelatihan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Numerasi untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru Matematika SMP. Sarwahita, 19(01), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/sarwahita.191.6
Mertens, D. . (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (3rd ed). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Miller, M. ., Linn, R. ., & Gronlund, N. . (2013). Measurement and assesmet in teaching 10th Ed. Pearson.
Milton, M. (2017). Inclusive Principles and Practices in Literacy Education. International Perspective on Inclusive Education, 11, 3–18.
156

Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assesment Frameworks. In TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119491774.ch8
Munayati, Z., zulkardi, & Santoso, B. (2015). Kajian Soal Buku Teks Matematika Kelas X Kurikulum 2013 Menggunakan Framework PISA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sriwijaya, 9(2), 188–206. https://unej.id/1cWvAd2
Muraki, E. (1992). A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Aplication of an EM Algorithm. In Educational Testing Service (Issue January).
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). USA: McGraw Hill Inc.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-assessment-and- analytical-framework_9789264255425- en%0Apapers3://publication/doi/10.1787/9789264255425-en
OECD. (2018). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (First Draft). European University Institute, 2, 2–5. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=PT%0Ahttp://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52012PC0011:pt:NOT
Osterlind, S. J. (1998). What is constructing test items? Springer.
Osterlind, S. J. (2002). Constructing test items: Multiple-Choice, Costructed-Response, Performance, and Other Formats. In Evaluation in Education and Human Services (Vol. 2, Issue 3). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149- 7189(91)90058-o
Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous Item response Theory Models. In Handbook of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861264.ch3
Pangesti, F. T. P. (2018). Menumbuhkembangkan Literasi Numerasi Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Soal Hots. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 5(9), 566–575. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org
Pasani, C. F. (2019). Analyzing Elementary School Students Geometry Comprehension Based on Van Hiele’s Theory. JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY, 54(5).
Pendidikan, P. A., & Makarim, N. (2020). Kebijakan Asesmen Nasional. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwcC17qeFi4
Perdana, R., & Suswandari, M. (2021). Literasi Numerasi Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Siswa Kelas Atas Sekolah Dasar. Absis: Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.32585/absis.v3i1.1385
Puslitjakdikbud. (2021). Risalah Kebijakan 2021 (Issue November).
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya: Untuk peneliti, praktisi pengukuran dan pengujian, mahasiswa pascasarjana. Nuha Medika.
157

Retnawati, H. (2015). Perbandingan Estimasi Kemampuan Laten Antara Metode Maksimum Likelihood Dan Metode Bayes. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5575
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama.
Richards, J., & Islam, M. S. (2018). Assessing literacy and numeracy among primary school students: A pilot survey in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Development, 61(December 2017), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.001
Rogers, G., & Badham, L. (1992). Evaluation in Schools Getting Started on Training and Implementation (Educational Management Series). Routledge.
Rohim, D. C., Rahmawati, S., & Ganestri, I. D. (2021). Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 33(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993
Safaruddin, Anisa, & AF, M. S. (2012). Partial Credit Model ( PCM ) dalam Penskoran Politomi pada Teori Respon Butir. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika, & Komputasi, 9(1), 39–48. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jmsk/article/view/3397%0Ahttp://files/171/S afarudin et al. - 2012 - Partial Credit Model ( PCM ) dalam Penskoran Polit.pdf
Schunk, D. . (2012). Teori-teori Pembelajaran Perspektif Pendidikan (Learning Theories An Educational Perspective)o Title (E. Hamdiah & R. Fajar (eds.)). Pustaka Pelajar.
Sellars, M. (2018). Numeracy in Authentic Contexts. In M. Sellars (Ed.), Numeracy in Authentic Contexts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5736-6
Setiawan, W. (2017). Era Digital dan Tantangannya. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 1–9.
Shantika, E. G., & Istiyono, E. (2019). A diagnosis of students’ errors in answering the mathematics test in senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16370
Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assesing Mathematical Literacy The PISA Experience. In Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_1
Supovitz, J. (2009). Can high stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9105- 2
Supriadi, N., Syazali, M., Lestari, B. D., Dewi, E. S., Utami, L. F., Mardani, L. A., & Putra, F. G. (2019). The Utilization of Project Based Learning and Guided Discovery Learning: Effective Methods to Improve Students’ Mathematics Ability. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 25(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i3.487
Sustekova, E., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2019). Validation of critical thinking test on Slovak conditions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112295
158

Syamsuddin, S., & Istiyono, E. (2018). The effectiveness of mathematics learning through contextual teaching and learning approach in Junior High School. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(September 2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054489
Trimurtini, T., Waluya, S. B., Walid, W., Dwidayati, N. K., & Kharisudin, I. (2021). Measuring Spatial Ability and Geometric Thinking Level of Prospective Elementary School Teachers Using the Rasch Model. İlköğretim Online Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 948–957. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.91
Tsatsaroni, A., & Evans, J. (2014). Adult numeracy and the totally pedagogised society: PIAAC and other international surveys in the context of global educational policy on lifelong learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9470-x
Ulandari, L., Amry, Z., & Saragih, S. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5721
van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691- 6
Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., & Mislevy, R. J. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Routledge. (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605931
Wang, K. (2017). A fair comparison of the performance of computerized adaptive testing and multistage adaptive testing [Michigan State University]. In Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 78, Issues 9-A(E)). http://ezproxy.lib.umb.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc t=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-29361-258&site=ehost-live
Widhiarso, W. (2011). Aplikasi Teori Respon Butir Untuk Menguji Invariansi Pengukuran Psikologi Guna Keperluan Survei dan Seleksi Pekerjaan. 3(2), 104– 117.
Widyaningrum, R. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika Berkonteks Islam di Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Wijaya, A., & Dewayani, S. (2021). Framework Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum ( Akm ). Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–107.
Yamamoto, K., Shin, H. J., & Khorramdel, L. (2019). Introduction of multistage adaptive testing design in PISA 2018 (Issue 209). www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers
Yan, D., von Davier, A. ., & Lewis, C. (2015). Computerized Multistage Testing: Theory and Applications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(3), 277–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811401979
159

Yustitia, V., & Juniarso, T. (2020). Literasi Matematika Mahasiswa Dengan Gaya Belajar Visual. Malih Peddas (Majalah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar), 9(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.26877/malihpeddas.v9i2.5044
Yusuf Eryandi, K., & Nuryanto, A. (2020). 21st Century Skills of Life Career Skills in Productive Learning of Vocational High School of Technical Expertise Engineering in Yogyakarta City. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8-7-5
Yusuf, S. (2011). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Rosdakarya.
Zahroh, H., Hafidah, Dhofir, & Zayyadi, M. (2020). Gerakan Literasi Matematika dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 4(1), 1–9.
Zukhrufurrohmah, & Putri, O. R. (2022). Pendampingan Pengembangan Instrumen Berciri Literasi Numerasi dalam Menyiapkan AKM pada Guru SD. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri, 6(1), 464–474. http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jmm
citation:   Hapsari, Wilis Putri and Haryanto, Haryanto  (2023) Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Numerasi untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/78286/1/tesis-wilis%20putri%20hapsari-19701251017.pdf