eprintid: 74619
rev_number: 9
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/46/19
datestamp: 2022-10-12 04:05:16
lastmod: 2022-10-12 04:05:16
status_changed: 2022-10-12 04:05:16
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Susilawati, Susilawati
creators_name: Aznam, Nurfina
title: Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Berbasis Socio- Scientific Issues Berbantuan ICT untuk Meningkatkan Soft Skills dan Scientific Literacy Calon Guru IPA.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D0
subjects: ipa
divisions: pps_ip
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: pendidikan lingkungan hidup, inquiry, ISSITech, scientific literacy,
socio-scientific issues, soft skills
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menentukan karakteristik model pembelajaran Inquiry Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues berbantuan ICT (ISSITech) untuk calon guru IPA, (2) menilai kelayakan model pembelajaran tersebut, (3) menilai kepraktisan model pembelajaran tersebut, dan (4) menguji efektivitas model pembelajaran tersebut dalam pengembangan soft skills dan kemampuan scientific literacy calon guru IPA.
Penelitian ini merupakan research and development yang menerapkan prosedur pengembangan Borg & Gall terdiri 10 tahap yaitu studi pendahuluan, perencanaan, pengembangan draft awal, uji coba draft awal, revisi draft awal, uji coba lapangan, revisi produk awal, uji coba operasional, revisi produk operasional, dan diseminasi. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa program studi pendidikan IPA yang sedang mengambil mata kuliah Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Universitas Tidar, dan IAIN Salatiga. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, wawancara, observasi, dokumentasi, dan tes. Data yang terkumpul terdiri dari data hasil survey permasalahan dan kebutuhan proses pembelajaran pada perkulaiahan Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup, data hasil validasi produk oleh pakar dan praktisi, data keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran dalam uji coba produk, serta data hasil uji efektivitas produk. Uji coba produk dilakukan sebanyak dua kali yang berupa uji terbatas dan uji skala luas dengan desain pretest-posttest control group design. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji Manova dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan 9 uji asumsi multivariat.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Struktur sintaks model pembelajaran ISSITech yang dikembangkan terdiri dari stimulasi masalah, melakukan observasi, melakukan investigasi, menganalisis data hasil temuan, mempresentasikan hasil dan menyusun simpulan disertai refleksi akhir. Perangkat pendukung pembelajaran terdiri dari bahan ajar, RPS, LKM, peragkat penilaian, aplikasi ISSITech, gambar, dan video. (2) Model pembelajaran ISSITech telah dinilai layak untuk diterapkan melalui proses validasi yang dilakukan oleh ahli desain pembelajaran, ahli media, ahli materi, dan dosen Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup sebagai praktisi. (3) Uji coba kepraktisan menghasilkan model pembelajaran ISSITech yang dinilai praktis oleh mahasiswa dan dosen sebagai pengguna model. (4) Model pembelajaran ISSITech dinilai efektif untuk meningkatkan soft skills dan kemampuan scientific literacy. Hasil uji coba produk model pembelajaran ISSITech menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan antara model pembelajaran ISSITech dengan model pembelajaran langsung. Model pembelajaran ISSITech terbukti efektif untuk mengembangkan soft skills dan kemampuan scientific literacy calon guru IPA pada matakuliah Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup.
date: 2022-08-08
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: Alim., Sarwi., & Subali, B. (2020). Implementation of ethno science-based guided inquiry learning on the scientific literacy and the character of elementary school students. Journal of Primary Education, 9(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.15294 /jpe.v9i2.29189
Anderson, D. (2014). The nature and influence of teacher beliefs and knowledge on the science teaching practice of three generalist New Zealand primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165- 014-9428-8
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach, 9th edition. New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
Ariza, M. R., Abril, A. M., Quesada, A., & García, F.J. (2014). Bridging inquiry based learning and science education on socio scientific issues: contributions to the parrise European project. Proceeding of International Technology, Education and
Development Conference (INTED), Spanyol.
Barbara, R. (2002). Interaction, reflection and learning at a distance. The Journal of Open,
Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), 39-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680510120110166 Beyer, B. K. (1971). Inquiry in the social studies classroom: A strategy for teaching.
Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research (4 ed.). New York: Logman Inc.
 
Andreas, S. (2018). Effects of the decline in social capital on college graduates soft skills. Industry and Higher Education, 32(1),42-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422217749277
   215
Bybee, R. W. (2009). PISA’S 2006 measurement of scientific literacy: an insider’s persective for the U.S. A Presentation for the NCES PISA Research Conference. Washington: Science Forum and Science Expert Group.
Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students’ decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkse.2010.30.7.887
Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Enhancing students’ communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6
Cresswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Diana, S., Arif, R., & Euis, S. R. (2015). Profil kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMA berdasarkan instrumen scientific literacy assesments (SLA). Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 2015.
Donia, M. B. L., O'Neill, T. A., & Brutus, S. (2018). The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.012
Edelson, C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). The challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(4), 391-450. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1466642
Elfindri. (2010). Soft Skills untuk Pendidik. Bandung: PT. Baduose Media.
Erniati, L. 2010. Membangun VOIP secara sederhana. Jurnal Kependidikan, 20(2), 187-201. 216
   
 European Commission. (2007). Science education now: a renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: The Education Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
European Commission. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. Report to the european commission of the expert group on science education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fowler, S.R., Zeidler, D.L., & Sadler, T.D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
Goksun. D.O., & Kurt. A.A. (2017). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ use of 21st century learner skills and 21st century teacher skills. Education and Science, 190 (42), 107-130. https://doi.org/ 10.15390/EB.2017.7089
Gong, C., Zhang, D., & Peng, R. (2019). Ways to improve and cultivate scientific literacy of minority college students. 6th International Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering Conference (IEESASM 2018). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 294, 498-501.
Gormally, C., Peggy, B., & Mary, L. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (tols): measuring information and arguments. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 364-377. Retrievied from https://www.lifescied.org/doi/pdf/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Grinnel, R. M. J. (1988). Social work research and evaluation. (3rd ed.). Itasca, Illionis: F.E. Peacok Publisher, Inc.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. United State of America: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  217

Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? college learning and career success. Washington, DC: The Association of American Colleges & Universities.
Haury, D.L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED359048.pdf
Herawati, D., & Ardianto, D. (2017). Socioscientific argumentation of pre-service teachers about genetically modified organisms. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE), 895. http:// dx.doi. org/10.1088/1742- 6596/895/1/012023
Hidayani, F., Rusilowati, A., & Masturi. (2016). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis literasi sains materi fluida statis. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(3), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v5i3.13726
Hughes, R. L., & Jones, S. K. (2011). Developing and assessing college student teamwork skills. New directions for institutional research, 149, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.380
Jagger, S. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012). Mind the gap: looking for evidence-based practice of "science literacy for all" in science teaching journals author(s). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9271-6
Jonathan, S. (2013). Mixed Method: Cara menggabung riset kuantitatif dan kualitatif secara benar. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Computindo.
Joyce, B. & Weil. (2000). Models of Teaching 6th edition. Boston-London: Allyn and Bacon. Joyce, B. & Weil. (2009). Models of Teaching 6th edition. Edisi ke-8 cetakan ke-1.
Diterjemahkan oleh Ahmad Fuwail dan Ateila Mirza, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
      218

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2016). Models of teaching 8th edition. Boston: MA Pearson.
Kemery, R., & Stickney, L. T. (2014). A multifaceted approach to teamwork assessment in an undergraduate business program. Journal of Management Education, 38(3), 462– 479. http://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913504762
Klaus, P. (2010). The hard truth about soft skills: workplace lessons smart people wish they’d learned sooner. New York: HarperCollins.
Kollas. S., & Halkia. K. (2016). Second chance schools in Greece: a critical analysis of science teachers’ views and practices on designing scientific literacy curricula. Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning: Contributions from Science Education Research 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_19
Koyan, I. W. (2012). Statistik pendidikan: teknik analisis data kuantitatif. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Press.
Kuswara, H. (2010). Strategi sukses mahasiswa indonesia meraih karier gemilang dengan soft skills. Cakrawala: Jurnal Humaniora Bina Sarana Informatika, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v10i1.5595
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing Character and values for global citizens: Analysis of preservice science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925– 953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113.
http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
      219

Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Assessing teamwork skills for assurance of learning using CATME team tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 5–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475313499023
Mathew, S. M., & Reddy, J. K. (2018). Soft skills of secondary level teachers. International Journal of Research, 7, 374-378. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329154117
Menteri Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2017 Tentang Standar Pendidikan Guru.
Menteri Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.
Mulyasa, E. (2008). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru (cetakan III). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Muslich, M. (2008). KTSP, Pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi dan kontekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
National Academy of Sciences. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academic Press.
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2017). The key variables employers seek on students’ resumes. Retrieved from https://www.naceweb.org/about- us/press/2017/the-key-attributes-employers-seek-on-students-resumes/
           220

 National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2019). Predicting employment through machine learning. Retrieved from https://www.naceweb.org/career- development/trends-and-predictions/predicting-employment-through-machine-learning/
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science achievement of U.S. Fourthand eighth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (2003). Standards for science teacher preparation. University of Nebraska – Lincoln: Faculty Publications Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnfacpub/86
Nieveen, N. (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training,125-136. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: a new framework for assessment. Paris: OECD
OECD. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2011). What kinds of careers do boys and girls expect for themselves? PISA in focus. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2013). Survey International Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). Paris: OECD Publishing.
    221

OECD. (2015). PISA2012 results: what students know and can do - student performance in reading, mathematics and science. (Vol. 1). Paris-France: OECD Publishing.
O'Neill, T. A., Hoffart, G. C., McLarnon, M. J. W., Woodley, H. J., Eggermont, M., Rosehart, W., & Brennan, R. (2017). Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and outcomes in student learning teams. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0183
Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75396
Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Ritter.B.A., Small. E. E., Mortimer. J.W., Doll. J.L. (2018). Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917703679
Robbles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today's workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 453–465. http://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912460400
Rusman. N. Y. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
             222

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680
Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly. L.A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: the effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463– 1488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
Sailah, Illah. (2008). Pengembangan soft skills di perguruan tinggi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Perana Media Grup.
Schulz, B. (2008). The importance of soft skills: education beyond academic knowledge. Journal of Language and Communication, 146-154.
Retrievied from http://hdl.handle.net/10628/39
Shuayto, N. (2013). Management skills desired by business school deans and employers: an
empirical investigation. Business Education & Accreditation, 5(2), 93-105.
Retrievied from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2239205 Suparno. (2004). Peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Susilawati., Aznam, N., & Paidi. (2019). Teachers’ perspectives toward soft skill in science learning. Manuscript submitted for publication
      223

Tang, K. N. (2018). The importance of soft skills acquisition by teachers in higher education institution. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 30, 1- 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.01.002
Tang, K. N., Chan, C. T., & Devi, U. (2015). Critical issues of soft skills development in teaching professional training: educators’ perspectives . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.039
Tang, K. N., Hasyim, N. H., & Yunus, H. Y. (2015). Novice teacher perceptions of the soft skills needed in today'sworkplace . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 284-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.338
Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1996). Teaching Secondary Schooll Science Strategies For Developing Scientific literacy. Englewood; New Jersey; Columbus; Ohio: Merrill an Imprint of Prentice Hall.
Udampong, L. (2014). Causal model of research competency via scientific literacy of teacher and student. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1581 – 1586. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.438
Utama, M.S., W.S. Suprapti, M. Wartini, P. Widyatmika. (2009). Evaluasi Pengembang an Softskills Mahasiswa Melalui Proses Pembelajaran. PHK-I: Universitas Udayana.
Walker, M. (2011). PISA 2009 plus results: performance of 15-year-olds in reading, mathematics and science for 10 additional participants. Melbourne: ACER Press
Wariyanti, A., Rusijono, & Nasution. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar siswa kelas iv SD pada subtema keindahan alam negeriku. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian, 5(2). 1019-1024.
  224

http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v5n2.p1019-1024
Weil, B., Joyce, & Calhoun.( 2000). Models Of Teaching. Newyork: A Person Education
Company.
Winata, A., Cacik, S., & Seftia, I. (2016). Analisis kemampuan awal literasi sains mahasiswa pada konsep IPA. Education and Human Development Journal, 1(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v1i1.291
Waddock, S., & Lozano, J. M. (2013). Developing more holistic management education: Lessons learned from two programs. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12(2), 265–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0002.
Zeidler, D.L., & Nichols, B.H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
Zhang, A. (2102). Cooperative Learning and Soft Skills Training in an IT Course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11(1), 65-79.
Retrievied from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111493/.
citation:   Susilawati, Susilawati and Aznam, Nurfina  (2022) Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Berbasis Socio- Scientific Issues Berbantuan ICT untuk Meningkatkan Soft Skills dan Scientific Literacy Calon Guru IPA.  S3 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/74619/1/disertasi-susilawati-17703261030.pdf