eprintid: 73198
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/31/98
datestamp: 2022-05-30 08:21:27
lastmod: 2022-06-09 01:38:18
status_changed: 2022-05-30 08:21:27
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Lengkong, Meilan
creators_name: Istiyono, Edi
title: Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Literasi Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D0
divisions: pps_lit_evazdik
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: literasi digital, literasi numerik, literasi sains, pembelajaran fisika.
abstract: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian sehingga perlu ditemukan: (1) konstruksi instrumen tes literasi; (2) kualitas instrumen tes untuk mengukur kemampuan literasi peserta didik; dan (3) profil kemampuan literasi peserta didik.
Penelitian ini merupakan research and development model pengembangan instrumen tes oleh Mardapi yaitu: (1) menyusun spesifikasi tes, (2) menulis tes, (3) menelaah tes, (4) melakukan uji coba, (5) menganalisis butir tes, (6) memperbaiki tes, (7) merakit tes, (8) melaksanakan tes, dan (9) menafsirkan hasil tes. Subjek uji coba empirik kemampuan literasi numerik, literasi sains, dan literasi digital pada kelas XI MIPA adalah 263 peserta didik SMA Negeri 3 Yogyakarta, SMA Negeri 7 Yogyakarta, dan SMA Negeri 10 Yogyakarta di Kota Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Subjek pengukuran dengan sampel terbatas ditentukan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan metode undian yang melibatkan 87 peserta didik kelas X MIPA Kota Yogyakarta. Produk yang dikembangkan adalah lembar penilaian kelayakan materi, lembar telaah produk, lembar penilaian kelayakan soal tes literasi numerik, literasi sains, dan literasi digital. Instrumen penilaian dikembangkan adalah bentuk tes, dengan soal pilihan ganda two-tier pada literasi numerik dan literasi sains, serta bentuk tes pilihan ganda dengan alternatif jawaban pada literasi digital. Analisis data pada kelayakan aspek materi dan instrumen menggunakan hasil tabulasi skor, hasil penilaian oleh expert judgment menggunakan persamaan V Aiken, dan analisis butir soal dilakukan untuk menghitung besar validitas, reliabilitas soal serta tingkat kesukaran soal berdasarkan PCM 1-PL. Analisis kemampuan literasi adalah dengan menghitung proporsi jawaban peserta didik pada setiap aspek.
Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Instrumen penilaian tes dinyatakan layak dan andal untuk digunakan dalam mengukur kemampuan literasi numerik, literasi sains, dan literasi digital peserta didik SMA serta karakteristik butir soal yaitu tingkat kesulitan butir soal kemampuan literasi numerik, literasi sains, dan literasi digital termasuk dalam kategori baik; dan berdasarkan analisis kecocokan butir dengan model PCM, menunjukkan keseluruhan item cocok dengan model. (2) Kemampuan peserta didik dianalisis tiap aspek kemampuan literasi, yang kemudian dianalisis secara menyeluruh pada tiap kemampuan literasi. Persentase kemampuan literasi numerik, literasi sains dan literasi digital peserta didik dikategorikan “sangat baik”, “baik”, “cukup”, “kurang”, dan “sangat kurang”. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan literasi numerik, dan literasi sains belum memuaskan dengan kategori terbesar yakni “kurang “dan “sangat kurang”; sementara untuk persentase kemampuan literasi digital, sebagian besar berada pada kategori sedang atau cukup”.
date: 2022-01-12
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Bumi Aksara.
Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. T. (1996). QUEST: The interactive test analysis system version 2.1. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school’s students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IP A Indonesia, 5(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493
Afriyanti, I., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Mengacu PISA Melalui Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 Berbasis Teknologi. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 608–617. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/
Aiken, L. R. (1985a). Three coefficients for analysing Reliability and Validity of rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005
Aiken, L. R. (1985b). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Aisyah, R., Zakiyah, I. A., Farida, I., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2017). Learning Crude Oil by Using Scientific Literacy Comics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
Alkharusi, H., Kazem, A. M., & Al-Musawai, A. (2011). Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of preservice and inservice teachers in educational measurement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2011.560649
Allchin, D. (2016). Teaching the nature of science: Perspective and resources. Mn: SHiPS Education Press.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction To Measurement Theory. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 41, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Andrianto Pangondian, R., Insap Santosa, P., & Nugroho, E. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kesuksesan Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Revolusi
163
Industri 4.0. Sainteks 2019, 56–60. https://seminar-id.com/semnas- sainteks2019.html
Anggrasari, L. A. (2020). Penerapan e-learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi digital di era new normal. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.7493
Arief, M. K., Handayani, L., & Dwijananti, P. (2012). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Pada Siswa Rsbi : Studi Kasus Di Rsmabi Se Kota Semarang. UPEJ (Unnes Physics Education Journal), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v1i2.1354
Arifin, Z., & Setyawan, A. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Aktif dengan ICT. Skripta Media Creative.
Arifin, Zainal. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (10th ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2020). Survei Penetrasi Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Bagian Penting dari Transformasi Digital. In Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (Vol. 2020, pp. 1–146). Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informastika Republik Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/survei
Astuti, A. T., Supahar, Mundilarto, & Istiyono, E. (2020). Development of assessment instruments to measure problem solving skills in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1440/1/012063
Astuti, I. A. D., & Handayani, S. (2018). Penggunaan Virtual Laboratory berbasis PhET Simulation Untuk Menentukan Konstanta Wien. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i2.2487
Astuti, I. A. D., Sumarni, R. A., & Saraswati, D. L. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Mobile Learning Berbasis Android. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 57. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/1.03108
Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The Practicality and Effectiveness of Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model by Using PhET Simulation to Increase Students’ Scientific Creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409–424. www.e-iji.net
Atkin, J. M., & Coffey, J. E. (2003). Everyday Assessment in the Science Classroom. NSTA Press.
Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, C. M. (1993). Media Literacy: From a Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. In MEDIA LITERACY in the INFORMATION AGE. The Aspen Institute. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351292924-4
Azizah, R., Yuliati, L., & Latifah, E. (2015). Kesulitan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Pada Siswa Sma. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 5(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v5n2.p44-50
164

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Bashooir, K., & Supahar. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran Fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590
Basri, H., Khasanah, S. N., & Hilmi, D. (2020). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Media Online Dalam Pembelajaran Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Tarbiyatuna : Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah, 5(2), 145–158.
Bayrak, B. K. (2013). Using Two-Tier Test to Identify Primary Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Alternative Conceptions in Acid Base. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.21.3.2
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. F. (2014). Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
Buckingham, D. (2009). “Creative” visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture and Society, 31(4), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.518644
Carjuzaa, J., & Kellough, R. D. (2013). Teaching in the middle and secondary schools: Tenth edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
Cassidy, J., & Ortlieb, E. (2012). Looking at Literacy in the 21st Century. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(4), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2012.659773
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90006F
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2015). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills 8th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. J. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for
165

teaching (7th ed.). OH Pearson.
Chiappetta, Eugene L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills. Pearson.
Christensen, C. K. (2011). Young Adults’ Accounts of Scientific Knowledge When Responding to a Television News Report of Contested Science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 1(2), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2010.548658
Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., Cortes, F., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004
Clyde, W., & Delohery, A. (2005). Using Technology in Teaching. Yale University Press.
Curry, M. J., & Hanauer, D. I. (2015). Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education. Language Studies, Science and Engineering (LSSE), 1.
Darma, R. S., Setyadi, A., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Multimedia Learning Module Development based on SIGIL Software in Physics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012042
Darmawijoyo. (2011). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis WEB. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 3(1), 294–303. http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jsi/index
Department of Learning. (2015). Green Paper: Digital Literacy. In The Fundamental Building Blocks of Digital Literacy From Enhancement to Transformation (pp. 1–20). https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/ERTE/Estudos_Tecnologias/elc_ digital_literacy.pdf
Dewi, D. P., Soekopitojo, S., Larasati, A., Kurniawan, M. F., & Hartanti, E. R. S. (2020). Developing instrument to measure student’s capability for future work in industry 4.0 at vocational education culinary program. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(12), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I12.15589
Dian Anggraeni, R., & Kustijono, R. (2013). Pengembangan Media Animasi Fisika Pada Materi Cahaya Dengan Aplikasi Flash Berbasis Android. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v3n1.p11-18
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010130.
166

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Dori, Y. J., Mevarech, Z. R., & Baker, D. R. (2018). Cognition , Metacognition , STEM Education: Learning, Teaching dan Assessment. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-66659-4
Dubosc, F., & Kelo, M. (2012). Human Resource Management in Public Higher Education in the Tempus Partner Countries (Issue 10). European Commission. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2797/89070
DuPaul, G. J., & Jimerson, S. R. (2014). Assessing, understanding, and supporting students with autism at school: Contemporary science, practice, and policy. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000184
Durak, G. (2017). Using social learning networks (SLNs) in higher education: Edmodo through the lenses of academics. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2623
Ellianawati, Meilanie, E. P., & Subali, B. (2021). Development of Science Literacy Assessment Based on Multi Representation of Rectilinear Motion Concept to Investigate Students ’ Science Literacy Competencies. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i3.2229
Erduran, S. (2014). Beyond Nature of Science : The Case for Reconceptualising ‘ Science ’ for Science Education. Science Education International, 25(1), 93– 1111.
Fadilah, N. U., & Suparwoto, S. (2016). Keterlaksanaan pembelajaran fisika implementasi kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan latar belakang akademik guru di MAN DIY. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8380
Faize, F. A., & Dahar, M. A. (2012). Engaging secondary grade physics students in developing test items. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(2), 3–11.
Faour, M. A., Ayoubi, Z., & The, Z. (2018). The Effect of Using Virtual Laboratory on Grade 10 Students’ Conceptual Understanding and their Attitudes towards Physics. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 54– 68. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.387482
Fariyani, Q., & Kusuma, H. H. (2021). Development of Test Instruments to Analyze Higher-Order Thinking Skills Through Science-Based Literacy Learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1886
Fatwa, V. C., Septian, A., & Inayah, S. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis 167

Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 389–398. http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
Fitriana, D. (2018). Peran Media E-Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Untuk Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Norma Sosiomatematik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional “Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Pada Siswa Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Global,” 0291, 58–62.
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a Measure of Scientific Literacy for Middle School Students. Science Education, 98(4), 549–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115
Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., & Shelley, B. E. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009 : Highlights From PISA 2009 : National Center for Education Statistics, 72. https://libproxy.library.unt.edu:9443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/l ogin.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED513640&scope=site
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Eighth Edi). McGraw-Hill.
Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational Research. In Lib-gen.is (seventh). Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008064-1
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (Sixteenth). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Gerde, H. K., Pierce, S. J., Lee, K., Egeren, L. A. Van, Gerde, H. K., Pierce, S. J., Lee, K., & Van, L. A. (2017). Early Childhood Educators ’ Self-Efficacy in Science , Math , and Literacy Instruction and Science Practice in the Classroom. Early Education and Development, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1360127
Geyer, M.-A., & Kuske-Janßen, W. (2019). Mathematical Representations in Physics Lessons. Mathematics in Physics Education, 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04627-9_4
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). The Preparation and Structure of Metalla- Sulphur/Selenium Nitrogen Complexes and Cages. Studies in Inorganic Chemistry, 14, 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-88933- 1.50023-4
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.
Griffin, P., Gillis, S., & Calvitto, L. (2007). Standards-referenced assessment for 168

vocational education and training in schools. Australian Journal of Education, 51(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410705100103
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi, 562–569.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900315
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory Library. SAGE Publications. Inc.
Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching, Learning & Assessing Science (Third). Paul Chpaman Publishing Ltd.
Henukh, A., Simbolon, M., Astra, I. M., & Rosdianto, H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa pada Konsep Kalor. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(2), 178–184.
Herpiana, R., Rosidin, U., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). Development of Instruments to Train Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in Physics Assessment for High School Students’ Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012046
Herring, J. E. (2021). A grounded analysis of year 8 students’ reflections on information literacy skills and techniques and an identification of students’ information literacy attributes. IASL Annual Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.29173/iasl7973
Hillman, A. M. (2014). A literature review on disciplinary literacy: How do secondary teachers apprentice students into mathematical literacy? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(5), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.256
Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Aspen Institute. 1 Dupont Circle NW Suite 700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280
Hoerunnisa, A., Suryani, N., & Efendi, A. (2019). the Effectiveness of the Use of E-Learning in Multimedia Classes To Improve Vocational Students’ Learning Achievement and Motivation. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v7n2.p123--137
Holbrow, C. H., Amato, J. C., & Parks, M. E. (2010). Modern Introductory Physics. In Springer (Second ed.). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1989650
169

Holliday, G. M., & G. Lederman, N. (2014). Informal Science Educators’ Views about Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.788802
Holotescu, C., Grosseck, G., & Danciu, E. (2014). Educational Digital Stories in 140 Characters: Towards a Typology of Micro-blog Storytelling in Academic Courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4301–4305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.936
ICT Literacy Panel. (2002). Digital Transformation: A Framework for ICT Literacy. A Report of the International ICT Literacy Panel. Educational Testing. https://doi.org/10.1.1.453.7843
Indaryani, E., & Suliworo, D. (2018). Dampak Pemanfaatan WhatsApp Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Pelajaran Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Quantum, 25, 25–31. seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/quantum
Irhamni. (2018). Prinsip-Prinsip Dan Pendekatan Dalam Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(5), 111–119.
Irhandayaningsih, A. (2020). Pengukuran literasi digital pada peserta pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi covid-19. Anuva, 4(2), 231–240.
Istiyono, E. (2014). The development of physics essay test for higher order thinking skills in Junior High School. International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences 2014, May, 18– 20.
Istiyono, E. (2018a). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika (1st ed.). UNY Press.
Istiyono, E. (2018b). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika Dengan Teori Tes Klasik dan Modern. UNY Press.
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Lede, Y. A., Rahayu, F., & Nadapdap, A. (2019). Developing IRT-based physics critical thinking skill test: A CAT to answer 21st century challenge. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12417a
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., & Muthmainah. (2019). Developing of Bloomian HOTS Physics Test: Content and Construct Validation of the PhysTeBloHOTS. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012017
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., & Rahayu, F. (2018). Pengembangan Tes Creative Thinking Skills Fisika SMA (PhysCreTHOTS) Berdasarkan Teori Tes Modern. Cakrawala Pendidikan.
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI FISIKA (PysTHOTS) PESERTA DIDIK SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1),
170

1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120
Istiyono, E., & Suyoso. (2019). The Developing and Calibration of PhysEDiTHOTS Based on IRT and IQF for Students’ HOTS Diagnostic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012038
Istiyono, E., Widihastuti, W., Supahar, S., & Hamdi, S. (2020). Measuring Creative Thinking Skills of Senior High School Male and Female Students in Physics (CTSP) Using the IRT-based PhysTCreTS. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.46
Johnston, L., & DeMarco, A. (2015). STEM Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3318414
Juniarti, N. M. E., & Rasna, I. W. (2020). PEMANFAATAN APLIKASI GOOGLE MEET DALAM KETERAMPILAN MENYIMAK DAN BERBICARA UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID- 19. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 9(2), 133–141.
Kartowagiran, B., Wibawa, E. A., Alfarisa, F., & Purnama, D. N. (2019). Can student assessment sheets replace observation sheets? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22207
Kemendikbud, G. (2017). Pedoman Penilaian dan Evaluasi Gerakan Literasi Nasional. http://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp- content/uploads/2017/08/pedoman-penilaian-evaluasi-gln.pdf
Kern, R. (2002). Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford University.
Ketut Sudarsana, I., Bagus Made Anggara Putra, I., Nyoman Temon Astawa, I., & Wayan Lali Yogantara, I. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165
Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P. (2019). Open online assessment management system platform and instrument to enhance the information, media, and ICT literacy skills of 21st century learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953
Kim, J., & Lee, W. (2013). Meanings of criteria and norms: Analyses and comparisons of ICT literacy competencies of middle school students. Computers and Education, 64, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.018
Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture and Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459.
171

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593
Krontiris-litowitz, J. (2013). Using Primary Literature to Teach Science Literacy to Introductory Biology Students. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 14(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v|4i|.538
Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. D. (2013). Educational Testing & Measurement: Classroom Application and Practice. In CSE Report (10 ed, Issue 1). Wiley. http://gcls.cmich.edu/reference/index.html#form
Kusuma, J. W., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Dengan Penggunaan Platform Whatsapp Group Dan Webinar Zoom Dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Pada Masa Pandemik Covid 19. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v5i1.5942
Kusumawardani, D. R., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Pentingnya Penalaran Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prisma, 1(1), 588–595.
Laksono, K., Retnadiningdyah, P ., Khamim, Purwaning, N., Sulastri, & NOrprigawati. (2018). Strategi Literasi Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Materi Penyegaran Instruktur Kurikulum 2013): Vol. II. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/11419/1/15. Modul Literasi.pdf
Langub, L. W., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2017). Rethinking Instructional Technology to Improve Pedagogy for Digital Literacy: A Design Case in a Graduate Early Childhood Education Course. TechTrends, 61(4), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0185-1
Latifah, S., Susilowati, N. E., Khoiriyah, K., Saidy, S., Yuberti, Y., & Rahayu, R. (2019). Self-Efficacy: Its Correlation to the Scientific-Literacy of Prospective Physics Teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012015
Lau, W. W. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2014). Developing and validating of a perceived ICT literacy scale for junior secondary school students: Pedagogical and educational contributions. Computers and Education, 78, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.016
Lay, Y. F. (2019). Integrating environmental education and ICT. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), 2018–2020. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105686
Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2004). International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results From the U.S. Perspective. Highlights. NCES 2005-003. US Department of Education. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED484183
Lengkong, M., Istiyono, E., Rampean, B. A. O., Tumanggor, A. M. R., & Nirmala, M. F. T. (2021). Development of Two-Tier Test Instruments to Detect
172

Student’s Physics Misconception. 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science, 279, 561–566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.082
Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2005). The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton University Press. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
Liem, T. L. (2007). Asyiknya Meneliti Sains: Invitations to science inquiry. Pudak Scientific.
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies. The Communication Review, 7, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
Loh, A. S. L., Subramaniam, R., & Tan, K. C. D. (2014). Exploring students’ understanding of electrochemical cells using an enhanced two-tier diagnostic instrument. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(3), 229– 250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.916669
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Mahadaniar, A. G., Siswaningsih, W., & Nahadi. (2013). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Kelas Pada Pembelajaran Hidrokarbon. Jurnal Pengajaran MIP A, 18(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v18i2.36143.g15522
Mansyur, J. (2015). Teachers’ and Students’ Preliminary Stages in Physics Problem Solving. International Education Studies, 8(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n9p1
Mansyur, Rasyid, H., & Suratno. (2019). Asesment Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Pustaka Pelajar.
Marbun, P. (2020). Disain Pembelajaran Online Pada Era Dan Pasca Covid-19. CSRID Journal, 12(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.22303/csrid
Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Parama Publishing.
Martin, A., & Madigan, D. (2006). Digital Literacies for Learning (1st editio). Faced publishing.
Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2016). Using categorization of problems as an instructional tool to help introductory students learn physics. Physics Education, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/51/2/025009
Maughan, J., Ogunkola, B., & Garner-O’Neale, L. (2014). Scientific literacy of undergraduate chemistry students in the University of the West Indies, Barbados: individual and joint contributions of age, sex. International Letters
173

of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 10(2), 41–55. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=181890
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
Michelini, M. (2018). Labs in Building a Modern Physics Way of Thinking. The Role of Laboratory Work in Improving Physics Teaching and Learning, 15– 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96184-2_2
Millah, S., Rubini, B., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2021). Analysis of the Science Assessment Items Using Scientific Literacy Competencies. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v2i1.
Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching (Vol. 53, Issue 9). Pearson Education, Inc.
Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
Mumba, F., Miles, E., & Chabalegnula, V. (2018). Elementary Education In-service Teachers’ Familiarity, Interest, Conceptual Knowledge and Performance on Science Process Skills. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.30707/jste53.2mumba
Mundilarto. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Fisika. Pusat pengembangan Instruktional Sains.
Murni, M., Mirdayanti, R., & AG, B. (2018). Literature Study on The Influence of Mathematics Basic Skills to Work Out Physics Problems. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 1(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v1i2.2146
Nadziroh, F. (2017). Analisa Efektifitas Sistem Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Desain Komunikasi Visual, 2(1), 1–14.
Nahdi, D. S., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2020). Analisis Literasi Digital Calon Guru Sd Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Virtual Classroom Di Masa Pandemi Covid- 19. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 6(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v6i2.2133
Narut, Y. F., & Supardi, K. (2019). Literasi Sains Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 61– 69. http://jurnal.unikastpaulus.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/214/169
Nashon, S. M., & Madera, E. K. (2013). Instrument for assessing disposition for contextual learning of science of students in East Africa. SAGE Open, 3(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013494862
Nilsen, T., Angell, C., & Grønmo, L. S. (2013). Mathematical competencies and the role of mathematics in physics education: A trend analysis of TIMSS
174

Advanced 1995 and 2008. Acta Didactica Norge, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1113
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational Assessment of Students. Pearson New International Edition.
OECD. (2007). Executive summary PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Assessment and analytical framework: science. In Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy,(Interscience: Paris, 2016).
OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. Oecd, 1–10. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa- 2018-results-volume-iii_bd69f805-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd- ilibrary.org//sites/bd69f805- en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/bd69f805-en#fig86
Oktasari, D. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika menggunakan Framework TP ACK-QR untuk meningkatkan keterampilan Komunikasi Ilmiah dan Literasi ICT Siswa. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Olander, C., Hajer, M., Johansson, S., Jakobsson, A., Karlsson, A., Kouns, M., Lyngfelt, A., & Larsson, P. N. (2017). DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC LITERACY : A MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDY IN MULTILINGUAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS. European Science Education Research Association (ESERA).
Oliver, R. (2002). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change agent for education. HE 21 Conference Proceeding, 1–8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228920282_The_role_of_ICT_in_ higher_education_for_the_21st_century_ICT_as_a_change_agent_for_educ ation
Pakpahan, R., & Fitriani, Y. (2020). ANALISA PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN JARAK JAUH DI TENGAH PANDEMI VIRUS CORONA COVID-19. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Researh, 4(2), 30–36. http://journal.stmikjayakarta.ac.id/index.php/jisamar/article/view/181/144
Pangesti, F. T. P. (2018). Menumbuhkembangkan Literasi Numerasi Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Soal Hots. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 5(9), 566–575. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org
Parno, Yuliati, L., Hermanto, F. M., & Ali, M. (2020). A case study on comparison of high school students’ scientific literacy competencies domain in physics with different methods: PBL-stem education, PBL, and conventional learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23894
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23
175

Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. (n.d.).
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2015 (p. 3). (2015). https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2015/06/permendikbud-no-12- tahun-2015-tentang-program-indonesia-pintar-4285-4285
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan No. 63 tahun 2009 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan. (n.d.).
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. (n.d.).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Pasal 64. (n.d.).
Perdana, R., Riwayani, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Web-Based Simulation on Physics Learning to Enhance Digital Literacy Skill of High School Students. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v4i2.1048
Pertiwi, U. D., Atanti, R. D., Ismawati, R., & Tidar, U. (2018). Pentingnya Literasi Sains Pada Pembelajaran IPA SMA Abad 21. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 01(1), 24–29.
Praptanti, I., & Ernawati, A. (2019). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri Dan Swasta Di Wilayah Purwokerto Kota. Seminar Nasional - LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v4i12019p045
Prihatiningtyas, S., Prastowo, T., & Jatmiko, B. (2013). Implementasi simulasi phet dan kit sederhana untuk mengajarkan keterampilan psikomotor siswa pada pokok bahasan alat optik. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2505
Pujiriyanto. (2012). Teknologi untuk pengembangan media dan pembelajaran. UNY Press.
Purpura, D. J., Hume, L. E., Sims, D. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2011). Early literacy and early numeracy: The value of including early literacy skills in the prediction of numeracy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.004
Purwanto. (2016). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar (B. Santoyo). Pustaka Belajar.
Putranta, H. (2019). Synthesis of the Cognitive Aspects ’ Science Literacy and Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) in Chapter Momentum and Impulse Synthesis of the Cognitive Aspects ’ Science Literacy and Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) in Chapter Momentum and Impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1397/1/012014
176

Rahmawati, N. I. (2018). Pemanfaatan ICT dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prisma, 1, 381. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19606/9529
Randy L. Bell. (2009). Teaching the Nature of Science: Three Critical Questions. Best Parctices in Science Education, 22, 1–6. http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/monographs/scl22- 0449a_sci_am_bell_lores.pdf
Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of Physics, Language of Math: Disciplinary Culture and Dynamic Epistemology. Science and Education, 24(5–6), 561–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya: untuk Peneliti, Praktisi Pengukuran dan Pengujian, Mahasiswa Pascasarjana. Nuha Medika.
Retnawati, H. (2015). The comparison of accuracy scores on the paper and pencil testing vs. Computer-based testing. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 135–142.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian: Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian. Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H. (2017). Validitas dan reliabilitas konstruk skor tes kemampuan calon mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(2), 126–135. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/10973
Retnawati, H., & Wulandari, N. F. (2019). The Development of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Proficiency. Problems of Education In the 21st Century, 77(4), 502.
Riduwan. (2013). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru - Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Alfabeta.
Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Digital Literacy Test: Development of Multiple Choice Test for Preservice Physics Teachers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(03), 7085– 7095. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/7567
Rodzalan, S. A., & Saat, M. M. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(2012), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.425
Rohli, M., Abdurrahman, & Suana, W. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Berorinentasi Literasi Sains Pada Model Pembelajaran Exclusive. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1). http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/8063
Rohman, S., Rusilowati, A., & SUlhadi. (2017). Analisis Pembelajaran Fisika Kelas X SMA Negeri di Kota Cirebon Berdasarkan Literasi Sains. Physics
Communication,
1(2), 12–18.
177

https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v1i2.10402
Rokhmah, A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2017). Science Literacy Indicators in Optical Instruments of Highschool Physics Textbooks Chapter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i1.8391
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2012). Science IDEAS: A research-based k-5 interdisciplinary instructional model linking science and literacy. Science Educator, 21(1), 1–11. http://proxy.libraries.smu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.a spx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=78301406&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368
Rosidin, U. (2017). Evaluasi dan Asesmen Pembelajaran. Media Akademi.
Rositasari, D., Saridewi, N., & Agung, S. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Untuk Mendeteksi Miskonsepsi Siswa Sma Pada Topik Asam- Basa. Edusains, 6(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i2.1148
Rusman, Kurniawan, D., & Riyana, C. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru. In Jakarta : Rajawali Pers. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sanaky, & Hujair, A. H. (2013). Media Pembelajaran Interaktif-Inovatif. Kaubaka. Scarratt, E., & Davison, J. (2012). The Media Teacher’s Handbook (1st ed).
Routledge.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2017). On learning and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1336986
Schunk, D. H. (2014). Learning theories : an educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.
Secolsky, C., & Denison, D. B. (2018). Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education. In Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education (second). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203142189
Şentürk, E., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2014). The Effect of Science Centres on Students’ Attitudes Towards Science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.726754
Sesli, E., & Kara, Y. (2012). Development and application of a two-tier multiple- choice diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of cell division and reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 214–225.
178

https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.688849
She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and Mathematics Literacy: PISA for Better School Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018- 9911-1
Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T. J., & Vermaat, M. E. (2002). Discovering Computers 2003: Concept for A Digital World, Web and XP ENchanced. Discovering Computers 2003: Concept for A Digital World, Web and XP ENchanced.
Siswanto, J. (2019). Implementasi Model IBMR Berbantu PhET Simulation untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v10i2.4437
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. In Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya (revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Smith, T. I., Eaton, P., Brahmia, S. W., Olsho, A., Zimmerman, C., & Boudreaux, A. (2020). Toward a valid instrument for measuring physics quantitative literacy. 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2020.pr.smith_t
Squibb, S. L. D., & Zanzucchi, A. (2020). Apprenticing Researchers : Literacy Competencies. 20(1), 161–185.
Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience. Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience, 1–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7
Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). In the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, July, 279–294.
Subali, B., & Suyata, P. (2011). Data Pengukuran Pendidikan Untuk Memperoleh Bukti Empirik Kesahihan. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan. Alfabeta.
Sukarno, & Widdah, M. El. (2020). The effect of students’ metacognition and digital literacy in virtual lectures during the covid-19 pandemic on achievement in the “methods and strategies on physics learning” course. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25332
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
Suni Astini, N. K. (2020). Tantangan Dan Peluang Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Pembelajaran Online Masa Covid-19. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu
179

Pendidikan, 3(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v3i2.452
Supahar, Rosana, D., Ramadani, M., & Dewi, K. (2017). The Instrument for Assessing the Performance of Science Process Skills Based on Nature of Science (NOS). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(3), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i3.14731
Suprihatiningrum, J. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran, Teori dan Aplikasi. AR-RUZZ MEDIA.
Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
Tan Wee Hin, L., & Subramaniam, R. (2009). Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges. In Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level: Issues and Challenges (Vol. 2, pp. 1– 982). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-120-9
Tariq, V. N., Qualter, P., Roberts, S., Appleby, Y., & Barnes, L. (2013). Mathematical literacy in undergraduates: role of gender, emotional intelligence and emotional self-efficacy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.770087
Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(March), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009
The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions.
Tim GLN. (2017). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Nasional.
Tohara, A. J. T., Shuhidan, S. M., Bahry, F. D. S., & Nordin, M. N. bin. (2021). Exploring Digital Literacy Strategies for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Digital Age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 3345–3358.
Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2008). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Humaniora.
Triling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. In 21St Century Skill (First edit, Issue Book). Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902951429
Tumanggor, A. M.R., Supahar, Kuswanto, H., & Ringo, E. S. (2020). Using four- tier diagnostic test instruments to detect physics teacher candidates’ misconceptions: Case of mechanical wave concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
180

6596/1440/1/012059
Tumanggor, Awal Mulia Rejeki, & Supahar. (2020). The development of diagnostic test instrument for mathematical representation ability (PhysDTRA) in high school physics learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1439–1453. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.777425
Tumanggor, Awal Mulia Rejeki, Supahar, Ringo, E. S., & Harliadi, M. D. (2020). Detecting Students ’ Misconception in Simple Harmonic Motion Concepts Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.4571
Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(6), 626–631.
Tüysüz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37–53.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Uyulgan, M. A., Akkuzu, N., & Alpat, Ş. (2014). Assessing the students’ understanding related to molecular geometry using a two-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 839–855.
Valerio, J. (2014). Attrition in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Data and Analysis. Nova Publishers Inc.
Wagner, D. A. (2011). What happened to literacy? Historical and conceptual perspectives on literacy in UNESCO. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.11.015
Walsh, L., Howard, R. G., Harvey, J., & Bowe, B. (2005). Investigation of the relationship between conceptual understanding and quantitative problem- solving in optics. Opto-Ireland 2005: Photonic Engineering, 5827, 558. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.605134
Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration : Teacher Perceptions and Practice STEM Integration : Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J- PEER), 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
Ward, G., & Haigh, M. (2017). Challenges and Changes: Developing Teachers’ and Initial Teacher Education Students’ Understandings of the Nature of Science. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1233–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9543-9
Wenning, C. J., & Vieyra, R. E. (2020). Teaching High School Physics: Teaching The Nature of Science. American Assosiation of Physics Teachers.
181

https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735421967
White, J. (2015). Digital Literacy skills for FE Teachers (A. Thornton (Ed.)). SAGE Publication.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2018). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajran Di Sekolah (rev.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations. AAPT Physics Education: The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3361987
Winstone, N. E., Balloo, K., & Carless, D. (2020). Discipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design. Higher Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00632-0
World Economic Forum. (2017). What Are the 21st-Century Skills Every Student Needs? Youth Power 2: Learning and Evaluation. https://www.youthpower.org/resources/what-are-21st-century-skills-every- student-needs
Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28.
Zhang, H., & Zhu, C. (2016). A Study of Digital Media Literacy of the 5th and 6th Grade Primary Students in Beijing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0285-2
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and After Covid-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3
citation:   Lengkong, Meilan and Istiyono, Edi  (2022) Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Literasi Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/73198/1/tesis-meilan%20lengkong-19701251011.pdf