eprintid: 72081
rev_number: 8
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/20/81
datestamp: 2022-02-02 04:26:42
lastmod: 2022-02-02 04:26:42
status_changed: 2022-02-02 04:26:42
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Sumantri, Cahya Mar'a Saliha
creators_name: Retnawati, Heri
title: Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Pengayaan Mata Pelajaran Matematika Untuk Siswa Cerdas Istimewa di SMP.
ispublished: pub
subjects: F4
divisions: pps_math
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: perangkat pembelajaran pengayaan matematika, siswa cerdas istimewa, kalkulator
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran pengayaan matematika berbantuan kalkulator untuk siswa cerdas istimewa di SMP yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Perangkat pembelajaran pengayaan yang dikembangkan terdiri dari Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP), Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) berbantuan kalkulator, dan Tes akhir berbantuan kalkulator.
Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian pengembangan yang menggunakan model pengembangan dari Plomp, terdiri dari tahap penelitian pendahuluan atau preliminary research, tahap pengembangan atau prototyping stage, dan tahap penilaian atau assessment phase. Penelitian dilakukan di SMP Negeri 1 Pasuruan pada siswa kelas VIII-A dengan subjek sebanyak 33 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan terdiri dari instrumen untuk menentukan kevalidan perangkat yaitu lembar validasi. Instrumen untuk mengukur kepraktisan yaitu lembar penilaian kepraktisan oleh guru dan siswa, serta lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran. Instrumen untuk mengukur keefektifan yaitu instrumen tes akhir berbantuan kalkulator. Analisis dilakukan dengan melakukan konversi data kuantitatif ke bentuk kualitatif berupa nilai standar lima skala.
Penelitian ini menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran pengayaan berbantuan kalkulator untuk siswa cerdas istimewa di SMP kelas VIII. Hasil penilaian kevalidan oleh para ahli menunjukkan perangkat valid dengan kategori baik untuk RPP, LKPD, dan tes akhir pembelajaran pengayaan berbantuan kalkulator. Hasil kepraktisan yang diperoleh berdasarkan penilaian guru yaitu menunjukkan kategori sangat baik dan penilaian siswa menunjukkan persentase
untuk kategori sangat baik,   untuk kategori baik, dan   untuk kategori cukup. Pada hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran menunjukkan rata-rata keterlaksanaan pembelajaran mencapai   untuk kegiatan guru dan
untuk kegiatan siswa. Keefektifan perangkat pembelajaran pengayaan dapat dilihat berdasarkan tercapainya minimal   siswa yang mendapatkan skor minimal baik untuk tes akhir pembelajaran pengayaan berbantuan kalkulator yaitu sebesar   . Berdasarkan hasil kuesioner mengenai pembelajaran pengayaan berbantuan kalkulator, siswa mengatakan bahwa melalui pembelajaran pengayaan mereka mendapatkan pengetahuan baru, disertai penggunaan teknologi dalam belajar yaitu kalkulator dapat menghibur dan menambah ilmu baru mengenai penggunaan kalkulator karena kebanyakan siswa mengatakan baru mengetahui fungsi lain dari kalkulator selain untuk menghitung sederhana saja.
date: 2020-08-24
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Pendidikan Matematika
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Antari, N.K.Y.T., I Wayan W., dan Ni Made R.W. (2017). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran Pengayaan dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas XO TKJ2 SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. E-Journal Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Sastra Indonesia, Undiksha, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jjpbs.v7i2.11251
Amanyi ,C.K., Sigme, B.B., dan Lloyd, A.O. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Usage of Calculators in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at the Junior High School Level in Ghana. European Journal of Educational and Development Psychology, 4(2), 33-52. Retrieved from: www.eajournals.org
Basuki, W.A, dan Wijaya, A.(2018).The Development of Student Worksheet Based on Realistic Mathematics Education. ICRIEMS 5, Journal of Physics (1097). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012112
Brown, R.G.(2010). Does the introduction of the graphics calculator into system- wide examinations lead to change in the types of mathematical skills tested?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9220-2
Compton, Lacy. (2014). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model. Waco:Prufrock Press Inc.
Coppens, L.C., et al.(2019). Effects of Problem-example and Example-problem Pairs on Gifted and Nongifted Primary School Students’ Learning. Instructional Science, 47, 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019- 09484-3
Correll, M.M.(1978). Teaching the Gifted and Talented. Bloomington:Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Cross, T.L., and Coleman, L.J. (2005). School-Based Conception of Giftedness. In Stenberg, R.J., and Davidson, J.E. (2nd Edition), Conceptions of Giftedness, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Darmaningrat, E.W.T., Ahmad, H.N.A., Radityo, P.W., dan Hanim, M.A. (2018). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Digital Learning untuk Pembelajaran Pengayaan di Sekolah Menengah Kota Surabaya. Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi Indonesia (SESINDO), 85-96. Retrieved from: http://is.its.ac.id/pubs/oajis/index.php/home/pub/53
Davis, G.A., and Sylvia, B.R.(1989).Education of The Gifted and Talented (2nd Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
149
Denman, G.A. (2013). Think It, Show It Mathematics: Strategies for Explaining Thinking. Huntington Beach:Shell Education.
Depdiknas.(2007). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan untuk Peserta Didik Cerdas Istimewa.
Depdiknas.(2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O.(2015).The Systematic Design of Instruction
(Eighth Edition). Upper Sadlle River:Pearson.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.(2010). Juknis Pembelajaran Tuntas, Remedialm dan
Pengayaan di SMA.
Doerr, H.M., dan Zangor, R.(2000).Creating Meaning for and with the Graphing Calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003905929557
Drijvers, P., dan Doorman, M.(1996). The Graphics Calculator in Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0732-3123(96)90027-9
Durr, W.K. (1964). The Gifted Student. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eva, Nur. (2016). Karakateristik Kecerdasan Anak Cerdas Istimewa. Jurnal Sains Psikologi,5(2),20-24. Retrieved from http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php /JSPsi/article/view/5982
Feldhusen, J., Joyce V.B., and Ken, S. (1989). Excellence in Educating The Gifted. Denver: Love Publishing Company.
Feng, W.Y.(2007).Conceptions of Mathematics Enrichment. British educational research association annual conference (University of Warwick).
Goos, M., Gloria, S., and Collen, V.(2007). Teaching Secondary School Mathematics. Singapore:CMO Image Printing.
Harskamp, Egbert., Cor Suhre, and Anno Van S.(2000).The Graphics Calculator and Students’ Solution Strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03217073
Heidari, M., Azizifar, A., Gowhary, H., dan Abbasi, Z.(2015).Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attitude towards Lesson Plannning based on their Gender. Advanced in Language and Literacy Studies, 6(4), 80-83. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.80
Hidayat, Dylmoon.(1997).Penggunaan Kalkulator dalam Pengajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XVI (1), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.9245
150

Ismayani, A.(2016).Pengaruh Penerapan STEM Project-based Learning terhadap Kreativitas Matematis Siswa SMK.Indonesian Journal of Mathematics adn Education, 3(4), 264-272. Retrieved from http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org/wp-content/uploads/IME-V3.4- 07.Ani_Ismayani.pdf
Izzati, N. (2015).Pengaruh Penerapan Program Remedial dan Pengayaan Melalui Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Eduma, 4 (1), 54-68. DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v4i1.20
Jones, K., and Simons, H.(2000). The Student Experience of Online Mathematics Enrichment. In:Nakahara T, Koyoma M, editors. Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Japan, 3, 103-110. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252948140_The_student_experie nce_of_online_mathematics_enrichment
Kemendikbud.(2017). Matematika Kelas VIII SMP/MTs Semester 2 (Edisis Revisi). Jakarta:Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud.(2017). Matematika Kelas VIII SMP/MTs Buku Guru (Edisis Revisi). Jakarta:Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud.
Kemp, J.E., Morrison, G.R., & Ross, S.M.(1994).Designing Effective Instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Kent, Ashley.(2013).School Subject Teaching: the history and future of the curriculum. New York: Routledge.
Kim, Mihyeon.(2016). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Enrichment Programs on Gifted Students. Gift Child Quarterly, 60(2), 1-15. DOI: 10.1177/0016986216630607
Kyriacou, C.(2009).Efffective teaching in schools:Teory and practice (3rd edition). Cheltenham:Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Majid, Abdul.(2019).Perencanaan Pembelajaran, Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung:PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Mitchelmore, M., dan Cavanagh, M. (2000). Students’ Dificulties in Operating a Graphics Calculator. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 12(3), 254- 268. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03217088
Muthmainnah, R.N., dan Mega P.(2019). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Peserta Didik dengan IQ Tinggi Memperoleh Hasil Belajar Matematika Rendah. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika. 5(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.5.1.81-86
151

NCTM.(2000).Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
NCTM.(1989).Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Author, Reston, VA.
Nesari, A.J., dan Heidari, M.(2014).The Important Role of Lesson Plan on Educational Achievement of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attitudes. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 3(5). Retrieved from http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_557178.html
Nicoleta, S.(2011).How Can Technology Improve Math Learning Process. Procedia Social an Behavioral Sciences, 11 ,170-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.055
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In: van den Akker J., Branch R.M., Gustasfon K., Nieveen N., Plomp T. (eds) Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, Springer, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Nitko, A.J. dan Brookhart, S.M. (2011).Educational Assessment of Student. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Omidkhoda, M., Majid, A., and Davood, N. (2013). Assessment of Educational Coordination of 9th Semester Theatrical Lessons of Dental University with Presented Lesson Plans (2009-2010). Future of Medical Education Journal, 3(1), 32-35. Doi:10.22038/fmej.2013.669
Ormrod, J.E.(2006).Essentials of Education psychology big ideas to guide effective teaching (3rd edition). Boston:Pearson Education Limited.
Ozcan, D., Aysin, K.(2015).What to the teachers think about gifted students?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 190, 569-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.044
Penglase, M., dan Arnold, S. (1996). The Graphics Calculator in Mathematics Education: A Critical Review of Recent Research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8(1), pp 58-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03355481
Permendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Permendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Permendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
152

Permendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Permendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Permendikdas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Plomp, T., Nieveen, N. (2013).An Introduction to educational design research. Enshede:SLO netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Posamentier, A.S., and Stepelman, J.(1986).Teaching Secondary School Mathematics Techniques and Enrichment Units.Ohio: A bell & Howell Company.
Prayitno, dan Amti E. (2015). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Renzulli, J.S. (1986). The Three Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Creative Productivity. In Stenberg, R.J., and Davidson, J.E. (2nd Edition), Conceptions of Giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J.S., dan Reis, S.M. (2007). A Technology Based Program That Mathces Enrichment Resources With Student Strengths. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2(3), 1-12. Retrieved from: https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/126
Richards, J.C., and David, B. (2011). Creating Effective Language Lessons. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Roschelle, J and Corrine S.(2008).Graphing Calculators:Enhancing Math Learning for All Students.International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, Springer, 20, 951-959. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_60
Ruthven, K., and Chaplin, D.(1997).The Calculator as a Cognitive Tool:Upper- Primary Pupils Tackling a Realistic Number Problem. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2, 93-124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009747024970
Salani, E.(2013).Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology: Calculator Use in Mathematics Instruction in Junior Secondary Schools in Botswana. European Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu- jer.2.4.151
153

Saparwadi, L.(2016).Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran Drill dengan Peer Teaching Ditinjau dari Minat dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3(1), 39-46. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/DM/article/view/4304
Sekowski, A.E., dan Lubianka B.(2015). Education of Gifted Students in Europe. Gifted Educational International, 31(1), 73-90. DOI: 10.1177/0261429413486579
Serin, Hamdi.(2017). Technology-integrated Mathematics Education: A Facilitating Factor to Enrich Learning. International Journal of Learning and Development, 7(4), 60-67. DOI:10.5296/ijld.v7i2.12082
Shaughnessy, M.(2013). By Way of Introduction: Mathematics in a STEM Context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324. DOI: 10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.6.0324
Sheffield, L.J.(2016).Dangerous Myths About “gifted” Mathematics Students. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(1), 13-23. DOI 10.1007/s11858-016-0814-8
Silverstein, A.B.(1970).The Measurement of Intelligence.Pacific State Hospital, Pomona.
Sovchik, R.J.(1989). Teaching Mathematics to Children. New York: HarperCollinsPublishers.
Suhariadi, F., Suminar, D.R, dan Sugiarti, R.(2015). Literature Study Social Competence of Gifted Intelligent Students. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 3(4), 263-270. Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/3004
Stenberg, R.J., and Davidson, J.E. (2005). Conceptions of Giftedness (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swiatek, M.A., dan Ann L.S.(2003).Elementary and Middle School Student Participation in Gifted Programs:Are Gifted Students Underserved. Spring, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700203
Tajudin, N.M., dan Zarkasi, N.I.(2014).Using Graphic Calculator Technology to Support Learning for Straight Line Topic. Proceeding of the 21st National Symposium on Mathematical Sciences (SKSM21), 1605, 714-719. DOI: 10.1063/1.4887677
Taley, I.B., dan Adusei, M.S.(2020). Junior High School Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge in Calculators. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 80-93. DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i1.9523
154

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S.,& Semmel, M.I.(1974).Instructional Development for Training Teacher of Exceptional Children. Minneapolis:The Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped (CITH).
Thomson, Moira.(2006). Supporting Gifted and Talented Pupils in the Secondary School. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Tim Direktorat Pembinaan SMP.(2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta:Kemendikbud.
Trianto.(2015).Model pembelajaran terpadu:konsep, strategi, dan impelementasinya dalam kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta:bumi Aksara.
Trouche, L. (2005). Calculators in Mathematics Education: A Rapid Evolution of Tools, with Differential Effects. In:Guin D., Ruthven K., Trouche L. (eds) The Didactical Challenge of Symbolic Calculators. Mathematics Education Library, 36, Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23435-7_2
Undang-undang. (2003). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Uno, Hamzah B., dan Koni, Satria.(2018).Assessment Pembelajaran.Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.
Wadsworth, Barry J. (1984). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive and Affective Development Third Edition. New York: Longman.
Wardhani, A., Zulkardi, dan Yusuf, H. (2017). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Level 5 untuk Program Pengayaan SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 3(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.19109/jpmrafa.v3i1.1438
Weiss, LG., Donald HS, James AH, and Aurelio P.(2016).WISC-V:Advances in the Assessment of Intelligence. WISC-V assessment and interpretation:Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp 3-23). San Diego, CA, US:Elsevier Academic Press.
Welty, G.(2009).The ADDIE Model an Instructional Generic Design Model.Journal of GXP Compliance.
Widoyoko, E.,P.(2019).Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Wiggins, H., Ansie H., and Johann E.(2017).Student Enrichment in Mathematics: a Case Study with First Year University Students.International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 48(S1), S16-S29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2017.1352046
Winkel, W.S.(2018).Psikologi Pengajaran.Yogyakarta:Media abadi. 155

Wulan, Dwi Kencana.(2011).Peran Pemahaman Karakteristik Siswa Cerdas Istimewa Berbakat Istimewa (CIBI) dalam Merencanakan Proses Belajar yang Efektif dan Sesuai Kebutuhan Siswa. Humaniora, 2(1), 269-276.
citation:   Sumantri, Cahya Mar'a Saliha and Retnawati, Heri  (2020) Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Pengayaan Mata Pelajaran Matematika Untuk Siswa Cerdas Istimewa di SMP.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/72081/1/tesis-cahya%20mara%20saliha%20sumantri-18709251034.pdf