eprintid: 70369
rev_number: 8
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/07/03/69
datestamp: 2021-04-05 04:23:43
lastmod: 2021-04-05 04:23:43
status_changed: 2021-04-05 04:23:43
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Zudianto, Hardian
title: Relative Clause Attachment Preference in Second Language Sentence Processing: Evidence from Indonesian Learners of English.
ispublished: pub
subjects: E4
divisions: pps_lingtera
full_text_status: public
keywords: attachment preference, L2 sentence processing, syntactic proficiency
abstract: This research aims to reveal the relative clause attachment preference in L2 sentence processing from the perspective of Indonesian learners of English. This objective is specified into the investigation of attachment preference of the Indonesian learners of English and the effect of syntactic proficiency on their L2 English sentence processing. Consequently, both investigations shed light on the architecture and universality of L2 sentence processing.
Three quantitative studies were conducted in the attempt to achieve the research objectives. Yogyakarta State University graduate students of the English Education and Applied Linguistics program majoring in English Education and English Literature participated in a judgement task and two self-paced reading (SPR) tasks. The judgement task provided an offline measure for the identification of attachment preference, while an SPR task of an experimental design served as the online measure. Another SPR task was devised to examine the effect of syntactic proficiency on L2 sentence processing. The judgement task study was in the form of questionnaire, with Kuder Richardson 20 formula suggesting a high internal consistency of the instrument (KR-20 = 0.84), while the generalized-H index reflected a well-defined latent variable to be stable across studies (G-H = 0.93). Both SPR tasks recorded the participants’ reaction time data on the monitor- displayed stimulus in milliseconds. An absolute cut-off method and outlier detection using z-scores were applied to the reaction time data to enhance the reliability of both studies. All instruments were consulted with an instrument validator, with the task administration followed a standardized procedure. The judgement task and the first SPR task both of which investigated the participants’ attachment preference were analysed using the t-test comparison of means. Meanwhile a generalized linear model was utilized to examine the effect of syntactic proficiency on L2 sentence processing in the latter SPR task.
The results show a marked tendency for an Early Closure attachment preference in the offline measure of judgement task, while no distinctive preference identified in the online measure of SPR task, indicating a possible modulatory role of working memory. On the effect of syntactic proficiency on L2 sentence processing, the results of the SPR task reveal an apparent decrease in reaction time of the final clause as the participants’ syntactic proficiency scores increase. The results of all three studies consulted with the previous research findings suggest an exposure-based nature of L2 sentence processing in the discussion of processing universality, and the modulatory role of syntactic proficiency in the architecture of L2 sentence processing. From these findings, the present research suggests the L2 researchers take into account the proposed L2 sentence processing model for further systematization of language processing, and L2 teachers to consider the underlying importance of syntactic parsing in developing learning approaches and materials.
date: 2020-01-30
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Linguistik Terapan
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Bader, M., & Hussler, J. (2010). Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990260
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Kretzschmar, F., Tune, S., Wang, L., Genç, S., Philipp, M., Roehm, D., Schlesewsky, M. (2011). Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.010
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990344
Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755636
Buchstaller, I., & Khattab, G. (2013). Population Samples. In R. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 74–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buxó-Lugo, A., & Watson, D. G. (2016). Evidence for the influence of syntax on prosodic parsing. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.001
Checa-Garcia, I. (2016). Prosodic Cues in Relative Clauses Disambiguation: Bilinguals vs. L2 Learners. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research.
Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical processing in language learners.
Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002
114
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(3), 615–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000890
Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2
Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. C., & Corley, M. M. B. (1996). Parsing in Different Languages. In M. Carreiras, J. E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language Processing in Spanish (pp. 156–187). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and Working memory in bilingual sentence Processing. Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000675
Dai, Y. (2015). Working Memory in L2 Sentence Processing: The Case with Relative Clause Attachment. In Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing (pp. 105– 124). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
De Vincenzi, M., & Job, R. (1995). An investigation of late closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure, and pragmatics in initial interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(5), 1303– 1321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1303
Dijkstra, T, & Heuven, W. Van. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 189-225). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728902003012
Dinçtopal-Deniz, N. (2010). Relative clause attachment preferences of Turkish L2 speakers of English: Shallow parsing in the L2? In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in Second Language Processing and Parsing (pp. 27–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
115

Dowens, M. G., Guo, T., Guo, J., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish - Evidence from Event Related Potentials. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.034
Drury, J. E., Baum, S. R., Valeriote, H., & Steinhauer, K. (2016). Punctuation and implicit prosody in silent reading: An ERP study investigating english garden- path sentences. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01375
Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Language-selective and domain-general regions lie side by side within Broca’s area. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.011
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2012). Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 571–603. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000488
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H. (2012). The Timing of Island Effects in Nonnative Sentence Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263111000507
Fernández, E. M. (2003). Bilingual Sentence Processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.29
Ferrando, P.J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-241. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.304
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 762- 780. doi:10.1177/0013164417719308
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158
Ferreira, F., & Çokal, D. (2016). Sentence Processing. In G. Hickok & S. L. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of Language (pp. 265–274). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-07351-9
116

Ferreira, F., Engelhardt, P. E., & Jones, M. W. (2009). Good Enough Language Processing: A Satisficing Approach. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Ferreira, F., & Nye, J. (2018). The modularity of sentence processing reconsidered. In R. G. de Almeida & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), On Concepts, Modules, and Language: Cognitive Science at its Core (pp. 63–86). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190464783.003.0004
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘Good Enough’ Approach to Language Comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184717
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning To Parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 285–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023258301588
Fodor, J. D. (2002). Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody.
Fossum, V., & Levy, R. (2012). Sequential vs. hierarchical syntactic models of human incremental sentence processing. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL 2012).
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036756
Fox, J. (2016). Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Frank, S. L., & Bod, R. (2011). Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611409589
Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: a tutorial review. Attention and Performance XII.
Frazier, L. (2013). Syntax in sentence processing. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 21–50). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203488454
117

Frazier, L. & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Frazier, L. & Clifton, C. (1997). Construal: Overview, Motivation, and Some New Evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025024524133
Frazier, L. & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The Brain Basis of Language Processing: From Structure to Function. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
Friederici, A. D. (2017). Language in Our Brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216438110
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00687-7
Gibson, E., & Schütze, C. T. (1999). Disambiguation Preferences in Noun Phrase Conjunction Do Not Mirror Corpus Frequency. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2612
Grainger, J., Midgley, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2014). Re-thinking the bilingual interactive-activation model from a developmental perspective (BIA-d). In M. Kail & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language Acquisition across Linguistic and Cognitive Systems (pp. 267–283). https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.18gra
Gross, J., Millett, A. L., Bartek, B., Bredell, K. H., & Winegard, B. (2014). Evidence for prosody in silent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.67
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future: A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Jöreskog.
118

Harley, T. A. (2014). The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory (4th ed.). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Hopp, H. (2014). Working Memory Effects in the L2 Processing of Ambiguous Relative Clauses. Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892943
Hopp, H. (2016). The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1253–1280. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716415000569
Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
Hwang, H., & Steinhauer, K. (2011). Phrase Length Matters: The Interplay between Implicit Prosody and Syntax in Korean “Garden Path” Sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00001
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.984231
Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017). More Than Just Convenient: the Scientific Merits of Homogeneous Convenience Samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12296
Jegerski, J. (2013). Self-paced Reading. In J. Jegerski & B. van Patten (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). New York: Routledge.
Juffs, A. (2015). Working Memory and Sentence Processing: A Commentary. In Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing (pp. 125–135). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Jun, S. A. (2003). Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022452408944
Jun, S. A. (2010). The implicit prosody hypothesis and overt prosody in english. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7), 1201–1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.503658
119

Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1997). Relative Clause Attachment: Nondeterminism in Japanese Parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025017817290
Keating, G. D., & Jegerski, J. (2015). Experimental designs in sentence processing research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000187
Kentner, G., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Prosodic focus marking in silent reading: Effects of discourse context and rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00319
Kim, A., & Sikos, L. (2011). Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: An ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction. Brain and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.002
Kim, E., Baek, S., & Tremblay, A. (2015). The Role of Island Constraints in Second Language Sentence Processing. Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2015.1028630
Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
Kreiner, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2014). The missing link in the embodiment of syntax: Prosody. Brain and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.004
Kuang, J., & Angeles, C. L. (2010). Prosodic Grouping and Relative Clause Disambiguation in Mandarin. Time.
Léwy, N., & Grosjean, F. (1999). BIMOLA: A computational model of bilingual spoken word recognition. In 2nd International Symposium on Bilingualism.
Léwy, N., & Grosjean, F. (2008). The Lewy and Grosjean BIMOLA model. In F. Grosjean (Ed.), Studying bilinguals (pp. 201–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120

Li, P., & Zhao, X. (2013). Connectionist models of second language acquisition. In M. del P. García Mayo, M. J. G. Mangado, & M. M. Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 177–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013). Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation. Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000351
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565- 2
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000036
Martín-Loeches, M., Fernández, A., Schacht, A., Sommer, W., Casado, P., Jiménez-Ortega, L., & Fondevila, S. (2012). The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.010
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1983). Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
McRae, K., & Matsuki, K. (2013). Constraint-based Models of Sentence Processing. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 51–77). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Mitchell, D. C., & Brysbaert, M. (1998). Challenges to Recent Theories of Crosslinguistic Variation in Parsing: Evidence from Dutch. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Sentence Processing: A Crosslinguistic Perspective (pp. 313–344). San Diego: Academic Press.
Mitchell, D. C., & Cuetos, F. (1991). The origins of parsing strategies. In C. Smith (Ed.), Current Issues in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1–12). Austin: Center for Cognitive Science.
121

Nakamura, C., Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.016
Nakano, H., Saron, C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2010). Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21400
Niikuni, K., & Muramoto, T. (2014). Effects of punctuation on the processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences in Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12052
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-Gap Dependencies and Island Constraints in Second-Language Sentence Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263111000313
Pan, H. Y., & Felser, C. (2011). Referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading. Lingua. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.08.003
Pan, H. Y., Schimke, S., & Felser, C. (2015). Referential context effects in non- native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913515769
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentece processing: A Study of Relative Clause Attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
Pearlmutter, N. J., & Gibson, E. (2001). Recency in Verb Phrase Attachment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.574
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018- 01193-y
Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa Yogyakarta State University. (2019). Yogyakarta
Reichle, R. V., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Processing focus structure in L1 and L2 French: L2 proficiency effects on ERPs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000594
122

Reichle, R. V., Tremblay, A., & Coughlin, C. (2016). Working memory capacity in L2 processing. Probus. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2016-0003
Roberts, L. (2012). Individual Differences in Second Language Sentence Processing. Language Learning, 62(SUPPL. 2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00711.x
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299– 331. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716410000421
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313503171
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016a). Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
Rohde, H., Levy, R., & Kehler, A. (2011). Anticipating explanations in relative clause processing. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.016
Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment Data. In R. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 27–50). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Snedeker, J. (2013). Children’s Sentence Processing. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 189–220). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Spivey, M. J., Anderson, S. A., & Farmer, T. A. (2013). Putting Syntax in Context. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 115–135). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., & Orlando Edelen, M. (2013). Using Logistic Approximations of Marginal Trace Lines to Develop Short Assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621612462759
123

ten Berge, J. M. F., & Kiers, H. A. L. (1991). A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294464
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220. doi:10.1037/a0023353
Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Across languages, space, and time. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000549
Traxler, M. J. (2012). Introduction to Psycholinguistics: Understanding Language Science. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., & Clifton, C. (1998). Adjunct Attachment Is Not a Form of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2600
van Gompel, R. P. G. (2013). Sentence Processing: An Introduction. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 1–20). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 284–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.003
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2007). Unrestricted Race: A New Model of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. In Reading as a Perceptual Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043642-5/50029-2
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2773
Witzel, J., Witzel, N., & Nicol, J. (2012). Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 419–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000427
124

Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early-closure attachment on first-pass reading times in french. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755715
Zhao, X., & Li, P. (2010). Bilingual lexical interactions in an unsupervised neural network model. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2010.488284
citation:   Zudianto, Hardian  (2020) Relative Clause Attachment Preference in Second Language Sentence Processing: Evidence from Indonesian Learners of English.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/70369/1/tesis-hardian%20zudianto-16706251008.pdf