eprintid: 68670
rev_number: 23
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/06/86/70
datestamp: 2020-08-05 04:04:46
lastmod: 2020-08-05 04:04:46
status_changed: 2020-08-05 04:04:46
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Saputra, Muhammad Galeih
creators_name: Ariswan, Ariswan
title: Pengembangan CD Interaktif Fisika Berbasis Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Grafik dan Matematik pada Materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana.
ispublished: pub
subjects: F2
divisions: pps_fisika
full_text_status: public
keywords: CD interaktif, PBL, representasi grafik dan matematik
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) menghasilkan CD interaktif fisika berbasis PBL pada materi gerak harmonik sederhana yang layak digunakan, (2) mengetahui keefektifan penggunaan CD interaktif fisika berbasis PBL pada materi gerak harmonik sederhana yang dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi grafik, (3) mengetahui keefektifan penggunaan CD interaktif fisika berbasis PBL pada materi gerak harmonik sederhana yang dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematik, (4) mengetahui profil peningkatan kemampuan representasi grafik dan representasi matematik yang dihasilkan dalam penggunaan CD interaktif fisika bebasis PBL.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan yang menggunakan model 4-D. Subjek coba lapangan adalah 64 siswa di SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta dengan rincian 32 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 32 siswa sebagai kelas control. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan angket penilaian kualitas produk, tes kemampuan representasi matematis dan grafik. Teknik analisis data menggunakan General Linear Model (GLM) dengan taraf signifikansi 5%.
Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. Pertama, media CD interaktif fisika berbasis PBL pada materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana yang dikembangkan dinyatakan layak digunakan berdasarkan penilaian oleh expert judgment, guru fisika, teman sejawat, dan masuk kategori sangat baik dengan nilai 4,36 dari nilai maksimal 5. Kedua, penggunaan CD interaktif fisika berbasis PBL efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan representasi grafik peserta didik di SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta kelas XI MIPA 5. Ketiga, Penggunaan CD interaktif fisika berbasis PBL efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematik peserta didik di SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta kelas XI MIPA 5. Keempat, profil peningkatan kemampuan representasi grafik dan representasi matematik yang dihasilkan dalam penggunaan CD interaktif fisika bebasis PBL yaitu masing- masing terjadi peningkatan yg signifikan, seperti yang tertera pada grafik estimasi peningkatan kemampuan baik grafik maupun matematik.
date: 2019-10-31
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Pendidikan Fisika
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Aladag, E., & Sahinkaya, N. (2015). Pre-service class teacher’ feeling about graphs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1813-1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.317.
Aviani, I., Erceg, N., & Mešić, V. (2015). Drawing and using free body diagrams: Why it may be better not to decompose forces. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,11(2), 020137.
Azhar Arsyad. (2002). Media Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. . (2011). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Carin, A. A & Sund, R. B. (1980). Teaching modern science (3rd ed). New York : Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skill. Boston: Pearson Education.
Chu, J. (2015). Diagrams Benefit Symbolic Problem Solving. (Doctoral dissertation,Vanderbilt University).
Coryn, C. L. S. et.al. (2011). A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990-2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32 (2), 199-226.
Depdikbud. (2013). Permen DIKBUD nomor 65 tahun 2013 Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
_________. (2013). Permen DIKBUD nomor 68 tahun 2013 Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5),184-196.
Etkina,E., Van Heuvelen, A., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., ... &Warren, A. (2006). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review special topics-physics education research, 2 (2), 020103.
Guttersrud, Ø., & Angell, C. (2010). Mathematics in Physics: Upper Secondary Physics Students’ Competency to Describe Phenomena Applying
 114
Mathematical and Graphical Representations. GIREP-ICPE-MPTL Conference, Reims-France.
Hamid, A. A. (2011). Pembelajaran Fisika di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: P21S UNY.
Heckler, A. F. (2010). Some consequences of prompting novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (14), 1829-1851.
Huinker, D. (2015). Representational competence: A renewed focus for classroom practice in mathematics. Wisconsin Teacher of Mathematics, Spring 2015.
I Ketut Tika, dkk. (2008). Penerapan Problem Based Learning Berorientasi Penilaian Kinerja Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Kerja Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran UNDHIKSA No. 5 Th XXXXI Juli 2008 ISSN 0215-8250 hal. 687.
Izzaty, R. E., dkk. (2008). Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta:UNY Press.
Jarrett, L., et.al. (2010). Adding Value to Physics Laboratorium for Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 18 (1) 26-42, 2010.
Jigger, P. L. (2015). Exploration of Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills: A Basis for Differentiated Science Inquiry Curriculum Model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4, page 255-259.
Karam, R., Pospiech, G., & Pietrocola, M. (2010). Mathematics in physics lessons: Developing structural skills. Proceeding of Selected Papers of The GIREP- ICPE-MPTL International Conference, 22-27 Agustus 2010, Reims,
France, 121-126.
Kamisah Osman. (2012). Primary Science: Knowing about the World through Science Process Skills. Journal Asian Social Science; Vol. 8, No. 16; ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025.
Knight, R. D. (2004). Five Easy Lessons: Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching. San Francisco: Pearson Education.
Kohnie et al.. 2011. A New Multimedia Resource for Teaching Quantum Mechanics Concepts. American Journal of Physics, 80, 148-153 Doi: 10.1119/1.3657800 diakses 27 Desember 2015 dari www.researchgate.net/
 115

Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why adiagram is (sometimes) worthten thousand words. Cognitivescience, 11 (1), 65-100.
Laužackas, R. & Tūtlys, V. (2007). Modelling the national qualifications framework of lithuania into the European qualifications framework. European journal of vocational training, 42, 167-183.
Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2013). Exploring one aspect of pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants using the test of understanding graphs in kinematics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9, 020120: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020120.
Maries & singh. (2016). To Use or Not to Use Diagrams: The Effect of Drawing a Diagram in Solving Introductory Physics Problems. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. Doi: 10.1063/1.4789707 Diakses 28 Desember 2015 dari http://www.compadre.org/PER/items/detail.cfm?ID=12834
Markowitsch, J. & Luomi-Messerer, K. (2007). Development and interpretation of descriptors of the European Qualifications Framework. European journal of vocational training, 42, 33-57.
Mayer. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Jounal of Physics Teachers, 55(6), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104.
Munandi, Yudhi. (2013). Media Pembelajaran Sebuah Pendekatan Baru. Jakarta: GP Press Group.
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What makes physics difficult?. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30-34.
Parekh. 2013. Principle of Multimedia. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill education Private Limited diakses 6 Januari 2016 dari https://books.google.com/
Petrova, H. G. (2016). Developing students’ graphic skills in physics education at secondary school. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(5), 123-126. Retrieved from http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosrjrme/papers/Vol- 6%20Issue-5/Version-1/P060501123126.pdf.
Planinic, M., Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2013). Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts. Physical
  116

Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9, 020103: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103.
Ratna Wilis. (1989). Teori-teori Belajar. Bandung: Erlangga.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang – undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003, tentang
Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Rogers & Scaife. 1998. How Can Interactive Multimedia Facilitate Learning?. In Lee, J. (1998) (ed.) Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces: Research and Applications. AAAI. Press: Menlo Park, CA diakses 27
desember 2015
http://users.mct.open.ac.uk/yvonne.rogers/papers/Rogers_Scaife98.pdf
dari
 Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2006,February). Casestudy: Students' use of multiple representations in problem solving. In 2005 physics education research conference (Vol. 818, pp.49-52).
Runi. (2005). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Sains Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas VII SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning). Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Savinainen, A., Mäkynen, A., Nieminen, P., & Viiri, J. (2013). Doesusinga visual- representation tool foster students’ ability toidentify forces and constructfree-body diagrams?. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9 (1), 010104.
Sezen, N., Uzun, M. S., & Bulbul, A. (2012). An investigation of preservice physics teachers’ use of graphical representations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3006-3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.605.
Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 4769. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169.
Shih-Yin Lin., Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2013). Student difficulties in translating between mathematical and graphical representations in introductory physics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789699.
Shishigu, A., Haiyu, A., & Anibo, Z. (2018). Problem-based learning and conceptual understanding of college female students in physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1):145154. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78035.
117

Siswanto, Joko. (2011). Compact Disk Online (Cd-O) Sebagai Multimedia Interaktif Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Proyek. JP2F, Volume 2 Nomor 1 April 2011.
Stelzer et al.. 2008. Comparing the Efficacy of Multimedia Modules with Traditional Textbooks for Learning Introductory Physics Content. American journal of Physics, 77, 184-190 Doi 10.1119/1.3028204 diakses 27 Desember 2015 dari http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0405
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistik untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suparno, P., dkk. (2001). Menuju Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: Universitas
Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
Supriyono. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Fisika. Malang: JICA UNM. Suradijono, SHR. (2004). Problem-based learning: Apa dan bagaimana? Makalah Seminar. Penumbuhan Inovasi Sistem Pembelajaran: Pendekatan Problem-Based Learning berbasis ICT (Information and Communication
Technology). 15/5/2004, Yogyakarta.
Sutikno, Sobry. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Lombok: Holistica
Suryabrata, S. (1983). Proses Belajar-Mengajar di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Minneapolis: Indiana University.
Trianto. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Villegas et al.. (2009). Representations in Problem Solving: A Case study with Optimization Problems. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 279-308. Diakses 16 Desember 2015 dari http://www.investigaci on psicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/17/english/Art_17_297.pdf
Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
citation:   Saputra, Muhammad Galeih and Ariswan, Ariswan  (2019) Pengembangan CD Interaktif Fisika Berbasis Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Grafik dan Matematik pada Materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/1/COVER.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/2/BAB%20I.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/3/BAB%20II.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/4/BAB%20III.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/5/BAB%20IV.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/6/BAB%20V.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/7/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68670/8/LAMPIRAN.pdf