eprintid: 68663
rev_number: 29
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/06/86/63
datestamp: 2020-08-04 03:12:16
lastmod: 2023-10-10 08:17:52
status_changed: 2020-08-04 03:12:16
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Asysyifa, Diena Shulhu
creators_name: Istiyono, Edi
title: Pengembangan Paper-based test (PBT) dan Computer-based test (CBT) untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Fisika dan Minat Peserta Didik SMA di Kabupaten Kulonprogo.
ispublished: pub
subjects: F2
divisions: pps_fisika
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: paper-based test, computer-based test, critical thinking skills, minat belajar, fisika.
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1) mengembangkan instrumen tes critical thinking skills dalam bentuk PBT yang layak; 2) mengembangkan media CBT yang layak; 3) mengetahui minat belajar peserta didik menggunakan PBT dan CBT; 4) mengetahui pemetaan hasil tes menggunakan PBT dan CBT untuk mengukur critical thinking skills.
Produk dikembangkan dengan menggabungkan model Oriondo dan Antonio untuk bank soal, serta model 4-D untuk media CBT. Tahapan yang dilakukan meliputi: 1) define: studi pendahuluan, perencanaan bank soal dan pendefinisan media CBT; 2) design: penulisan butir soal dan desain awal CBT; 3) develop: validasi bank soal, ujicoba terbatas bank soal, pengembangan CBT, input bank soal ke dalam CBT dan implementasi PhysCriThiS dan CBT-PhysCriThiS; 4) disseminate: evaluasi, pengemasan produk akhir dan penyebaran. Penelitian dilakukan di SMA/MA yang berada di Kabupaten Kulonprogo. Sampel ujicoba melibatkan 249 peserta didik yang dipilih menggunakan teknik cluster sampling sedangkan implementasi pengukuran melibatkan 408 peserta didik. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan teori respon butir politomus model PCM memanfaatkan program PARSCALE 4.1 dan QUEST. Analisis validitas isi oleh ahli terhitung sangat tinggi berdasarkan formula Aiken dan semua asumsi teori respon butir dinyatakan telah terpenuhi.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) keseluruhan butir bank soal PhysCriThiS fit dengan model PCM, tingkat kesukaran berada pada rentang -1,16 hingga 0,77, berdasarkan fungsi informasi dan SEM, tes cocok diberikan untuk kemampuan −1,4 < θ < 3,0 . 2) media CBT-PhysCriThiS dinyatakan valid melalui validitas isi dengan indeks V Aiken pada interval 0,87-1,00. CBT-PhysCriThiS memanfaatkan komputer terintegrasi algoritma teori respon butir. 3) Minat terhadap pembelajaran fisika oleh peserta didik yang menggunakan PBT lebih baik daripada yang menggunakan CBT. 4) Hasil pemetaan kemampuan berpikir kritis fisika menggunakan CBT-PhysCriThiS mendapat respon sebesar 76,62%, lebih tinggi dari penggunaan PBT dengan respon 66,58%.
date: 2019-10-30
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Pendidikan Fisika
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Asyhar, R. (2012). Kreatif Mengembangkan Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gaung Persada (GP) Press Jakarta.
Astuti, S.P. (2015). Pengaruh Kemampuan Awal dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Formatif 5(1): 68-75, 2015.
Ari, A., Nyoman, D., Wayan, L. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA ditinjau dari Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Dasar. Vol. 5, Hal. 2-10.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Arikunto, S. (1999). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Rineka Cipta.
Jakarta.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bafadal, I. (2005). Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Baghaei, P., Carstensen, C. H. (2013). Fitting the mixed Rasch model to a reading comprehension test: Identifying reader types. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(5), 1-13. ISSN 1531-7714.
Barnes, N., Fives, H. & Dacey, C. M. (2015). U.S. teachers' conceptions of the purposes of assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education 65 (2017) 107-116.
Barnett, J. E., & Francis, A. L. (2012). Using higher order thinking questions to foster critical thinking: a classroom study. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(February 2013), 201– 211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.638619
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., Rumble, M., (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In B. McGaw
  143
& E. Care (Eds), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp 17-.66). New York, NY: Springer.
Berry, R. & Adamson, B. (2011). Assessment reform past, present and future. In R. Berry, & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment Reform in Education: Policy and Practice (pp.3-14). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
BSNP. (2006). Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran SMP/MTs dan SMA/MA. BSNP. Jakarta.
Butler, H. A. (2012). Halpern critical thinking assessment predicts real-world outcomes of critical thinking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, in press. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2851.
Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. Luxembourg: European Union.
Cakir, O., & Simsek, N. (2010). A comparative analysis of the effects of computer and paper-based personalization on student achievement. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1524-1531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.018
Chee, T.C. (2010). Common Misconceptions in Frictional Force among University Physics Students. Journal on teaching and Learning, 16 (2), 107-116.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, Judy C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location aware mobile learning system for natural science course. Computers & Education, 55, 1618-1627. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002.
Chua, Y. P., & Don, Z. M. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1889–1895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.008
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York: Routedge.
Cooper, D. C. and Schindler, P. S. (2001) Business Research Methods (seventh edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical Thinking Skills Developing Effective Analysis and Argument. PALCRAVE MACMILLAN
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cullinane, A. dan Liston, M. (2011). Two-tier Multiple-Choice Question: An Alternative Method of Formatif Assessment for First Year Undergraduate Biology Students. Limerick: National Center for Excellence in
    144

Mathematics and Education Science Teaching and Learning (NCE-MSTL).
Dana, R. & Suwardi. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar Siswa FKIP Unnes. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Ekonomi. Vol. 1 (2), Hal. 5.
Dariese, O. (2010). An Assessment of Secondary School Students Misconceptions of Force and Motion in Ughelli Nort Local Government Area, Delta State. Department of Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies, University of Berlin.
Deutsch, T., Herrmann, K., Frese, T., & Sandholzer, H. (2012). Implementing computer-based assessment – a web-based mock examination changes attitudes. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1068–1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2011.11.013.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory. Psychology Press.
Eraikhuemen, L & Agustine E.O. (2014). An Assessment of Secondary School Physics Teacher Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion in Edo South Senatorial District. Academic Research International Vol 5 (1): 2223-9553.
Erceg, N., Aviani, I., & Mesic, V. (2013). Probing students’ critical thinking processes by presenting ill-defined physics problems. Revista Mexicana de Fısica Education, 59, 65–76.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA, California Academic Press.
Ferdous, A.A., Plake, B.S. & Chang, S.R. (2007). The Effect of Including Pretest Items in an Operational Computerized Adaptive Test: Do Different Ability Examinees Spend Different Amounts of Time on Embedded Pretest Items? Educational Assessment, 12 (2), 161-173.
Fisher, A. (2011). Critical thinking: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Flores, K.L., Matkin, G.S., Burbach, M.E., Quinn, C.E., & Harding, H. (2012).
Deficient critical thinking skills among college graduates: Implications for leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (2), 212-230.
Giancoli, D.C. (2005). Fisika Prinsip dan Aplikasi. (Alih Bahasa: Irzam Hardiansyah). Jakarta: Erlangga.
  145

Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2012). The effects of two strategic and metacognitive questioning approaches on children’s explanatory behaviour, problem-solving, and learning during cooperative, inquiry-based science. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.02.003.
Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A. & Mc Dermott, L. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostik Instruments to Identify Students’ misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11 (5), 989-1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Hadi, A. (2018). Bridging Indonesia’s Digital Divide: Rural-Urban Linkages?. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Volume 22, Issue 1, July 2018 (17-33). http://doi.org/ 10.22146/jsp.31835.
Hadi, S. (2013). Pengembangan computerized adaptive test berbasis web.Yogyakarta. Aswaja Presindo.
Hamalik, O. (2004). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Hauswirth, M, & Adamoli, A. (2013). Teaching Java programming with the
Informa clicker system. Science of Computer Programming, 78, 499–520. Hewitt, P.G. (2015). Teaching the Delightful Laws of Physics in a Survey Course.
The Physics Teacher 53, 394 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4931003
Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, S., Wang, C. Y., & Huang, Z. H. (2012). A pilot study of cooperative programming learning behavior and its relationship with students’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 58, 1267–1281.
Istiyono, E. Mardapi, D. & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika peserta didik SMA. Jurnal penelitian dan evaluasi pendidikan, 18,1,1-12.
Istiyono, E. (2014). Pengukuran kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika peserta didik SMA di DIY. Disertasi doktor, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014).
Teaching to the Test or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-0139248-9.
Jeong, H. (2012). A comparative study of scores on computer-based tests and paperbased tests. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(4), 410–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.710647.
        Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1963). Management and Accelerating
 Technology. California Management Review, 6(2), 39–48.
 http://doi.org./10.2307/41165574.
 146

Kartini, T. (2007). Penggunaan Metode Role Playing Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Siswa. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Dasar. Vol. 8. Hal. 1-5.
Keeves, J., & Alagumalai, S. 1999. Advances in Measurement in Science Education. In Fraser, B. & Tobin, K. (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: BPSDM PKPMT
Khodijah, N. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Khol, P.B & Finkelstein, N.D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by expert and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topic – Physics Education Research.
Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., Fischer, H.E., Gess-Newsome, J., & Aufschnaiter, V.C. (2016). Developing and evaluating a paper-and-pencil test to assess components of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education,38,8,1343–1372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking. New York, NY: Springer
Kothari, C.R. (2002). Research Methodology Method and Techniques. New age international (p) Ltd., New Delhi.
Kowsalya, A.S., Hunter, C.N., Putnam, S.A., Miller, T., & Fisher, T.S. (2012)
Photonically enhanced flow boiling in a channel coated with carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters, 100 (7), 071601.
Kubinger, K. D., Holocher-Ertl, S., Reif, M., Hohensinn, C., and Frebort, M. (2010). On Minimizing Guessing Effects on Multiple Choice Items: Superiority of a two solutions and three distractors item format to a one solution and five distractors item format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 111-115
Ladyshewsky, R.K. (2015). Post-graduate student performance in ‘supervised inclass’ vs. ‘unsupervised online’ multiple choice tests: implications for cheating and test security. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (40), 7, 883–897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956683.
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers and Education, 115, 143– 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015.
   Lawson, TJ. (2002). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning
 outcome for psychology majors. Teach Psychol. (26) 207–209.
 147

Lee, W., Myung-Jin, L., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology Volume 39, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 86-99
Lesage, E., Valcke, M. and Sabbe, E. (2013) Scoring Methods for Multiple Choice Assessment in Higher Education—Is It Still a Matter of Number Right Scoring or Negative Marking? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 118-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.07.001.
Ling G., Attali Y., Finn B. & Stone E.A. (2017). Is a Computerized Adaptive Test More Motivating Than a Fixed-Item Test? Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 7, (495).
Lodico, M., Spaulding, D. & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Luecht, R. M. (2006). Designing tests for pass/fail decisions using IRT. In S. Downing & T. Haladyna (Eds.) Handbook of test development (pp. 575– 596). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Maguire, K.A., Smith, D.A., Brailler, S.A. (2010). Computer-based testing: a comparison of computer-based and paper-and pencil assessment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Volume 14, Number 4.
Magas, C. P., Gruppen, L. D., Barrett, M., Dedhia, P. H., & Sandhu, G. (2017). Intraoperative questioning to advance higher-order thinking. American Journal of Surgery, 213(2), 222– 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.027
Matt, Jarvis. Teori-Teori Psikologi. Cet. X, Bandung: Nusa Media, 2011, hal. 142 Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta:
Nuha Litera.
______ (2016). Pengukuran, Penilaian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002.
Marušić, M., & Sliško, J. (2012). Influence of Three Different Methods of Teaching Physics on the Gain in Students’ Development of Reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2).
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2012). Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence, and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Miller, M. D, Linn, R.L., & Gronlund, N.E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River.
   148

 Meyer, J. & Zhu, S. (2013). Fair and Equitable Measurement of Student Learning
 in MOOCs: An Introduction to Item Response Theory, Scale Linking, and
 Score Equating. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 26–39.
Mulnix, J.W. (2010). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and theory 44 (5), 464-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14695812.2010.00673.x
Muhubbin, S. (2011). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mundilarto. (2002). Kapita Selekta Pendidikan Fisika. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computerbased and mobile-based self-assessment on students’ science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241– 1248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025.
Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Students (6th) ed. Boston: Pearson.
Nurcahyo, F.A. (2016). Aplikasi IRT dalam Analisis Aitem Tes Kognitif. Buletin Psikologi, Vol. 24, No. 2, 64 – 75 (Online) DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25218
Oriondo, L.L & Antonio, E. M.D. (1998). Evaluating educational outcomes (Test measurement and evaluation). Florentino St: Rex Printing Company, Inc.
Ormrod, J.J. (2014). How We Think and Learn Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Implications. Cambridge University Press
Ozden, Y., Erturk, I. & Sanli, R. (2004). Students’ perceptions of online assessment: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 19 (2), 77-92.
Pawasauskas, J., Matson, K. L., & Youssef, R. (2014). Transitioning to computerbased testing. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2013.11. 016
Piaw, C.Y. (2012). Replacing Paper-based Testing with Computer-based Testing in Assessment: Are we Doing Wrong? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 655-664.
Pratama, N.S., dan Istiyono, E. (2015). Studi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Higher Order Thinking (HOTS) pada Kelas X di SMA Negeri Kota Yogyakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika (SNFPF). Vol.6 (1):104-112.
Pressman, R.S. (2010). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, Seventh Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  Prisacari, & Danielson. (2017). Rethinking testing mode: Should I offer my next
 chemistry test on paper or computer? Computers & Education, 106, 1-12.
149

Peterson, M. (2010). Massively multiplayer online roleplaying games as arenas for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 5, December 2010, 429–439, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.520673.
Ramos, J. L. S., Dolipas, B. B., & Villamor, B. B. (2013). Higher order thinking skills and academic performance in physics of college students: A regression analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 4, 4860.
Potter, Mary lane. 2010. From Search to Research: Developing Critical Thinking Through Web Research Skills. 2010 Microsoft Corporation.
Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Puspendik (Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan). (2012). Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMP Indonesia Menurut Bechmark Internasional TIMSS 2011. Jakarta: Balitbang Kemendikbud
Putri, F.S, Istiyono, E., & Nurcahyanto, E. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Beralasan (Politomus) Di DIY. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5 (2) (2016)
Ratnawulan, Elis dan Rusdiana. (2014). Evaluasi Belajar. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. L. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education (3nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Roida. (2008). Pengaruh Minat dan Kebiasaan Belajar Siswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 2 (2), 122-131.
Rossana, D. & Sukardiyono. (2015). Analisis butir dan identifikasi ketidakwajaran skor ujian sekolah untuk standarisasi penilaian. Jurnal Kependidikan, 45 (2). 130-141.
Sari, A.L, Parno & Taufik, A. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton. Malang: Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Salkind, N. J. (2013). Tests and measurement for people who (think they) hate tests and measurement (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
  Redecker, C., & Johannessen. (2013). Changing Assessment - Towards a New
 Assessment Paradigm Using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1),
 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018
150

Sansone, C. & Thoman, D.B. (2005). Interest as the Missing Motivator in SelfRegulation. European Psychologist ,10, pp. 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175.
Sardiman, A.M. (2007). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Sarigoz, O. (2012). Assessment of the High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 5315 – 5319.
Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2015). The Big-FisheLittle-Pond-Effect revisited: Do different types of assessments matter? Computers and Education, 80, 198– 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.003
Shah, C.G. (2010). Critical Thinking: What it is and why it matters to emerging professional? Advance Materials and Processes, 168 (5), 66-67.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar Dan Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Subali, B. (2012). Prinsip Assessment & Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
_______. (2016). Pengembangan tes beserta penyelidikan validitas dan reliabilitas secara empiris. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sudjana, N. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: TrimKom.
Suparno, P. (2007). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Surapranata, S. (2005). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes, Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Susilowati, Sajidan dan Murni Ramli. (2017). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Negeri di Kabupaten Magetan. Surakarta: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains.
Suter, W.N. (2011). Introduction to educational research: A critical thinking approach. SAGE Pubications
   Sindre, G., & Vegendla, A. (2015). E-exams versus paper exams: A comparative
 analysis of cheating-related security threats and countermeasures.
 Smith, V. G., & Szymanski, A. (2013). Critical Thinking: More than Test Scores.
 International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8, 16-25. DOI:
 10.4236/ce.2016.710145
 151

Suyoso, S., Istiyono, E., & Subroto, S. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen pengetahuan fisika berbasis komputer untuk meningkatkan kesiapan peserta didik dalam menghadapi ujian nasional berbasis komputer. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 5(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v5i1.12461.
Timmers, C. F., Braber-van den Broek, J., & van den Berg, S. M. (2013).
Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Computers & Education, 60, 25–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.007.
Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. A Sourcebook.
Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.
Trianto. (2010). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Motivatif- Progresif : Konsep, Landasan dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana
Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., and Economides, A. A. 2008. CAT-MD: Computerized adaptive testing on mobile devices. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (extended versions of the best papers presented at m-ICTE2006 Conference), 3(1), 13-20.
Tsai, C. C. (2001). The interpretation construction design model for teaching science and its applications to Internet-based instruction in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 401–415.
Uno, H.B. & Koni, S. (2012). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Van der Linden, W. J &Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item
Response Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc
Wallace, P. E., & Clariana, R. B. (2005). Gender differences in computer administered versus paper-based tests. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 175– 183.
Wenemark, M., Persson, A., Brage, H. N., Svensson, T., & Kristenson, M. (2011).
Applying motivation theory to achieve increased response rates, respondent satisfaction and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics, 27(2), 393-414.
White, T., Whitaker, P., Gonya, T., Hein, R., Kroening, D., Lee, K., Hayes, E. (2009). The Use of Interrupted Case Studies to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills in Biology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10(1), 25-31.http://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v10.96.
   152

Widyoko, E.P.S. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wijayanta, F.W., Muslim, S., Buditjahjanto, I.G.P.A. (2015). Pengaruh Tes Paperless Dan Paper and Pencil Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kompetensi Persiapan Pembuatan Dokumentasi Audio Video Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Siswa: Studi Eksperimen Di Smk Negeri 5 Surabaya. Pendidikan Vokasi:Teori Dan Praktik, 3,2.
Willingham, D. (2008). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21-29.
Winarti, Cari, Suparmi, Sunarno, W., & Istiyono, E. (2017). Development of Two-Tier Test to Assess Conceptual Understanding in Heat and Temperature. Journal of Physics. Conf. Series 795 (2017) 012052. Diambil dari http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1 742-6596/795/1/012052/pdf.
Winkle, W.S. (1991). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Rasindo.
Yang, T.,Chen, S.Y., & Hwang, G. (2014). The Influences of a Two-Tier Test Strategy on Student Learning: A Lag Sequential Analysis Approach. Computers & Education, S0360-1315(14)00274-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.021.
 Wilson, B., & Lowry, M. (2000). Constructivist Learning on the Web. New
 Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2000(88), 79–88.
 http://doi.org/10.1002/ace.8808.
citation:   Asysyifa, Diena Shulhu and Istiyono, Edi  (2019) Pengembangan Paper-based test (PBT) dan Computer-based test (CBT) untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Fisika dan Minat Peserta Didik SMA di Kabupaten Kulonprogo.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/1/Cover.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/2/Bab%20I.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/3/Bab%20II.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/4/Bab%20III.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/5/Bab%20IV.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/6/Bab%20V.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/7/Daftar%20Pustaka.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/68663/8/Lampiran.pdf