eprintid: 66786 rev_number: 15 eprint_status: archive userid: 1290 dir: disk0/00/06/67/86 datestamp: 2019-11-27 02:22:41 lastmod: 2019-11-27 02:22:41 status_changed: 2019-11-27 02:22:41 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Hertanti, Alfiramita creators_name: Wutsqa, Dhoriva Urwatul title: Pengaruh Kecerdasan Logis-Matematis, Kecerdasan Visual-Spasial, dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMA kelas XI di Kabupaten Gowa ispublished: pub subjects: F4 subjects: pasca_sarjana divisions: pps_math full_text_status: public abstract: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui (1) mendeskripsikan kecerdasan logis-matematis, kecerdasan visual-spasial, motivasi belajar dan kemampuan pemecahan masakah, (2) pengaruh kecerdasan logis-matematis terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah, (3) pengaruh kecerdasan visual-spasial terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah, (4) pengaruh kecerdasan visual-spasial terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan (5) pengaruh kecerdasan logis-matematis, kecerdasan visual-spasial, dan motivasi belajar secara simultan terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian survei dengan pendekatan kuantitaif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Gowa dan sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 353 siswa. Metode pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah proportional stratified random sampling. Instrumen tes yang digunakan berupa tes kecerdasan logis-matematis, tes kecerdasan visualspasial, tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan angket motivasi belajar. Instrumen yang digunakan telah dibuktikan validasi konten dan konstruk serta diestimasi reliabilitasnya. Analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi berganda untuk mengetahui pengaruh kecerdasan logis-matematis, kecerdasan visualspasial, dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) kecerdasan logis-matematis berada pada kategori sedang, kecerdasan visual-spasial berada pada kategori sedang, motivasi belajar berada pada kategori tinggi, dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika berada pada kategori rendah, (2) terdapat pengaruh positif kecerdasan logis-matematis terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah, (3) terdapat pengaruh positif kecerdasan visual-spasial terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah, (4) terdapat pengaruh positif motivasi belajar dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika, (5) terdapat pengaruh positif kecerdasan logis-matematis, kecerdasan visual-spasial, dan motivasi belajar secara simultan terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditunjukkan oleh koefisien regresi R = 0,334. Dengan koefisien determinasi R =0,111 berarti pengaruh kecerdasan logis-matematis, kecerdasan visual-spasial, dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa hanya sebesar 11,1%. Ini menunjukkan masih ada faktor-faktor lain yang menyumbang kemampuan pemecahan masalah sebesar 88,9%. Kata Kunci: kecerdasan logis-matematis, kecerdasan visual-spasial, motivasi belajar, kemampuan pemecahan masalah date: 2019-08-27 date_type: published institution: Program Pascasarjana department: Pendidikan Matematika thesis_type: tesis referencetext: DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abdurrahman, M. (2009). Pendidikan bagi anak berkesulitan belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Akhmad, A. H. (2014). Pengaruh kecerdasan spasial dan kecerdasan matematis terhadap kemampuan menggambar teknik siswa pada mata pelajaran pembacaan dan pemahaman gambar teknik di SMK Negeri 3 Yogyakarta (Doctoral dissertation, UNY). Al-Ghraibeh, A. H. (2012). Brain based learning and its relation with multiple intelligences. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(1), 103113. Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Amelia, D., Susanto, S., & Fatahillah, A. (2016). Analisis hasil belajar matematika siswa pada pokok bahasan himpunan berdasarkan ranah kognitif taksonomi bloom kelas VII-A di SMPN 14 jember. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(1), 1-4. Amstrong, T. (2002). Sekolah para juara. Penerjemah: Ani Cahayani. Yudhi Murtanto. Bandung: kaifa. Amstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. New York: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Anggraini, I. S. (2016). Motivasi Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh: Sebuah Kajian Pada Interaksi Pembelajaran Mahasiswa. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 1(02). Arani, H. K & Mobarakeh, S. D. (2012). Metacognitive strategies and logical/ mathematical intelligence in EFL Context: investigating possible relationships. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 304-313 Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to teach, 9th edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill Education. Asis, M., Arsyad, N., & Alimuddin. (2015). Profil kemampuan spasial dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Jurnal Daya Matematis,3(1), 78-87 119 Avcu, S & Avcu R, (2010). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ use of strategies in mathematical problem solving. Elsevier, 9, 1282-1286. Azwar, Saifuddin. (2016). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Bani, A. (2012). Pemecahan masalah dan representasi pembelajaran matematika. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2). Baenninger, M. (1995). Enviromental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(4), 363-379. Baum, S., B. Viens, B. Slatin. (2005). Multiple intelligences in the elementary classroom: a teacher’s toolkit. Teacher Colleges, Columbia University. Bishop, A.J. (1980). Spatial abilities and mathematic education: a review. Education Studies in Mathematic,11, halaman: 257-269. Bozpolat, E. (2016). Investigation of the self-regulated learning strategies of students from the faculty of education using ordinal logistic regression analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 301-318. Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms (Vol. 775). Springer Science & Business Media. Conny Semiawan. 2008. Belajar dan pembelajaran prasekolah dan sekolah dasar. Indeks. Jakarta. Cooney, T.J., davis, E.V., & Henderson, K.B. (1975). Dinamics of teaching secondary school mathematics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Corpus, J. H., McClintic-Gilbert, M. S., & Hayenga, A. O. (2009). Within-year changes in children’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Contextual predictors and academic outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 154-166. Demircioğlu, H., Argün, Z., & Bulut, S. (2010). A case study: Assessment of preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ metacognitive behaviour in the problem-solving process. ZDM, 42(5), 493-502. Dick, Carey & Carey, J.O. (2001). The systematic design if instruction. Buston : Person Publisher. 120 Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Duckworth, A., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 108(19), 7716–7720. Ebel, Robert L. & Frisbie, David A. (1991). Essentials of education measurement. New Jersey : Prentice Hall. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2016). Educational psychology: windows on classrooms (Tenth Edit). NY : Pearson Education. Eleni, A., Filippos, V. & Panagiota, S. (2013). Multiple intelligences of typical readers and dyslexic adolescences. International Journal of Education Learning and Development, 1(2), 61-72. Fleetham, M. (2006). Multiple intelligences in practice: Enhancing self-esteem and learning in the classroom. A&C Black. Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence?: Beyond the flynn effect. Cambridge University Press. Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver is unsuccessful in his or her own: affective and cognitive faktors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 71-90. Gangadevi. & Ravi. (2014). Multiple intelligence based curriculum to enhance inclusive education to bring out human potential. International Journal of Advanced Research , 2(8), 619-626. Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariat dengan program IBM SPSS 21. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit –Undip. Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Allyn & Bacon, 160 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02194-2310. Hamalik,O. (2005). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Uno, Hamzah B. (2013). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakara : PT. Bumi Aksara. Handayani, K. (2017). Analisis faktor–faktor yang mempengaruhi kemampuan pemecahan masalah soal cerita matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika: Peran Alumni Matematika dalam Membangun Jejaring 121 Kerja dan Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan, 6 Mei 2017, Fakultas Matematika Universitas Negeri Medan, 325-330. Hidayatulloh, S. (2012). Pengaruh kecerdasan visual spasial terhadap hasil belajar matematika pada materi kubus dan balok siswa kelas VII SMPN 2 trenggalek tahun ajaran 2011/2012. Hoerr, T. R. (2000). Becoming a multiple intelligences school. Alexandria : ASCD. Irvaniyah, I & Akbar, R.O. (2014). Analisis kecerdasan logis matematis dan kecerdasan linguistik siswa berdasarkan jenis kelamin. EduMa, 3(1), 138-159 Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2019). Multiple intelligences. In Student Centered Cooperative Learning (pp. 85-97). Springer, Singapore. Jayantika, dkk. (2013). Kontribusi bakat numerik, kecerdasan spasial, dan kecerdasan logis matematis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa SD Negeri di Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal (Volume 2 Tahun 2013). Singajara: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Jonassen, D.H. (2011). Learning to solve problem: an instructional design guided. Sans Fransisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Kaplan, A; Calp, U. F & Özdemir, E. (2011). The determination of visually impaired students’ multiple intelligences dimensions and their relationships with success in mathematics. Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 6(13), pp. 2841-2849, 4 July, 2011 Available online at http://www cademicjournals.org/SRE. Khaerunisa, F., & Hindarto, N. (2012). Penerapan better teaching and learning berbasis pembelajaran kooperatif untuk meningkatkan berpikir logis dan keaktifan siswa. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 1(2). Khan, S., Hafeez, A., & Saeed,M. (2012). The impact of problem solving skill of head’s on students’ academic achievement. Interdiciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(1), 316. Kim, Y. H & Ham, J. Y. (2016). A Study on ways to connect multiple intelligence theory and „thinking and expression‟ course. Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research, 1, 83-88. 122 Koballa Jr, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2013). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 89-116). Routledge. Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). The impact of critical thinking and logico-mathematical intelligence on algorithmic design skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 173-193. Kruse, P. D. (2009). Working smart: problem solving strategies for school leaders. Maryland: Rowman Littlefield. Lieberman, D. A.(2000). Learning: behavior and cognition. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and individual differences, 13(3), 251-258. Lunenburg, F. C., & Lunenburg, M. R. (2014). Applying multiple intelligences in the classroom: a fresh look at teaching writing. International journal of scholarly academic intellectual diversity, 16(1). Lwin, May. (2008). How to multiply your child’s intelligance: cara mengembangkan berbagai komponen keterampilan. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks. Madkour, M., & Mohamed, R. A. A. M. (2016). Identifying college students' multiple intelligences to enhance motivation and language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 92-107. Maier, P. H. (1996). Spatial geometry and spatial ability–how to make solid geometry solid. In Selected papers from the Annual Conference of Didactics of Mathematics (pp. 63-75). Marsigit, dkk. (2015). Filsafat matematika dan praktis pendidikan matematika. Yogyakarta: UNY Press. McCutcheon, S. L. T. (2008). Self-efficacy in mathematics: affective, cognitive, and conative domains of functioning. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 507-513. McFarland , H.S.N.(2017). Psychological theory and educational practical. London: Routledge. 123 McKenzie, W. (2005). Multiple intelligences and instructional technology. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education. McKim, R. (1980). Experiences in visual thinking. Monterey: Brooks/Cole. McLean, A. (2009). Motivating every learner. Washington DC: PAGE Publication Inc. Mevarech, Z. R., & Amrany, C. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of meta- cognitive instruction on regulation of cognition and mathematics achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 147-157. Muljo, A. (2018). Korelasi kecerdasan visual spasial dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif di SMA negeri 1 kejuruan muda. Vicratina: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 47-56. Mulligan, J. (2015). Looking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: Connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. ZDM, 47(3), 511517. Muslimah, N., & Binadja, A. (2014). Pembelajaran multiple intelligences bervisi sets untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan motivasi siswa. In Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif (Vol. 2). Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational researcher, 18(8), 4-10. Gunhan, B. C., Turgut, M. & Yilmaz, S. (2009). Spatial ability of a mathematics teacher: the case of oya. IBSU Scientific Journal, 3(1), 151-158. Nicol, D. J. & Dick, D. M (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. Nitko, A.J & Brookhart, S.M .(2011). Educational assessment of student. Boston: Pearson. Novitasari, D., Rahman, A. & Alimuddin. (2015). Profil kreativitas siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari kecerdasan visual spasial dan logis matematis pada siswa SMAN 3 makasar. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 3(1), 41-50. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., Bell, D., Gardner, S., Gardner, A., & Carrager, J. (2007). The contribution of logical reasoning to the learning of 124 mathematics in primary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 147–166. Pimta, S., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Factors influencing mathematic problem-solving ability of sixth grade students. Online Submission, 5(4), 381-385. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method, (2nd ed). NJ: Princeton University Press. Prakitipong, N. & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of mathematics performance of grade five students in thailand using newman procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 111-122. Prawira, P.A. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan dalam perspektif baru. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media. Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Reys, et al. (2014). Helping children learn mathematics. Danvers: John Wiley & Sons. Rofiah, N. H. (2016). Menerapkan multiple intelligences dalam pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. DINAMIKA, 8(1). Ryan, T. P. (2013). Sample size determination and power. NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Safranj, J. (2016). Logical/mathematical intelligence in teaching english as a second language. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 75 – 82. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective sixth edition. Boston: Pearson. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38. Sipus, Z. M. & Cizmesija, A. (2012). Spatial ability of students of mathematics education in Croatia evaluated by the mental cutting test. Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae, 40, 203–216. 125 Skemp, R. R. (1989). Mathematics in the primary school. London: Routledge. Slavin, R. (2017). Educational psychology theory and practice 12 ed. Boston: Pearson Education. Spirovska, E. (2013). Integrating multiple intelligences in teaching english as a foreign language-SEEU experiences and practices. South East European University Review, 9(1), 9-20. Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 383-393. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 5 edition. NY: Routledge. Sardiman, A. M. (1986). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Sudjana, N. (2008). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya. Sugiyono. (2015). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suhendri, H. (2011). Pengaruh kecerdasan matematis–logis dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1). Suparno, Paul. (2004). Teori inteligensi ganda dan aplikasinya di sekolah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Susanti, V. D. (2018). Analisis kemampuan kognitif dalam pemecahan masalah berdasarkan kecerdasan logis-matematis. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 71-83. Tambunan, S. M. (2006). Hubungan antara kemampuan spasial dengan prestasi belajar matematika. Hubs-Asia, 10(1). Tientje, N., & Iskandar, Y. (2004). Pendidikan anak usia dini untuk mengembangkan multipel inteligensi. Jakarta : Dharma Graha Press. Tsai, M. Y. (2016). Research on multiple intelligences of junior high school students with different background variables. Journal of Modern Education Review, 6(1), 10-18. 126 th th Tuna, A., Biber, A. C., & İncikapı, L. (2013). An analysis of mathematics teacher candidates’ logical thinking levels: case of turkey. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in The World, 3(1), 83-91. Wahid, A. H., & Karimah, R. A. (2018). Integrasi higher order thinking skill (hots) dengan model creative problem solving. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 5(1), 82-98. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. Winarso, W. (2014). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah Matematika mahasiswa jurusan PGMI melalui pembelajaran berbasis multipel intelligensi pada mata kuliah matematika 2. Holistik, 15(1), 99-120. Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology: 10th editions. New York: Pearson. Yaumi. (2012). Pembelajaran berbasis multiple intelligences. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat. Yavuz, G & Erbay, H.N. (2015). The analaysis of pre-service teachers beliefs about mathematical problem solving. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2687-2692. Yazgan, Y. (2015). Sixth graders and non-routine problems: Which strategies are decisive for succes. Educational Research and Review, 10(13), 18071816. Yenilmez, K. & Kakmaci, O. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between the spatial visualization success and visual/spatial intelligence capabilities of sixth grade students. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 189-204. Yildiz, S. G., & Özdemir, A. S. (2017). Development of the spatial ability test for middle school students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 41-54. Zulfairanatama, G., & Hadi, S. (2013). Kecerdasan logika-matematika berdasarkan multiple intelligences terhadap kemampuan matematika siswa SMP di Banjarmasin. EDU-MAT, 1(1). citation: Hertanti, Alfiramita and Wutsqa, Dhoriva Urwatul (2019) Pengaruh Kecerdasan Logis-Matematis, Kecerdasan Visual-Spasial, dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMA kelas XI di Kabupaten Gowa. S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana. document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/1/Cover.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/2/BAB%20I.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/3/BAB%20II.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/4/BAB%20III.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/5/BAB%20IV.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/6/BAB%20V.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/7/Daftar%20Pustaka.pdf document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66786/8/Lampiran.pdf