eprintid: 66087
rev_number: 31
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/06/60/87
datestamp: 2019-10-09 02:32:55
lastmod: 2021-11-01 03:18:14
status_changed: 2019-10-09 02:32:55
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Susapti, Peni
creators_name: Kartowagiran, Badrun
title: Model Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Scientific Approach dalam Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA.
ispublished: pub
subjects: D0
subjects: F1
divisions: pps_lit_evazdik
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: model evaluasi, scientific approach, pembelajaran Biologi
abstract: Model pembelajaran dengan pendekatan saintifik sudah dilaksanakan sejak beberapa tahun, tetapi belum semua guru melaksanakannya dengan baik, sehingga perlu dibuat model evaluasi EPSA. Terkait dengan hal tersebut, maka tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: (1) mengembangkan model evaluasi program pembelajaran scientific approach dalam pembelajaran biologi di SMA (EPSA); (2) mendeskripsikan kelayakan model evaluasi yang dikembangkan tersebut.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan yang menggunakan metode Plomp, terdiri dari tiga tahap kegiatan pokok, yaitu: (a) perencanaan; (b) uji coba; dan (c) implementasi. Model EPSA terdiri dari: (1) panduan pelaksanaan evaluasi; (2) instrumen evaluasi dan panduan penskoran; dan (3) bukti kelayakan model.
Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah: (1) model EPSA yang dikembangkan sudah akurat dan terpercaya, dengan perincian sebagai berikut: (a) konstruk instrumen kegiatan inti model EPSA terdiri dari mengamati, menanya, mencoba, menganalisis, dan mengkomunikasikan (5 M), berdasarkan hasil EFA dan CFA; (b) validitas instrumen pengukuran untuk model EPSA terbukti baik dan CFA fit; (c) reliabilitas instrumen pengukuran model EPSA dinyatakan baik, untuk koefisien Cronbach’s Alfa rata-rata di atas 0,70; (2) model EPSA yang dikembangkan termasuk kategori layak dan dapat digunakan (rata-rata skor dari butir-butir yang ada dalam produk mencapai 3,6) dan kualitas pedoman penggunaan termasuk kategori layak, berdasarkan pengakuan pengguna pada saat uji coba.
date: 2019-05-28
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
thesis_type: disertasi
referencetext: Adnyana, G.P. (2009). Meningkatkan kualitas aktivitas belajar, keterampilan berpikir kritis, dan pemahaman konsep biologi siswa kelas X-5 SMA Negeri 1 Banjar melalui penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Kerta Mandala Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali, 1, 1-13.
 Akker, J.V.D. (2007). Curriculum design research in an introduction to
 educational design research. Proceedings on the seminar conducted at The East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26,
 P .37-52.
 Alkharusi, H., Aldhafri, S., Alnabhani, H., & Alkalbani, M. (2014). Classroom
 assessment: Teacher practices, student perceptions, and academic self- efficacy beliefs.Social Behavior and Personality: an international
 journal, 42(5), 835-855.
 Almulla, M. (2016). An ivestigation of Saudi teachers perceptions towards
 training in cooperative learning. International Journal of Social Sciences. 2,
 1, 715-737.
Altschuld, J.W. & Krathwohl, D. (1995). Program evaluation in science education: The model perspective. New Direction Program Evaluation, 65, 5-19.
Aman, (2012). Developing model of history learning evaluation program in SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Tahun 16 (2), 437–456.
Amin, M. (2016) Perkembangan biologi dan tantangan pembelajarannya. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Saintek, di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.
Anderson, L.W. (2003). Classroom assesment: enhaching the quality of teacher decision making, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates.
Anderson, R. D & Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed). (2001). A taxonomy learning, teaching, and assesing, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Anderson, R. D., Stuartr, K, Gene, V. K. & Mary, L.S. (1983). Science Education: A meta-Analysis of Major Questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 379-385.
Ayala, F. J. (2007). Darwin's greatest discovery: design without designer". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 Suppl 1: 8567– 8573. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701072104.PMID 17494753.
248
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Babie, E. (1986). The practice of social research (4th ed). Belmont: Wadsworth
Publishing Co.
Balderas, A., Duarte, M.P., Dodero, J.M., Sáiz, M.S. I., & Gómez, G. R., Scalable authentic assessment ofcollaborative work assignments in wikis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0122-1.
Baker, J. et.al. (1989). Modern biology. Austin, New York, San Diego, Chicago, Toronto, Montreal: Holt, Rinehard, & Winston. Inc.
Balanay, C. A. S. & Elnor, C. R. (2013). Assessment on student’s science process skills : a student centred approach. International Journal of Biology Education, 3, 1-44.
Birrent, J.E., Kinney, D.K., Schale, K.W. & Woodruff, D.S. (1981). Develeopmental psychology: a life-span approach. Boston: Hougton Mifflin Company.
Boersma, K., Jan Waarlo, A. & Klaassen, K. (2011). The feasibility of systems hinking in bBiology education. Journal of Biological Education, 45, 190- 200.
Boolotion, R.A. & Stiles, K.A. ( 1976). College Zoology (9th ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction. New York & London: Longman.
Brody, C.M. & Nagel, N.G. (2004). Teacher decision making for cooperative learning in a preservice master’s program. Dalam Cohen. E.G., et.al, (Eds.), Teaching Cooperative Learning The Challenge For Teacher Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
Brooks, E., Erin D., & Frans T. (2011). Partnership for research & education in plants (PREP): involving high school students in authentic research in collaboration with scientists, The American Biology Teacher, 73, 135-142.
Brum & McKane, (1989). Study guide biology; exploring life, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
249

Brinkerhoff, R. O., Brethower, D. M., Nowakowski, J., Hluchyj, T. (Eds), (1983).
Program Evaluation. A Practitioners’s Guide for Trainers and Educators. Western Michigan: Springer.
Budiyanto, M.A.K, Waluyo, L, Mochtar, A. (2016). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran di Pendidikan Dasar di Malang. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13, 1, 2016: 46-5 1.
Carin, A.A. & Sund. (1989). Teaching science through discovery. New York: Merrill Publishing Company.
Changelosi, J. S. (1990). Designing test for evaluating students achievement. New York: Longman publishing Group.
Chiappetta, E.L. (1997). Enquiri-based science strategies and techniques encouraging inquiry in the classroom, The Science Teaching, 64, 7, 22-26.
Clement, J.J. & Rea-Ramirez, M.A. (2008). Model Based Learning and Instruction in Science. USA. Springer.
Cohen, R. J. & Swerdlik, M.E. (2005). Education in developing Asia volume 5. The quality of education; Dimensions and strategis. Manila: Asia Development Bank.
Dawn & Walker, M. (2012). Classroom assesment techniques: An assesment and student evaluation method. Scientific Research, 3, 903-907.
Depdiknas. (2008). Standar proses pendidikan, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor: 3 Tahun 2008.
Dikdasmen. (2004). Pedoman Penilaian Dengan Portofolio, Jakarta : Depdiknas. Djaali & Pudji, M. (2004). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. Jakarta:
Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Djamarah, Syaiful B. (1996). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Donnelley, R.R. (2008). Improving outcomes for learners through self-evaluation. Livingston: HMIE.
Doran, R.L. ( 2009). Basic measurement and evaluation of science instruction. Retrieved from http: // pysicsed.buffalostate.edu/pubs/pdf.
Dunn, W.N. (1998). Pengantar analisis kebijakan publik (ed II). Cetakan I. (terjemahan Samodra Wibawa, dkk). Yogyakarta: UGM Press.
250

Enger, E. D., Frederick, C.R. & David, B. B. (2005). Concepts in biology. North America: Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of educational programs. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluation and Curriculum Development.
Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Fogarty, Robin. (1991). How to integrated the curricula. Palatine, Ilinois: IRI/ Skylight Publishing, Inc.
Gani, H. dan Suyanto. (2006). Evaluasi pendidikan: konsep dan aplikasi. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press.
Gerungan, W.A, (2004). Psikologi sosial. Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama.
Glasgow, N. A, Cheyne, M.. & Yerrick, R. K, (2010). What successful science teachers Do 75 research-based strategies. California: Corwin A Sage Company.
Glass, G.W.& Hopkins, K.D. (1984). Statistical methods in educations and pschology. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall Inc.
Ghozali, T. & Fuad (2012), Structural equation modelling: Teori , konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 8.80. Edisi III. Semarang: Badan penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Goberta, J. D., O’Dwyerb, L. , Paul, H. , Barbara, C. B. , Sharona, T. & Uri, W. (2010). Examining the relationship between students’ understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 1-32.
Goldston, M.J. & Downey, L. ( 2013). Your science classroom becoming an elementary/Middle School Science Teacher. Los Angeles, london, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage Publications Inc.
Hair, J.F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7thed). Prentice Hall [versi elektronik].
Harlen. (1992). The teaching of science, London: David Fulton Publisher.
Herrington, J. & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assesment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 17 (3), 305-322.
251

Hickman, F.M., Manert, H.K., Eunice, A.C., & Catherine, M.M. (1980). Biological science an inquiry into life. Orlando.New York. Chicago. Atlanta. Dallas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
Ho, Robert (2006). Haandbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. New York: Taylor & Francis Gruop.
Hooper, D., Couglan, J., Mullen, M., R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guideelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Johnson, J.A. (2001). Principles of effective change : curriculum revision that works. The Journal of Research for Educational Leaders,. 1, 1.5-20.
Johnson, E. (2009). Contextual teaching and learning. Jakarta: MLC.
Jorgensen, K. M. & Pauline, C. H. (2011). Vissualization in simulation tools: requirements and a tool specification to support the teaching of dynamic biological proceses. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 1, 579-595.
Kaplan, Robert M. & Dennis P, Saccuzo. (1982). Psycological testing : Principles, applications, and issues. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Kartowagiran, B. (2013). Optimalisasi evaluasi pembelajaran teknik mesin melalui logic model untuk meningkatkan soft skill lulusan. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar disajikan dalam Rapat Senat Terbuka, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Kaufman, R. & Thomas, S. ( 1980). Evaluation without fear. New York: United States of America.
Kendeigh, S. C. (1980). Ecology with special reference to animal and man. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winstone, Inc.
Kesidou, S. & Jo Ellen, R. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from project 2061s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522-549.
252
 Hubbal, H. & Helen B. (2004). An Integrated approach to developing implementating learning-centered curriculum. International Journal For Academic Development , l 9, 51–65.

Kemendikbud, (2014). Kurikulum 2013 disesuaikan dengan tuntutan perbandingan internasional. Retrieved from http://kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/berita/1334.
Khakiim, U., Degeng, I. N. S., & Widiati, U. (2016). Pelaksanaan membuka dan menutup pelajaran oleh guru kelas 1 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1, 9, 1730-1734.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2008). Evalauting training programs the four levels. third edition. San Fransisco: Berret Koehler Publishers Inc.
Kimball, J. W. ( 1983). Biology. New York: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Krajick, J.S. & John E.P. (1989). Evolution of a model science teacher education program. Maryland. Iowa. Journal of Science in Teaching, 26, 99-810.
Kunandar, (2013). Penilaian autentik (penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013) suatu pendekatan praktis disertai dengan contoh. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Kutschera, U. & Niklas, K. J. (2004). The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis. _ Naturwissenschaften, 91:255–276, DOI 10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y.
Lawson, A. E. (2010). Teaching inquiry science in middle and secondary Schools. Los Angeles. London. New Delhi. Singapore. Washington DC. Sage Publications, Inc.
Longbotham, G.J & Longbotham. C.R. (2006). Scientific approach to iImplementing change. Journal of Practical Consulting, 1, 19-24.
MacBeath, J. & McGlynn, A. (2005). Self-evaluation. What’s in it for schools? London & New York: Routledge Falmer Taylor & Francis group.
Machin, (2014). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik, penanaman karakter dan konservasi pada pembelajaran materi pertumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3, 1,28-35.
253
   Leung, K., Wen, J. L., Wang, & Wei, C. Y. C. (2010). Factor affecting student’s evaluation in comunity service-learning program. Journal of Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, 475-490.
Linn, R. L. (1989). Educational measurement. New York: American Council on Education.

Madaus, G. F. , Scriven, M. S. & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1986). Evaluation models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer- Nijhoff Publishing.
Maddini, H. (2014). Model Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMP dan Kaitannya dengan Perilaku Siswa. Disertasi, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Maddox, E. N.. Forte, M., & Robert, W. B. (2000). Learning readiness: an underappreciated yet vital dimension in experiential learning. Jornal of Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 27, 272- 278.
Majid, A. & Rochman, C. (2014). Pendekatan ilmiah dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mardapi, D. (2004). Penyusunan tes hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Martin, D. J. (2008). Elementary sciences methods a contrucstivist approach (5th ed). Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, Untited Kingdom, United State: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Mayer, et.al. (1980). Biological science an inquiry into life (4th ed). Colorado: Biological sciences curriculum study.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought diversity, evolution, and inheritance. America: The United States of America.
Mcinerney, J. D., (1987). Curriculum development at the biological sciences curriculum. Educational Leadership.
Michael, S. R. (2002). Inquiry & scientific method. Retrieved from
www.indiana.edu/-educy 520/sec 5982/week.../inquiry_sci_method02.pd... 254
 Maloof, J. & Vanessa, K. B. W. (2006). Team Study Training in The College Biology Laboratory. Journal of Biologycal Educations, 39, 120-126.
 Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press.

Milani, J.P., Erk, F, C., Mcinerney, J.D., Mclver. P.D., Mayer. W.V., Slowiczek, F., Stone, C.L., Uno, G.E., (1987). Biological science: an ecological approach (6thEd). Dubuque-Iowa: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Milles, B.M. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: sage Publication.
Musfiqon & Nurdyansyah, (2015). Pendekatan pembelajaran saintifik. Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center.
Mutlu, M. & Temis, B. K. (2013) Science process skills of students having field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 8, 11, 766-776.
Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assesment of students. Bosto: Pearson Education, Inc.
Nizam, (2016). Ringkasan hasil-hasil asesmen belajar dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIMSS, INAP . Retrieved from https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/seminar/upload/Hasil%20Seminar%20P uspendik%202016/Nizam- Hasil%20Penilaian_seminar%20puspendik%202016.pdf.
Noor, A.M. (2007). Teaching Thinking Skill: Redesigning Classroom Pratices.Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242188418.
Norman, G.R. & Schdmidt, H.G. (2000). Effectiveness of problem based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. J. of. Medical Education, 34, 721-728.
Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (3), 61-75.
Ololube, N.P. & Peter, J.K. (2012). Approaches to conducting scientific research in education, arts and the social sciences. Online Journal on Educational Research, 1, 44-56.
Paidi, (2010). Model pemecahan masalah dalam pembelajaran biologi di SMA. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional MIPA, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Pandey, N.N. & Kaushal, K. (2015) Effect of cooperative learning on cognitive achievement in science. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in
S.E. Asia, 26, 52-65.
255

Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes . The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15, 1, 20-33.
Pasch, A. (1958). John Dewey’s theory of inquiry. The Journal of Philosophy, 56, 1-5.
Plomp, T. (1997). Educational and training system design. Netherlands: University of Twente Faculty of Educational Science and Technology Enschede.
Popham, W. J. (1994). Classroom assesment. What teachers need to know. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Prayekti, (2006). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Interaktif pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di SD. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 12, 1-26.
Primrose, K & Chabaya R. A. (2013). Curriculum Development and Implementations: Factors Contributing Towards Curriculum Development in Zimbabwe Higher Education System. European Social Sciences Research Journal, 1, 1-11.
Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2003). Penilaian tingkat kelas: pedoman bagi guru. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.
Quinn, R. (2012). School self evaluation guidelines for primary schools inspectorate guidelines for schools. Livingston: Inspectorate.
Rahmatilah, (2015). Pendekatan Saintifik Sebagai Solusi Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. e_Buletin Media Pendidikan LPMP Sulsel. Retrieved from http://www. lpmpsulsel.net/v2/index.php?option=com content&view=a rticle&id=360:pendekatansaintifik&catid=42:ebuletin&Itemid=215.
Ratumanan, T. G. & T. L. Laurens, (2003). Evaluasi hasil belajar yang relevan dengan kurikulum berbasis kompetensi. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Ratumanan, T. G. (2007). Sikap manusia : teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20. Tahun 2003. tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 65. Tahun 2013. tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
256

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas & karakteristik butir (panduan untuk peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (the comparison of aiken index and expanded gregory index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 156-164.
Santrock, J.W. (2010). Life-Span Development Perkembangan Masa Hidup (ed V). (terjemahan Achmad Chusairi dan Juda Damanik). Cetakan I. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Serafini, A. (1993). The epic history of biology. New York: Plenum. Press.
Schwartz, R. S, Norman, G. L. & Barbara, A. C. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context in explicit approach bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Theacher Education, 611-645.
Setiawan, I.G.N. (2008). Penerapan pengajaran kontekstual berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas X2 SMA Laboratorium Singaraja. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Undhiska, Bali, 2, 42-59.
Shihusa, H. & Keraro F. N. (2009). Using advance organizers to enhance students motivation in learning biology. Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 5, 413-420.
Shweta, Bajpai, R.C. & Chaturvedi, H.K. (2015). Evaluation of inter-rater agreement and inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview of concepts and methods. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 41,3, 20-27.
Slamet, P.H. (2005). Kapita selekta disentralisasi pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Handout.
257
 Shymansky, J.A., William, C. K, JR. & Jennifer, M. A. (1983). The effect of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 387-404.
 Stefanou, C., & Parkes, J. (2003). Effects of classroom assessment on student
 motivation in fifth-grade science. The Journal of Educational
 Research, 96(3), 152-162.

Stark, JS & Thomas (1994). Assessment and program evaluation. Needlemen Hights: Simon & Scuters Custom Publishing.
Stufflebeam, D. L. , Madaus, G. F. , & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models viewpoints on educational and human ervices evaluation. (second edition). New York. Boston. Dordrecht.London. Moscow: Kluwar Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation A self- instructional guide to theory and practice. Hingham, Massachusetts, U. S .A. : Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Subali, B. (2013). Pemanfaatan Classroom Assesment for Learning dalam Mata Pelajaran Biologi Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Peserta Didik dalam Menempuh Ulangan Umum serta Ujian Sekolah dan Ujian Nasional. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar disampaikan di Rapat Terbuka Senat Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sudijarto, Thamrin, Karyadi, B., Siskandar, & Sumiyati. (2010). Sejarah pusat kurikulum. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Sudiyono, A. (2003). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sudjarwo. (1989). Beberapa aspek pengembangan sumber belajar. Jakarta: Mediyatama Sarana Perkasa.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PPs UPI dan Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sumarwan, Sumartini, & Kusmayadi. (2004). Sains biologi SMP. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Susilo, M.J. (2016). Pembelajaran IPA Biologi Berbasis Scientific Approach Di SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Depok Sleman. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, Seminar Nasional XIII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 13,1, P. 97-101.
Suryabrata, S. (2005). Pengembangan alat ukur psikologis. Yogyakarta: Andi. Suryadarma, I.G.P. (1993). Pendekatan ekologis dalam pemahaman masalah
biologi. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1, 1-12.
Suryo, (1984). Genetika strata 1. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
258

Suryosubroto, B. 2002. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Suyanto, S. (2018). The implementation of the scientific approach through 5MS of the revised curriculum 2013 in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1, 22-29.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007) Using multivariate statistic. Fifth edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Tatsuoka, K. K. (2009) Cognitive assesment. An introduction to the rule space method. New York, London: Roudledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Tatto, M. T. (1996). Examining values and belieffs about teaching diverse Students : understanding the challenges for teacher educations. Journal of Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 155-180.
Terssier,J. (2010). An inquiry-based biology laboratory improves preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes about science . Journal of College Science Teaching, 84-91.
Thorndike, E. L. (1914). Mental work and fatgue and individual differences and their causes. New York: Theachers College.
Treagust, D.F. & Leonie, J. R. (1993). Implementing technology from the school curriculum : a case study involving six scondary schools. Journal of Technology Education, 5, 38-53.
Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of Various Models. Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 5, 16- 22.
UNDP.2018. Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Updat. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-indices- indicators-2018-statistical-update.
Valadez, Y. & Bamberger, M. (1994) . Monitoring and evaluating social program in developing countries: a handbook for policymaker, manager and research. Economic Development Institute of World Bank.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2013). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
259

Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scintific approach to science education. Retrieved from www.cwsei.ubc.ca/SEI_research/files/Wieman-change-
Sept-Oct2007.pdf.
Willet, J. B. , Juni, J. M. Y. & Ronald, D. A. A, (1993). Meta – analysis of instructional systems applied in science teaching. Journal of Reaserch in Science Teaching, 20, 405-417.
Wilson, Christopher D., Joseph A. T, Susan M. K, Janet C, (2009). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47, 276-297.
Wirawan, (2011). Evaluasi. teori, model, standar, aplikasi, dan profesi. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Wise, K. C. & James R. O. A. (1983). Meta – analysis of the effect of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 419-451.
Worthen, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1981). Educational evaluation theory and practice. Columbus: Worlinton Jones.
Wright, R. J., (2008). Educational assessment tests and measurements in the age of accountability. Los Angeles. London. New Delhi. Singapore: Sage Publications.
Wijayanti, A. (2014). Pengembangan autentic assesment berbasis proyek dengan pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir ilmiah mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,3,2,102-108.
Woods, J. D. (1988). Curriculum Evaluation Models : Practical Applications for Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 13, 1. Retrieved form http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1988v13n2.1.
citation:   Susapti, Peni and Kartowagiran, Badrun  (2019) Model Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Scientific Approach dalam Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA.  S3 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/1/Cover.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/2/Bab%20I.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/3/Bab%20II.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/4/Bab%20III.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/5/Bab%20IV.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/6/Bab%20V.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/7/Dafar%20Pustaka.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/66087/8/Lampiran.pdf