eprintid: 65930
rev_number: 14
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1290
dir: disk0/00/06/59/30
datestamp: 2019-09-18 08:53:23
lastmod: 2019-09-18 08:53:23
status_changed: 2019-09-18 08:53:23
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Ifthinan, Dinda Nadia Mutiara
creators_name: Atun, Sri
title: Pengembangan Media Laboratorium Virtual Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia dan Efektivitasnya terhadap Kemampuan Inkuiri dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa SMA.
ispublished: pub
subjects: F3
divisions: pps_kimia
full_text_status: public
abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengembangkan media Laboratorium Virtual (LAVIA) berbasis inkuiri pada materi kesetimbangan kimia untuk peserta didik kelas XI SMA; (2) menguji kelayakan media yang dikembangkan tersebut; (3) menguji perbedaan antara kemampuan inkuiri dan hasil belajar kognitif peserta didik kelas XI SMA yang menggunakan dan yang tidak menggunakan media tersebut.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan yang mengacu pada 10 tahapan pengembangan Borg & Gall. Produk yang dikembangkan adalah media LAVIA berbasis inkuiri yang dinilai oleh ahli media, ahli materi, pendidik kimia, peer reviewer, dan di ujicobakan pada peserta didik. Sampel yang digunakan pada uji pelaksanaan lapangan adalah dua kelas, satu kelas digunakan sebagai kelas eksperimen dengan penerapan media LAVIA berbasis inkuiri, sedangkan kelas lainnya sebagai kelas kontrol yang tidak menerapkan media tersebut. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah lembar observasi, angket kemampuan inkuiri, dan soal hasil belajar kognitif yang telah divalidasi sebelumnya. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah MANOVA, untuk menguji perbedaan kemampuan inkuiri dan hasil belajar kognitif dengan adanya penerapan media tersebut.
Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Media LAVIA berbasis inkuiri merupakan media yang dapat dioperasikan dalam perangkat berbasis Windows, dapat dilakukan kapanpun dan dimanapun, yang menyajikan kegiatan praktikum secara virtual; (2) berdasarkan hasil penilaian dari pendidik kimia, peer reviewer, peserta didik uji coba lapangan awal, dan peserta didik uji coba lapangan, media tersebut termasuk dalam kategori sangat baik; (3) Ada perbedaan kemampuan inkuiri dan hasil belajar kognitif antara peserta didik yang menggunakan dan yang tidak menggunakan media tersebut.
date: 2019-05-14
date_type: published
institution: Program Pascasarjana
department: Pendidikan Kimia
thesis_type: tesis
referencetext: Abidin, Y. (2016). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Achmad, H., & Baradja, L. (2012). Demonstrasi sains kimia: kimia deskriptif melalui demo kimia Jilid 2. Bandung: Penerbit NUANSA.
Adams, R.J., & Khoo, S.T. (1996). Quest: the interactive test analysis system (version 2.1). Melbourne: The Australia Council for Educational Research.
Ambusaidi, A., Musawi A.A., Al-Balushi, S., & Al-Balushi, K.(2018). The impact of virtual Lab learning experiences on 9th grade students’ achievement and their attitudes towards science and learning by virtual Lab. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 13-29. doi: 10.12973/tused.10227a.
Anderson, L.W., & Kratwhol, D.R. (1965). A Taxonom for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
Anwar, N., Karim, S., & Effendi, R. (2014). Profil kemampuan inkuiri dan hasil belajar siswa dengan strategi teaching learning sequences dalam inkuiri terbimbing oada materi gaya gesek. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, Pascasarjana UM.
Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317–337. doi:10.1002/tea.20005.
Arsyad, A. (2004). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Azwar, S. (2015). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46 (2), 26-29. Retrieved from http://www.miseagrant.umich.edu/lessons/files/2013/05/The-Many-Levels- of-Inquiry-NSTA-article.pdf
Bakar, N., Zaman, H.B., Kamalrudin, M., Jusoff, K., & Khamis, N. (2013). An effective virtual laboratory approach for chemistry. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 78-84. Retrieved from http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas_Special%20issue_2013.html.
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1, cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: an introduction, fifth edition. New York: Longman.
Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Reserach in Learning Technology, 25, 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1968.
Brinson, J.R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
Chang, R. (2005). Kimia dasar konsep-konsep inti edisi ketiga jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Coffman, T. (2009). Engaging students through inquiry-oriented learning and technology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Cohen, J, (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
CNN Indonesia. (24 Juni 2015). Masih banyak siswa dan guru indonesia yang gagap teknologi. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/ 20150624150511-185-62108/masih-banyak-siswa-dan-guru-indonesia-yang -gagap-teknologi.
Demircioglu, G., Demircioglu, H., & Yadigaroglu, M. (2013). An investigation of chemistry students teachers’ understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4 (2), 192-199.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. United State of America: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Handayani, Y., Sopandi, W., & Kadarohman, A. (2016). Profil kemampuan berinkuiri siswa SMA pada topik pengaruh perubahan suhu terhadap sistem kesetimbangan kimia. Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 1 (2), 38-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jta.v1i2.1232
Handriani, L.S., Harjono, A., & Doyan, A. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terstruktur dengan pendekatan saintifk terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar fisika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1 (3), 210-220.

Herga, N.R., Cagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 12(3), 593-608. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a.
Jeschke, S., Richter, T., & Zorn, E. (2010). Virtual labs in mathematics and natural sciences. International Conference on Technology Supported Learning & Training: Online Educa Berlin. Retrieved from: http://www.ibi.tuberlin.de/diskurs/veranst/online_educa/oeb_04/ Zorn%20TU.pdf
Jihad, A., & Haris, A. (2008).Evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Press.
Kambeyo, L. (2017). The possibilities of assessing students’ scientific inquiry skills abilities using an online instrument: a small-scale study in the omusati region, namibia. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 1-21. doi: 10.19044/ejes.v4no2a1.
Kean, E., & Catherine, M. (1985). Panduan belajar kimia dasar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kennepohl, D. (2001). Using computer simulations to supplement teaching lab in chemistry for distance delivery. The Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 58–65. Retrieved from http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/178/124
Kirschner, P., & Huisman, W. (1998). Dry laboratories in science education: computer-based practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 665-682. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200605.
Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007).Guided inquiry: learning in the 21st century. United States of America: Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi=10.1.1.464.4579&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Kustandi, C., & Sutjipto, B. (2011). Media pembelajaran manual dan digital. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Leal, S., & Leal, J.P. (2013). One example of a chemistry e-lab experiment: chemical equilibrium reaction. International Journal of Online Engineering, 9 (8). doi.10.3991/ijoe.v9iS8.3380.
Lou, Y., Blanchard, P., & Kennedy, E. (2015). Development and validation of a science inquiry skills assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(1), 73-85. doi: 10.5408/14-028.1.

Lukac, S. (2015). Stimulation of the development of inquiry skills in teaching functions. ICTE Journal, 4(4), 4-18. doi: 10.1515/ijicte-2015-0016.
Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: a comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1-24. doi: 10.1145/1132960.1132961
Magwilang, E.B. (2016). Teaching chemistry in context: its effects on students’ motivation, attitudes and achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research,15(4), 60-68. Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/670/289.
Majid, A. (2017). Penilaian autentik proses dan hasil belajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction- what is it and does it matter? results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1-24. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347.
Mulatsih, B. (2018). Peningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran kimia melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan.
Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V.M., & Wise, K. (2007). Analysis of new zambian high school physics syllabus and practical examinations for levels of inquiry and inquiry skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3). 213-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75400.
Munir. (2013). Multimedia dan konsep aplikasi dalam pendidikan. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ngaliman, Fauzani, M., & Salabi, A. (2016). Strategi dan model pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Oliver, R. (2007). Exploring an inquiry-based learning approach with first-year students in a large undergraduate class. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,44, 3-15. doi: 10.1080/14703290601090317.

Oidov, L., Tortogtokh, U., & Purevdagva, E. (2012). Virtual laboratory for physics teaching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management and Education Innovation, IPEDR, 37, 319-323. Retrieved from: http://www.ipedr.com/vol37/062-ICMEI2012-E10015.pdf
Pekdag, B. (2010). Alternative methods in learning chemistry: learning with animation, simulation, video and multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education,7(2), 111-118. Retrieved from http://www.tused.org/internet/ tused/archive/v7/i2/text/tusedv7i2a5.pdf.
Prince, M., & Felder, R.M. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 14-20. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Inductive(J CST).pdf.
Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Pardo, J.P., & Portoles, J.J.S. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ misapplication of Le Chatelier’s principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 939-957. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320906.
Rusman. (2012). Belajar dan pembelajaran berbasis komputer mengembangkan profesionalisme abad 21. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement error studies at the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Washington D. C.: U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97464.pdf
Sani, R.A. (2014). Inovasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Santoso, S. (2017). Statistik multivariat dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: an overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 5. Retrieved from http://www.tused.org /internet/tufed/arsiv/v4/i2/metin/tusedv4i2s1.pdf.
Solikhin, F. (2018). Pengembangan laboratorium virtual kimia terintegrasi dalam pembelajaan hibrid untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar dan efikasi diri pada materi elektrokimia. Tesis, Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Solomonidou, C., & Stavridou, H. (2001). Design and development of a computer learning environment on the basis of students’ initial conceptions and

learning difficulties about chemical equilibrium. Education and Information Technologies, 6(1), 5-27. doi: 10.1023/A:1011359010331.
Sudjana, N. (2012). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Sutopo, Y., & Slamet, A. (2017). Statistika inferensial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
Syukri, S. (1999). Kimia dasar 2. Bandung: ITB.
Treagust, D.F., & Chittleborough, G. (2001). Chemistry: a matter of understanding representations. Subject-Specific Instructional Methods and Activities, 8(I), 239-267. doi:10.1016/s1479-3687(01)80029-8.
Tyson. L., Treagust, D.F., & Bucat, R. (1999). The complexity of teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 554- 558. doi: 10.1021/ed076p554.
Tresna, S. (1998). Proses belajar mengajar kimia. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Trisanti, D.C., & Sanjaya, I.G.M. (2013). Pengembangan media permainan stoichio game pada materi pokok konsep mol bagi siswa SMA sekolah berstandar internasional. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 2(II),181- 187.
Tuysuz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-53.
Wenning, C.J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. Online, 4(2), 21-24.
Widoyoko, E.P. (2018). Penilaian hasil pembelajaran di sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Winkelmann, K., Baloga, M., Marcinkowski, T., Giannoulis, C., Anquandah, G., & Cohen, P. (2015). Improving students’ inquiry skills and self-efficacy through research-inspired modules in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, doi: doi.org/10.1021/ed500218d
Woodfield, B. (2005). Virtual chemlab getting started. Pearson Education website. Retrieved from http://www.mypearsontraining.com/pdfs/ VCL_getting_started.pdf
Wu, H.K., & Hsieh, C. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry-based learning environments.
International Journal of Science Education, 28(11). 1289-1313. doi: 10.1080/09500690600621035.
Yulianti, D., Khanafiyah, S., & Sugiyanto. (2012). Penerapan virtual experiment berbasis inkuiri untuk mengembangkan kemandirian mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8, 127-134. doi:10.15294/jpfi.v8i2.2152.
Zulfiani, Z., & Herlanti, Y. (2018). Scientific inquiry perception and ability of pre-service teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 128-140. doi: 10.12973/tused.10225a.
citation:   Ifthinan, Dinda Nadia Mutiara and Atun, Sri  (2019) Pengembangan Media Laboratorium Virtual Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia dan Efektivitasnya terhadap Kemampuan Inkuiri dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa SMA.  S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana.   
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/1/Cover.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/2/Bab%20I.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/3/Bab%20II.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/4/Bab%20III.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/5/Bab%20IV.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/6/Bab%20V.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/7/Daftar%20Pustaka.pdf
document_url: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/65930/8/Lampiran.pdf