<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY)"^^ . "This study aimed to compare the testees‘ ability estimation in the politomus and\r\ndichotomous scoring model. The data used in this study are the responses of testees to the\r\nTest of English Proficiency (TOEP) set 1 in reading subtest, which are usually scoring in\r\ndichotomous model then they are scoring in politomus model. In the reading subtest of\r\nTOEP, in one text presented several items related to the text. In the dichotomous scoring,\r\neach item is scored one by one item. As alternative, every item item is scored using\r\ndichotomous model separately, but for every text, the acquisition of these items are added to\r\nthe score attained politomous model. The estimation of items‘ and abilities‘ parameter in\r\ndichotomous scoring were done using the Rasch models and in the politomous scoring were\r\ndone with partial credit models using QUEST software. Comparative analysis of the two\r\nmodels are seen based on the average results of the estimated difficulty level, graphical\r\nanalysis, calculating the correlation, and the results of the value of information function. The\r\nresults of the analysis showed that the average item difficulty dichotomous scoring model is\r\n0.486 with a standard deviation of 0.895 and the mean level of difficulty politomous scoring\r\nmodel is -0.105 with a standard deviation of 0.695. The correlations between abilities of\r\nparticipants using the dichotomous and the politomous scoring model is 0.94. The value of\r\ninformation function in the dichotomous scoring model is higher than in the politomous\r\nscoring models. These results indicate that the Reading of TOEP set 1,the dichotomous\r\nscoring model is better than the politomous scoring model."^^ . "2014" . . . "Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta"^^ . . . "Seminar Nasional dan Temu Alumni Peran Pendidikan dalam Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa"^^ . . . "9786029617269" . . . . . . . "Retnawati"^^ . "Heri"^^ . "Retnawati Heri"^^ . . . . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY) (Text)"^^ . . . "11.pdf"^^ . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "indexcodes.txt"^^ . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "THE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER\r\nESTIMATION\r\nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING\r\n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #24891 \n\nTHE COMPARISON OF ITEMS‟ AND TESTEES‟ABILITY PARAMETER \nESTIMATION \nIN DICHOTOMOUS AND POLITOMUS SCORING \n(STUDIES IN THE READING ABILITY OF TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY)\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "ICERE 2014" . .