%0 Thesis
%9 S1
%A Choiru Nisa, Nisa
%A Abdullah Taman, SE.Akt.,M.Si.,
%B Pendidikan Akuntansi
%D 2015
%F UNY:14935
%I Fakultas Ekonomi
%T THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL  TYPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’  LEARNING OUTCOMES IN ACCOUNTING: CASE STUDY  OF GRADE XI ACCOUNTING STUDY PROGRAM  SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 2 MOYUDAN  ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2014/2015
%U http://eprints.uny.ac.id/14935/
%X This research aims to improve students’ learning outcomes in accounting:  case study of grade XI accounting study program at SMK Muhammadiyah 2  Moyudan academic year of 2014/2015 with The Implementation of Cooperative  Learning Model Type Think Pair Share (TPS).  This research is a Class Action Research (CAR) conducted collaboratively  between researcher and subject teachers accounting for two cycles. The target of  this research is a grade XI accounting study program at SMK Muhammadiyah 2  Moyudan which amounts to 21 students by implementing the Cooperative  Learning Model Type TPS. Accounting Learning Outcomes data collection in this  research using observation sheets, test, and field notes. Analysis of the data used  to determine the improvement of student learning outcomes are quantitative  descriptive with percentage.  Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the implementation  of Cooperative Learning Model Type TPS can improve students' learning  outcomes of the Grade XI Accounting at SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Moyudan  Academic Year of 2014/2015. Learning outcomes on the cognitive domain first  cycle only 13 from 21 students or 61,90% achieved complete value with an  average value of 77,14 and in the second cycle the number of students rose to 18  from 21 students or 85,71% with an average value of 81,90. Learning outcomes  on the affective domain first cycle only 12 from 21 students or 57,14% achieved  complete value with an average value of 76,67 and in the second cycle the number  of students rose to 18 from 21 students or 85,71% with an average value of 86,19.  Learning outcomes on the psychomotor domain first cycle only 9 from 21  students or 42,86% achieved complete value with an average value of 75,24 and  in the second cycle the number of students rose to 16 from 21 students or 76,19%  with an average value of 85,24.